Re: clocked speed not showing in dev.cpu.[0-7].freq

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 19:22 +0100, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure where to put this. system is amd64/stable/13. It's running > powerd but with no additional flags. > > CPU is Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU. Has 32GB RAM > > The system is clocked in the bios at 4.251 GHz. I never see this

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 16:39 -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system > before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page. > I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0,

Re: Drastic slowdown for geli attach

On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 21:34 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Sometime around the first week of this month (February) the time to > do a > geli attach on my 13.0-ALPHA3 amd64 system sharply increased. It > started > taking about 10 seconds. Prior to this, it took about 3-4 seconds. I > have > not seen

Re: NTP, UTC, and (negative) leap seconds

On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 19:50 -0500, David Magda wrote: > Hello, > > So there was a recent weblog post on a timekeeping observation: > > https://fanf.dreamwidth.org/133823.html > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=251458700 (via) > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second >

Re: make kernel ignore broken SATA disk

On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 16:37 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > I have a server I don't have physical access to right now, which has > a broken SATA disk that produces mostly errors (but not entirely). > > The disk has two partitions that are part of a zpool each. I can't > bring the system up with

Re: ntp problems stratum 2 to 14?

On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 07:49 +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Ian, Good points. I did remove the fudge and 127.127.1.1 lines from the > config with the same result as below. Interestingly the clock at 10.0.7.6 > isn't really unreliable, as its been my time source since 2005, and serves >

Re: ntp problems stratum 2 to 14?

On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 16:37 +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > I usually run ntpd with both aslr and as user ntpd. While testing I > noticed that my server with a direct network cable to my main time keeper, > jumped from the expected stratum 2 to 14 as follows (I record the date so I > can synch

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 12.0 end-of-life

On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 19:01 -0600, Mike Karels wrote: > > From mike Sun Feb 23 17:24:54 2020 > > > Gerard E. Seibert wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:27:40 -0600, Mike Karels stated: > > > In this case (a USB failure), I bisected the problem some

Re: ntpd doesn't like ASLR on stable/12 post-r350672

On Sun, 2019-08-25 at 15:03 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:40:22AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 01:28+0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > > > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2019

Re: Geli prompts on gptzfsboot (Was:: Serious ZFS Bootcode Problem (GPT NON-UEFI -- RESOLVED)

On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 12:35 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 2/10/2019 12:01, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 11:54 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > On 2/10/2019 11:50, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 11:

Re: Fwd: Serious ZFS Bootcode Problem (GPT NON-UEFI)

On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 11:37 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 2/10/2019 09:28, Allan Jude wrote: > > Are you sure it is non-UEFI? As the instructions you followed, > > overwriting da0p1 with gptzfsboot, will make quite a mess if that > > happens to be the EFI system partition, rather than the

Re: Fwd: Serious ZFS Bootcode Problem (GPT NON-UEFI)

On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 11:54 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 2/10/2019 11:50, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 11:37 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > On 2/10/2019 09:28, Allan Jude wrote: > > > > Are you sure it is non-UEFI? As the instructions you follo

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-19:05.kqueue

On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 03:46 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 06.02.2019 3:18, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > 2019, of course. re@ does NOT make mistakes. What you fail to > > > realize is that NIST was using kqueue to check their atomic > > > clock, and > >

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-19:05.kqueue

On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 13:00 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:55 PM Shawn Webb wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:40:30PM +, FreeBSD Errata Notices wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > >

Re: Success updating stable/11 to /12; a couple things to note

On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 08:30 -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 09:13:09AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 05:53 -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > > > > * I found that I actually needed to create the ntpd user on

Re: Success updating stable/11 to /12; a couple things to note

On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 05:53 -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > * I found that I actually needed to create the ntpd user on the >   running system prior to "make installworld" -- having run >   "mergemaster -U" against the target (DESTDIF) was insufficient. The correct update sequence involves

Re: zfsboot@12.0: Shortening read at xxxx from 16 to -479991569

On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 08:59 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018, 6:19 AM Mark Martinec s.si > wrote: > > > > > On one of my hosts (now running 12.0-RELEASE) the zfsboot shows > > this weird negative number, which sounds suspicious: > > > >    Verifying DMI pool Data .

Re: /dev/crypto not being used in 12-STABLE

On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 18:38 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > So while OpenSSL now uses more of its own native C and assembly code > > (e.g. for AES-NI support), and that's certainly faster than all the > > overhead that cryptodev(4) brings with it (see jhb@'s post), I wonder: > >  > > 1. What happens

Re: Boot loader stuck after first stage upgrading 11.2 to 12.0-RC2

On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 21:51 +0200, Toomas Soome via freebsd-stable wrote: > > > > > On 4 Dec 2018, at 19:59, Mark Martinec > i> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-11-29 18:43, Toomas Soome wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I just did push biosdisk updates to stable/12, I wonder if > > > > > you

Re: sudo not available after configuring ipmi serial over lan

the device name as well. -- Ian > El jue., 8 nov. 2018 a las 10:39, Ian Lepore () > escribió: > > > > > On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 06:10 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > > > > 08.11.2018 5:56, Jordan Caraballo wrote: > > > > > >

Re: sudo not available after configuring ipmi serial over lan

On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 06:10 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 08.11.2018 5:56, Jordan Caraballo wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > After configuring ipmi serial over lan console, I am not being able > > to > > execute any command related to sudo; not even "sudo su -". I am > > using ttyu0 > > and

Re: How to boot from GPT partition without "bootme" attribute?

On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 21:37 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >  I have disk with GPT scheme and three partitions: > > p1 - freebsd-boot > p2 - freebsd-ufs > p3 - freebsd-ufs > >  pmbr is installed on this disk, and gptboot is installed on p1. Both > p2 > and p3 contains valid FreeBSD installation,

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 11:58 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:47 AM Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 11:38 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:26 AM Ian Lepore > > > wrote: > &

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 11:38 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:26 AM Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 10:21 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:15 AM Michelle Sullivan > > > wrote

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 10:21 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:15 AM Michelle Sullivan > wrote: > > > > > tech-lists wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm astonished you're considering removing rl given how common it is. > > > > > I'll second that comment - though no disrespect to

Re: Bind to port <1024 in jail

On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 17:02 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am 20.08.2018 um 16:59 schrieb Eugene Grosbein : > > > > > > 20.08.2018 21:47, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > > > > > > > I have a Go program (acme-dns) that wants to bind 53, 80, and > > > 443, and I’d rather have it run as a non-privileged

Re: Bind to port <1024 in jail

On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 16:47 +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > I have a Go program (acme-dns) that wants to bind 53, 80, and 443, > and I’d rather have it run as a non-privileged user.  The program > doesn’t provide a facility to drop privs after binding the ports. I’m > planning to run it in a jail. >

Re: How do I stop using local_unbound ?

On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 15:35 +0100, Pete French wrote: > > > > Hmm.  First, make sure that it isn't running (service local_unbound > > stop, etc). > > Then look at your /etc/resolv.conf -- unbound tends to rewrite that > > on initial > > startup, taking some of it's settings

Re: -STABLE can no longer build -CURRENT kernel, linker missing ifunc

On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 15:55 -0600, Alan Somers wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Kyle Evans > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Alan Somers > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Ian Lepore > > > w

Re: -STABLE can no longer build -CURRENT kernel, linker missing ifunc

On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 14:35 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Hey all, as of a couple of weeks ago, neither 11.2-RELEASE nor a > recent > 11-STABLE can buildkernel from head. > > This has stopped the Coverity Scan runs dead in its track and I > wonder how > anyone would boostrap a move from 11.x to

Re: lint errors in stable/11

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 14:40 +, Rick Miller wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:23 AM Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > > On 10 May 2018, at 12:47, Rick Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 6:35 AM Rick Miller

Re: [Bug 227323] [patch] [spi] sys/modules/spi/mx25l cannot be built outside of kernel build environment

On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 13:09 +, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227323 > > Bug ID: 227323 >    Summary: [patch] [spi] sys/modules/spi/mx25l cannot be > built > outside of kernel build environment >  

Re: KBI unexpexted change in stable/11 ?

On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 16:30 +0100, John wrote: > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, at 15:20, Greg Byshenk wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:11:50PM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > > > > > > On 28/03/2018 14:39, Gregory Byshenk wrote: > > > > > > > > You can do this manually, or by adding a PORTS_MODULES

Re: Stability of 11.1S

On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 10:50 +, Pete French wrote: > > On 20/03/2018 01:05, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > > > > We rebuild 11.1-Stable at least every two weeks.  Our build on the 7th > > Feb is in use on our development boxes, however the rebuild on 22nd > > resulted in frequent crashes and our

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 17:21 +, Pete French wrote: > > On 10/03/2018 23:48, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > I based my fix heavily on that patch from the PR, but I rewrote it > > enough that I might've made any number of mistakes, so it needs fresh > > testing.  The

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 23:42 +, Pete French wrote: > > > > It looks like r330745 applies fine to stable-11 without any changes, > > and there's plenty of value in testing that as well, if you're already > > set up for that world. > > > > Ive been running the patch from the PR in production

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 23:08 +, Pete French wrote: > Ah, thankyou! I haven;t run current before, but as this is such an issue  > for us I;ll setup an Azure machine running it and have it reboot every  > five minutes or so to check it works OK. Unfortunately the error doesnt  > show up

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Sat, 2018-03-03 at 16:19 +, Pete French wrote: > > > > > That won't work for the boot drive. > > > > When no boot drive is detected early enough, the kernel goes to the > > mountroot prompt.  That seems to hold a Giant lock which inhibits > > further progress being made.  Sometimes

Re: [CFT] [X11] graphics/drm-next-kmod now builds, loads and works on FreeBSD-11-stable

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 14:27 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Hans Petter Selasky > wrote: > > > > > Hi FreeBSD desktop users! > > > > During the past week and over the weekend all parts needed for building, > > loading and using graphics/drm-next-kmod on

Re: Clock occasionally jumps backwards on 11.1-RELEASE

On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 17:29 -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Mike Pumford > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 22/01/2018 17:07, Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: FreeBSD on 64MB memory

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 01:40 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 13.02.2018 1:30, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZERES STATETIMEWCPU COMMAND > > > >   911 root1  220  8

Re: FreeBSD on 64MB memory

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 01:04 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 13.02.2018 0:38, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an old Soekris system with 64MB memory that I upgraded from 10.3 > > > > to 11.1 recently. Since then it’s started hanging every few days. > > > Please show

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:52 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > Dear Scott, > > Am 26.01.2018 um 09:07 schrieb Scott Bennett > >: > > cd /usr/src; PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAKE_CMD=make > /usr/obj/usr/src/make.amd64/bmake -m /usr/src/share/mk -f Makefile.inc1

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 12:40 +, tech-lists wrote: > 2. I don't know the difference between svnlite and svn. All I know is > that svnlite is in base and it will be in base for reasons and one of > those reasons will be that it works reliably. I think svn in ports might > be more featureful, but

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 00:25 -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:39 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > > > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett <benn...@sdf.org> wrote: > >

Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?

On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:39 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote: > > > > > > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ? > > > > I wrote: > > > > > >    On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists

Re: Freebsd 10 to 11 sendmail compile issues..

On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 19:22 -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote: >   Hopefully someone can help or give me a pointer to a solution to this  > one.   Running FreeBSD 10.3 and figured I would do a source build and  > jump to FreeBSD 11.1.  For the most part this seemed to be going well,  > but when it goes

Re: [Asterisk-bsd] Asterisk13 coredump on freebsd 11.1

On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 01:17 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi, > > I just upgraded and hit these SEGFAULTs too. First of all you need > to  > install GDB 8.0 from ports to get the right backtrace (important). > This  > leads straight into LibUnwind in libgcc: > > (gdb) bt > #0  

Re: entropy lockup

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 09:20 +1000, Morgan Reed wrote: > In all likelihood the process wasn't "hung" per-se, more likely > random > hadn't been seeded yet and as such you *can't* get 4096b of entropy > out of > it (so the process was attempting to do its job, just nothing on the > device). > > The

Re: Error in /usr/src/release/release.sh

On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 14:34 +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:26:59AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 13:23 +, Glen Barber wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 01:18:14PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > &g

Re: Error in /usr/src/release/release.sh

On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 13:23 +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 01:18:14PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 05:12:02PM +, Bryce Edwards wrote: > > > > > > When trying to build a set of RELENG/11.1 release files, I'm > > > getting the > > > following

Re: Unable to boot 11.0-release on Unisurf Notebook

On Sun, 2017-03-26 at 19:30 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2017-Mar-25 10:19:57 +1100, Peter Jeremy > wrote: > > > > I've just bought a Unisurf Notebook[1] and am trying to boot it > > from a > > FreeBSD-11.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img.  The boot starts OK but > > hangs > >

Re: Booting Raspberry Pi with input on serial console

On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 11:40 +0100, Peter Ankerstål wrote: > Hi! > > I have a problem that should (?) have a simple solution but I havent > found one.  > > I have a raspberry pi with a NMEA-GPS constantly hooked up to the > serial console of the Pi.  > > My problem is that when booting the Pi it

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:13 -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:00 +, tech-lists wrote: > > > > On 12/12/2016 23:40, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > > > > > > > PORTS_MODULES does not work if KERNCONF contains multiple > >

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:00 +, tech-lists wrote: > On 12/12/2016 23:40, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > > PORTS_MODULES does not work if KERNCONF contains multiple kernels: > > > > The problem is obviously in /usr/src/sys/conf/kern.post.mk (line > > 66): > > > > WRKDIRPREFIX?=  

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 20:22 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra rg> > wrote: > > > > > Kevin Oberman skrev: > > > > > > > > > Clearly the documentation is a bit behind the times. For some > > > time people > > > have used

Re: leapsecond file

On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 22:40 -0700, Andreas Ott wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:44:55PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On 11.0-BETA4 I have: > > > grep expires /var/db/ntpd.leap-seconds.list > > #File expires on: 1 Jun 2017 > > > > But I see what you do on 10.3-RELEASE. Looks like the

Re: Call for testing: VM bugs in 10.3

On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 22:25 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Below is the merge of some high-profile virtual memory subsystem bug > fixes from stable/10 to 10.3. I merged fixes for bugs reported by > users, issues which are even theoretically unlikely to occur in real > world loads, are not

Re: FreeBSD 10.3 slow boot on Supermicro X11SSW-F

On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 20:42 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > Before: ca. 660 seconds to reboot, now 77 seconds to reboot. > > > Now, if someone could explain, why... > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2016-June/084865 > > .html > > Any pointer to a commit or three

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:44 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 12:39, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 12:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 11:32, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger < > > > k...@denninger.net> > > >

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 09:50 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Karl Denninger > wrote: > > > Here's the backtrace ... sounds like expected behavior, which is > > not-so > > good all-in for a situation like this. I guess the strategy is to > >

Re: Not-so stable if you take a CAM error....

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 06:30 -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 7/11/2016 02:57, Ronald Klop wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 02:54:38 +0200, Karl Denninger > > wrote: > > > > > Got a (nasty) surprise this afternoon on my sandbox machine. > > > > > > I was updating some

Re: unbound and ntp issuse

On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 12:10 +0100, krad wrote: > whops that should be > > ntpdate_hosts not servers > These suggestions are essentially insane because they're ignoring the basic fact that the freebsd installer creates a non-working system. If unbound requires DNSSEC, and DNSSEC requires good

Re: DISPLAY not set inside jails after update to 10.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-PRERELEASE #4 r297043

On Sat, 2016-03-19 at 13:48 +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > nothing else was changed on the machine except the update. I could > use > > ssh 192.168.12.12 > > to connect to a jail running under that IP address before the update > without problems. > > It works now only with > > ssh -Y

Re: releng/10.3 rc netwait disabled by ipfw dependency

On Sat, 2016-03-12 at 16:46 +1100, John Marshall wrote: > I recently upgraded a server from 10.2-RELEASE to 10.3-RC2. The > server > has ipfw configured and also has netwait enabled in rc.conf. All was > good in 10.2-RELEASE. > > Now, rc pauses during netwait for the full ${netwait_timeout}

Re: [Solved] Problems with ucom/uftdi and sendfax on 10.2 p12 (works like a charm with 7.4)

On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 21:21 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > Dear Ian, > > > On 02.03.2016, at 11:45, Holger Kipp <holger.k...@alogis.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 01.03.2016 um 23:08 schrieb Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org > i...@freebsd.org>>: &

Re: PPS input on a generic GPIO pin on Raspberry Pi.

On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 10:54 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: > On 3/3/2016 12:57, Peter Ankerstål wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have sort of exactly the same question as Erik: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2014-July/2590 > > 55.html > > > > I have bought a

Re: Problems with ucom/uftdi and sendfax on 10.2 p12 (works like a charm with 7.4)

On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 19:58 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > Hi all, > > I currently encounter a problem with sending faxes with new server > and FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE p12 > using mgetty+sendfax and RS232-Modems via USB to RS232-Adapter (com, > uftdi). > > Problem is that _after_ sending the first

Re: Segmentation fault running ntpd

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 17:49 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 4 November 2015, at 08:15, Mark Martinec < > > mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si> wrote: > > > > Upgrading 10.2-RELEASE-p6 to 10.2-RELEASE-p7 now solved ntpd > > crashes > > (apparently fixed by: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-15:20.vm). >

Re: ntpd and router with a *lot* of addresses

On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 01:47 +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Yesterday we'd found/stepped on a bit of trouble: on some of our > FreeBSD-based > routers (hundreds of vlans, etc): > > Oct 20 22:12:46 gwn4 ntpd[86421]: ntpd 4.2.4p5-a (1) > Oct 20 22:12:46 gwn4 ntpd[86422]:

Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?

On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 08:51 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bezüglich Ian Lepore's Nachricht vom 21.08.2015 00:34 (localtime): On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 15:19 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bezglich Ian Lepore's Nachricht vom 12.07.2015 17:41 (localtime): And let's all just hope that a

Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?

On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 15:19 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bezglich Ian Lepore's Nachricht vom 12.07.2015 17:41 (localtime): And let's all just hope that a week or two of testing is enough when jumping a major piece of software forward several years in its independent evolution. … I

Re: 10.2: ntp update breaks DCF77 clock

On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 08:10 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 15/08/2015 16:46, Christian Weisgerber wrote: The ntp code is not very transparent, but I think the root cause are the ntp/config.h changes that came with the 4.2.8p3 update. A number of previously disabled obscure clock drivers

Re: 8-stable crashing recently in ufsdirhash

On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 23:54 -1000, parv wrote: Please CC me as I cannot properly use my laptop, Thinkpad X200 (i386). 8-stable has been crashing a lot since source update of Jul 2015[0]. After building debug kernel, kgdb shows lock reversal order in ufsdirhash. File systems (/, var, misc)

Re: struct timehands: th_generation field

On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 10:59 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, deco33...@yandex.com wrote: Is the maximum value for th_generation equal to 10 ? http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L77 I don't think those relate to generations.

Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?

On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 04:31 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2015-Jul-12 09:41:43 -0600, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote: And let's all just hope that a week or two of testing is enough when jumping a major piece of software forward several years in its independent evolution. Whilst I

Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP?

And let's all just hope that a week or two of testing is enough when jumping a major piece of software forward several years in its independent evolution. The import of 4.2.8p2 several months ago resulted in complete failure of timekeeping on all my arm systems. Just last week I tracked it down

Re: How do I build a brand new /etc?

On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 22:20 -0400, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: So, I built a new 9.3-p14 with these commands: #! /bin/sh set -x export DESTDIR=/ROOT/in_progress/ export MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=$DESTDIR/usr/obj cd $DESTDIR/usr/src make buildworld make buildkernel Then as root I: make

Re: Adaptec 7805H drivers

On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 09:53 +1200, Phil Murray wrote: Hi, I have a few Adaptec 7805H HBA cards which FreeBSD doesn’t support natively. However Adaptec have provided binary drivers for FreeBSD 9.2 (9.3 and 10.x support sadly absent). The problem I have is with the GENERIC kernel the

Re: umcs (4-Port-USB-serial) triggering way too much ehci IRQs

On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 17:38 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bezüglich Hans Petter Selasky's Nachricht vom 17.09.2013 11:24 (localtime): On 09/17/13 11:06, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: ... Shall we switch to non-list-comm? Hi, That's OK. Hmm, in my case, this

Re: umcs (4-Port-USB-serial) triggering way too much ehci IRQs

On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 19:32 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Bezüglich Ian Lepore's Nachricht vom 17.09.2013 18:16 (localtime): On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 17:38 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: ... Try this patch and see what happens:

Re: umcs (4-Port-USB-serial) triggering way too much ehci IRQs

On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 23:08 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Harald. You wrote 17 сентября 2013 г., 21:43:17: HS Is that worth a try? HS http://www.asix.com.tw/FrootAttach/driver/MCS7840_7820_FreeBSD_driver_v1.1.zip Nope. I've started from this driver, and it even doesn't support

Re: gmirror crash writing to disk? Or is it su+j crash?

On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 21:50 +0200, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com w dniu 29 sie 2013, o godz. 23:35: So I have a system running: FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55 EDT 2013

Re: system sporadically hangs on shutdown after switching to WITH_NEW_XORG

On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 09:07 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 06:01:49PM +0200, Michiel Boland wrote: On 06/16/2013 17:55, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: [...] Are you running moused(8)? Actually, I can see quite clearly that you are in your core.txt: Starting ums0

Re: 9.1-stable: ATI IXP600 AHCI: CAM timeout

On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 16:21 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: Steven Hartland wrote: Have you checked your sata cables and psu outputs? Both of these could be the underlying cause of poor signalling. I can't easily check that because it is a cheap rented server in a remote location.

Re: ada(4) and ahci(4) quirk printing

On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 11:59 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: I think this just outlines the problem - bootverbose is too verbose. eg, what the audio code outputs. And yes, net80211 when you're doing 11n. I agree that the sound driver(s) output Too Much Stuff with bootverbose, so much so that it

Re: 9-STABLE buildworld compile error

On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 14:28 +0300, Dmitry Luhtionov wrote: When I put MALLOC_PRODUCTION=yes in /etc/make/conf, make buildworld hangs with error /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/ malloc.c:126:1: error: MALLOC_PRODUCTION redefined command-line: error: this is the location of the previous definition

Re: Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?

On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 09:17 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 28.03.2013 02:43, Adrian Chadd wrote: My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code. It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations

On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 11:35 -0700, Unga wrote: Hi all I have a heavily threaded C application, developed on an Intel Core i5 laptop (2 cores) running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE. When this application compile and run on another Intel Core i7 laptop (4 cores) running FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE, this

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 11:33 -0700, Unga wrote: - Original Message - From: Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org To: Unga unga...@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:06 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory

Re: svn commit: r247485 - in stable/9: crypto/openssh crypto/openssh/openbsd-compat secure/lib/libssh secure/usr.sbin/sshd

On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 17:02 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net writes: The pcaps and basic wireshark output at http://tancsa.com/openssh/ This is 6.1 with aesni vs 6.1 without aesni; what I wanted was 6.1 vs 5.8, both with aesni loaded. Could you also

Re: svn - but smaller?

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 16:04 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:43:33PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick

Re: svn - but smaller?

On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608 bytes) and command[] (32769 bytes). I'm referring to this: Why? I absolutely do not understand why people are always

Re: svn - but smaller?

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 13:24 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:19:57AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 22:31 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Also, John, please consider using malloc(3) instead of heap-allocated buffers like file_buffer[6][] (196608

Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 09:23 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, The base compiler is supposed to compile base and bootstrap whatever else you need to compile other software. It's not supposed to be continuously updated to new, major versions. :-) I bet *office just uses a bunch of either

Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?

for their documents, while the office@ maintainers prefer the easy way of just adding the newer compiler to the requirements. Getting these two distinct groups to meet in one thread was the point of this topic... On 19.02.2013 12:35, Ian Lepore wrote: In any case, why hasn't that port been

Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?

On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 13:54 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: Licensing prevents us from updating gcc in the base. Licensing? Could you elaborate, which aspect of licensing you have in mind? Versions of gcc after the 4.2.1 version we use are licensed under GPLv3. I'm not a lawyer, so I don't

Re: So I whip out a FTDI-based multiport Serial USB Adapter....

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 12:57 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: ... and plug it into FreeBSD 9.1-Stable with the rev ID FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #16 r244942 and it returns ugen4.4: vendor 0x0409 at usbus4 uhub6: vendor 0x0409 product 0x0050, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 4 on usbus4

Re: So I whip out a FTDI-based multiport Serial USB Adapter....

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 14:58 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: On 2/4/2013 2:06 PM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 12:57 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: ... and plug it into FreeBSD 9.1-Stable with the rev ID FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #16 r244942 and it returns ugen4.4: vendor 0x0409

  1   2   >