Re: USE PF to Prevent SMTP Brute Force Attacks - Resolved !!!

2012-06-17 Thread Shiv. Nath
On 16/06/2012 21:03, Shiv. Nath wrote: Dear Matthew, Matthew, one a, one e. first thanks for assisting to secure 22/25 ports from brute force attack. i wish to consult if the following white list looks fine to exclude trusted networks (own network) int0=em0 secured_attack_ports={21,22,25}

Re: (bsd)tar and multi-volume

2012-06-17 Thread nickolasbug
Hello, Harald. To create multivolume archive, you may use tar + split. --- wbr, Nickolas 2012/6/16 Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de:  Hello, according to tar(1), the base system tape archiver is bsdtar since 8.x , which lacks support for multi-volumes. I guess I can

Re: Stucking processes

2012-06-17 Thread Daniel Nebdal
Couldn't that just be because you're running a world that expects one kernel but finds another? As far as I know, running a newer world in a jail on an older system is not really recommended (while the opposite ought to be ok)? On Jun 16, 2012 11:33 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:

Kernel panic at early boot time

2012-06-17 Thread mnln.l4
I get a kernel panic at early boot time on 9.0-stable (r237150), GENERIC, AMD64. Repro step: 1. Boot, wait for welcome screen. 2. Repeat pressing Enter key rapidly (so kernel is loading, don't stop pressing Enter key). 3. See the following message at early boot * * *ACPI APIC Table: ALASKA A M

Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP

2012-06-17 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 15 June 2012 19:02:27 animelo...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps you can ask the very same question in another way so its easier to understand why you losing packets? All in all I always thought TCP/IP was the basic unit in Internet based networking but feel free to correct me if you have

Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP

2012-06-17 Thread H
Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Friday 15 June 2012 19:02:27 animelo...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps you can ask the very same question in another way so its easier to understand why you losing packets? All in all I always thought TCP/IP was the basic unit in Internet based networking but feel free

Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP

2012-06-17 Thread sthaug
I loose packets because I use a WLAN adapter. Sometimes the link is down for various reasons, and then the routes start changing for manually created routes, and I want to prevent that. well that is certainly not a reason for changing routes I have the feeling you are not

PORTS_MODULES

2012-06-17 Thread Doug Barton
Howdy, This is an FYI to let people know about a really nice feature for those that have ports installed which include kernel modules. You can place a list in /etc/src.conf like this: PORTS_MODULES= emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod sysutils/fusefs-kmod x11/nvidia-driver which will cause those

Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP

2012-06-17 Thread H
sth...@nethelp.no wrote: I loose packets because I use a WLAN adapter. Sometimes the link is down for various reasons, and then the routes start changing for manually created routes, and I want to prevent that. well that is certainly not a reason for changing routes I have the feeling

Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP

2012-06-17 Thread Etienne Robillard
On 06/17/2012 03:52 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Friday 15 June 2012 19:02:27 animelo...@gmail.com wrote: Perhaps you can ask the very same question in another way so its easier to understand why you losing packets? All in all I always thought TCP/IP was the basic unit in Internet based

FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0 r237184 if_tun auto-up upon create.

2012-06-17 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Hoping someone here might be able to clue me in on what I am seeing. FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0 r237184 When creating a if_tun(4) device... ifconfig tun0 create With these line in rc.conf(5) cloned_interfaces=tun0 ifconfig_tun0=metric 100 down And sysctl net.link.tun.devfs_cloning=0 The