From: Eugene Grosbein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:48:47 +0700
To: Patrick van Iersel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Extreme load with local password db lookups
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:44:37AM +0100, Patrick van Iersel wrote:
See
Doug Hardie wrote:
Between 6.2 and 7 /boot has grown from 45 MB to 114 MB. That poses a
significant issue for those of us who have been running production
systems for many years. I have the root partition set to 200 MB which
has been more than enough. Its no longer usable. 7.0 beta will
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:56:06AM -1000 I heard the voice of
Parv, and lo! it spake thus:
So, just what have you been stuffing in /?
kernel.debug for one thing. But that's not what really kills it; it's
when there are TWO kernel.debug's in the time between starting the
upgrade and being sure
I would like to point out that in FreeBSD 7.x there is a daemon called nscd.
I
believe it was created exactly for this purpose (speeding up name lookups by
caching them).
Is it true that 4.x has nearly O(n) lookup speed while later versions
has O(n^2) method? Why 4.x does not need caching
On Friday 07 December 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:44:37AM +0100, Patrick van Iersel wrote:
From: Eugene Grosbein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=75855
It seems the regression from RELENG_4 is still here.
There are so many
Just as a followup to this - I soent some time going through all
the suggestions and advice that people gave me regarding this problem.
It turns out that the newer servers shipped by HP have different cache
settings to the older ones on their RAID controllers, plus I get very
different
I know FreeBSD 4.x is old..., but we are using on a production system
with postgres and apache. The above message
is appearing periodically. I googled for the message but found no
recommendation for adjusting it.
Is the sysctl kern.vm.pmap.shpgperproc available on 4.x? This can be
configured
Hello List,
I know FreeBSD 4.x is old..., but we are using on a production system
with postgres and apache. The above message
is appearing periodically. I googled for the message but found no
recommendation for adjusting it.
Any suggestions.
Thanks,
Steve
--
They that give up essential
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:57:16 +0200
Alexander Motin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cpghost wrote:
The problem is that the last mile carrier of the PPP provider
that this router is attached to disconnects the ppp session
forcibly once every 24h. Before the update, ppp would detect
this and
Stephen Clark wrote:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
I know FreeBSD 4.x is old..., but we are using on a production system
with postgres and apache. The above message
is appearing periodically. I googled for the message but found no
recommendation for adjusting it.
Is the sysctl
What settings are there on the cache? I have a DL 380 G5 with 2 x
The RAID cards on the original machines came with the cache configured
as 50/50 read/write split. The new ones came configured 25/75 read/write
splitl. Having set them all to 50/50 using the Smart Start CD then I now
get
Just as a followup to this - I soent some time going through all
the suggestions and advice that people gave me regarding this problem.
It turns out that the newer servers shipped by HP have different cache
settings to the older ones on their RAID controllers, plus I get very
different results
Hi Steve,
Stephen Clark wrote:
Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
But you can put that option into the kernel config file:
options PMAP_SHPGPERPROC=...
and build a new kernel with it.
You are correct. My question is more how much should I increase it. The
current default in the 4.x LINT file
is
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Matthew D. Fuller thusly...
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:32:41PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Doug Hardie, and lo! it spake thus:
Between 6.2 and 7 /boot has grown from 45 MB to 114 MB. That
poses a significant issue for those of us who have been running
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 22:48:52 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
There is FreeBSD box that was 6.2-STABLE before, now it became
7.0-BETA3 via source upgrade. The kernel has 'options COMPAT_FREEBSD6'
How did you upgrade the OS? Did you use make delete-old-libs?
Did you install compat-6x?
compiled in.
Dell's got a decent deal on their PowerEdge T105 box with an 1.8GHz AMD
dual-core Opteron, 512MB RAM, 80GB disk, and Gigabit ether: $350.
I'd love to pick one of these up if FreeBSD was known to work on it,
especially FreeBSD-7.
Any reports of success or failure? I couldn't find anything on
But you can put that option into the kernel config file:
options PMAP_SHPGPERPROC=...
and build a new kernel with it.
You are correct. My question is more how much should I increase it. The
current default in the 4.x LINT file
is options PMAP_SHPGPERPROC=201 should I double it?
Hi!
There is FreeBSD box that was 6.2-STABLE before, now it became
7.0-BETA3 via source upgrade. The kernel has 'options COMPAT_FREEBSD6'
compiled in. However, qemu-0.8.2s.20061225_1 stopped to work,
it dumps core when started with an error:
Fatal error 'Cannot allocate red zone for initial
Claus Guttesen wrote:
I know FreeBSD 4.x is old..., but we are using on a production system
with postgres and apache. The above message
is appearing periodically. I googled for the message but found no
recommendation for adjusting it.
Is the sysctl kern.vm.pmap.shpgperproc available on
Hello Pyun,
- Original Message
From: Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD STABLE freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2007 4:01:42 AM
Subject: Re: Intel DG31PR and RTL8168/8111 issue
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:09:47PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Thank you. Now I wonder, how such thing may happen
if qemu was built under 6.2 where there were no
libthr.so.3 and libc.so.7?
Most likely, you have rebuilt some library that brough in the dependencies.
Check with
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:22:52AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:52:54AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
You have to either rebuild/install _no_ ports, or rebuild _all_
ports (portupgrade -af). You now seem to have applications
or libraries that are linked to
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:02:06AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
libpthread.so.2 = /lib/libpthread.so.2 (0x481f5000)
RELENG_6 libpthread
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4821c000)
RELENG_6 libc
[skip]
libthr.so.3 = /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x48546000)
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 07:45:52AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
But I do not see this:
# ldd `which qemu`
/usr/local/bin/qemu:
[skip]
libpthread.so.2 = /lib/libpthread.so.2 (0x481f5000)
RELENG_6 libpthread
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4821c000)
RELENG_6 libc
[skip]
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:28:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:28:53 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:28:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:29:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:29:26 -
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:29:29 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:29:29 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:29:29 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:30:12 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 04:30:12 -
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:46:35 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:46:35 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:46:35 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:47:20 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:47:20 -
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 07:49:58AM -0800, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Hello Pyun,
- Original Message
From: Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FreeBSD STABLE freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, December
On Dec 7, 2007, at 02:25, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
Between 6.2 and 7 /boot has grown from 45 MB to 114 MB. That poses
a significant issue for those of us who have been running
production systems for many years. I have the root partition set
to 200 MB which has been
Hi All.
Just wondering if anyone has noticed the following problem on Sparc64
FreeBSD STABLE.
When I partition a disk from the postinstall disklabel option and then
exit the sysinstall shell
I am left in an environment where I have no access to any binaries nor
can I login via ssh from
another
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 12:55:37PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 07:45:52AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
But I do not see this:
# ldd `which qemu`
/usr/local/bin/qemu:
[skip]
libpthread.so.2 = /lib/libpthread.so.2 (0x481f5000)
RELENG_6
There is FreeBSD box that was 6.2-STABLE before, now it became
7.0-BETA3 via source upgrade. The kernel has 'options COMPAT_FREEBSD6'
How did you upgrade the OS? Did you use make delete-old-libs?
Did you install compat-6x?
No, I've tried now: install compat-6x port and ran make
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:52:54AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
You have to either rebuild/install _no_ ports, or rebuild _all_
ports (portupgrade -af). You now seem to have applications
or libraries that are linked to multiple FreeBSD library versions
(e.g., libc.so.6 and libc.so.7,
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:45:29 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:45:29 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:45:29 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:46:09 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2007-12-08 03:46:09 -
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 12:39:22PM +, Pete French wrote:
Just as a followup to this - I soent some time going through all
the suggestions and advice that people gave me regarding this problem.
It turns out that the newer servers shipped by HP have different cache
settings to the older
Claus Guttesen wrote:
could either replace my 10K rpm drives (in raid 1+0) with 15K ditto
which would require a downtime which we could not afford at this tim
I have several times successfully upgraded mirrored volumes with new
disks without any downtime at all. Just change one disk, let the
Uwe Doering wrote:
Hi Steve,
Stephen Clark wrote:
Uwe Doering wrote:
[...]
But you can put that option into the kernel config file:
options PMAP_SHPGPERPROC=...
and build a new kernel with it.
You are correct. My question is more how much should I increase it.
The current default
[21:30]([EMAIL PROTECTED])[~] dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 22:48:52 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
There is FreeBSD box that was 6.2-STABLE before, now it became
7.0-BETA3 via source upgrade. The kernel has 'options COMPAT_FREEBSD6'
How did you upgrade the OS? Did you use make
On Friday 07 December 2007, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
I would like to point out that in FreeBSD 7.x there is a daemon called
nscd. I believe it was created exactly for this purpose (speeding up name
lookups by caching them).
Is it true that 4.x has nearly O(n) lookup speed while later
Hi.
Does anybody need an Intel G965 patch for 6.3-Beta AGP i810?
I posted to Japanese freebsd-users-jp ML, but there has been no response.
I referred to 7.0-current (don't have idea when).
The patch may not be good enough, so I hope somebody will check and
improve it.
At least it works with
41 matches
Mail list logo
