On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision. How hard
it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the
critical ones like dig and nslookup
While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision. How hard
it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the
critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com mentioned:
i don't mind if dig, doc, et alia are not in base, as long as they are a
separate port from the bind hippo.
The major benefit of having them in the base
is the ability to cross-compile them when
building the
In message 20100402013353.f544e8ad.s...@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com mentioned:
Ports doesn't support cross-compilation yet,
and it would be a pity to find yourself
bootstrapping another tiny arm platform and
having to use ports
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:55:07 +
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk mentioned:
In message 20100402013353.f544e8ad.s...@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com mentioned:
Ports doesn't support cross-compilation yet,
and it would
In message 20100402021715.669838e0.s...@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:55:07 +
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk mentioned:
Sorry, I think I was not clear enough.
Sorry for misunderstanding.
Yes, the case can certainly be made that DNS query tool belongs in
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:24:51AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 20100402021715.669838e0.s...@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:55:07 +
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk mentioned:
Sorry, I think I was not clear enough.
Sorry for
[1]: FreeBSD really needs to move away from the base system as a
concept, as I've ranted about in the past.
Strongly disagree.
Or if it cannot, the base
system needs to start using pkg_* (somehow) for use, and src.conf
WITHOUT_xxx (where xxx = some software) removed. Concept being: I
On 02.04.2010 12:28, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
[1]: FreeBSD really needs to move away from the base system as a
concept, as I've ranted about in the past.
Strongly disagree.
Or if it cannot, the base
system needs to start using pkg_* (somehow) for use, and src.conf
WITHOUT_xxx (where xxx
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The result of the RFC was that bind is not a mandatory component to make a
usable system, so you argument suffers from bad logic.
With an eye on the date of Doug's suggestive e-mail, I actually am concerned
that we maintain support for DNSSEC
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 03:14:54AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[1]: FreeBSD really needs to move away from the base system as a
concept, as I've ranted about in the past. Or if it cannot, the base
system needs to start using pkg_* (somehow)
No, it does not need to do that. It might be a
Strongly disagree.
Or if it cannot, the base
system needs to start using pkg_* (somehow) for use, and src.conf
WITHOUT_xxx (where xxx = some software) removed. Concept being: I
don't need Kerberos; pkg_delete base-krb5. I also don't need
lib32;
pkg_delete base-lib32. Beautiful concept, hard
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:50AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision. How hard
it will be to continue maintaining
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Oleg Lomaka wrote:
Hi,
I have a kernel panic when connect to postgresql8.4 server installed in one of
jails from another jail. It's 100% reproducible.
Also I have tried to connect from host machine to jailed pg server. That way it
works fine without crash.
Server
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:44:55PM +0200, Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote:
On 02.04.2010 12:28, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
[1]: FreeBSD really needs to move away from the base system as a
concept, as I've ranted about in the past.
Strongly disagree.
Or if it cannot, the base
On Apr 2, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Oleg Lomaka wrote:
I have a kernel panic when connect to postgresql8.4 server installed in one
of jails from another jail. It's 100% reproducible.
Also I have tried to connect from host machine to jailed pg server. That
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:28:36PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
[1]: FreeBSD really needs to move away from the base system as a
concept, as I've ranted about in the past.
Strongly disagree.
I'm with you!
Or if it cannot, the base
system needs to start using pkg_* (somehow) for
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Oleg Lomaka wrote:
Hey,
uname -a
FreeBSD cerberus.regredi.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #7 r206031: Thu Apr
1 13:43:57 EEST 2010 r...@cerberus.regredi.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
Link to dmesg.boot:
On Apr 2, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Oleg Lomaka wrote:
uname -a
FreeBSD cerberus.regredi.com 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #7 r206031: Thu
Apr 1 13:43:57 EEST 2010
r...@cerberus.regredi.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Link to dmesg.boot:
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 03:14:54 -0700
From: Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:24:51AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 20100402021715.669838e0.s...@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov
writes:
On Fri, 02 Apr
Based on the inspection of the source tree, I want my bikeshed mauve.
I've not been had by AFD jokes in a while but Doug pulled this one
off...
-Reko
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2 April 2010, at 04:27, Denny Lin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:50AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision.
Can we do sendmail next April 1?
Sent from a device with a tiny keyboard
On Apr 2, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Reko Turja reko.tu...@liukuma.net wrote:
Based on the inspection of the source tree, I want my bikeshed
mauve. I've not been had by AFD jokes in a while but Doug pulled
this one off...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 03:14:54 -0700
From: Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
I disagree (so what else is new?) It should be kept out of the base
system. KISS:
Doug pulling BIND out of the base system /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
So first of all, yes Virginia, this was an April Fool's Day joke. To
both those for whom this post created a false sense of despair, and
(perhaps more importantly) to those for whom it created a false sense of
joy, my apologies. :) And for the
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:07 -0400, David Boyd wrote:
The link (actually file) called 6.4 moved to ftp-archive is missing from
most/all mirrors.
We have been using these files to follow the releases when they move.
It works as long as the 6.4 moved to ftp-archive file is present.
Please
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote:
[1]: FreeBSD really needs to move away from the base system as a
concept, as I've ranted about in the past. Or if it cannot, the base
system needs to start using pkg_* (somehow) for use, and src.conf
WITHOUT_xxx
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm just a lowly sysadmin and ex-port maintainer, but ...
No, no, no, definitely no, no, and no!!
The greatest thing about FreeBSD is that there is a clear separation
between
the base OS and everything else (ports,
Firstly, congratualtions to do...@.
On 2010-Apr-02 05:15:26 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
1) In most scenarios (historically speaking), what gets updated quicker:
base or ports? Answer: ports.
In some ways this is a problem. On the downside, it means that a
-RELEASE
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
So first of all, yes Virginia, this was an April Fool's Day joke. To
both those for whom this post created a false sense of despair, and
(perhaps more importantly) to those for whom it created a false sense of
joy, my apologies. :) And for the
30 matches
Mail list logo
