Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:59:19 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Skip Ford wrote:
Well, it wasn't immediately obvious to me that someone would ever want to
mark a port ignore and then want to upgrade it.
Skip Ford wrote:
So, basically, portmaster stopped and asked for input because it thought I
might've forgotten that I installed an +IGNOREME file 10 minutes prior.
I'd prefer to not have tools that try to think about what I'm doing.
It should do what I say it should do, not what it thinks I
Doug Barton wrote:
Skip Ford wrote:
So, basically, portmaster stopped and asked for input because it thought I
might've forgotten that I installed an +IGNOREME file 10 minutes prior.
I'd prefer to not have tools that try to think about what I'm doing.
It should do what I say it should
Doug Barton wrote:
Skip Ford wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Second, without knowing what command line you used I couldn't tell you
for sure what happened of course, but assuming you used some
combination of '-af' what you saw was expected behavior. There is a
conflict (I think a fairly
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 05:34:11 Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:28:48 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that
happened after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :)
There is an
Troels Kofoed Jacobsen wrote:
For some reason portmaster will not build kBuild or ports building with
kBuild
(such as virtulabox). However a manual make install clean works fine for me.
I
guess it's a bug in portmaster.
Don't guess. :) The bug is in kBuild. Portmaster makes heavy use
Skip Ford wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Yes, unfortunately it's not omniscient. :)
Well, to be honest, it wouldn't need to be. It would just need a flag
to know when nobody is present from whom to request input, and then take
the default action.
That's never going to happen. The default
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:59:19 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Skip Ford wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Yes, unfortunately it's not omniscient. :)
Well, to be honest, it wouldn't need to be. It would just need a flag
to know when
On Wed, August 26, 2009 16:51, Doug Barton wrote:
Troels Kofoed Jacobsen wrote:
For some reason portmaster will not build kBuild or ports building with
kBuild
(such as virtulabox). However a manual make install clean works fine for
me. I
guess it's a bug in portmaster.
Don't guess. :)
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
this. is ther any way to make it not
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that happened
after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :)
There is an extensive writeup in the EXAMPLES section of the man page
on how to rebuild all of your ports. I don't actually recommend that
people use '-af'
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest
way to deal with that is to use '-aD' and then when it's
Skip Ford wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest
way to deal with that is to use '-aD' and
Doug Barton wrote:
Skip Ford wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest
way to deal
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:28:48 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that happened
after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :)
There is an extensive writeup in the EXAMPLES section of the man page
on how
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:03:40PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? delete and go ahead ?
On Mon, August 24, 2009 12:06, Marc Olzheim wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:03:40PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire
a
portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it
asks
this. is ther any
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? delete and go ahead ?
You really want to read the man page thoroughly
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
hail,
portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Just in case someone reads this and tries 'portupgrade -af', it also
will re-build all installed ports, whether they need upgrading. This is
the command to re-build ALL ports when the library versions get bumped
(as they did recently for 8.0BETA).
To just update the
20 matches
Mail list logo
