On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Adrian Chadd
wrote:
> Ok, so which subset of changes is the culprit?
>
> (sorry, I'm tired.. :( )
>
>
> The merge of 281874 broke it. Unfortunately, this is a fairly large and
important change that touches five files, mainly dev/pci/pci.c and
dev/pci/pci_pci.c wi
Ok, so which subset of changes is the culprit?
(sorry, I'm tired.. :( )
-a
On 28 June 2015 at 22:45, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>>>
>>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>>> > ok. I've upda
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and it is okay at
>> > suspend/resume.
>>
>> No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
>>
>> > I can go a
Thanks for digging into this!
(two laptops are now running -head from today, all iswell. I'll update
the t400 tomorrow.)
-a
On 28 June 2015 at 16:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>>
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > ok. I've updated my x230 to t
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Adrian Chadd writes:
> > ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and it is okay at
> > suspend/resume.
>
> No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
>
> > I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another
> > ref
Adrian Chadd writes:
> ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and itis okay at
> suspend/resume.
No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
> I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another
> reference laptop.
You might ping Allan Jude. If I'm not mistaken he had at
Hi,
ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and itis okay at suspend/resume.
I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another
reference laptop.
I don't run stable/10 on anything, so it may be something odd with
what he MFCed and what's in stable/10.
I'll update the othe
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>
>> Kevin Oberman writes:
>> > I have narrowed it to between 283990 and 284074. Have to crash, so maybe
>> > someone else will track it down by tomorrow. I only see a handfull (<10)
OK. This time I'm REALLY adding jhb@ to the CC. Guess my first cup of tea
had not kicked in.
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 201
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Kevin Oberman writes:
> > I have narrowed it to between 283990 and 284074. Have to crash, so maybe
> > someone else will track it down by tomorrow. I only see a handfull (<10)
> > commits in there that look like possible causes. 280434 is
Kevin Oberman writes:
> I have narrowed it to between 283990 and 284074. Have to crash, so maybe
> someone else will track it down by tomorrow. I only see a handfull (<10)
> commits in there that look like possible causes. 280434 is compiling right
> now as the prime candidate.
Cool. I think you
On 06/28/2015 09:12, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Brandon J. Wandersee <
brandon.wander...@gmail.com> wrote:
Kevin Oberman writes:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
Adrian Chadd writes:
does it always fail now?
Yes. The behaviour I descr
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Brandon J. Wandersee <
brandon.wander...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Kevin Oberman writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> >
> >> Adrian Chadd writes:
> >> > does it always fail now?
> >>
> >> Yes. The behaviour I described is, so far w
13 matches
Mail list logo
