I'm slowly cathing up on FreeBSD related mails and found this mail ...
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
kern.ipc.numopensockets: 7400
kern.ipc.maxsockets: 12328
ps looks like:
stuff deleted
2368 p2 Is+ Sat01PM 0:00.03 /bin/tcsh root2112 0.0 0.1 5220
2360 p3 Ss+
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 09:39:35PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
How did the backing out work for you?
Taken from another mail from Marc, since there's now multiple threads
discussing this:
Did we determine whether backing out to before the unpcb socket
reference count change made any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It didn't kept climbing ...
- --On Tuesday, May 15, 2007 21:39:35 +0200 Ulrich Spoerlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm slowly cathing up on FreeBSD related mails and found this mail ...
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
kern.ipc.numopensockets:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
So, over 7000 sockets with pretty much all processes shut down ...
Shouldn't the garbage collector be cutting in somewhere here?
I'm willing to shut everthing down like this again the next time it happens
(in 2-3 days) if someone has some other
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
If I remember correctly, you wrote that 11k sockets are
in use with 90 jails. That's about 120 sockets per jail,
which isn't out of the ordinary. Of course it depends on
what is running in those jails, but my guess is that you
just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, May 08, 2007 15:14:29 +0200 Oliver Fromme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of jails are those? What applications are
running inside them? It's quite possible that the
processes on one machine use 120 sockets per jail,
while
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Now, that makes sense to me, I can understand that ... but, how would
that look as far as netstat -nA shows? Or, would it? For example, I
have:
You should use -na to list all sockets, not -nA.
mars# netstat -nA | grep c9655a20
c9655a20 stream 0 0
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:01:02PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Now, that makes sense to me, I can understand that ... but, how would
that look as far as netstat -nA shows? Or, would it? For example, I
have:
You should use -na to list all sockets, not -nA.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, May 07, 2007 19:01:02 +0200 Oliver Fromme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If I remember correctly, you wrote that 11k sockets are
in use with 90 jails. That's about 120 sockets per jail,
which isn't out of the ordinary. Of course it
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Robert had mentioned in one of his emails about a Sockets can also exist
without any referencing process (if the application closes, but there is
still
data draining on an open socket).
[..]
Again, if I'm reading / understanding things
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I'm trying to probe this as well as I can, but network stacks and sockets
have never been my strong suit ...
Robert had mentioned in one of his emails about a Sockets can also exist
without any referencing process (if the application closes, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, May 04, 2007 12:05:11 +0100 Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think we should be careful to avoid prematurely drawing conclusions about
the source of the problem. First question: have you confirmed that the
resource limit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to probe this as well as I can, but network stacks and sockets have
never been my strong suit ...
Robert had mentioned in one of his emails about a Sockets can also exist
without any referencing process (if the application closes, but
:I'm trying to probe this as well as I can, but network stacks and sockets have
:never been my strong suit ...
:
:Robert had mentioned in one of his emails about a Sockets can also exist
:without any referencing process (if the application closes, but there is still
:data draining on an open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, May 03, 2007 18:26:30 -0700 Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing you can do is drop into single user mode... kill all the
processes on the system, and see if the sockets are recovered. That
will give
:*groan* why couldn't this be happening on a server that I have better remote
:access to? :(
:
:But, based on your explanation(s) above ... if I kill off all of the jail(s)
on
:the machine, so that there are minimal processes running, shouldn't I see a
:significant drop in the number of
16 matches
Mail list logo
