I wrote:
Mar 27 13:32:30 zmori kernel: da0: CREATIVE NOMAD_MUVO 0001
Removable Direct Access SCSI-4 device
Mar 27 13:32:30 zmori kernel: da0: 1.000MB/s transfers
Mar 27 13:32:30 zmori kernel: da0: 125MB (256001 512 byte sectors:
64H 32S/T 125C)
Mar 27 13:32:39 zmori kernel: umass0: BBB
I'm in need of administrators who use Supermicro hardware, specifically
Supermicro servers or motherboards, for a project I've been working on:
http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/bsdhwmon/
If you have said hardware, and are willing to help, great!
FreeBSD-specific stuff that's required:
- smb.ko
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:21:16AM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
My son's laptop (HP V6107au, nVIDIA MCP51 chipset, 6.x/amd64) gives
varying results (sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't) and he's
found that plugging flashdisks into the USB hub on his keyboard gives
better results than plugging
this problem is very old for me. it goes, at least from
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97272
I found a workaround: you simply should set
ServerName foobar.emxample
in httpd.conf
i don't know why missing ServerName causes coredump of apache in case of
php+php_pgsql, but this
this problem is very old for me. it goes, at least from
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97272
I found a workaround: you simply should set
ServerName foobar.emxample
in httpd.conf
i don't know why missing ServerName causes coredump of apache in case of
php+php_pgsql, but
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:02:33AM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
I didn't stress-test this MB for a while, but last time I did was
with 7-PRELEASE/RC?/CANTremember-exactly-but-close-to-release
and all worked great
I did add 2G ECC to the 2nd CPU since, though I doubt that interferes
with
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 08:46 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:13:17PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
In my experience, umass over EHCI has never worked on any machine
ever, going back to 5.x and over multiple kinds of umass devices. (I
never saw panics, only triple-fault
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:10:44PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
Hello!
I tried, accidentally, to save a video-file (via firewire) to a
read-only location.
The entire system paniced with the message in subject. Why did it
happen?
Because the kernel has a bug ? As is, the report is useless.
I would suppose you might have to sync the mirror and then break off and
forget the local copy and then sync again. In our case, I'm not sure --- it
was awhile ago, but a number of them are also in the 'load' state --- as the
higher latency network drives would normally show a higher load.
I
On понеділок 21 квітень 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
= Because the kernel has a bug ? As is, the report is useless. Please, do
= not hesitate to provide at least the backtrace.
The backtrace is attached. The filesystem is thus (newfs -N):
/store: 476940.0MB (976773168 sectors) block size 16384,
Pete French wrote:
It's frustrating, it is *so* close to being workable with iscsi, and the
performance is very good, but if it is going to keep locking up on
me then I just cant use it that way :-(
You should complain about it :) Try to get a backtrace of the situation
on the server (enable
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:02:33AM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
I didn't stress-test this MB for a while, but last time I did was
with 7-PRELEASE/RC?/CANTremember-exactly-but-close-to-release
and all worked great
I did add 2G ECC to the 2nd
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
because of the memory you added.
yop, though I'm still not convinced the memory is bad (the very same
Kingston
Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
I concur, this fix should really be MFCed. The problem went away in
7.x due to a total rewrite. I am distracted by other stuff at the
moment, so, starter's orders...
This just bit me. The fix is in RELENG_6, but it is not
--- Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you update your src-all tree to pull this in,
rebuild the kernel,
and tell us if it behaves better for you?
Test 1. amarok in real-time, count in idle priority.
last pid: 1331; load averages: 1.15, 1.11, 0.84
up 0+00:22:07 23:03:21
At 10:52 AM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Device is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:10:0: class=0x068000 card=0x289510f1
chip=0x005710de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Nvidia Corp'
device = 'nForce4 Ultra NVidia Network Bus Enumerator'
class = bridge
cap 01[44] =
You should complain about it :) Try to get a backtrace of the situation
on the server (enable kernel debugging, enable keyboard hotkey to kernel
debugger; see
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kern=
eldebug.html),
then start a new, properly named thread
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 11:27 -0400, Michael Proto wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
I concur, this fix should really be MFCed. The problem went away in
7.x due to a total rewrite. I am distracted by other stuff at the
moment, so, starter's
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:43:33AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
because of the memory you added.
yop,
hi,
i'm running
FreeBSD murus 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Mon Mar 3 20:53:07
CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
today this machine crashed, but lucky me i did get a crash dump. i'm
not a kernel developer so any help would be great in finding out the
reason for
Hello,
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
because of the memory you added.
[ .. stuff deleted; I'll
Toni Schmidbauer wrote:
hi,
i'm running
FreeBSD murus 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Mon Mar 3 20:53:07
CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
today this machine crashed, but lucky me i did get a crash dump. i'm
not a kernel developer so any help would be great in
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 06:24:45PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
As for reliability I see no particular reason for that board to be less
reliable than any other multi-CPU board.
Sorry for my complete and total opinionated noise, then.
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at
yet another quick partial answer :
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
because of the memory you
Dear FreeBSD friends,
It is already the third time that I report this error. Can someone help
me in solving this issue?
Over and over again and always after heavy disk I/O I see the following
errors in the log files. If I force ar0s1g to unmount the machine
spontaneously reboots. Nothing
At Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:18:30 +0200,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
kern_select() does not call rman_reserve_resource_bound() so ether
this trace is corrupt or you have a RAM error. Note that the IP for
this function (0xc078075e) is a single bit flip from being very close
to kern_select (0xc0788b72),
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:30:48PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
NB, (CC to kris@ for this) why is memtest86 port marked as i386-only?
Basically because it's a bootable i386 binary image.
(maybe I should leave one box dedicated to freebsd-i386 for things
like this ;) )
No need - just download
I have 4 HP DL145G2 boxes (dual opteron). I recently upgrded them from
6.2-STABLE to 7.0-RELEASE using cvsup on each, compiling world + kernel.
The upgrade was (fairly painless on two machines, and has broken the other
two machines.
On boot, the broken machines hang somewhere after kbdc and
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:04:03PM +0200, Willy Offermans wrote:
Dear FreeBSD friends,
It is already the third time that I report this error. Can someone help
me in solving this issue?
Probably the reason that you hear so little is that you provide so
little information. Most of us are not
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Do you have any stability issues after tuning? What settings you are
using?
I am testing ZFS for a short time with these values:
vm.kmem_size=1024M
vm.kmem_size_max=1024M
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=1
kern.maxvnodes=40
vfs.zfs.zil_disable=1
(on Sun Fire X2100 with
Hi,
Every now and then people are complaining about the bug in ab2 that
makes it unusable for benchmarking from FreeBSD (as a client). ab2 is
a HTTP benchmark that's bundled with the Apache web server. I found the
apparent solution and I'd like to invite everyone who's interested to
register
re,
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
because of the memory you added.
yop, though I'm still
Hello,
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 10:52 AM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Device is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:10:0: class=0x068000 card=0x289510f1
chip=0x005710de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Nvidia Corp'
device = 'nForce4 Ultra NVidia Network
Hi Willy,
You seem to have emailed me directly as well as posting to the list.
The bad offsets are probably because you have filesystem corruption, and the
actual event that caused it was probably not reported (or is at least not
reported by these errors).
Basic question: Do you have a hardware
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:04:20PM -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
I'm also running ZFS and wanted to share my experiences. It doesn't
cope well with low-memory environments, but I've successfully run with
2GB ram and 3TB disk with no problems on both i386 and amd64. amd64
needs a little bit
At 05:57 PM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Less than an hour in general (running the same client script
simultanuously on a 100Mbps linux box and 1Gbps bds6-x86)
Hi,
I ran it for over an hour without cpufreq and powerd without
problems with just one client. I will recompile the
36 matches
Mail list logo
