Quoting Chris H chr...@1command.com:
Greetings,
I'm unable to get xorg-7.4 to accomodate my Gforce4 MX 440.
On 7.1-7.2 releases. I'm currently working (struggling) with
it on a 7.1 install/GENERIC with cvsup over the weekend (Sunday),
I've seen only a few discussions regarding this, but no joy
#8 0xc076cf64 in devfs_fp_check (fp=0xc78fadf4, devp=0xee156b0c,
dswp=0xee156b08) at /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:89
89 *dswp = devvn_refthread(fp-f_vnode, devp);
(kgdb) p *(struct file *)0xc78fadf4
$1 = {f_list = {le_next = 0xc78ab5f0, le_prev = 0xc789e5f0}, f_type = 1,
Kostik,
Looking good after applying your patch and rebuilding the kernel. I've
been exercising the machine for a couple of hours under the same load
which crashed it in short order yesterday.
I will report back if any problems appear.
Thank you for your help!
Regards,
-Chris
last pid
if (*devp != NULL) {
211 cdp = (*devp)-si_priv;
212 if ((cdp-cdp_flags CDP_SCHED_DTR) == 0) {
213 csw = (*devp)-si_devsw;
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Chris Timmons wrote:
Yesterday I updated a rock-solid machine (uptime hundreds of days
Yesterday I updated a rock-solid machine (uptime hundreds of days) from
7-stable circa July, 2008, to the latest stable. I run Nessus on this
machine, with about 60 concurrent scans. It pushes the load average up as
high as 20 for short periods of time, but overall is reasonably efficient.
Can you get a stack trace? Your panic is quite different then the original
one.
Let me know if there is any other information which would be helpful. I
rebooted the 7.0 kernel from July, and the machine has been happily
chugging along running Nessus under load for almost 6 hours.
Hello Miroslav, and thank you for your reply...
Quoting Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz:
Chris H wrote:
Hello, and thank you for your reply...
Quoting Holger Kipp h...@alogis.com:
[...]
Can you check if you have any fdisk metadata on either of your disks?
Especially as da0, da1, da2
of this, and it's
on a fresh reboot. I'm afraid I don't know how to proceed. Is it
a problem with gstripe(8)? I /really/ need to stripe these drives
so as to upgrade the system.
Thank you for all your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Chris H
Hello, and thank you for your reply...
Quoting Holger Kipp h...@alogis.com:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:48:00AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I'm attempting to upgrade one of our servers to 6.4 (from 6.2)
Before doing so I need to stripe 3 identical drives on the
same SCSI port into one
Quoting Chris H chr...@1command.com:
Hello Gavin, and thank you for your reply...
Quoting Gavin Atkinson ga...@freebsd.org:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 02:48 -0700, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I have several Tyan S2518UGN (Thunder LE-T) server boards that I've
been running for a few yrs. I've
to this list, and it involves problems installing
7 - or any other release on an ATA device.
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
.
--Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hello Gavin, and thank you for your reply...
Quoting Gavin Atkinson ga...@freebsd.org:
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 02:48 -0700, Chris H wrote:
Greetings,
I have several Tyan S2518UGN (Thunder LE-T) server boards that I've
been running for a few yrs. I've always used the SCSI on them, so never
the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.
...
I was able to install /usr/ports/x11/xcb with no issue. But have
no idea where to find x11-xcb. Where can I get it?
thank you for all your time and consideration in this matter.
--Chris
:
max open files (3578) is smaller than max sockets (4096)
Running named with all of the same files /prior/ to the new
kernel/world did not produce this message. Any thoughts?
Thank you for all your time and consideration in this matter.
--Chris
uname:
FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE Thu Mar 26 i386
2009/2/25 Paul B. Mahol one...@gmail.com:
On 2/24/09, SDH Support ad...@stardothosting.com wrote:
I tried using my ath based D-Link DWL G650, which still seems to have
some issues in regard to interrupt handling:
I've been able to get /most/ wireless cards working with ndiswrapper.
*BSD
2009/2/25 Christian Walther cptsa...@gmail.com:
2009/2/24 SDH Support ad...@stardothosting.com:
I tried using my ath based D-Link DWL G650, which still seems to have
some issues in regard to interrupt handling:
I've been able to get /most/ wireless cards working with ndiswrapper.
This is
Quoting Łukasz Bromirski luk...@bromirski.net:
On 2009-01-30 03:18, Chris H wrote:
Please see: https://bsdforge.net/cisco-data/ for a list of manuals I
have available for download on these (and similar).
What's the sense of downloading it from Your site, if cisco.com
contains the files
Hello Bruce, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Bruce M. Simpson b...@freebsd.org:
Chris H wrote:
...
I know Peter Grehan was looking at getting FreeBSD onto the Cisco
827 a while back.
That's good news. I'll have to see if I can get more info on that.
I just purchased a lot of cisco
Hello Patrick, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Patrick Mahan ma...@mahan.org:
Chris H presented these words - circa 1/30/09 7:03 AM-
Hello Bruce, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Bruce M. Simpson b...@freebsd.org:
Chris H wrote:
...
I know Peter Grehan was looking
. But the only similarity is that it
is network related. Anyway, this seems quite feasable as far as I can
tell. So I thought I'd ask in hopes someone might enlighten me further.
Maybe someones already tried it?
Thank you for all your time and consideration in this matter.
--Chris
to accomodate BIND, or unbound. Although tinydns
might be able to fit the bill. Oh well, it's close - thanks
for the pointer. :)
--Chris
Quoting Lawrence Farr freebsd-sta...@epcdirect.co.uk:
Have a look at pfsense, don't think it's what you want tho.
-Original Message-
From: owner
as a framework to build
a FreeBSD based equivalent (or better) version of OpenWRT. I think I'll
fly a page now to announce the project - look for it in a ports
section near you. ;)
Thank you again for the reply.
--Chris
Quoting Michael Grant mg-fb...@grant.org:
Check out OpenWRT
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Michael Grant mg-fb...@grant.org:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Chris H chr...@1command.com wrote:
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
While it's not /exactly/ what I was looking for - it's close. :)
The filtering capability is my biggest
+.
You can also check out http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php?cPath=60_84products_id=492
for a nice PIX-sized chasis for pfsense if you need a small box.
On Jan 29, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Chris H wrote:
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Michael Grant mg-fb...@grant.org:
On Thu, Jan
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Chris Peterson ch...@lameness.info:
Pfsense sounds like exactly what you're looking for. It's a stripped
down freeBSD
Don't get me wrong, I think pfSense goes a long way to my intended
goal - not the least of which, is pfDNS. I haven't written
fix that.
Doesn't provide swap space - this seems like this could be
a real liability under heavy load/outside abuse, even with
a decent amount of RAM/Memory.
Thanks again for the reply.
--Chris
On 1/29/09, Chris H chr...@1command.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm RP for a fairly large chunk of IP
get more info on that.
I just purchased a lot of cisco *DSL/routers on ebay, in an effort
to push this project forward (I can experiment on these with less concern).
So my list of HW now includes:
* 3 - 802's
* 2 - 1604's
* 1 - 1721
* 2 - 837's
Thank you again for your input.
--Chris
2008/12/17 test1...@cogeco.ca:
This is a test message from Cogeco Cable. No reply is necessary.
What's wrong with http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-test ?
--
R $h ! $- ! $+ $@ $2 @ $1 .UUCP. (sendmail.cf)
___
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Chris St Denis wrote:
Hi,
[ jail patches ]
Serious question here (not trolling).
These patches have been around for years, why have they never been
committed to trunk/stable?
Well, the multi-ipv4 patch has been for a while - what we are talking
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi, there's a patch by Bjoern A.Zeeb, available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/bz_jail7-20080920-01-at150161.diff
which succeeds and works well with 7.1-PRERELEASE currently.
I had similar issues to solve and patched several hosts
with it, so far with success.
Bjoern
Hello,
I've got a handful of i386 boxes, and a handful of amd64 boxes running
a 32-bit application, the reasons for this exact configuration mystify
me as well as the deployment predates my time in the environment. Now
that the dataset the application is loading is rapidly approaching
Thanks Joe, that did it.
Out of curiosity, I don't see any of the compat tree in /boot/defaults/
loader.conf, is there any place this is documented besides kernel
sources? If not then I guess I should give something back to the
community and change that :)
Regards,
Chris Peterson
On Oct
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:00:48 +0200
From: Eirik Wix?e Svela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook?
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I have an Apple MacBook with an Intel Core 2 Duo
port 0x3000-0x301f mem
0xe0427000-0xe04270ff irq 18
at device 31.3 on pci0
ichsmb0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
ichsmb0: [ITHREAD]
smbus0: System Management Bus on ichsmb0
Error:
attack:~ root# smbmsg -p
smbmsg: Cannot open /dev/smb0: No such file or directory
Hope this helps,
Chris Ruiz
On Sep 12, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:19:55PM -0500, Chris Ruiz wrote:
I have an ICH9 system and get the following:
First, my kernel:
FreeBSD attack.young-alumni.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE
#0: Sat Sep 6 08:33:04 CDT 2008 root
they are trying to tell
me. :)
Thanks again for responding.
--Chris
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Congratulations! Thanks for sharing, I'm guessing that you've
probably prevented a few ppl from tripping on this by posting this.
Me; I'm still waiting for:
make zfs ad0s1, ad1s1, ad2s1 install. :-)
Best wishes.
--Chris
Quoting Bartosz Stec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello there!
Here's my story
=yes
WITH_ARCHIVE=yes
WITH_CSV=yes
.endif
NOTE the YES | NO, as opposed to TRUE | FALSE. I changed them to true v false.
But I have already built MySQL with the YES | NO. Could this be the issue?
Source(s) cvsupped 08-09-01
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
/false are used to evaluate conditionals. It is
/quite/ necessary for me to resolve /why/ this keeps happening. As nothing
(many||most) things will not work as intended - if at all until the problem
is found fixed.
Thank you for taking the time to respond.
--Chris
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL
the culprit(s).
This
issue is not new to me - see thread:[: -le: argument expected for details.
You haven't mentioned where this thread exists - definitely not here.
Ahem...
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:18:14AM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
I wanted to sync up my
/local/include/php5/*,
/usr/local/lib/php5/*. by way of the ports system. But I *clearly*
didn't set things correctly.
*Any* help/advice would be *GREATLY* appreciated.
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
/etc/php5/php-ini-*, /usr/local/include/php5/*,
/usr/local/lib/php5/*. by way of the ports system. But I *clearly*
didn't set things correctly.
*Any* help/advice would be *GREATLY* appreciated.
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
Quoting Chris St Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed/configured, and
in use copy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Chris St Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Given that the folks at PHP have decided that no one is allowed
to use PHP4 any longer. I've decided to *attempt* to install a copy
of PHP5 (cgi only) along side my already installed
$LOCALBASE.
I'll have a close look at $LOCALBASE. That sounds like a good
candidate. With any luck, it'll also cover extensions, ini(s), and
related libs. :)
Thank you for taking the time to respond.
--Chris
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd
${LOCALBASE} you change it for
*all* subsequently installed port. Chris' suggestion to use make
install PREFIX=/usr/local/php5 is the correct one for changing the
location of a single port.
Hello, and thank you very much for your reply.
Yes. After looking closely at the variable, I discovered
be aware that if you change ${LOCALBASE} you change it for
*all* subsequently installed port. Chris' suggestion to use make
install PREFIX=/usr/local/php5 is the correct one for changing the
location of a single port.
Hello, and thank you very much for your reply.
Yes. After looking closely
thing. I'm going to end it here, and
get on with it.
Thank you again for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
obvious, my opinions are my own
and not those of my employer.
**
WARNING: Check the headers before replying
been
suggested here by Paul, Chris, and all. ;)
since it
does its thing whether you use make install or portupgrade or
portmaster or portsuperwhatsit. A line like
php5*: PREFIX=/usr/local/php5
should take care of all php5 base/extension ports, wherever in the
tree they end up. Of course, you're
getting. You need
the revision number of the card, and then find out which chipset it
is. Make sure the drivers you downloaded are for that exact revision.
Hope you have more luck than I did, I tossed mine and bought a Ralink.
Chris
AMD64 Arch ironically it worked beautifully for ages
have more luck than I did, I tossed mine and bought a Ralink.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on and the other data LED is blinking.
--
Martin
I may have misunderstood the purpose of this, but do you have the bpf
compiled into your kernel? If you're having DHCP troubles, this could
be a problem.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
2008/8/4 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:00:16AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:55:53 +0200
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to be sure: also if the first command you try on the interface
2008/7/14 Sorin Pânca [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm sorry for my late response, I was on vacation.
I think this was the case (although I thought we have only amd64 machines).
Is there a way to recover from this situation by ssh access only?
Thank you!
Sorin.
Chris Rees wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Jun
:)
This is a clean install; it works perfectly with the restriction
jumper on, now it comes off.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02/07/2008, Chris Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:55:07 +0200
Daniel Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Can the OP get some non-Samsung disks for testing?
I've got a 750 GB Western Digital that I've been planning to use
installing it, anything I should do to make this error more obvious?
My hard drive is a WDC WD2000JS-00SGB0;
http://www.wdc.com/en/library/sata/2879-001146.pdf
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
, like SSE, that would also create problems if you have optimised
your ports.
Chris
I thought devel/linuxthreads was using some old library so I tried to
rebuild it:
# cd ../../devel/linuxthreads make install clean # portupgrade -f
wouldn't do anything
=== linuxthreads-2.2.3_23 is only
we need to get Theo in to finish it off!
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by
the 6.2 EoL; the expiry date has been advertised since the 6.2
release itself.
It has changed
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by
the 6.2 EoL; the expiry date has been advertised
considered.
Regards,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mean they think the whole project is trash. Excluding
the fact that we're all human and have emotions / ego, you have to agree
that such a hostile approach isn't really the best thing.
Regards,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Also, it's not like anyone should have been caught by surprise by
the 6.2
Ivan Voras wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
The option provided seems like a fairly good compromise to both
interests. Pick 6.3 (or anything the release team wishes) to support for
a longer period of time. Keep all other releases to 12 month support and
continue doing what I believe is some fairly
:21 amnesiac kernel: nfe0: link state changed to UP
Jun 5 18:26:58 amnesiac sudo:chris : TTY=ttyp0 ;
PWD=/usr/home/chris ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/su
Hm, I swear that's getting more regular. Anyway, it hasn't lost
permanantly yet, but I was just ignoring them (my Linux background
Doug Barton wrote:
Chris Marlatt wrote:
Adrian Chadd wrote:
The project is doing what it can with what people are contributing. If
What if it can accomplish the same or more by simply reorganizing what
it's already doing?
I think that the problem here is that you have no idea how absurd
-conductor cable, and 80 works fine, but
the cable is a special length; I need to use the provided one to shut
the case!
Is there _any_ way to disable ata DMA at kernel compile time?
Remembering that Cromwell won't support loader
Thanks a lot
Chris
--
One of the main causes of the fall
ultimately be committed?
Thanks for your effort.
Regards,
-Chris
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Ed Maste wrote:
I suspect Adaptec has a firmware bug relating to the RequestAdapterInfo
and RequestSupplementAdapterInfo commands. The driver family support
brought in the latter, while the former has always
The diff applied cleanly except for the __FBSDID().
With this new revision, I can still run batch scripts as shown below and
get the correct output from aaccli. Unfortunately, if you manually invoke
aaccli and type in open aac0, all terminal input is locked. The only
way to recover the
that will be used with ALL your boxen. Then
simply add any host specific options as required/desired. Leaving you
less to keep track of, and less opportunity for errors to creep in. :)
--Chris H
/Mike
--
Michael Gratton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quuxo Software http://web.quuxo.com/
--
panic
far today, only one piece of spam - from the ports
list.
I'd have to agree. I'm subscribed to several of the FBSD lists. Yet
in any 30 day period, the most I've received is less than 4. I'd
have to say, that's a pretty good ratio. :)
--Chris H
the
included base bind allows you to enable any of the dlz drivers. Was this
excluded from the release?
Chris McGee
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.4/1310 - Release Date: 3/4/2008
8:35 AM
Quoting Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past 127.0.0.1.
What evidence do you have for this? Show your ifconfig commands, etc
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:03:20AM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
I have absolutely no idea why FBSD v7 (on 2 machines) will only
dole out 127.0.0.1, while all my other servers running RELENG_6 all
dole out a /minimum/ of 127.0.0.1/8 by default. But, having
Quoting Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 00:03 -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Hello Mark. Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
FWIW I'm hosting my own zone, out of my domain's address using a
different host name. I'm simply forwarding the requests to a different
port, so
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:23:21AM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
What I am having absolutely no understanding of; is why do
2 FBSD servers sharing the same setups, and the same stock
lo0 setups react /completely/ differently than each other,
when the only
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:48:31AM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
In long; Both servers have the same (and only) entry:
/etc/defaults/rc.conf: ifconfig_lo0=inet 127.0.0.1
no more, no less.
The RELENG_6 server reports:
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING
am
wondering how that is possible when the same binary is linked against
different libraries on a different machine.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Quoting Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, adding an entry in /etc/rc.conf that provides 254 IP's now
reveals:
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64
scopeid
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, adding an entry in /etc/rc.conf that provides 254 IP's now
reveals:
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
Quoting Greg Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-03-04, Chris H. wrote:
Yes, adding an entry in /etc/rc.conf that provides 254 IP's now
reveals:
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64
scopeid 0x3
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you ask me, kernel developer | server install should be on
disc1, and desktop^*$ should go on disc99.
FreeBSD
...the power to serve.
^
eh ?
???
So what do you propose to use as workstations with your
Quoting Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On Monday, March 03, 2008 02:20:49 -0800 Chris H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would assert that FreeBSD is first and foremost a Server OS.
The fact that it can also provide a full blown desktop, is so much
the better.
In this context, I believe
in this area has changed since 6. But I'm unable to discover any
info on it.
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris H
--
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Hello Jeremy, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past 127.0.0.1.
More specifically; I installed rbldnsd from ports
Quoting Royce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote, on 3/3/2008 5:21 PM:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
I've looked at this software: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
Why exactly do you need this software to bind to 127.0.0.2 or 127.0.0.3?
I don't
Quoting Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:23:59PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get the install disc? Mine clearly doesn't. :(
All I am provided is 127.0.0.1 - not 127.0.0.2,3
Quoting Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get the install disc? Mine clearly doesn't. :(
All I am
Quoting Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Jeremy, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use
in this area would pay dividends.
I am definitely not arguing that point, lots can be done here.
If you ask me, kernel developer | server install should be on
disc1, and desktop^*$ should go on disc99.
FreeBSD
...the power to serve.
^
--Chris H
install process - I just
performed one the other day. Then blew it away and replaced
it with a fresh copy of RELENG_7. :)
Happy BSD'ing
--Chris H
People in the know, and those with reasonable network bandwidth, generally
use either the 'boot only' or just the 'disk 1' CDs to install a pretty
Quoting Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
* log on as root - or su to root after logging on as regular user
* type /usr/sbin/sysinstall - this brings up the installer again
* choose post install
* choose install additional ports/packages
* choose net/cvsup-without-gui
* when
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BSD is /different/. Which is /not/ bad, just /different/. :)
Never said it was bad (on the *very* contrary)
Been using it for a little more than 10 years now: would I have been if I had
thought otherwise ? ;-)
* choose net
thought it
worth mentioning:
LIBMAP.CONF(5)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=libmap.confapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+6.3-RELEASEformat=html
--Chris H
--
One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk
Tacunka Witco
401 - 500 of 999 matches
Mail list logo
