On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote:
On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote:
[...]
The card is more stable when using nve driver
On 29/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:05:35PM +0100, Chris wrote:
On 28/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 06:30:20PM +0100, Chris wrote:
On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:17:40PM +0100, Chris wrote:
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
On 27/09/2007, Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:44:09PM +0100, Chris wrote:
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
On 27/09/2007, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:09:22PM +0100, Chris wrote:
Hi I am concerned about the availabilities of these encryptions in
freebsd releases that are marked stable.
It seems gbde has a problem when the the data written goes over the
lba
guidelines. The data itself was actually written and not corrupt but
the server did crash whilst was in use occasionally so needed reboots
which is no good for a production server.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 26/09/2007, Michael Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris wrote:
Hi I am concerned about the availabilities of these encryptions in
freebsd releases that are marked stable.
It seems gbde has a problem when the the data written goes over the
lba boundary around lba48.
Could you
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x
inet x.x.x.x netmask
On 24/09/2007, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00
On 24/09/2007, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00
On 24/09/2007, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:57:23AM +0100, Chris wrote:
nfe0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=8VLAN_MTU
inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.x.x.x
inet x.x.x.x netmask
if it supports it?
5 - is it safe to use with zero copy sockets?
6 - I currently have both net.isr.direct and mpsafenet disabled is
this driver safe to use on them?
Thanks
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
the handbook to the latter.
I set the sector size to 2048 as the handbook said although the file
says to leave at 512 for best stability.
Freebsd 6.2-STABLE if the box still boots as I am worried it wont then
I will provide a dmesg and kernel config output.
Chris
I'm trying to get the onboard NIC working on FreeBSD 6.2, but I'm not having
any luck. From what I've read, others have had problems with it as well. I
believe it is the Broadcom 5787.
Christopher D. Miller
CAD Concepts Inc.
1328 Dublin Rd, Suite 201
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Main:
Quoting vuthecuong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tnx for quick response. I would like to confirm as below:
You said that:
You don't want to buy a domain (or at least not in the first place).
The thing you need is a static IP address, first, and that's not being
'sold' by a domain reseller / registrar.
your time and consideration.
--Chris
--
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 04/06/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris wrote:
So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases
will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of
FreeBSD?
I can't help but get the impression that you're spoiling for a fight
here, so
On 02/06/07, Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack
of any schedule on http
On 02/06/07, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 2, 2007, at 3:45 , Chris wrote:
Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system
is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be
upgrading freebsd on their servers every few
On 02/06/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would
slower major release cycles as
well but I keep been told no on that one :) eg. it would be nice if
7.0 was delayed a month or more to allow the full pf openbsd synch up
rather then leaving it because lack of time before 7.0 release.
Chris
Chris
___
freebsd
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (28/5/07):
After that, I created a new xorg.conf (using X -configure) and added my
settings to it (keyboard language).
Even xdm works (it still doesn't look good, but it never has)!
Try out my Xresources, Xsetup_0, and Xstartup_0 if you don't like
. Or is this simply not possible to do?
Sysinstaller I do agree it does the job but thats it, its not good
enough for people not familiar with freebsd I feel and is a major
reason for adoptivity to freebsd.
Good news on the dynamic tcp stuff :)
Thanks
Chris
user not a fan of
linux so not been a troll this is a serious post.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it's committed on HEAD, doesn't that mean it's only on 7-CURRENT? When
does this fix get through to 6-STABLE, if you know, please? Or am I being
ignorant?
Thanks
Chris
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:27:27 +0200
From: Thomas Quinot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/112119: system
Kind of embarrassing, I'm running 6.2-STABLE, and I recently used
pkg_cutleaves to free some disk space. However, xfce's desktop doesn't work
any more, neither will Thunar, and they both complain about missing file
/usr/local/lib/libmd5.so.1. My locate database says it was there before I
Ah, brilliant! Thanks, I knew there was a way like that, but six hours'
googling didn't find it, though I'm sure it was just me being thick! Maybe I
should suggest adding libwww as dependiencies to xfce4, or maybe I shouldn't
just delete ports without making a careful list...
On 27/04/07, Daniel
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
feb 24 code, the machine isn't using
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
feb 24 code, the machine isn't using
Quoting Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
[...]
However, I don't think that your actual problem (lock-up
and panics) is related to rpc.lockd or rpc.statd. It
rather sounds like something else is wrong with your
machine. NFS
requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
0/56/8704 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
0 requests for sfbufs denied
0 requests for sfbufs delayed
20233 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
7740 calls to protocol drain routines
Chris
lines,
BUT I /can/ reproduce this at will - I simply need to copy a file larger
than a few k to a mounted host. Yes, this /does/ happen /every/ time.
Any and all help with this will be /GREATLY/ appreciated.
Thank you for all your time and consideration in this matter.
--Chris
--
panic: kernel
Quoting Ruben van Staveren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 26
16:27:14 PST 2007
Greetings,
Does anyone know when NFS and friends will be working again? I haven't
been able
to /safely/ use it from 4.8 on. I
is this one here, and it is the
/only/ one with:
rpc_lockd_enable=YES
rpc_statd_enable=YES
in rc.conf I simply chose these in an effort to keep everything current
and accurate. You don't happen to have any experiences keeping rpc.statd
running?
Thank you for taking the time to reply.
--Chris
Quoting Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Chris,
Well - the NFS server is 4.5-RELEASE - a rather old box.
Everything worked fine when the shop was all 4.x boxes, but as soon
as we put in a 5.x or 6.x box - the NFS clients on those (5.x/6.x) boxes
locked up hard if rpc.lockd
Quoting Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
I have found that if I kill rpc.lockd on the NFS server,
most of the NFS issues I have (including a similar lock-up on
6.1-RELEASE) go away.
FWIW, I also had problems with running
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:43:46AM -0700, Chris H. wrote:
# uname -a
FreeBSD host.domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 26
16:27:14 PST 2007
Greetings,
Does anyone know when NFS and friends will be working again?
It works
Thanks. My system configuration is intel p3 866 MHz, 192 MB RAM, 20
GB HDD using i386.
The FreeBSD is in the another PC without X.
Just out of interest, how are you connecting to your network? I used
to have a similar problem using wpa_supplicant with a Belkin F5D7050
wireless G adapter. I
on 0.90_3.
Any chance to update the port to use 0.90.1 ? It fixes a number of
bugs, one of which happens fairly often (bad directory perms after a db update)
---Mike
What configuration in exim is needed to make it use tcp instead of sockets?
thanks
Chris
the
'TCPSocket' and 'TCPAddr' settings so it looks like this:
#LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clamd
TCPSocket 3310
TCPAddr 127.0.0.1
-pcf
many thanks seems to be working
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I'm
not using, instead of you buying one. It's a Realtek PCI 8139 10/100
Mb/s. Let me know if you're interested.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
remember that you may have counted wrong.
so now the latest version of the port has same cpu utilisation as 0.88.7?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
it caused the smtp to completely backlog and
stopped emails arriving.
I downgraded back to 0.88.7 again and all is fine again.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
Was this indeed compiled with pthread or with lpthread?
I had this issue on a 4.11-RELEASE machine very recently. As it does
not have lpthread, it would fail to compile against this.
Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
Change the threading lib. It fixed it for us.
% cat /etc/libmap.conf
[clamd]
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs mounted.
I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4 which cleared up
fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
-Chris
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Juergen Nickelsen
1748 chris 3 960 66408K 42528K STOP 0:02 0.00% firefox-bin
but it never dies.
Any ideas?
I'm using portupgrade to make sure all my dependencies are up to
date. Anything else I should look for?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-stable
Thank you Kris, and all who took the time to respond.
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:45:15PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Hello and thank you for your response...
Quoting Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP (1102.51-MHz 686
to achive a Pentium kernel?
Thank you very much for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
--
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
-
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19:37:23 PST 2006
make.conf
file to achive a Pentium kernel?
Thank you very much for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
--
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
-
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19:37:23 PST 2006
Context switching.
We already preserve the core CPU state and the FPU state between
context switches. Adding MMX into the mix means preserving an MMX
state (since it can clobber the FPU state) and so forth.
jmc
Quoting Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
I've noticed building
Quoting Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
I've noticed building kernels, that since v. = 5 that during
the phase 2/3 all the lines echoed to the screen contain:
-mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 ...
See /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf.
Sigh, the obvious is so /easily
Hello and thank you for your response...
Quoting Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP (1102.51-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x680 Stepping = 0
Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX
run backtrace
then dump the output to disk so people who have no local access can
get backtraces?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
affecting nfs.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:20:21PM +, Chris wrote:
On 18/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006
On 18/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
nfs/sshfs disconnection ie. network timeout.
I
boot without freezing.
I can test future 6.2 RC's or the final release and let you know if I'm
still seeing the same issue if you'd like.
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
-Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
nfs/sshfs disconnection ie. network timeout.
I
On 07/12/06, Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:36, Chris wrote:
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kris a development on this, someone
=0x920010b7 rev=0x78
hdr=0x00
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on em(4), but it doesn't appear
all the issues are resolved. I'm not sure what I should try, what
information I could provide that might be useful, etc. I'd be more than
happy to help troubleshoot this, with some guidance on what I could do
to be helpful.
Cheers,
-Chris
on the onboard IDE controller.
Cheers,
-Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kris a development on this, someone else posted about a nfs problem
and reading his post some starkling point he made about network cards,
he
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kris a development on this, someone else posted about a nfs problem
and reading his post some starkling point he made about network cards,
he
On 22/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:49:12AM +, Chris wrote:
On a few occasions all different remote servers I have had nfs cause
servers to stop responding so I stopped using it all the servers were
either 6.0 release 6.1 release or 6-stable
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 05:25:21AM +, Chris wrote:
On 22/11/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:49:12AM +, Chris wrote:
On a few occasions all different remote servers I have had nfs cause
servers
locking up on me with
nfs/sshfs all inicdently use sis/fxp/rl no coincidence the only 2
servers that dont use these lan cards which are using dc/re work fine
with nfs.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
/ad4s1a
Regards
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
count and only be reset on
Sunday night at 12:00 midnight?
Thank you,
Chris Pratt
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and smoother on pretty much every UP setup and I
think it would do freebsd's reputation some good if a 4.12 was to come
about.
just my 2 pence worth.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
++ -I. -c client.cc
When the job completes, script will exit informing you. The results
(in the second example) will be in the file named: err in the current
directory.
Hope this helps.
--Chris
tried
mico-c++ -I. -c client.cc err
and
mico-c++ -I. -c client.cc 2 err
what directory are you
more problems with my 5.x install than I ever
did with my 4.x install. I'm afraid to even look to see if 6.0 will run on
it.
Just another $0.2.
-=Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Monday 02 October 2006 21:16, Roland Smith wrote:
Well, these are the same guys that bought a license from SCO for SCO's
alleged IP in Linux (and alledgedly in *BSD, before the settlement in
USL vs BSDi was made public). Apparently after a large
bribe^H^H^H^H^Hdiscount from Microsoft.
wishes,
Chris H.
FYI,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
panic
Greetings,
...
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Greetings all,
...
Quoting Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
DNS round robin is not about redundancy, the only thing you could have
that way is a kind of load balancing (not the most sophisticated way,
though
and got the
above error.
This is my first time doing this, so I'm sure I've missed something
somewhere.
-Ron T.
Instead of regenerating the INDEX, why not just download it?
# cd /usr/ports
# make fetchindex
Regards,
Chris Jones
--
Chris Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Ron Tarrant wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
Instead of regenerating the INDEX, why not just download it?
# cd /usr/ports
# make fetchindex
Regards,
Chris Jones
Thanks for the reply, Chris.
Yup, good idea. I did this and found out that INDEX-6 was already
up-to-date. Could this be why index
freebsd nfs having problems with other OS's nfs.
The crashes arent so bad the killer is the unable to mount on the
following reboot, could geli be causing this since this is relatvely
new, whilst gdbe is more established. Can gdbe be used on loopback
filesystems?
Thanks
Chris
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:24:36 -0700
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mark, and thank you for your prompt reply.
Quoting Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
Hello,
I just recenlly found
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:25:47 -0700
Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I built the entire Xorg-6.9 server and libraries from source.
Everything worked/ performed as expected. I have not made anything
Hello,
I just recenlly found that I am almost always unable to
build X (Xorg) related applications on a 5.5 box that has
pretty recent source. The applications all die during the
make process with the following error:
error: syntax error before _X_SENTINEL
Any to fix this? Googling indicates that
Hello Mark, and thank you for your prompt reply.
Quoting Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
Hello,
I just recenlly found that I am almost always unable to
build X (Xorg) related applications on a 5.5 box that has
pretty recent source. The applications all die during the
make
gname=wheel mode=0755
var uname=root
dump
..
log
..
run
named
..
..
stats
..
..
..
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Apologies if posted to wrong list, the rc.d script for named chowns
/etc/namedb to root:wheel if set to bind:bind why is this? A slave
named server running as bind user cannot download new slave zones if
dir ownership is root or update it if file ownerships are root which I
sometimes see.
Chris
From KDE (or Gnome) there is a Run a program or similar on the main
menu. Type firefox in there and it will most likely come up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Merryweather
Cooper
Sent: Wednesday, 12 July 2006 2:54 AM
To: Mihir
Quoting Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So it would appear that you cured the NFS problems inherent with FBSD-6
by replacing FBSD with Fedora Linux. Nice to know that NFSd works in Linux.
But won't help those on the FBSD list fix their FBSD-6 boxen. :/
First NFS is designed to make machines
Quoting Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess I'm still just a bit stunned that a bug this obvious not only
found it's way into the STABLE branch, but is still there. Maybe it's
not as obvious as I think, or not many folks are using it? All I know
for sure here is that if I had upgraded to
,
-Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clint Olsen wrote:
Linux has a cool program: lsof (list open files). Does FreeBSD have
something similar?
Yes, 'fstat'. Though I very rarely remember its name ('lsof' is far more
memorable, IMHO).
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
server to build/ install on their system. It's a no brainer.
Choose Dovecot. It's sure to get even better as it matures.
--Chris out...
P.S. I am not employed by, nor do I have any affiliation with
Dovecot. Other than having made the choice to install it on my
system.
Quoting Mike Jakubik [EMAIL
; there *must* be a better (less painful) way to handle upgrading
the _installed_ ports. I only wish I could figure one out. Please note;
this is a solicitation. ;) I am only adding (augmenting) to what Paul has
stated here.
(I build/manage some 50 FreeBSD boxes. So you can imagine the grief.)
--Chris
in this state.
--Chris H.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect
BOFH excuse #146:
Communications satellite used by the military for star wars
--
Shameless self-promotion follows...
... or does
Quoting Frank Steinborn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
This brings up a point I have been wanting to bring up for over a mos.;
I adopted an orphaned port (contacted the owner, whom then relenquished
ownership to me.). But found it _more_ than difficult to discover how
to inform the fBSD
Quoting Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
IIRC, there are some quota and snapshots changes merged in
6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want
to try that.
Thats correct. I have been meaning to test these, but not had the time
to do so yet. If you can, update to -STABLE
upgrade from UFS
to UFS2 without rebuilding FS.
How can one convert their UFS to UFS2 (with, or without SSH)? Is it possible?
Or must one delete their current slices and create new (UFS2) slices?
Thanks you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris H.
The problem is that it's not possible
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Duane Whitty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I have a question as to accomplishing an upgrade of *only* what ports I
already have installed. That is to say; I somewhat frequently suck down
the latest
reinstall What?! I'm *upgrading* (or at least trying) this port. :\
Anyway, thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris H.
--
-
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19:37:23 PST 2006
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I have a question as to accomplishing an upgrade of *only* what ports I
already have installed. That is to say; I somewhat frequently suck down
the latest source for system and ports for the release I run on my servers
(RELENG_5_4 - soon to be 5_5
Quoting Iantcho Vassilev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My vote goes to PureFtpd..
It`s ideal server..
But is not *nearly* as secure as vsftpd.
On 5/4/06, N.J. Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Noah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-04 05:48:40 -0800]:
What are people using for their ftpd these days? I
601 - 700 of 999 matches
Mail list logo
