Hi,
On 31 Aug 2013, at 21:49, Tim Bishop t...@bishnet.net wrote:
Hi all,
This is regarding kern/170070 and these two threads from last year:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-July/068987.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/069043.html
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:22:11PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
On 31 Aug 2013, at 21:49, Tim Bishop t...@bishnet.net wrote:
This is regarding kern/170070 and these two threads from last year:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-July/068987.html
Hi all,
This is regarding kern/170070 and these two threads from last year:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-July/068987.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-August/069043.html
I'm running stable/9 r255017 and I'm seeing the same issue, even with
the
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Hi,
as there have been more people having problems with pf and IPv6 after
the changes I am replying to stable@ cc: pf@.
...
[...]
nat on $ext_if_plus from $xenophobe_int to any - $xenophobe_ext
rdr inet6 proto tcp from localnets to $xenophobe_ext \
On 01/08/2012 18:13, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Any of you who are expereincing problems with packets dropped due to
invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
report back if you also see this without modulate state in your
pf.conf (if you have 'modulate' in there, can you
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/08/2012 18:13, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Any of you who are expereincing problems with packets dropped due to
invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
report back if you also see this without modulate state in your
pf.conf
schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb am 29.07.2012 01:02 (localtime):
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Just for the public; I am talking to him privately currently; I'll
summarize findings either here or in a commit message.
Thanks for the info! Any news worth to share?
Best regards,
-Harry
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Just for the public; I am talking to him privately currently; I'll
summarize findings either here or in a commit message.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new
So, I tried to do a routine update to the latest stable/9 yesterday
(r238771), and I found that access to the jail on my server had stopped
working. Everything else seemed to be fine, and reverting to the
previous system (r237456 from 2012-06-22 (Boot Environments FTW)) bought
it all back to
On 7/26/2012 2:45 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
So, I tried to do a routine update to the latest stable/9 yesterday
(r238771), and I found that access to the jail on my server had stopped
working. Everything else seemed to be fine, and reverting to the
previous system (r237456 from 2012-06-22 (Boot
On 26/07/2012 21:51, Mike Andrews wrote:
Sounds like what I hit and filed kern/170070 on -- basically a host not
being able to talk to itself on IPv6, except on the ::1 address.
Workaround: ifconfig lo0 -txcsum6 -rxcsum6
or in /etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_lo0=inet 127.0.0.1/8 -txcsum6
11 matches
Mail list logo