could also use this by first upgrading my host and then running this command
to write the /basejail over with the updated files from the host to bring
them into sync? I still don't know how I would then fix the /etc under each
individual jail though.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
are upgrading from a production
release to a development branch of the OS?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
-STABLE, 7.3-RELEASE and so on.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
or more or is this i386 + 1-2gb ram? Amd64 systems with
2gb ram or more don't really usually require any tuning whatsoever
(except for tweaking performance for a specific workload), but if this
is i386, tuning will be generally required to archieve stability.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
8589934592 bytes transferred in 76.031399 secs (112978779 bytes/sec)
(107,74mb/s)
Individual disks read capability: 75mb/s
Reading off a mirror of 2 disks with prefetch disabled: 60mb/s
Reading off a mirror of 2 disks with prefetch enabled: 107mb/s
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 system with a Supermicro X7SPA-H board
using an Intel gigabit nic with the em driver, running on top of a ZFS
mirror, I was seeing a strange issue. Local reads and writes to the
pool easily saturate the disks with roughly 75mb/s throughput, which
is roughly the best
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On a FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 system with a Supermicro X7SPA-H board
using an Intel gigabit nic with the em driver, running on top of a ZFS
mirror, I was seeing a strange issue. Local reads and writes to the
pool easily
Hello
Is powerd finally considered stable and safe to use on 8.0? At least
on 7.2, it consistently caused panics when used on Atom systems with
Hyper-Threading enabled, but I recall that Attilio Rao was looking
into it.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
at 1249 Mhz
after boot by default when not using powerd and why it gets stuck at
1666 Mhz with powerd enabled and doesn't scale back down when IDLE?
Out of curiosity, I stopped powerd but the CPU remained at 1666 Mhz.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd
with powerd disabled and it gets stuck there, this
shouldn't happen.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
both before and after issuing that command :)
Still doesn't explain why the system boots up at 1249 Mhz, but that's
not that big of an issue at this point now I see that powerd is
behaving correctly.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
seems to have increased by a factor of 2 to 3
and is now definately in line with the expected performance of the
disks in question (cheap 2TB WD20EADS with 32mb cache). Thanks to
everyone who has offered help and tips!
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
about it? :)
Thanks!
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Matt Reimer mattjrei...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matt Reimer mattjrei...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know, but I plan to test that scenario in a few days.
Matt
after your
changes? :)
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
for
L2ARC/cache? The ZFS documentation explicitly states that cache
device content is considered volatile.
Using a ramdisk as an L2ARC vdev doesn't make any sense at all. If you
have RAM to spare, it should be used by regular ARC.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena
and boards.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
Hi,
Do have test about this? I'm not really impressed with the i5 series.
Regards,
Andras
There: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3634p=10
The i5 750, which is a 180 euro CPU, beats Q9650 C2Q, which is a 300 euro CPU.
- Sincerely,
Dan
3081E-R $235
4. SATA cables $60
5. Crucial 3×2G ECC DDR3-1333 $191 (+ $6 shipping)
6. Xeon W3520 $310
You do realise how much of a massive overkill this is and how much you
are overspending?
- Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supermicro
setup:
1. Samsung SATA CD
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my
watt/disk for really powerhungry ones. So yes.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
. Is this a known issue and/or should I submit a PR?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
From the SUN ZFS Administration Guide:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461/gaztn?a=view
If ZFS is currently managing the file system but it is currently
unmounted, and the mountpoint property is changed
be to setup a script that polls the
SMART data of all disks affected by the problem every 8-9 seconds and
have this script launch on boot. This will keep the affected drives
just busy enough to not park their heads.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd
2010/2/8 Gerrit Kühn ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:43:46 +0200 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote
about RE: one more load-cycle-count problem:
DN Any further ideas how to get rid of this feature?
DN 1) The most clean solution is probably using the WDIDLE3 utility
misunderstanding something or is the Supermicro support tech misguided?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
are of exact same model and look to be same firmware. Should
I be worried that the newer disk has, in 136 hours reached a higher
Load Cycle count twice as big as on the disk thats 5253 hours old?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
network unless I absolutely have to :)
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
:)
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
) to worry were people like me, who were seeing the
rate increase at a rate of 43+ per hour.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI
Motin
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=HIPMI=Y
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
http
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:29 PM, John j...@starfire.mn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:02:53AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010
Server and NTFS. So what would be the
cause of these very low Bonnie result numbers in my case? Should I try
some other benchmark and if so, with what parameters?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
of raw disks, but to my knowledge (I recall reading this from
multiple reputable sources) this issue does not affect FreeBSD.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
ZFS writes to a mirror pair
requires two independent writes. If these writes go down independent I/O
paths, then there is hardly any overhead from the 2nd write. If the
writes
go through a bandwidth-limited shared path
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at
http://green
or through the FreeBSD
Foundation? And how would one go about calculating the appropriate
amount of money for such a thing?
Thanks.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
partitioning and that I had swap
as my first partition inside the slice and that it all worked dandy.
Has this changed at some point? Oh, and for the curious the
installation script is here: http://jago.pp.fi/zfsmbrv1-works.sh
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
Hi,
I recently found a nifty FreeBSD ZFS root installation script and
been reworking it a bit to suit my needs better, including changing it
from GPT to MBR
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 05:57:23AM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
Hi,
I recently found a nifty FreeBSD ZFS root installation script and
been reworking
will be marked as active during
the installation of the bootcode. Is there anything I can do to
archieve the same result in 8.0-RELEASE or is installing from a
snapshop of 8-STABLE my only option?
Thanks.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 1/19/2010 12:11 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks
using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as
active. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406cat=bin
for a prime example.
In 8.0-RELEASE, using gpart
it to his disk with DD. Can anyone point me
towards an explanation regarding how to edit and apply my own PMBR to
my disk to see if it helps?
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
the SSD host the swap, boot, root and a few
other partitions. What do I need to know in regards to partition
alignment and filesystem block sizes to get the best performance out
of the Intel SSDs?
Thanks.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable
2010/1/12 Rafał Jackiewicz free...@o2.pl:
Thanks, could you do the same, but using 2 .eli vdevs mirrorred
together in a zfs mirror?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
Hi,
Proc: Intell Atom 330 (2x1.6Ghz) - 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) x 2 HTT threads
Chipset: Intel 82945G
Sys: 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0
with nothing? Also, does
this mean that GPT is _NOT_ in fact fixed regarding this bug?
Thanks.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
is the CPU in the system showing no overhead? Having no
noticable overhead whatsoever sounds extremely unlikely unless you are
actually using it on something like a very modern dualcore or better.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
of=/data02/test bs=1M count=500
500+0 records in
500+0 records out
524288000 bytes transferred in 20.090274 secs (26096608 bytes/sec)
Rafal Jackiewicz
Thanks, could you do the same, but using 2 .eli vdevs mirrorred
together in a zfs mirror?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
. However the capability to remove dedicated ZIL or gracefully
handle the death of a non-redundant dedicated ZIL vdev does not
currently exist in Solaris/OpenSolaris at all.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
, the system
is an Atom 330 which is currently using Windows 2008 server with
TrueCrypt in a non-raid configuration and with that setup, I am
getting roughly 55mb/s reads and writes when using TrueCrypt
(nonencrypted it's around 115mb/s).
Thanks.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Damian Gerow dge...@afflictions.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
: I am mostly interested in benchmarks on lower end hardware, the system
: is an Atom 330 which is currently using Windows 2008 server with
: TrueCrypt in a non-raid configuration and with that setup
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Damian Gerow dge...@afflictions.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
: Yes, this is what I was basically considering:
:
: new AHCI driver = 40gb Intel SSD = UFS2 with Softupdates for the
: system installation
: new AHCI driver = 2 x 2tb disks, each fully encrypted
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com wrote:
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
Attilio
Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
visible in top as a result)
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/23 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/7/22 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Could that one (on i386) be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
I have no idea about it
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file
at some point, with and without powerd.
Rather sad if powerd is the actual cause, considering that the whole
point of using an Atom-based system is powersaving :(
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
... (although I want to have it enabled)
I hope you can get some crash dumps for the developers to look at,
Attilio was trying to help me but sadly the machine had to be put into
active use so I could no longer play with FreeBSD due to unsolved
instability.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter
Jeremypeterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Jul-09 15:39:35 +0300, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
A single 40 disk raidz (DO NOT DO THIS) will have 40 disks total, 39
disks worth of space and will definately explode on you sooner rather
than
is the method you use for updating your ports tree? What happens
if you nuke /usr/ports from orbit and run: portsnap fetch; portsnap
extract and try running 'portupgrade -ay' again?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
raidz (40 disks total) is fine.
A single pool consisting of a 40 (or any amount bigger than 9) disk
raidz is not.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Nenhum_de_Nosmath...@eternamente.info wrote:
On Thu, July 9, 2009 09:25, Dan Naumov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nenhum_de_Nosmath...@eternamente.info
wrote:
On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi, all,
I just wanted to say a big
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dan Naumovdan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com
isn't exactly up to the
task.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
atom# uname -a
FreeBSD atom.localdomain 7.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed
Jun 24 00:14:35 UTC 2009
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
atom# ls -1 /boot/kernel | wc
10111011 15243
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
to it to avoid
such issues?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
understand the logic of metadata being protected if I
do a: gpart add -b 1 -s ENTIREDISK -t freebsd-zfs
/dev/label/disk01 since gpart will have to go through the actual
label first, but what actually happens if I issue a gpart directly to
the /dev/device?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
partition size for /, a bit too tight for my liking.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
files to my home network over Samba and running a few
irssi instances in a screen. What do I need to do to catch more
information if/when this happens again?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot
%. This is adjustable. See the -m
switch to tunefs.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
are 1.5T?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Freddie Cashfjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list.
I have a single 2tb disk used on a 7.2-release/amd64 system with a
small part of it given to UFS and most of the disk given to a single
file.
This would help avoid having to manually approve installation of
hundreds of files in /etc when you upgrade to new releases using
freebsd-update.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Dominic Fandreykamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
I'd really like mergemaster to tell me
.
Sincerely,
- Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
...
Sincerely,
- Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
in performance or is there something else in play? The
system is an Intel Atom 330 dualcore, 2gb ram, Western Digital Green
2tb disk. Also what would be another good way to get good numbers for
comparing the performance of UFS2 vs ZFS on the same system.
Sincerely,
- Dan Naumov
All the ZFS tuning guides for FreeBSD (including one on the FreeBSD
ZFS wiki) have recommended values between 64M and 128M to improve
stability, so that what I went with. How much of my max kmem is it
safe to give to ZFS?
- Dan Naumov
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Ronald Klopronald-freeb
on partitions instead and keeping a few gb unused on each
disk leaves us with some room to play and be able to avoid this issue.
- Dan Naumov
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Freddie Cashfjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know for sure if it's the same on FreeBSD, but on Solaris, ZFS will
disable
If this is true, some magic has been done to the FreeBSD port of ZFS,
because according to SUN documentation is is definitely not supposed
to be possible.
- Dan Naumov
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Pete
Frenchpetefre...@ticketswitch.com wrote:
The new 2tb disk you buy can very often
this probably varies from
manufacturer to manufacturer, but some average estimates would be
nice, just so that one could evaluate whether this 64k barrier is
enough.
- Dan Naumov
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Pete
Frenchpetefre...@ticketswitch.com wrote:
If this is true, some magic has been done
-way one?
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
You need to mount your /dev/ad6s1d.journal as /usr and not
/dev/ad6s1d, because this is the new device provided to you by GEOM.
- Dan Naumov
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Garrett Cooperyanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Garrett Cooperyanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
.
===
And...
===
agathon# which install
/usr/bin/install
===
Any ideas?
- Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
Hello list
Any ideas if gptzfsboot is going to be MFC'ed into RELENG_7 anytime
soon? I am going to be building a NAS soon and I would like to have a
full ZFS system without having to resort to running 8-CURRENT :)
Sincerely,
- Dan Naumov
___
freebsd
gptboot. I didn't make any changes to the stock
Makefiles and used GENERIC kernel config. Do I need to adjust some
options for gptzfsboot to get built?
- Dan Naumov
5/25/09 - last month
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
from 8-CURRENT? Is that getting MFC'ed into
into RELENG_7 anytime soon?
Where are all make.conf options documented by the way? Neither
/usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf nor man make.conf make any
reference to the LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT option.
- Dan Naumov
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Alberto
directly to benefit
the development of ZFS support on FreeBSD, should I continue donating
to the foundation or should I be sending donations directly to
specific developers?
Thank you
- Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Anyone else think that this combined with freebsd-update integration
and a simplistic menu GUI for choosing the preferred boot environment
would make an _awesome_ addition to the base system? :)
- Dan Naumov
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Philipp Wuenschecryx-free...@h3q.com wrote:
I wrote
having to setup some crazy GEOM mirror setup using 2 of them?
- Dan Naumov
2009/6/2 Gerrit Kühn ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de
On Sat, 30 May 2009 21:41:36 +0300 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote
about ZFS NAS configuration question:
DN So, this leaves me with 1 SATA port used for a FreeBSD
that made me pause for a second and made me go WOW, this is how
UNIX system upgrades should be done. Any hope of us lowly users ever seeing
something like this implemented in FreeBSD? :)
- Dan Naumov
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
The system
A little more info for the (perhaps) curious:
Managing Multiple Boot Environments:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/getstart/bootenv.html#bootenvmgr
Introduction to Boot Environments:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/snapupgrade/index.html
- Dan Naumov
On Tue, Jun 2
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
