Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #316

2016-07-14 Thread jenkins-admin
See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: 11.0-BETA2 may be delayed

2016-07-14 Thread Glen Barber
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:10:17PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > As I am sure you have already seen, there is an issue in 11.0-BETA1 that > has caused some headaches for people. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210884 > > The issue is actively being investigated, and despite

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #315

2016-07-14 Thread jenkins-admin
See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

2016-07-14 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 20:42 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > Before: ca. 660 seconds to reboot, now 77 seconds to reboot. > > > Now, if someone could explain, why... > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2016-June/084865 > > .html > > Any pointer to a commit or three

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

2016-07-14 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > Before: ca. 660 seconds to reboot, now 77 seconds to reboot. > > Now, if someone could explain, why... > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2016-June/084865.html Any pointer to a commit or three that fixed it ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

2016-07-14 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Before: ca. 660 seconds to reboot, now 77 seconds to reboot. > Now, if someone could explain, why... > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2016-June/084865.html -- brandon s allbery kf8nh

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

2016-07-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2016-07-14 13:36, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! > I installed FreeBSD 10.3 on brand new machine Supermicro X11SSW-F. It > sits on top of 4x 1TB Samsung SSDs on ZFS RAIDZ2. > > The booting is painfully slow from BTX to menu to kernel loading. I have the same problem on a Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F.

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

2016-07-14 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > I installed FreeBSD 10.3 on brand new machine Supermicro X11SSW-F. It > > sits on top of 4x 1TB Samsung SSDs on ZFS RAIDZ2. > > > > The booting is painfully slow from BTX to menu to kernel loading. > > I have the same problem on a Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F. > > I found this blog post

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

2016-07-14 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Kurt Jaeger wrote on 07/14/2016 18:11: Hi! I installed FreeBSD 10.3 on brand new machine Supermicro X11SSW-F. It sits on top of 4x 1TB Samsung SSDs on ZFS RAIDZ2. The booting is painfully slow from BTX to menu to kernel loading. I have the same problem on a Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F.

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

2016-07-14 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I installed FreeBSD 10.3 on brand new machine Supermicro X11SSW-F. It > sits on top of 4x 1TB Samsung SSDs on ZFS RAIDZ2. > > The booting is painfully slow from BTX to menu to kernel loading. I have the same problem on a Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F. > Progress indicated by \ | / - characters

LINT tinderbox failure on ^/stable/10 with arm

2016-07-14 Thread Ngie Cooper
Hi, I’ve been running “make tinderbox” periodically on ^/stable/10 and noticed that arm.LINT has been failing recently with kbdmux(4) at link time. I’ve included the failing context below (this also can be found at https://people.freebsd.org/~ngie/tinderbox-arm-LINT-failure.txt ).

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [clang 3.8.0: powerpc int instead of 32-bit SYSVR4's long and 64-bit ELF V2 long]

2016-07-14 Thread Mark Millard
[Top post of a history note for powerpc and wchar_t's type in FreeBSD. The history is from looking around in svn.] [The below is not a complaint or a request for a change. It just looks like int for wchar_t for powerpc was a choice made long ago for simpler code given FreeBSD's pre-existing

Jenkins build is still unstable: FreeBSD_stable_10 #314

2016-07-14 Thread jenkins-admin
See ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [clang 3.8.0: powerpc int instead of 32-bit SYSVR4's long and 64-bit ELF V2 long]

2016-07-14 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jul-13, at 6:00 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 13.07.2016 11:53, Mark Millard wrote: >> [The below does note that TARGET=powerpc has a mix of signed wchar_t and >> unsigned char types and most architectures have both being signed types.] > > POSIX says nothing about