Starting this Friday, we are going to hold a bugathon to work through
some of the network-related PRs. More details, and a list of resources,
are available at http://wiki.freebsd.org/Bugathons/January2009.
I have come up with a page that details a subset of those PRs as a set
of suggested PRs:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net wrote:
I'm reviving this, as I too am seeing something eerily similar. I have
made my own thread under freebsd-stable, so I will hopefully move that
discussion to this list.
I believe we are seeing performance problems when the
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
am I right concluding that under FreeBSD jail there is no way to attach two
processes to the same port of external interface address and localhost?
I tried to move rather standard two-tier nginx(ip:80)+apache(127.1:80)
scheme into a jail and on
Hello,
I think this needs a few more eyes:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2009-January/003782.html
In short, writes are slow, likely do to the write-cache being enabled on
the controller. The sysctl used in 6.x to turn the cache off don't seem
to be in 7.x.
Thanks,
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Robert Watson wrote:
RW am I right concluding that under FreeBSD jail there is no way to attach
RW two processes to the same port of external interface address and
RW localhost?
RW
RW I tried to move rather standard two-tier nginx(ip:80)+apache(127.1:80)
RW scheme into
Greetings,
I'm RP for a fairly large chunk of IP real estate. I carved out
a /27 segment for my home network. Which is currently running over
a cisco 837 GW (adsl/router). I'm not really keen on it (the router/modem).
So I thought to myself that it couldn't be /that/ hard to build a
box with FBSD
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello,
I think this needs a few more eyes:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2009-January/003782.html
In short, writes are slow, likely do to the write-cache being enabled on
the controller. The sysctl used in 6.x to turn the cache off don't seem
to
Alex Goncharov wrote:
I hate to say this, but the new X (as exists in the current FreeBSD
ports) sucks and gets in the way of work big time.
There are definitely issues with xorg-7.4 at the moment.
The root issue seems to be that USB mice simply don't work for me,
and running Xorg
,--- You/Bruce (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:06:45 +) *
| One theory is that somehow the mouse driver ioctls which are passed
| to ums, are somehow hosing USB, although why that would be, I don't
| understand. ums currently doesn't have driver instrumentation in that path.
|
| I pulled a
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
While it's not /exactly/ what I was looking for - it's close. :)
The filtering capability is my biggest gripe on the Cisco
*DSL products. They're just not as /capable/ as is offered in
FBSD. DNS is another plus (pfDNS). But I don't think I'd be
modify pfDNS
Check out OpenWRT, this is essentially linux (busybox on a linux
kernel I believe) that you can load on a router and it runs on more
than a handfull of routers. It's not freebsd. Not sure if the Cisco
837 is supported though, but many other routers are. If not
supported, just go out and buy a
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 07:46 -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Bruce (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:06:45 +) *
| One theory is that somehow the mouse driver ioctls which are passed
| to ums, are somehow hosing USB, although why that would be, I don't
| understand. ums currently doesn't
Hello Michael, and thank you for your reply.
Yes, OpenWRT is pretty much was what I was asking about. Being
/exclusively/ FBSD I hadn't run across it - thanks. :)
Of course it doesn't support any Cisco products, but hey, like
you said; I can just choose one that it /does/, or write a driver
,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:40:11 -0500) *
| I've had patches available for probably a couple of months now posted to
| freebsd-...@. For the few people who tested it, I had no real issues
| reported. We were stalled for a long time, While X kept moving, so the
| amount of change
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Michael Grant mg-fb...@grant.org:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Chris H chr...@1command.com wrote:
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
While it's not /exactly/ what I was looking for - it's close. :)
The filtering capability is my biggest
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 08:58 -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:40:11 -0500) *
| I've had patches available for probably a couple of months now posted to
| freebsd-...@. For the few people who tested it, I had no real issues
| reported. We were stalled for a
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Bruce (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:06:45 +) *
| One theory is that somehow the mouse driver ioctls which are passed
| to ums, are somehow hosing USB, although why that would be, I don't
| understand. ums currently doesn't have driver instrumentation in that
,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:12:47 -0500) *
| Problem is, it isn't just the Xserver... All of the pieces are
| intertwined and so in many cases to update Xserver you also need to
| update some/several libraries as well as all of your drivers. Xorg is
| about 60 or 70 ports now.
That
Hi All,
I have run into a problem that seem rather puzzling. I have upgraded an
installation of FreeBSD from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.0-STABLE and 7.1-STABLE, but i
fail to boot with either one of the STABLE upgrades. I end up at this point:
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
Manual root
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 08:16 -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Bruce (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:06:45 +) *
| One theory is that somehow the mouse driver ioctls which are passed
| to ums, are somehow hosing USB, although why that would be, I don't
|
According to Mike Barnard:
Any one with any ideas?
Do you have GEOM_BSD in your kernel configuration file?
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.freenix.fr
Dons / donation Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/
___
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Ollivier Robert
robe...@keltia.freenix.frwrote:
According to Mike Barnard:
Any one with any ideas?
Do you have GEOM_BSD in your kernel configuration file?
no, i have this:
options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables.
options
I'm having a problem enabling gssapi support in bind 9.5 under FreeBSD
7. I now think it may be something related to freebsd. Even if I force
the path in the Makefile with the entry
--with-gssapi=/usr/include/gssapi.h /usr/include/gssapi/gssapi.h, I
still get
configure:6359: checking for GSSAPI
According to Mike Barnard:
no, i have this:
options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables.
options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization
Try adding GEOM_PART_BSD then.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=-
On 2009-01-29 11:43:46AM +, Richard Tector wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello,
I think this needs a few more eyes:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2009-January/003782.html
In short, writes are slow, likely do to the write-cache being enabled on
the controller.
Peter C. Lai wrote:
I am guessing this is only related to SATA drives on SAS controllers?
The only mpt hardware I have is LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 and it writes
sustained 40MB/s to my LTO-2 drives out of the box without any tweaking.
Correct. When SATA drives are used instead of SAS drives on this
Greetings,
I have a hard time with file system access.
Here's the story: I'd been unhappy about GEOM_JOURNAL within the same
provider as my /usr and /var partitions (used JOURNAL on a fresh
install), it would occasionally give up on fsync() for lock messups
(FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p2). Several
These show up under Windows XP as if they are SCSI adapters (they're
not, obviously.)
Has there been any view towards supporting these on FreeBSD? They're on
all the recent Intel motherboards for the last year and a half or so.
Also, is there any particular benefit (or penalty) to running
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:25 -0500, Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Robert (Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:12:47 -0500) *
| Problem is, it isn't just the Xserver... All of the pieces are
| intertwined and so in many cases to update Xserver you also need to
| update some/several libraries as well as all
Mike,
I ran into this very issue on a Mac Pro that I installed 7.1-RELEASE on
and then cvsup'd, make buildworld to 7.1-STABLE. On my machine,
7.1-RELEASE named the drives ad8, ad9, and ad10 (I have 3 drives and
installed 7.1-RELEASE on ad9). When I booted the STABLE keneral (GENERIC
no tweaks),
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Ollivier Robert
robe...@keltia.freenix.frwrote:
According to Mike Barnard:
no, i have this:
options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables.
options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization
Try adding GEOM_PART_BSD
On January 28, 2009 10:10 pm Larry Baird wrote:
Initially thought this upgrade was a mistake, until I found out about
hald_enable and dbus_enable. Upgrade would have be a lot easier if
they were mentioned in /usr/ports/UPDATING. I would have found these
knobs more quickly if mentioned in
Thanks John
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:43 PM, j...@larush.com wrote:
I entered ufs:ad7s1a and booted the kernel when I
recognized that the drive had been re-named from ad9 to ad7. After
booting, I changed /etc/fstab appropiately and have had no further
problems. I've never run into this
Pfsense sounds like exactly what you're looking for. It's a stripped
down freeBSD with a fancy web interface (well, not too fancy, it's
been incredibly stable for me). I've deployed it a couple times in
pseudo production environments and it's been holding up well for the
last 1.5years+.
Pfsense sounds like exactly what you're looking for. It's a stripped
down freeBSD with a fancy web interface (well, not too fancy, it's
been incredibly stable for me). I've deployed it a couple times in
pseudo production environments and it's been holding up well for the
last 1.5years+.
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Brent Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net wrote:
...
The issue I am seeing, is that for certain file types, the FreeBSD NFS
client will either issue an ASYNC write, or an FSYNC.
However, NFSv3 and v4 both support safe ASYNC
On Mon, 26.01.2009 at 15:00:11 +0200, Timo Rikkonen wrote:
Hi,
We are using VScom PCI-200L and Moxa Technologies, C168H/PCI
-cards for serial ports. After installing 7.0 the ports or the
connection to the port hang after a while. A while could be
half-a-day or 10 minutes. There is no error
At 08:00 AM 1/26/2009, Timo Rikkonen wrote:
Hi,
We are using VScom PCI-200L and Moxa Technologies, C168H/PCI
-cards for serial ports. After installing 7.0 the ports or the
connection to the port hang after a while. A while could be
half-a-day or 10 minutes.
There is no error message to be
Thanks to Robert for pointing out a few things to me.
I have run
portupgrade -rf libxcb
and it rebuilt quite a few pieces that had not been rebuilt in the
standard portupgrade that gave me X.org 7.4 in the first place.
After rebuilding firefox and a bunch of smaller libraries, my
Dan Allen wrote:
Thanks to Robert for pointing out a few things to me.
I have run
portupgrade -rf libxcb
I normally run portupgrade -WrRpPa
This is what I ran and it totally hosed my system.
I had to revert back to an earlier version to be able to
bring X back up.
This should have
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 16:45 -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
Thanks to Robert for pointing out a few things to me.
I have run
portupgrade -rf libxcb
I normally run portupgrade -WrRpPa
This is what I ran and it totally hosed my system.
I had to revert back to an
SDH Support wrote:
Seconded for Pfsense -- although I doubt the Cisco hardware would be
compatible with FreeBSD, and even if it is , I wouldn't want to use it in a
production environment without thorough testing.
If someone can provide more detailed hardware specs, including the chipsets
and
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Pete French wrote:
I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0 perfectly
happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations for the last
couple of months on our test server and it has performed perfectly.
So the last two days I have been
Apologies for being terse, in a hurry here.
1) -o async doesn't work with NFS, don't use that.
2) how big are the text versus binary files?
3) how are you copying them over nfs?
I suspect, (could be wrong of course) that the ascii files
are a lot smaller than the binary files, so what's
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Chris Peterson ch...@lameness.info:
Pfsense sounds like exactly what you're looking for. It's a stripped
down freeBSD
Don't get me wrong, I think pfSense goes a long way to my intended
goal - not the least of which, is pfDNS. I haven't written it
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting SDH Support ad...@stardothosting.com:
Pfsense sounds like exactly what you're looking for. It's a stripped
down freeBSD with a fancy web interface (well, not too fancy, it's
been incredibly stable for me). I've deployed it a couple times in
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com:
http://m0n0.ch/wall/ ?
Good candidate. Thanks for mentioning it.
On the up side - it's FreeBSD based. :)
I guess my only disappointments would be that configuration
is done by way of PHP. But of course I could
Hello Bruce, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Bruce M. Simpson b...@freebsd.org:
SDH Support wrote:
Seconded for Pfsense -- although I doubt the Cisco hardware would be
compatible with FreeBSD, and even if it is , I wouldn't want to use it in a
production environment without thorough
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Richard Tector wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello,
I think this needs a few more eyes:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2009-January/003782.html
In short, writes are slow, likely do to the write-cache being enabled on
the controller. The sysctl used
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:43:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
[ snip ]
Any idea what happened to the sysctl? Is there some other method to
verify the loader tunable took (other than testing the throughput)?
Boot with -v. If the loader tunable took effect, you should see
Enabling SATA
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Mike Barnard wrote:
Hi All,
I have run into a problem that seem rather puzzling. I have upgraded an
installation of FreeBSD from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.0-STABLE and 7.1-STABLE, but i
fail to boot with either one of the STABLE upgrades. I end up at this point:
Trying to mount
Hi Wes,
Have you checked the jumper settings on the drive? There may be a jumper
forcing SATA150 mode on the drive. I'd reset everything to factory defaults
if possible.
It's the first thing I did and I did it for the sake of doing it since this
is a brand new computer straight out of HP.
Thanks Phillip,
1) you can have a boot hint in file /boot/loader.conf to say where the
system should take the root file system (and therefore /etc/fstab) from.
This would work if the OS was able to detect the disk. In this case, after I
boot the STABLE installation, i do not see any hard
53 matches
Mail list logo
