Re: 11.2-STABLE kernel wired memory leak

2019-02-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 13.02.2019 19:04, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:14:31PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Long story short: 11.2-STABLE/amd64 r335757 leaked over 4600MB kernel wired >>> memory over 81 days uptime >>> out of 8GB tot

Re: Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get?

2019-02-13 Thread Jason Tubnor
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 00:53, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > You can't. Either wait until a 12.0 with the fix included or > > 12.1 is released, or you fetch the source with the fix included, > > and build from source. > Got it -- thanks. Wait it shall be. > > > I also have hit this IPv6 issue (I th

Re: Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get?

2019-02-13 Thread Karl Denninger
On 2/13/2019 07:49, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I know (and have done) binary updates between -RELEASE versions > [...] >> How do I do this, say, coming from 11.2 and wanting to target 12 post >> the IPv6 fix MFC? > You can't. Either wait until a 12.0 with the fix included or > 12.1 is released,

Re: Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get?

2019-02-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I know (and have done) binary updates between -RELEASE versions [...] > How do I do this, say, coming from 11.2 and wanting to target 12 post > the IPv6 fix MFC? You can't. Either wait until a 12.0 with the fix included or 12.1 is released, or you fetch the source with the fix included, and

Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get?

2019-02-13 Thread Karl Denninger
I know (and have done) binary updates between -RELEASE versions But 12 has a problem with -RELEASE and IPv6, which was recently fixed and MFC'd.  So now I have an interesting situation in that I have two machines in the field running 11.2 that do things for me at one of the "shared colo" joints, a

Re: 11.2-STABLE kernel wired memory leak

2019-02-13 Thread Karl Denninger
On 2/13/2019 03:59, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 12/02/2019 20:17, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 13.02.2019 1:14, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> >>> Use following command to see how much memory is wasted in your case: >>> >>> vmstat -z | awk -F, '{printf "%10s %s\n", $2*$5/1024/1024, $1}' | sort >>> -k1,1 -rn

Re: 11.2-STABLE kernel wired memory leak

2019-02-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein
12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:14:31PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Long story short: 11.2-STABLE/amd64 r335757 leaked over 4600MB kernel wired >> memory over 81 days uptime >> out of 8GB total RAM. >> >> Details follow. >> >> I have a workstatio

Re: 11.2-STABLE kernel wired memory leak

2019-02-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
On 12/02/2019 20:17, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 13.02.2019 1:14, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> Use following command to see how much memory is wasted in your case: >> >> vmstat -z | awk -F, '{printf "%10s %s\n", $2*$5/1024/1024, $1}' | sort -k1,1 >> -rn | head > > Oops, small correction: > > vmstat

[Bug 229694] [zfs] unkillable "zpool scrub" in [tx->tx_sync_done_cv] state for damaged data

2019-02-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229694 --- Comment #5 from Andriy Gapon --- (In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #3) 5 101937 zfskern txg_thread_entermi_switch+0xc5 sleepq_wait+0x2c _cv_wait+0x160 zio_resume_wait+0x4b spa_sync+0xd46 txg_sync_thread+0x25e