On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:18:34PM +0200, Thomas Beer wrote:
Dear all,
after upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4-Stable
I get
DEVFS Overflow table with 65538 entries allocated
I already doubled the values in the kernel config via
options NDEVFSINO=2050
options
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 08:36:12AM -0300, Jon F wrote:
--
Kernel build for MYKERNFILE started on Thu May 12 08:13:28 ADT 2005
--
=== MYKERNFILE
mkdir -p /usr/obj/usr/src/sys
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:28:14AM +0100, Chris wrote:
Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4
onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning
on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month.
Have you guys tried this without SMP?
Guys..ULE
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:03:39PM -0700, W C wrote:
Do not build examples and this port will build and install.
It should (and does, for others) build with default options though..
What other ports do you have installed? Perhaps it is detecting one
of them and enabling broken code.
Kris
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:35:50PM -0700, W C wrote:
It was a _real basic_ system when I encountered this failure: [dnetc was
not installed yet] [neither was gmake]
$ pkg_info
dnetc-2.9008.491_1,1 Distributed.net distributed computing project client
gettext-0.14.1 GNU gettext
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:14:51PM -0500, Billy Newsom wrote:
Here's something pretty stupid about either the code in mount, df, or
both. I'm on the verge of a denial of service if this lasts much
longer.
Why do you think so?
When I mount an nfs device more than once, I get this
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 06:55:16PM -0400, Jim Campbell wrote:
I have FreeBSD 4.11-Stable installed. I am having a problem running
portupgrade because of ports/x11/wrapper. The Makefile for wrapper has
a line BROKEN= Incomplete pkg-plist. This is causing portupgrade to
bail out. One
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:03:55AM +0200, None wrote:
hello,
first of i'd like to excuse any of the hardcore unix heads here, bringing
such possibly unimportant topics :-)
to keep it quick - the idea is simple, there is some standard *bsd games
distribution, but those games are hardly
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 07:31:32PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Hello, from the Mk/bsd.port.mk I read:
# CONFIGURE_ARGS
# - Pass these args to configure if ${HAS_CONFIGURE} is set.
# Default: --prefix=${PREFIX} ${CONFIGURE_TARGET} if
#
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:10:35AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and
Why hopefully? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?
i am convinced, but some
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:57:36AM +0200, Jan Pechanec wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Iain Dooley wrote:
Use sysinstall to do a binary upgrade, or carefully follow the
directions in the handbook.
binary upgrade!!! brilliant, i didn't even know it existed. is there a
section
in the
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:19:00PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:10:35AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:19:16AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and
Why hopefully? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?
i am convinced, but some of
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 01:45:47PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Hi!
on a 5.4-prerelease machine (dell 2850 dual cpu, running amd64), I have
this in rc.conf:
fsck_y_enable=YES
background_fsck=NO
Still, I'm not certain that fsck is really run at startup. At least,
running fsck on
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:23:05AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
hi all, i keep seeing comments such as upgrading across major versions is
not recommended for mere mortals. so what the hell are 'mere mortals' such
as myself supposed to do when we want to upgrade across major versions?
Use
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:40:19AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:23:05AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
hi all, i keep seeing comments such as upgrading across major versions
is not recommended for mere mortals. so what the hell are 'mere mortals
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:52:59AM +, Iain Dooley wrote:
you're going to keep using new ports/packages then it's recommended
that you reinstall everything (e.g. with portupgrade) to avoid the
incompatibilities that can arise if you mix and match 4.x and 5.x
packages.
i see, i've just
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:14:07AM +0300, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
I am curently using portsdb -U to make the index. Are these errors
safe to ignore or is it better to update the index some other way?
They're usually safe and caused by your local environment variables,
which cause two ports
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:34:39AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Thu, 2005-Apr-21 22:04:01 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm getting this on a RELENG_5_4 sparc64 system (e4500):
# rm -rf *
/bin/rm: Unknown error: 7283.
Cute. Does it affect anything other than /bin/rm? Is /bin/rm sane
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:53:04AM +0400, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
Hi list
I have 5.4-stable from 18 apr.
netstat -m prints some strange current mbufs number. any suggestions?
See the 5.3 errata and previous discussions here, on freebsd-net and
elsewhere.
Kris
pgp6nmMfkqXvA.pgp
I got the following when running 'umount' on a ufs system on an
up-to-date RELENG_5 sparc64 system (e4500):
panic: trap: memory address not aligned
cpuid = 7
KDB: enter: panic
Dumping 5120 MB (5 chunks)
chunk at 0: 1073741824 bytes |\^H/\^H-\^H
---
#0 doadump () at
I'm getting this on a RELENG_5_4 sparc64 system (e4500):
# rm -rf *
/bin/rm: Unknown error: 7283.
# ktrace rm -rf *
/usr/bin/ktrace: Address already in use.
# ktrace /bin/rm -rf *
/usr/bin/ktrace: Software caused connection abort.
# ktrace -di sh
# /bin/rm -f *
/bin/rm: Network dropped connection
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:34:29PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Apr 20, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hi all,
Before 5.4R is released, I would like to make sure which problems
described in 5.3R errata[*] are solved and which are not.
If you had a problem on 5.3R and you make
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:48:37PM -0700, Rob wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that 'random.ko' module is required by ssh,
especially when running the server sshd. However, the
sshd script in /etc/rc.d does not verify the pressence
of the random.ko module and neither loads it if
necessary. Shouldn't
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:04:28PM -0700, Mike Harding wrote:
On 5.4-RC3, a Dell 2650 with two processors, and hyperthreading turned
off, a 'make -j4 buildword' never shows idle % less than 33.3, either
in top or systat. Anybody else see this, or know why it happens?
Your disks are too slow
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:34:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should be more clear - the idle % never goes below 33.3%, spends
most of its time at 33.3%, and the disks are not even remotely
saturated. They are 15K SCSI drives and the above is true even when
there is no apparent disk
CC'ing to jeffr
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 07:21:29AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
My son's computer deadlocked last night. show lockedvnods in DDB showed:
Locked vnodes
0xc1669840: tag ufs, type VDIR, usecount 8, writecount 0, refcount 2, flags
(VV_ROOT|VV_OBJBUF), lock type ufs: EXCL (count
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:36:14PM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
On 4/16/05, Anders Nordby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:27:11PM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
I'm using a Pentium Xeon 3.2G * 2 running 5.3/5.4 amd54 RELEASE.
That's a strange combination. Don't use
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:14:18PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have something real strange about netst -m in RELENG_5:
caipi# uname -a
FreeBSD caipi 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #11: Tue Apr 5 13:18:21 CEST
2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APP
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:21:33PM +0800, N ;-) wrote:
hi all:
I just installed FreeBSD 5.3R on Dell PE 2850,and cvsuped the
src,build my own SMP kernel(HTT on), then builded the
kernel(SCHED_ULE),got this 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0 system.
ULE is known to still have bugs, so
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:11:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During sysinstall answered no to the server and client nfs questions
and after installed completed and system rebooted I see task
nfsiod1,2,3,4 running in output of ps ax command. This was not the
case in any of the 4.x
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:29:48PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:11:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During sysinstall answered no to the server and client nfs questions
and after installed completed and system rebooted I see task
nfsiod1,2,3,4 running in output
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:06:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plan and simple. It's a security hole.
OK, you've changed your mind; last time you were claiming it was a
waste of resources.
If no nfs is selected in
sysinstall then there should not be any nfs stuff started at all.
It's in
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:35:11AM +0200, Oleg Tarasov wrote:
Hello,
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does enabling WITNESS support (and possibly excluding
WITNESS_SKIPSPIN) produce any diagnostics?
Kris
I can enable WITNESS, but I don't know where to find that useful
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 03:44:53PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
# On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:39:50AM +0200, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
#
# The trace doesn't look too wierd, otherwise. There was a warning about
# having libm.so.2
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:02:16PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Huh? I thought by default it is HIGH, but it would also explain the
experiences in the thread cpufreq related RELENG_5 regression
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:51:43PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I'm not under the impression that my CPU is running at a lower
frequency.
OK, but did you try the workaround?
I have now and it doesn't make any difference.
OK, must be a different problem
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:39:50AM +0200, Shaun Jurrens wrote:
The trace doesn't look too wierd, otherwise. There was a warning about
having libm.so.2 and libm.so.3 causing a potential conflict during
compile... It seems to find the correct lib, but later also opens libm.so.2
That's a
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:33:49AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Since I upgraded from 5.3-stable to 5.4-prerelease, I've noticed that my
computer is hanging badly under load. I've a P4 2.53 GHz without
hyperthreading (no SMP). I use the same kernel configurations
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 07:00:35AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
You both forgot to mention which scheduler ;-)
Uhm, how should I know?
Check your kernel config.
The default thingy, I haven't changed
anything.
SCHED_4BSD, then.
Kris
pgpxzgu1YCV8G.pgp
Description
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:22:30AM -0500, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Check your kernel config.
SCHED_4BSD, then.
options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler
yes.
mkb.
I have this option too. Do I have
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:32:27PM -0800, Dave Knight wrote:
That document also says:
As is detailed in the operational information below, snapshots are
definitely alpha-test code and are NOT yet ready for production use.
Is this the current opinion of snapshots ?
Not really, you just have
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
Got this panic with auto-reboot (no dump :( ), saved from dmesg on
5.4pre 2003-05-29 09:49 UTC
processor eflags = IOPL = 0
current process = 29 (swi1: net)
trap number = 3
panic: breakpoint
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:17:50AM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
Hi,
I've stumbled over some new LORs (all continuable) on 5.4pre from
2005-03-29 09:49 UTC, thus before the bpf/DHCP fix.
lock order reversal
1st 0xc0642b60 Giant (Giant) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:256
2nd 0xc14d7264
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:17:08PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:51:04AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
Got this panic with auto-reboot (no dump :( ), saved from dmesg on
5.4pre 2003-05-29 09:49 UTC
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:09:19PM +0200, Oleg Tarasov wrote:
Hello,
This problem had unusual solution. It seems the key to this problem is
that FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE-p5 (I have updated my system) has DEADLOCKS
when intensively using sio device on high speed (115200) with SMP support.
It seems
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:07:05PM -0500, Derek VerLee wrote:
Hi, i have become fascinated with getting sched_ule to run reliably, and
I've been running tests with about 8 different configurations. I've
listed some of them and the results at my website, at
quad-cpu amd64 package machine running RELENG_5 with ULE and
PREEMPTION, panicked with:
Mar 17 19:51:58 fbsd-amd64 kernel: pid 8261 (try), uid 0: exited on
signal 10 (core dumped)
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 2; apic id = 02
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:00:47PM +0100, Lolownia wrote:
A Panic happend to me on shutdown. It seem's to be a `this shouldn't happen'
scenario in subr_turnstile.c:propagate_priority(...) :
AFAIK, this is usually a secondary panic and the real panic occurred
in some other thread. If you
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:31:40AM +0100, Emmanuel OTTON wrote:
The panic message is:
fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid: 00; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:02:22PM -0500, Brian Wolman wrote:
Just wanted to find out if there are any issues when jumping from the
4.11 to the 5.3. Like way out of the ordinary type problems, this jump
for me is going to be very difficult as it is and I want to make sure I
don't get a
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:58:02AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 15:21 +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Dear colleagues,
dumping the snapshot of 140G ufs2 fyle system under contemporary RELENG_5 I
found that during mksnap_ffs file system is unresponsible even for
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:10:09PM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:38:29PM +0100, cyb wrote:
Could the freezes come from a faulty IDE hdd (which would mean that I
better get rid of it), or are there other possiblities.
How much RAM do you have? I also
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 04:05:39PM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:12:44PM +, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It is necessary to increase KSTACK_PAGES (e.g. to 4) on machines with
certain patterns of heavy disk write load to avoid double faults in
the softupdates code
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:29:04PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:52:00PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
hehe.. talked to early.. just had another crash.. and as usual
it didn't dump, and it didn't enter ddb.. it just reset!
OK, now
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:13:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
I have tried enabling PREEMPTION on 5.3-RELEASE-p5 whilst it ran OK
for a few hours, it crashed overnight whilst doing a make index in
/usr/ports. I've tried repeating make index and it worked. I have
a coredump of the crash and
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:24:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 19:28:29 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I don't think there are known problems with use of PREEMPTION on
RELENG_5.
Thanks for that. How about RELENG_5_3? Do I need to move to
-STABLE (and traditionally
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:54:55AM +0200, Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote:
Is nice broken?
FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Feb 26 14:17:21 EET 2005
# nice -n 5 date
nice: Badly formed number.
nice -n 5 date
nice: Badly formed number.
which nice
nice: shell built-in command.
/usr/bin/nice -n 5
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 02:23:15PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Sat, 2005-Feb-26 11:24:26 +, Robert Watson wrote:
I don't have too much insight into the syncer (I've CC'd phk to victimize
him with more e-mail as this is an area he takes great interested in). A
couple of questions:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:09:43AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Right away ... first thing!
--
Installing everything
--
cd /usr/src; make -f Makefile.inc1 install
I got this on a 12-processor e4500 running RELENG_5:
panic: Assertion td-td_sleepqueue != NULL failed at
/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:258
cpuid = 0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 1 tid 13 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x38: ta %xcc, 1
db wh
Tracing pid 1 tid 13 td
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:54:05PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I got this on a 12-processor e4500 running RELENG_5:
panic: Assertion td-td_sleepqueue != NULL failed at
/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:258
cpuid = 0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 1 tid 13 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:55:15PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:54:05PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I got this on a 12-processor e4500 running RELENG_5:
panic: Assertion td-td_sleepqueue != NULL failed at
/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:258
cpuid = 0
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:52:00PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
hehe.. talked to early.. just had another crash.. and as usual
it didn't dump, and it didn't enter ddb.. it just reset!
OK, now that we've established that it's not actually panicking, the
overwhelmingly most likely cause of
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:47:12PM +0200, Dani Popa wrote:
but on top :
CPU states: 25.3% user, 0.0% nice, 56.4% system, 46.3% interrupt, 0.0% idle
my question is: why 46.3% interrupt , i don't see with vmstat -i any device
use interrupt so many
top is quite poor at measuring CPU
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:34:42AM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
another crash.. and in /var/log/messages I see:
Feb 17 12:20:50 jupiter savecore: no dumps found
Any hints, please?
If you watch
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
another crash.. and in /var/log/messages I see:
Feb 17 12:20:50 jupiter savecore: no dumps found
Any hints, please?
If you watch it panic (or trigger one; break to ddb and use call
doadump), does it dump?
Kris
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:39:40PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
another crash.. and in /var/log/messages I see:
Feb 17 12:20:50 jupiter savecore: no dumps found
Any hints, please?
If you watch
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:12:57PM -0500, Julio Capote wrote:
I've been on RELENG_5 for about 1 week now running ULE with PREEMPT.
Recently, I noticed some strange behavior that could be related to
scheduling; usually I leave my computer on all night (doing nothing as I
sleep), But when I'd
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 12:36:21AM +, Dick Davies wrote:
Is there a fix for the firefox advisory that portaudit keeps popping up?
=== firefox-1.0_7,1 has known vulnerabilities:
= web browsers -- window injection vulnerabilities.
Reference:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:11:31PM +, John wrote:
Another data point - I see this in my nightly security logs:
swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: ad0s1f, blkno: 28190, size: 4096
maybe there's a bad block on the swap partition??
That's what this usually means, yes.
Kris
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:28:33PM +, Alex Burke wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering whether it is posibl to build say a 4.11 kernel
on a 5.3 system - I'd like to have only one machine here on which I
maintain all the sources and buidl what i need, then I think you can
mount the /usr/obj
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:30:42AM +, John wrote:
Hello list
Is there a way of seeing *what* program/process is eating swap. There are
loads of ways of seeing that it is being eaten, but so far haven't found a way
of knowing what eats, so can't fix the problem. Can anyone enlighten me?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:27:16AM +0100, Jack Raats wrote:
Yesterday I've install FreeBSD 5.3 on a machine. After compiling the kernel
with device my, I can connect through the network with that machine.
Everything works fine, but when I try to update the source tree or ftp-ing
to a local
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:59:45PM +0100, Mipam wrote:
Hi,
Has vfs without giant already been imported in releng_5?
No, the bugs are still being worked out in -current.
Kris
pgpgBTYVtAS8K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:31:25PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Can this be true? Are they really looking to kill the FreeBSD demon?
No. See replies elsethread.
Kris
pgpkSkhcv9dQP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:23:16AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I
didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and
I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?).
But when I put a # before
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in the USB
mass storage
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:45:17 +0200 (EET)
Viktor Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8, 2005 14:33, Michael Nottebrock :
On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote:
I saw several changes to sched_ule.c
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:03:25AM +, Darryl Woodford wrote:
In reply to a post I found online re: not being able to run java from
command line, I found removing the /usr/bin links and recreating them
solved my problem...
vladdy:/usr/bin# rm javac
vladdy:/usr/bin# ln -s
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:08:30AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
I'm getting this reproducible panic with a 5-STABLE system based on
sources from yesterday. The machine in question is an i386 SMP box.
The panic is reproducible by running an updated version of the
security/scanssh port
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:17:34AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:10:47PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:08:30AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote:
I'm getting this reproducible panic with a 5-STABLE system based on
sources from yesterday
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:00:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
FreeBSD Tinderbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TB --- 2005-02-06 15:45:26 - tinderbox 2.3 running on dwp.des.no
Ack! This was a test run, I didn't intend for mail to go out but
forgot to change the rc file.
It's okay,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
Chris wrote:
Have tested on 3 boxes.
yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't
believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible.
Finally, I found the
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:30:43AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
Chris wrote:
Have tested on 3 boxes.
yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:40:48PM -0200, T?rgan Flores de Siqueira wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +, Chris wrote:
4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
libs version jump, why
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +, Chris wrote:
4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
libs version jump, why wasnt this done in 5.0 so 3rd party apps could
adjust, now we have a
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:00:54PM +, Alex Burke wrote:
Hi,
I have some further information that might be of some use, and also
points me to a cause of this bug.
This indeed looks like the bug which is fixed by the patch in the
erratum you mentioned.
Kris
pgpFDsvAD8Le6.pgp
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:16:48PM +0100, Juergen Dankoweit wrote:
In a german documenation I have read that the -j-switch should not be
used because I makes trouble especially on SMP-systems.
This is incorrect.
Kris
pgp1E7A9hT37x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:53:12AM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
I have a similar system to yours, but a dual processor. One thing I see is
that as the days have gone by since the original 5.3-Release, the SMP code
has had some code changes that have alternately caused crashes or
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 05:31:21AM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
I do want scripts to use a portable mechanism to invoke Perl regardless of
where the binary happens to be found, but if people are determined to do
otherwise, well, that's up to them. One solution for those people might be
to
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 02:47:08PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In other words, it's an impossible dream to hope that all scripts will
conform to this or any of the other possible choices (remember the
perl motto). Even making everything perl
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:42:11AM +, Chris wrote:
Well it started out with me getting a complaint from a user on my
server saying he couldnt compile psybnc since I upgraded to 5.3 I told
him I would investigate when I get time, I then found out later that
ezbounce also failed (i use
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 12:17:37AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:42:11AM +, Chris wrote:
Well it started out with me getting a complaint from a user on my
server saying he couldnt compile psybnc since I upgraded to 5.3 I told
him I would investigate when I get
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:03:28PM +, Chris wrote:
there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I
wonder how much testing went into the new gcc compiler or was it just
bundled into the release, considering this is the reccommended release
for production server's now
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:48:01AM -0800, Rob wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be a bug with the gcc version of 5.3
STABLE (gcc 3.4.2), when using:
#define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
#define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC
What are those? FreeBSD doesn't use GLIBC, so how do you know it's a
FreeBSD bug?
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:44:59PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Paul Mather said:
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 19:17 +, Chris wrote:
what does -fno-strict-alias do? I cannot find it in man gcc
It is a truncation of -fno-strict-aliasing. The flag does not appear
to be described in the gcc
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:10:53PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Hello, this is what I got after running buildkernel on 5.3-RELEASE with
GENERIC on an MSI FIS2R (VIA K8T800-based board), AMD64 2800+, 1.5GB RAM
(transcribed as I didn't have the opportunity to set up crashdumps; does
it work in
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:36:30AM +0100, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
When everything is working normally, the CPU is at:
15% system30% user65% idle
At the first screen update after a stall, the CPU is at:
15% system85% user 0% idle
Also, the VM statistics such as zfod and
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:30:19PM +, Chris wrote:
I have been compiling ports using -O2 since I started using FreeBSD
back in 2003 and only port that has had issues with this is lang/ezm3
in FreeBSD 5.2.1 it needed -O.
Do yourself a favour and use -O2 -fno-strict-alias instead, because
1001 - 1100 of 1403 matches
Mail list logo
