sources and compile your stuff on
your own and stay far away from ports
--
João Martins (JoaoBR)
Infomatik Development Team
http://wipserver.matik.com.br
+55 11 4249.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Monday 27 October 2008 20:03:21 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I had no idea users were blindly uncommenting examples in
well seems you're new in support business then :)
the issue might be the reason why weapons are not delivered with roles in the
chambers ... so developers probably should take
On Friday 17 October 2008 15:49:54 Xin LI wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
Hi
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this
corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
scrub is not able to repair, when comes to touch this files machines
reboots, deleting
On Friday 17 October 2008 15:39:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote:
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool,
this
corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
Presumably your SATA drives are correctly being reported
On Monday 20 October 2008 11:22:08 you wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:37:40AM -0200, JoaoBR wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008 15:39:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote:
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool
On Monday 20 October 2008 14:44:50 Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, all--
On Oct 20, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[ ...JoaoBR wrote... ]
well, hardware seems to be ok and not older than 6 month, also
happens not
only on one machine ... smartctl do not report any hw failures on
disk
On Monday 20 October 2008 15:03:14 Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Hm... I thought we determined earlier in this thread that the OP is
not
getting the benefits of ZFS checksums because he's not using raidz
(only
a single disk with a single pool)?
Hi
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this
corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
scrub is not able to repair, when comes to touch this files machines reboots,
deleting and restorin also is not possíble, seems I need to delete the files,
On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:13:16 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
Same hardware with SATA works
:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
Same hardware with SATA works perfect
Same hardware with scsi up to 3.5Gigs installed works
On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:57:11 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:51:18 +0200
Fabian Wenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jeremy
On 11.10.08 18:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Could the problem be specific to certain firmware revisions on the
cards?
Some other idea,
On Sunday 12 October 2008 14:10:36 Scott Long wrote:
I am using some LSI (mpt driver) ultra4 (U320 scsi) and LSI SAS
controllers in FreeBSD 7.x amd64 with 20G of ram, and Adaptec (aac
driver) with a 5th generation RAID card with 8G of ram, both have no
such corruption problems. Providing
On Monday 13 October 2008 10:50:54 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:35:10 -0200
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 11 October 2008 07:13:16 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
It's a driver problem. If you want to use SCSI then you'll have to
limit memory to 3.5 GB.
I
:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:29:37 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried MBs as Asus, Abit and Gigabyte all same result
Same hardware with SATA works perfect
Same hardware with scsi up to 3.5Gigs installed works perfect
what calls my attention that all this MBs do not have
I get a problem on several am2 motherboards when an SCSI Adaptor (LSI or
Adaptec) is installed and with 4Gigs of Ram
the problem is easy to repeat, after some minutes compiling world the machine
crashes, sometimes a panic mmap ffs crossrefeerence or something, passes too
fast to look an when
On Friday 10 October 2008 07:43:07 Dieter wrote:
I get a problem on several am2 motherboards when an SCSI Adaptor (LSI
or=20 Adaptec) is installed and with 4Gigs of Ram
the problem is easy to repeat, after some minutes compiling world the
machi= ne=20
crashes, sometimes a panic mmap
I have difficulties transferring data from or to nokia smartphones in mass
storage mode, specially nokia N80 and N95.
The files are coming with missing parts, accessing a photo which s stored ont
the phone is beeing seen cut somewhere in half, mp3 files are transferred but
there are missing
Hi
kern.cp_time seems is reporting wrong values (most time too high) with Phenom
and amd64 (i386 Ido not know)
but with snmpget I get the correct machine values when consulting
ssCpuRawUser.0 ssCpuRawNice.0 ssCpuRawSystem.0 ssCpuRawInterrupt.0
ssCpuRawIdle.0
kern.cp_time on RELENG6 reports
On Sunday 18 May 2008 12:39:11 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
and if necessary /etc/rc.d/zfs should start hostid or at least set REQUIRE
different and warn
...
I've been in the same boat you are, and I was told the same thing. I've
documented the situation on my Wiki, and the necessary
Hi
anybody else experience a problem with this SATA controller?
atapci1: nVidia nForce CK804 SATA300 controller port
0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfe02d000-0xfe02dfff irq 21 at device 7.0 on pci0
atapci1: [ITHREAD]
ata2: ATA channel 0 on atapci1
ata2:
On Sunday 01 June 2008 09:41:09 JoaoBR wrote:
Hi
when you need /usr/compat on your sistem (linuxfs) and you have /usr on zfs
boot fails because mountcritlocal does not find /usr/compat
so I changed the rcorder as you can see in the attached files
also I changed /etc/rc.d/zfs and added /etc
Hi
when you need /usr/compat on your sistem (linuxfs) and you have /usr on zfs
boot fails because mountcritlocal does not find /usr/compat
so I changed the rcorder as you can see in the attached files
also I changed /etc/rc.d/zfs and added /etc/rc.d/zfs_swap in order to make the
actual
after trying to mount my zfs pools in single user mode I got the following
message for each:
May 18 09:09:36 gw kernel: ZFS: WARNING: pool 'cache1' could not be loaded as
it was last accessed by another system (host: gw.bb1.matik.com.br hostid:
0xbefb4a0f). See:
On Sunday 18 May 2008 12:39:11 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:20:33PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Sunday 18 May 2008 11:11:38 Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 09:56:17AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
after trying to mount my zfs pools in single user mode I got
On Sunday 09 March 2008 20:41:51 Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:19:33 -0300
your computer will or better CAN use ipv6 when it is on a ipv6 network
and nothing else, ipv6 WILL NOT come eventually available on your ipv4
network (unless it's
On Monday 03 March 2008 19:07:38 Mark Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
Is it required to have 'options INET6' even if I'm not using any IPv6
connectivity ?
No, not unless you rely on SCTP, which at this time *does* require
INET6. If you
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 07:49:42 Holger Kipp wrote:
Hello,
I updated a system with 12 dc-interfaces to a new hardware
with 14 em-interfaces. Yes, it is a firewall.
New System is 6.2-RELEASE-p8.
What I now experience between two internal networks (100MBit/s each)
is the following:
On Sunday 10 February 2008 11:24:41 Matthieu Bollot wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that the current synaptics driver doesn't work with xorg 1.4,
but with the patch it isn't necessary for virtual scrolling and 3 tap
clic for middle clic.
If somebody else has the problem :
- apply this patch
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 19:48:56 Matthieu Bollot wrote:
Hi,
I've recently installed FreeBSD 6.3, and I've got a problem with
synaptics.
I've installed it, followed the pkg-message :
hw.psm.synaptics_support=1
It works, dmesg gives :
psm0: PS/2 Mouse irq 12 on atkbdc0
psm0:
On Monday 29 October 2007 20:25:18 Jason Slack wrote:
I have an HP Media center PC that has the Viiv 920-D processor with 4GB of
RAM. I hate Windows, but had to sell my MacBook so my Fiance and I could
get into a new apartment together.
you really should read manpage of gmirror deactivate or
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 23:28:42 LI Xin wrote:
We (one of the largest ICP company in China and provides some billions
of free e-mail accounts)
well ... and the server is hosted in Gotham City
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
On Thursday 23 August 2007 14:37:57 Ian Smith wrote:
so now I did because of your question and it seems the power_profile
script has a bug
I tries to set hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest=C1
but I guess it should be dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest
Ah, ok. Updated in HEAD but not STABLE:
On Thursday 23 August 2007 00:17:56 Ian Smith wrote:
Call me curious, but (assuming that you're tuning for performance, not
economy, and so will always run these boxes on AC power, not battery):
a) why you think that line in /etc/rc.d/power_profile is 'funny'?
well, in first place
On Thursday 23 August 2007 14:37:57 Ian Smith wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 23 August 2007 00:17:56 Ian Smith wrote:
Call me curious, but (assuming that you're tuning for performance, not
economy, and so will always run these boxes on AC power, not battery
On Monday 06 August 2007 09:28:35 JoaoBR wrote:
.
I had a chance to test several MBs with the same 6000+, 5000+ and 4600+ cpu
At the end seems that the problem is mb/hardware related since some
combinations hung even with latest BIOS installed and others not.
not sure if somebody still
On Saturday 28 July 2007 07:10:21 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
but I have better news and seems my first idea was right, the MB is it
I found a tech info on the manufactor's support site telling cpu support
up to 4600+ and found a bios for newer cpus including my 5000+
so I upgraded the
On Monday 06 August 2007 12:54:08 Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 8/6/07, JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only to remember the problem only ocurres when loading powerd and seems
the freeze happens when cpu freq is upshifting not down.
Try setting:
hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled=1
in /boot
On Saturday 28 July 2007 04:21:39 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
JoaoBR schrieb:
On Friday 27 July 2007 12:31:55 Nate Lawson wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
Hi
when I enable powerd with default flags (and any other also) the
computer freezes some seconds after powerd is started. It does not
reach
On Saturday 28 July 2007 07:10:21 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
JoaoBR schrieb:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 04:21:39 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
JoaoBR schrieb:
On Friday 27 July 2007 12:31:55 Nate Lawson wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
Hi
when I enable powerd with default flags (and any other also
On Saturday 28 July 2007 08:40:33 Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:33:55AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
my ok msg was too fast, after some time my video starts flickering and
stays so and the PC is freezed up, disabling powerd and works stable
until it freeze cpu
On Saturday 28 July 2007 14:47:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:46:15PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Meanwhile I found a workaround for my system: I had SCHED_ULE configured
in my kernel - switching to SCHED_4BSD gets rid of the freezes. Should
have thought of that
On Saturday 28 July 2007 10:46:15 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
JoaoBR schrieb:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 07:10:21 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
JoaoBR schrieb:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 04:21:39 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
JoaoBR schrieb:
On Friday 27 July 2007 12:31:55 Nate Lawson wrote:
JoaoBR
On Saturday 28 July 2007 10:46:15 Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Good to hear. Unfortunately my Mobo's BIOS is already up-to-date, the
CPU is officially supported and Cool'n'Quiet works dandy in Windows XP
... =/
my ok msg was too fast, after some time my video starts flickering and
stays
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:21:02 Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Jul-28 19:03:54 -0300, JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so using ULE in 7 is ok ? ? ?
Yes.
I thought it is SCHED_SMP on 7 ... isn't it? if not forget my joke, I remember
a msg from Roberson saying the _SMP will substitute _ULE
When I tar -xzvf file.tar.gz -C/d the machine freeze completely and instantly
after extracting the first file. I tried different option no chance. No error
msg nothing. I used then gtar on the same file created with tar -c and it
worked.
It is amd64 with smp kernel. The tarball is 2.4G . I
On Friday 29 June 2007 16:37:34 Tobias Roth wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- snip bind question --
And how exactly is this related to FreeBSD -STABLE?
There is a tradition of answering basic SA questions on our lists,
whether they are directly relevant to the
On Monday 11 June 2007 18:05:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
you
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 17:17:28 Ivan Voras wrote:
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
on a newly built Supermicro with Pentium D 2.8 (Dual core) with SMP
kernel I got zillions of 'runtime went backwards' errors, both on i386
and amd64 kernels.
Upd: on GENERIC/amd64 kernel I
On Friday 25 May 2007 23:36:24 Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 5/25/07, JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... it tells to run script xorg-upgrade but this xorg-upgrade does not
exist either
The UPDATING entry does not tell you to run a script named
xorg-upgrade, it tells you to run the script(1
On Saturday 26 May 2007 09:14:21 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
This is off topic in this mail list.
Why do not you please move the thread to freebsd-x11/freebsd-ports
Most of us are subscribed to this list because they are interested in
FreeBSD-STABLE,
and if we want to read discussions about
On Saturday 26 May 2007 10:22:23 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
On Saturday 26 May 2007 09:14:21 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
This is off topic in this mail list.
Why do not you please move the thread to freebsd-x11/freebsd-ports
Most of us are subscribed to this list because
On Friday 25 May 2007 07:21:24 Oliver Fromme wrote:
First, I don't think atapicam is an exotic driver.
I'm using it for several years (in fact, since it was an
inofficial patch, before it hit the repository). It's
working perfectly fine for me, including with today's
RELENG_6.
Second, if
On Friday 25 May 2007 13:54:04 Oliver Fromme wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
It didn't. All the drivers were in one huge package, the X server. Now
they are in seperate ports. But the xorg or xorgs-drivers meta-ports
should install all of them.
ok, that is what I
On Thursday 24 May 2007 15:15:51 you wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:40:25 -0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ uname -a
FreeBSD asus64.konav201.local 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Tue Apr
17 17:38:20 HST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ dmesg | grep
On Thursday 24 May 2007 12:12:34 Joe Altman wrote:
__FBSDID($FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c,v 1.42.2.5
2007/05/15
16:19:42 thomas Exp $);
I am, and I just wanted to acknowledge your message, unfortunately I
won't be able to further look into it immediately, as I'm about to
On Thursday 24 May 2007 16:10:02 Robert Marella wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:48:04 -0300
Hi
so you are suggesting a rollback? I compiled on may 21st and 23rd
and as Joe Altman confirmed too it's not working anymore on amd64 ...
on i386 it's ok, may be this is a good moment then to
On Thursday 24 May 2007 17:19:00 Andy Fawcett wrote:
ping# uname -a
FreeBSD ping.int.athame.co.uk 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Wed May 23
15:19:22 EEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PING
amd64
(compiled from sources updated immediately before the build started, no
Hi, some knows how to solve this problema or what it is?
acd0: CDRW HL-DT-ST GCE-8527B/1.02 at ata0-master UDMA33
acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00
acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00
cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
cd0: HL-DT-ST CD-RW GCE-8527B
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 13:05:40 you wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
Hi, some knows how to solve this problema or what it is?
acd0: CDRW HL-DT-ST GCE-8527B/1.02 at ata0-master UDMA33
acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00
acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 13:46:55 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:28:50PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 13:05:40 you wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
Hi, some knows how to solve this problema or what it is?
acd0: CDRW HL-DT-ST GCE-8527B/1.02 at ata0-master
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:03:18 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:49:33PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
sure, but as make kernel KERNCONF=blabla after building world
may be that I am running amd64 is the problem?
I only run i386, so I can't confirm/deny. Sorry. :-(
I am now
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 16:26:25 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:06:46AM +0300, Iulian M wrote:
joke
Yep... you have to rebuild everything. Not to fix the error but just
because you don't read other threads on the ML
/joke
On another thread the conclusion was that
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 14:03:18 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:49:33PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
acd0: CDRW HL-DT-ST GCE-8527B/1.02 at ata0-master UDMA33
acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00
acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 17:51:34 Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by this 7.2 xorg
thing
Says it all, really. :-)
you're not laughing at me aren't you?
and kind of lame that portupgrade
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 18:46:41 Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:18:12PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 17:51:34 Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by this 7.2
On Thursday 17 May 2007 15:10:06 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:51:07PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:30 +0100, Chris wrote:
A more user friendly installer so datacentres stop been put off
FreeBSD.
Although work on a new installer is ongoing,
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 18:10:38 Martin Dieringer wrote:
not to mention the energy waste
power off solve this if it is really your issue ... :S
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik
make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER [re]install do install a second port (duplicate)
is this a bug or do I have some problem on this machine?
6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Fri Apr 27 20:46:32 BRT 2007
portsnap update I did today
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 01:24, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Wow. Somehow we've slipped through a one-year timewarp:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 07:47:54AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 07:40, Andrew Reilly wrote:
After the last rebuild on my amd64-x2 box, both the nve ethernet
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 00:05, you wrote:
Console is not intended for everyday use! You should login
to your FreeBSD box with ssh-client of your choise and from
the OS of your choise (preferably from graphic mode).
please stay on topic
the question is not what one should or not
but to
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 04:49, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Apr-03 14:27:00 -0300, JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
simply consider RH graphical boot in 1024x768 has a very professional look
while Freebsd still looks like Gate's MsDos before selling it to IBM
I don't understand why
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/04/07, JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
don't try to be smart with me
nobody said that RH is professional because of it's graphics in console
I said that for example RH looks professional with the graphic boot they
offer
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 05:53, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Well, FreeBSD is mostly a volunteer project, so people work
on it when they have time.
we all know that, we could discuss the general issue deeply which might be
usefull but might be misunderstood by people, anyway I like to answer your
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:18, Freddie Cash wrote:
I don't understand why people who want high resolution consoles don't
run X.
that is very easy to understand, look:
A/ fits much more info on one screen
B/ line wraps do not complicate orientation on screen
both points are very usefull
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 15:02, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 10:27 am, JoaoBR wrote:
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:18, Freddie Cash wrote:
Just a note that the above should read:
On Monday 02 April 2007 05:45 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
As I am not the one who wrote
it seems I can not add pipes with releng6 sources from the last days
ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
or any similar add pipe command does not work (sure I have options DUMMYNET in
kernel)
world and kernel from march 29 works still fine
with new sources I get an mpt error which is not present with sources from
march 28
mpt0: LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 Adapter port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem
0xfd7e-0xfd7f,0xfd7c-0xfd7d irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci1
mpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
mpt0: MPI Version=1.2.14.0
...
(xpt0:mpt0:0:-1:-1): reset
On Sunday 01 April 2007 12:04, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:07 AM 4/1/2007, JoaoBR wrote:
it seems I can not add pipes with releng6 sources from the last days
ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
or any similar add pipe command does not work
(sure
On Sunday 01 April 2007 14:02, Matthew Jacob wrote:
pleasep pooint out what the error is, and are you booting verbose?
On 4/1/07, JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with new sources I get an mpt error which is not present with sources
from march 28
mpt0: LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 Adapter port
On Sunday 01 April 2007 14:49, Matthew Jacob wrote:
this reset bus didn't and do not happen with some day older sources:
(xpt0:mpt0:0:-1:-1): reset bus
Well, don't worry about it. It's always been happening.
no, I do not boot verbose
Thanks. I'll make this message show up under
On Sunday 01 April 2007 15:22, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 11:55 AM 4/1/2007, JoaoBR wrote:
by all respect to Julians work but with ipfw broken and sunday fucked up
...
kind of scaring when seeing I have no time to check, I do it on tuesday
or I need to do the userland ipfw too to add some new
hi
some else has seen this? With more then 2 scsi disks on one channel I get the
error below. The machine seems to work on all disks after then. With one or
two disks the machine boots well.
The error does not appear with FC6 and Tyan support argues a freebsd driver
problem.
some idea what I
hi, somebody knows to interprete this scsi error I get after upgrading amd64
with sources from 26/03/ or is this a hardware problem?
Mar 27 17:48:45 msrv kernel: (da0:ahc0:0:3:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 0 60 1 1f
0 0 20 0
Mar 27 17:48:45 msrv kernel: (da0:ahc0:0:3:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 18:17, you wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
hi, somebody knows to interprete this scsi error I get after upgrading
amd64 with sources from 26/03/ or is this a hardware problem?
You either have a failing disk or a power supply that is underpowered
and/or failing. In short
On Saturday 17 March 2007 03:58, Mark Andrews wrote:
nothing goes to this machine because by default everything is blocked
until
you permit it
You're absolutely correct, however your original post seems to have
taken many of us by surprise, causing some of us (at least me!) to
since some time now it seems ipfw starts first of all, I think that is not
correct
rcorder: file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' is before unknown provision `NETWORKING'
rcorder: requirement `ppp' in file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' has no providers.
/etc/rc.d/ipfw
I changed the order for my needs but it might be a
On Friday 16 March 2007 07:51, Oliver Fromme wrote:
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since some time now it seems ipfw starts first of all, I think that is
not correct
No, it starts after networking is up, which is the correct
behaviour, I think.
it should
rcorder: file `/etc/rc.d
On Friday 16 March 2007 08:52, Oliver Fromme wrote:
rcorder: file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' is before unknown provision
`NETWORKING' rcorder: requirement `ppp' in file `/etc/rc.d/ipfw' has
no providers.
That sounds like you have accidentally deleted the files
On Friday 16 March 2007 10:40, Pertti Kosunen wrote:
JoaoBR wrote:
I don't agree to what you say
what sense does it make to have my forward rules up but natd still not?
what sense does it makes logging while syslog is not up?
What would it forward log when network isn't up?
man
On Friday 16 March 2007 18:50, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 06:00:30PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
man, starting ipfw after network does not mean that the network is not up
Okay, imagine this order:
1) Kernel starts
2) Network driver is loaded
3) Link is brought up
4
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 07:16, Ian Smith wrote:
It's primarily for item #1 that I hadn't mentioned this earlier, as most
readers of -STABLE users are probably looking for a more scalable
solution.
Scaleable? Easy ..
For 2.5 drives, a tack hammer does nicely.
For 3.5 to 5 drives,
On Saturday 17 February 2007 09:36, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Has anyone ever managed to get some USB 2.0 - like speeds out of ehci
anyway? I'm not seeing quite such abysmal performance as Kevin did, but I
don't even need to benchmark to be certain that Windows does *much* better
with the
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 04:57, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Kevin Way wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
But you called it confusing. That's just your personal
perception. It doesn't mean it is confusing to everybody.
If asked what -alias does, would you really reply it removes the
On Monday 12 February 2007 12:26, Oliver Fromme wrote:
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig nic -alias is obviously a wired and confusing behaviour
It might be confusing to you. Personally I think that the
current behaviour isn't that far off.
the question is not you or me, I
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:09, Oliver Fromme wrote:
it is not misleading and it is a perfect term. With alias you add
secondary addresses to an interface. Like secondary is probably the
better word,
No, not at all. As soon as you use the terms primary IP
address and secondary IP
On Monday 12 February 2007 16:27, Brooks Davis wrote:
Setting media options and the like via _aliasesX variables makes no
sense and you don't appear to be doing it so I'm confused by your
question. The ifconfig_iface_aliasX syntax exists to add IPv4 addresses
to an interface. New
On Monday 12 February 2007 22:37, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:18:54 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the problem here is that
ifconfig_nic=inet IP
ifconfig_nic=ether MAC
does not work on one line and does not work on two either, the latter
overrides
On Saturday 10 February 2007 01:54, Ian Smith wrote:
Secondly, pardon my ignorance, but what does 'NS' refer to here? That
string / term occurs nowhere else in ifconfig(8).
nameserver
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service
On Saturday 10 February 2007 17:08, Spil Oss wrote:
Hi Michael,
Well, actually I'm proposing a change to the GENERIC kernel and
make.conf.example to add to the comment that one should add
WITHOUT_IPV6 to the make.conf if you enable NO_INET6.
That sounds to me like something completely
On Friday 09 February 2007 20:29, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 01:49:08PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:06:56PM -0500, Kevin Way wrote:
I recently ran into a bug in the jail startup scripts that caused this
command to be executed:
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
