Kris,
If relevant, I may be able to test your patch, but the problem is
occurring only rarely. Do you have any suggestions for isolating and
reproducing this bug?
Run your script in a loop?
And I assume I can meaningfully test w/o the rsync call? I.e., just
mounting and unmounting the
Jeff,
Kris Kennaway directed me to this thread from FreeBSD-questions. I am
seeing a panic: unmount: dangling vnode with 6.0-RELEASE. Here are the
relevant threads:
2 probs w/ backup.sh: Device busy and dangling vnode
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:58:35AM -0500, Chad Whitacre wrote:
Kris,
If relevant, I may be able to test your patch, but the problem is
occurring only rarely. Do you have any suggestions for isolating and
reproducing this bug?
Run your script in a loop?
And I assume I can meaningfully
Kris,
No, the rsync (i.e. activity on the filesystem) is important.
Yeah, just ran a test w/o it actually. We are planning to run a test w/
some disk activity later this afternoon. I suppose the more activity,
the more likely to see the bug, eh?
chad
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:26:47PM -0500, Chad Whitacre wrote:
Kris,
No, the rsync (i.e. activity on the filesystem) is important.
Yeah, just ran a test w/o it actually. We are planning to run a test w/
some disk activity later this afternoon. I suppose the more activity,
the more
Kris,
Yes. FYI, I am fairly confident this is fixed, because I make
extensive use of mount/umount+filesystem activity, and I am no longer
seeing problems like this.
Great! Thanks for the info. We won't kill ourselves trying to test this
then.
chad
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:33:28PM -0500, Chad Whitacre wrote:
Kris,
Yes. FYI, I am fairly confident this is fixed, because I make
extensive use of mount/umount+filesystem activity, and I am no longer
seeing problems like this.
Great! Thanks for the info. We won't kill ourselves trying
On 3/3/06, Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to MFC all of this lovely stuff for 6.1:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/vfsmfc.diff
I'm looking for people who are willing to patch their stable boxes and
test this. This has the following changes in it:
1) Improved debugging
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:15:59AM -0800, David Kirchner wrote:
Do you have a list of the PRs that this affects and/or resolves?
I don't know of any relevant PRs, but I haven't looked very hard. The
bugs Jeff has been fixing are mostly those I've been able to reproduce
myself in testing.
I'm
Kris,
For the record, we ran the following for about 30 minutes, with no ill
effect:
#!/bin/sh
exec /var/log/panic
exec 21
echo
echo `date` -- trying to panic
while [ 1 ]
do
/sbin/mount /backup/
/bin/rm -rf /backup/foo
/bin/cp -R /usr/bin /backup/foo
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:41:55PM -0800, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I plan to MFC all of this lovely stuff for 6.1:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/vfsmfc.diff
I'm looking for people who are willing to patch their stable boxes and
test this. This
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:41:55PM -0800, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I plan to MFC all of this lovely stuff for 6.1:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/vfsmfc.diff
I'm looking for people who are willing to patch their stable boxes and
test this. This has the following changes in it:
1)
I plan to MFC all of this lovely stuff for 6.1:
http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/vfsmfc.diff
I'm looking for people who are willing to patch their stable boxes and
test this. This has the following changes in it:
1) Improved debugging with DEBUG_LOCKS via the new stack(9) api.
2)
13 matches
Mail list logo
