cannot destroy '': dataset is busy vs iSCSI

Hi. I'm using zvol clones with iSCSI. Perdiodically I renew them and destroy the old ones, but sometimes the clone gets stuck and refuses to be destroyed: (I'm showing the full sequence so it's self explanatory who is who's parent) [root@san2:/etc]# zfs destroy esx/games-reference1@ver5_6

FreeBSD doesn't boot automatically from UEFI

Hi. Recently I've installed FreeBSD 10.3 as an experiment to get the UEFI-enabled system, on one of mine Supermicro servers. The installer worked just fine, but after insttallation I got myself a problem: it cannot boot. If I select to boot the old way, froma disk, BIOS says there's no valid

Re: mrsas(4)

Hi. On 29.07.2016 20:14, Mike Tancsa wrote: On 7/29/2016 9:41 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Hi. I'm experiencing some weird troubles with an LSI MegaRAID SAS9341-4i - has anyone seen anything similar on mrsas ? I'm kinda open to the ideas. To be honest, I suspect the controller

mrsas(4)

Hi. I'm experiencing some weird troubles with an LSI MegaRAID SAS9341-4i controller: sometimes, all of a sudden, it reports that disk was reattached. I'm using zfs, and a redundant pool, so, besides the fact that it's bad by itself, everything should continue to work, but instead my FreeBSD

freebsd loses cd-drive during installation

Hi, Is there some hack to install FreeBSD when it loses the cd-drive during installation ? I have a couple of ole Sun Fire X2270 without service contract, so I would install FreeBSD onto them, but the thing is that the BIOS does see the CD-drive, and the kernel doesn't. Linux does boot and

FreeBSD as iSCSI target and VMWare ESX

Hi. Guys, does someone have experience with multiple LUNs on a target in ctld ? Recently I was installing ESX on a bunch of diskless hosts, connected to FreeBSD ctld. I was organizing them inside one target, multiple LUNs. As soon as the _count_ of LUNS went over 9, the whole thing went

Re: cannot delete on-interface route in FIB

Hi. On 08.06.2016 19:37, Alan Somers wrote: What is the value of "sysctl net.add_addr_allfibs"? In your case, it sounds like you want to set it to 0. Thanks a lot, looks like it, will try. Eugene. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

cannot delete on-interface route in FIB

Hi. (first part of the message is describing why I need this, so impatient people can proceed to th 'setfib 2 route delete' part directly). I have a FreeBSD router connected to the ISP network, which is organized according to the rfc3069 (you know, when all of the clients think they have /24.

Re: HAST, zfs and local mirroring

Hi, On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > I am suggesting next setup: > > node0: > own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0 >remote-iscsi_disk1/1 > local_disk1: exported by iscsi as remote-iscsi_disk0/1 to node1 > > node1: > own pool zroot1:

Re: HAST, zfs and local mirroring

Hi. On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I am suggesting next setup: > > node0: > own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0 >remote-iscsi_disk1/1 > local_disk1: exported by iscsi as remote-iscsi_disk0/1 to node1 > > node1: > own pool zroot1:

vt(4) and HP iLO

Hi. Recently I've updates some of my HP DL g6 servers to vt(4) console driver. These servers are equipped with lo100i IPMI management device (basically it mimics IPMI). After some time I connected to it's web-interface and opened the Virtual KVM tab, Then I saw this:

Re: HAST, zfs and local mirroring

Hi. On 01.06.16 18:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > Only FS support changed data bypass FS layer is Files-11 ODS-2 level, > may be hardware support required. > > Can you use ZFS mirror with one vdev local and other vdev by iSCSI? > Every node using separate ZFS pool in this case. If you mean

Re: HAST, zfs and local mirroring

Hi. On 01.06.16 02:49, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin > <e...@norma.perm.ru <mailto:e...@norma.perm.ru>>wrote: > > I wat to start using HAST, I have two nodes and a pair of disk on > each node. So I want to use HASt i

HAST, zfs and local mirroring

Hi. I wat to start using HAST, I have two nodes and a pair of disk on each node. So I want to use HASt in an environment where each HAST resource would be mirrored. What is the preferred approach if I want to use ZFS on an end-device to avoid exsessive fscking, and, in the same time, I want

booting from separate zfs pool

Hi. So, I'm still struggling with my problem when I cannot boot from a big zfs 2T pool (I have written some messages about a year ago, the whole story is too long and irrelevant to retell it, I'll only notice that I took the path where I'm about to boot from a separate zfs pool closer to the

FreeBSD and UDF

Hi, recenlty I needed to mount the Windows 2012 R2 iso image, which pappened to ba an UDF image. After mdconfiging it and attempting to mount I got: # mount -t udf /dev/md1 cdrom01 mount_udf: /dev/md1: Invalid argument udf is in kernel. Is UDF filesystem supported in FreeBSD ? I run

high disk %busy, while almost nothing happens

Hi. I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity measured in iops/reads/writes is low, form my point of view: L(q) ops/sr/s kBps ms/rw/s kBps ms/w %busy Name 8 56 50

Re: high disk %busy, while almost nothing happens

Hi. On 26.11.2015 14:19, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've > noticed that disks are always busy while gstat shows that the activity > measured in iops/reads/writes is low, form my point of view: > > &

Re: high disk %busy, while almost nothing happens

Hi. On 27.11.2015 01:37, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:19:18 +0500 > "Eugene M. Zheganin" <e...@norma.perm.ru> wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I'm using FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE as an application server, last week I've >> noticed that disks ar

poudriere and chflags

Hi. I'm trying to build a tree and ports for a raspberry pie, I'm doing it on a FreeBAS 10.2-STABLE with poudriere and qemu. During a jail setup I receive an error: [...] --- configlexer.l --- cp -p

zfs, mc, mcview and files opening

Hi. my midnight commander is terribly slow at vieweing files with mcview. Opening of a file of approximately 10 megabytes takes about 30-40 seconds. This isn't related with the compression setting, %busy wait or pool properties- I tested on various machines, it's fully reproducible. This lag

Re: zfs, mc, mcview and files opening

Hi, on 10.11.2015 15:05, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > I blame file(1), it's hopelessly slow. mcview uses file(1) to deduce > if it should just display the damn file or run the file through some > filter. Maybe an option in mc/mcview to disable the use of file(1) is > an acceptable compromise.

Re: zfs, mc, mcview and files opening

Hi, on 10.11.2015 15:29, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > A workaround is to navigate to the file you wish to view. Hit M-! or > ESC ! to activate the filter command. Hit the Home key, type in c a t > followed by a space and hit enter. > My guys just told me this whole file(2)/libmagic issueis fixed

Re: unable to boot a healthy zfs pool: all block copies unavailable

Hi. On 06.11.2015 21:00, Alan Somers wrote: > I notice that my 10.2-RELEASE VM prints the same message about "all > block copies unavailable" and then continues to boot just fine. So I > wonder if that part is just red herring. There is another possibility > here: I have seen a bug where ZFS

unable to boot a healthy zfs pool: all block copies unavailable

Hi. Today one of my zfs pool disks dies, I was unable to change it on the fly (video board was blocking it) so I powered off, changed disk (not in root pool) and all of a sudden I realized that i cannot boot: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't read MOS of pool zroot

Re: unable to boot a healthy zfs pool: all block copies unavailable

Hi. On 06.11.2015 02:58, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > It could be that your BIOS is not able to read past 1TB (512 * INT_MAX). That > seems to be a rather common problem for consumer motherboards. > Here is an example of how it looked for me: > https://people.freebsd.org/~avg/IMAG1099.jpg >

Re: when the sshd hits the fan

Hi. On 23.09.2015 15:11, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Eugene M. Zheganin wrote on 09/23/2015 10:44: >> Hi. >> >> I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons, >> out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service >>

Re: when the sshd hits the fan

Hi. On 23.09.2015 18:32, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <e...@norma.perm.ru> writes: I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons, out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service to start before non-system (lo

Re: when the sshd hits the fan

Hi. On 23.09.2015 20:35, Glenn English wrote: Mildly OT from a profound BSD noob: Why is it necessary to have SSH working before the system has finished booting? That 'Welcome' menu times out, so I can't think of a reason, or find one from Goggle, for needing console access after a power

when the sshd hits the fan

Hi. I'm trying to understand why the sshd still starts after local daemons, out-of-the-box, and what it takes to make this extremely vital service to start before non-system (local) ones. I bet I'm not the first one to ask, so why isn't this already done ? Seems quite easy for me. Eugene.

Re: [POSSIBLE BUG] 10-STABLE CARP erroneously becomes master on boot

Hi. On 20.08.2015 14:51, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Hello list, We've managed to find the source of the bug, if it is indeed a bug. It all comes down to the order in which the IP addresses are assigned to the interface from /etc/rc.conf. When using the following syntax, the physical IP

ipsec on recent STABLE

Hi. Recently I built an i386 nanobsd image from a recent STABLE, r285595M (seems like some patch laso wasn't overwritten correctly in my tree), and I cannot get it to work. In the same time same revision on amd64 works fine. Symptoms are - nanobsd sends traffic just fine, it's seen on the remote

Re: ipsec broken again

Hi. On 15.07.2015 09:44, Glen Barber wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:42:05AM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: As soon as I upgraded one of my ipsec routers to recent stable (10.2-BETA1 #0 r285524) it stopped working as a security gateway. Ipsec traffic is passed out and receiving in, SA

zfs dataset and hanging getdirentries() on it

Hi. I have a funny zfs dataset on a recent stable, which listing takes several minutes. In the same time - it runs last available pool version with all available feature flags enabled (however, problem manifested itself on a one year old stable) - it's an old /tmp directory - it used to

ipsec broken again

Hi. As soon as I upgraded one of my ipsec routers to recent stable (10.2-BETA1 #0 r285524) it stopped working as a security gateway. Ipsec traffic is passed out and receiving in, SA are in place, but nothing happens upon receipt (I run gre over ipsec, so gre interface doesn't see any incoming

zpool on a zvol inside zpool

Hi. I'm moving some of my geli installation to a new machine. On an old machine it was running UFS. I use ZFS on a new machine, but I don't have an encrypted main pool (and I don't want to), so I'm kinda considering a way where I will make a zpool on a zvol encrypted by geli. Would it be

Re: kern/165903: mbuf leak

Hi. On 11.04.2013 01:39, Chris Forgeron wrote: I do not experience the error if I load up vmware tools and use the vmx3f0 adapter, it's just with em0. I have set the mbufs to very high numbers (322144) to buy more time between lockups/crashes. Most often the systems stay functional, they

Re: watchdogs

Hi. On 22.02.2013 22:47, Mark Atkinson wrote: I just want to /metoo that I have 32bit/i386 box running zfs, pf and - -current that is hardlocking randomly (usually has an uptime for a few days to a couple weeks). SW_WATCHDOG won't fire when it locks so it must be locking pretty fast. I just

watchdogs

Hi. I have a bunch of FreeBSDs that hangs (and I really want to do something to fight this). May be it's the zfs or may be it's the pf (I also have a bunch of really stable ones, so it's hard to isolate and tell). Since 9.x hang more often I suppose it's pf. I use ichwd.ko and watchdogd to

zfs v28 solaris compatibility

Hi. Is the FreeBSD v28 zfs fully compatible with solaris zfs ? I need to switch disks between servers, these disks are SAN disks, and it's about 20T of data. I don't want to lose them. I am aware that our zfs is compatible with Solaris, but I just want to be sure, like really really sure. Of

Re: GEOM_RAID in GENERIC is harmful

Hi. On 13.09.2012 15:51, Alexander Motin wrote: Problem of on-disk metadata garbage is not limited to GEOM_RAID. For example, I had case where remainders of old UFS file system were found by GEOM_LABEL and ZFS incorrectly attached to it instead of proper GPT partition, making other

Re: VLAN and ARP table

Hi. On 01.09.2012 1:04, Brad Plank wrote: VLAN interfaces no longer show up in arp -an, in FreeBSD 9.x, however, the VLAN appears to be fully functional. Any ideas? They do. arp -an ? (86.109.196.1) at 00:21:1b:d1:14:1b on vlan818 expires in 1192 seconds [vlan] ? (89.250.213.121) at

Re: GEOM_RAID in GENERIC 9.1

Hi. On 17.08.2012 14:44, Gabor Radnai wrote: Sorry the content of original mail I replied to was missed. For clarity here it is: [...] My reply again then: Unfortunately I am a less experienced user so no clue how to disable GEOM_RAID but i am hit by this issue. My zfs setup is totally messed

NMI button

Hi. Guys, I have a IBM system x 3560 server, it hangs, I was told to use the NMI button when it hangs, I found it and pressed, nothing happened. I reset the server, and pressed a NMI button after entering a multiuser. Nothing happened. FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE Now questions: - what should

console in graphic mode

Hi. I'm trying to play with a console in graphic mode and with UTF-8 in it. Nowadays device sc and options SC_PIXEL_MODE are in GENERIC, so I added only the options TEKEN_UTF8 and built/installed the new kernel. Now I'm stuck in a pretty stupid situation: my monitor refuses to work

Re: console in graphic mode

Hi. On 06.08.2012 20:46, nickolas...@gmail.com wrote: You need VESA and X86BIOS support in your kernel (for i386/amd64 archs). options VESA is already included in GENERIC, you need to add options X86BIOS to kernel config file or load modules during boot process (man loader.conf) Didn't help

base kerberos

Hi. I don't see kgetcred binary, but looks like Heimdal version should have it (or it will lack some functionality) plus I see it in the source tree... Do I miss something ? Thanks. Eugene. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

GEOM_RAID in GENERIC 9.1

Hi. I am aware about how this thing works and what it does. However, every time I upgrade new server I got hit by it again and again, simply forgetting to remove it from the kernel's config. I'm afraid this thing will hit lots of FreeBSD installations after the release; it may be easily

Re: GEOM_RAID in GENERIC 9.1

Hi. On 30.07.2012 11:04, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: I am aware about how this thing works and what it does. However, every time I upgrade new server I got hit by it again and again, simply forgetting to remove it from the kernel's config. I'm afraid this thing will hit lots of FreeBSD

Re: zfs, 1 gig of RAM and periodic weekly

Hi. On 27.02.2012 13:40, Peter Maloney wrote: 8.2-RELEASE is highly unstable with ZFS in my opinion. For example, my system with 48 GB of RAM would hang or crash for no apparent reason in random intervals. Upgrading in September fixed most of it, except 1 random hang possibly related to NFS,

Re: zfs, 1 gig of RAM and periodic weekly

Hi. On 28.02.2012 01:02, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: regardless of the pool size ? I was planning on making an atom board a file server for my home, and I have two options: soekris net6501 2GB RAM and intel board powered by the 330 atom (says 2GB limited as well). My plans are to use from 4 up to 8

Re: zfs, 1 gig of RAM and periodic weekly

Hi. On 27.02.2012 20:42, Johannes Totz wrote: You could try to narrow it down to one specific script. My first guess is that 310.locate brings the machine down as it traverses the whole tree. You're absolutely right. Eugene. ___

zfs, 1 gig of RAM and periodic weekly

Hi. I'm haunted by a weird bug. Some of my servers (IBM x3250) hang periodically. And this is always saturday morning. Different servers in different cities, all with zfs and one gig of RAM. And yeah, it's periodic weekly. I can say more - it's repeatable. 25 minutes ago I typed 'periodic

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 09.02.2012 14:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: And please take the reports after discrepancy between ARC size an wired size is large enough, like e.g. 1GB. That's when they are useful. Okay, I wrote a short script capturing sequence of top -b/zfs-stats -a/vmstat -m/vmstat -z in a timestamped

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 09.02.2012 14:35, Andriy Gapon wrote: And please take the reports after discrepancy between ARC size an wired size is large enough, like e.g. 1GB. That's when they are useful. One more thing - this machine is running a debug/ddb kernel, so just in order to save two weeks - when/if it

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: [output snipped] Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there. Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance? I think that examination of vmstat -m and vmstat -z outputs may provide some clues as to what got all that memory

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 08.02.2012 18:15, Alexander Leidinger wrote: I can't remember to have seen any mention of SWAP on ZFS being safe now. So if nobody can provide a reference to a place which tells that the problems with SWAP on ZFS are fixed: 1. do not use SWAP on ZFS 2. see 1. 3. check if you see

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 09.02.2012 02:29, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 08/02/2012 12:31 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following: Hi. On 08.02.2012 02:17, Andriy Gapon wrote: [output snipped] Thank you. I don't see anything suspicious/unusual there. Just case, do you have ZFS dedup enabled by a chance? I think

zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. I have a server with 9.0/amd64 and 4 Gigs of RAM. Today's questions are about the amount of memory in 'wired' state and the ARC size. If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says: ===Cut=== ARC Size: 12.50% 363.14 MiB

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 07.02.2012 16:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 07/02/2012 10:36 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following: If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says: ===Cut=== ARC Size: 12.50% 363.14 MiB Target Size: (Adaptive

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 07.02.2012 17:43, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 07/02/2012 13:34 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following: Hi. On 07.02.2012 16:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 07/02/2012 10:36 Eugene M. Zheganin said the following: If I use the script from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide , it says: ===Cut

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

Hi. On 07.02.2012 21:51, Andriy Gapon wrote: I am not sure that these conclusions are correct. Wired is wired, it's not free. BTW, are you reluctant to share the full zfs-stats -a output? You don't have to place it inline, you can upload it somewhere and provide a link. Well... nothing

VOP_WRITE hex is not exclusive locked but should be

Hi. I have a server with an 8.2-RELEASE/amd64. It's primary use for routing/ipsec+gre tunneling. It's also running zfs. Sometimes it's locking up: it stops to respond to the network, but the console is still alive, though it doesn't log me in - the 'password:' prompt never comes up (I only

a bunch of dumb questions about freebsd installing

Hi. I have an IBM xSeries server, its ip-kvm and different FreeBSD images. The goal is to perform a remote installation of FreeBSD using server ip-kvm and USB devices it emulates. I can perform a non-remote installation in a wariety of ways but this post is about a remote one. 1) Since USB

Re: a bunch of dumb questions about freebsd installing

On 11.05.2011 15:14, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Hi. I have an IBM xSeries server, its ip-kvm and different FreeBSD images. The goal is to perform a remote installation of FreeBSD using server ip-kvm and USB devices it emulates. I can perform a non-remote installation in a wariety of ways

8.1 livelock/hangup: possible actions

Hi. I'm having problems with 8.1-REL/zfs/amd64. It's a IMB x3250 m2 system, 1Gb RAM, dualcore intel e3110, two bge(4) and LSI1064e disk controller. Suddenly it can stop answering to network requests and nothing works except of the keyborad, so I guess the system isn't really dead. No trap

krb5 and clock skew

Hi. Panic on em(4) in vlan environment (after upgrade from 7.2-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE) forced me to use 8.1-STABLE (built 2 days ago) on one of my productions. Almost all is fine now except of two things, which I decided to split in two letters. This one is about my kerberos setup. I have

netgraph and interface nodes

Hi. I'm using 8.1-STABLE on one of my production servers. I wrote about krb5 problem some time ago. Second trouble is netgraph-related. I'm using dot1q on an em(4) card. It's loaded as a module atm (however earlier it was in kernel). I have ng_ether/ng_iface in kernel, if_vlan loaded as a

Re: netgraph and interface nodes

Hi. On 12.11.2010 17:27, Milan Obuch wrote: Slightly related... how about em0.100 type nodes? # ngctl list There are 3 total nodes: Name: em0 Type: ether ID: 0001 Num hooks: 0 Name: em1 Type: ether ID: 0002 Num hooks: 0 Name:

Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE, 4.7-RELEASE vs Asus P2B-DS motherboard

Hello KAKIUCHI, Saturday, October 26, 2002, 4:05:36 PM, you wrote: KM I'm using P2B seriese boards. KM When I enable USB IRQ on BIOS or remove USB device from kernel, KM it's seems good. Thanks a lot. Now it works ! 8)) -- Best regards, Eugene

<    1   2