I am struggling with my AR9285 for more than a year now. Sometimes it
is better, sometimes worse, but never without disconnections.
I have also noticed it dies more frequently on heavy usage. I read
somewhere that raising value of kern.ipc.nmbclusters (in my case to
51200) could be of help, so I
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote:
I am struggling with my AR9285 for more than a year now. Sometimes it
is better, sometimes worse, but never without disconnections.
I have also noticed it dies more frequently on heavy usage. I read
somewhere that raising value of
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:46:01 +0530
Tj Hariharan t...@archlinux.us wrote:
Hmm, let me know how that goes, I'll probably try it too. How did you
find the number '51200', and what does that value do?
I searched error message I was getting and found this thread:
On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wondering can I
commit this to
9-stable now? (or is it already in?)
It didn't make it because there was only sparse feedback after the
On 19.08.2013 05:40, Thomas Mueller wrote:
cd devices:
disk devices:
disk0 BIOS drive A:
disk0s1: Unknown
disk1: BIOS drive C:
disk2: BIOS drive D:
disk2p1: FreeBSD boot
disk2p2: FreeBSD UFS
disk2p3: FreeBSD swap
disk3: BIOS drive E:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:40:44AM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote:
I am total layman, and am just sharing my experimentations. I
am not sure if they will get us any improvements. What else can I do when
there are 175 PRs currently open:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:15:32AM +0530, Tj Hariharan wrote:
O never mind, it still happens, though obviously more intermittently,
since I didn't notice anything odd for almost an entire day. A few more
things this time though:
a. It IS intermittent, there seems to be very little pattern to
On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it into 9.2, I'm wondering
can I commit this to
9-stable now? (or is it already
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.comwrote:
On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 16.08.2013 10:29, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 16.08.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, I'm kind of bummed out this didn't make it
Are you running the AR9285 on -HEAD? If not, upgrade. It should behave
much, much better.
-adrian
On 19 August 2013 00:59, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
I am struggling with my AR9285 for more than a year now. Sometimes it
is better, sometimes worse, but never without
A lot of the ath PRs filed by me can be closed. They're reminders that
things needed fixing, which I've done.
A lot of them are for older cards on older machines with odd behaviour due
to PCI/cardbus issues, power save bugs, ACPI hilarity, etc. I've tried to
port over some fixes to address these
Hi,
Please just do it manually for now.
# ifconfig wlan0
# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ath0
# wpa_supplicant -i wlan0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf
# dhclient wlan0
.. see what happens.
-adrian
On 19 August 2013 06:30, Tj Hariharan t...@archlinux.us wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at
Ok it's gotten worse now. I can no longer restart netif, it just hangs
there in uninterruptible wait forever (trying to delete the wlan0
interface using ifconfig)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote:
I am struggling with my AR9285 for more than a year now. Sometimes it
is
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to the same amount as a
machine with less than 4GB ram.
This was fixed in head but not merged back in time.
This results in poor out of the box performance on 10gige and servers
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.comwrote:
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to the same amount
as a machine with less than 4GB ram.
This was fixed in head but not merged back in
On 19.08.2013 18:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com
mailto:alf...@ixsystems.com wrote:
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
Vnodes and mbufs on a machine with 24gb ram is limited to the same amount
as
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 19.08.2013 18:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com
mailto:alf...@ixsystems.com wrote:
Performance is bad for large memory requirements period.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Alfred
Perlstein
Sent: Tuesday, 20 August 2013 2:05 AM
To: Outback Dingo
Cc: r...@freebsd.org; sta...@freebsd.org; Andre Oppermann;
nones...@longcount.org
Subject:
On 8/19/13 9:19 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
mailto:an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 19.08.2013 18:09, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Alfred Perlstein
alf...@ixsystems.com
I can repeat (again) what uname -a shows:
FreeBSD amelia2 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #17 r254196: Sun Aug 11
00:36:49 UTC 2013 root@amelia2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY amd64
Hello,
can you try to install this loader?
http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/loader
[sending this from hub since bellsouth.net doesn't seem to like my
`normal' mailserver...]
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 07:30:16PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I can repeat (again) what uname -a shows:
FreeBSD amelia2 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #17 r254196: Sun Aug 11
00:36:49 UTC
..so you probably never saw my post about the updated super grub disk iso:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-August/074711.html
I.e. they fixed the kfreebsd misspelling and the grub 2.00 bug that
prevented it from booting a 9.1+ kernel directly, so the
I can repeat (again) what uname -a shows:
FreeBSD amelia2 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #17 r254196: Sun Aug 11
00:36:49 UTC 2013 root@amelia2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY amd64
Hello,
can you try to install this loader?
http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/loader
On 20.08.2013 06:58, Thomas Mueller wrote:
was taken to a loader prompt where I could not access any files on
the hard disk.
Was the output of lsdev command the same or something changed?
So again I had to reboot, this time from the USB stick and at the
loader prompt typed set boot_askname
On 20.08.2013 06:58, Thomas Mueller wrote:
was taken to a loader prompt where I could not access any files on
the hard disk.
Was the output of lsdev command the same or something changed?
So again I had to reboot, this time from the USB stick and at the
loader prompt typed set
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, David Demelier wrote:
http://files.malikania.fr/DSC_0223.jpg
What's that? Is this a joke?
Yes, sort of.
This is fantastic. Kudos and thanks for the laugh to whoever snuck it in there.
After
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Have you been able to pass the debugging info on to Kostik?
It would be really nice to get this fixed for FreeBSD9.2.
You're probably not talking to me, but headway here is slow. At our
location, we have been continuing
27 matches
Mail list logo
