Re: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-21 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 11:27 -0400, Michael Proto wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > > > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > > > >>> I concur, this fix should really be MFCed. The problem went away in > >>> 7.x due to a total rewrite. I am distracted by other stuff at the > >>> moment,

Re: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-21 Thread Michael Proto
Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > >>> I concur, this fix should really be MFCed. The problem went away in >>> 7.x due to a total rewrite. I am distracted by other stuff at the >>> moment, so, starter's orders... >> >> This just bit me. The fix is in RELENG_6,

Re: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote: Given how simple the patch is and that if fixes a known panic this might be worthy of an errata notice or errata candidate. (At least a note in the errata pointing to the 1.85.2.10 commit if not an actual patch to RELENG_6_3.) I added an item t

Re: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: I concur, this fix should really be MFCed. The problem went away in 7.x due to a total rewrite. I am distracted by other stuff at the moment, so, starter's orders... This just bit me. The fix is in RELENG_6, but it is not present after the -p1 ta

Re: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-18 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Bruce M. Simpson wrote: I started to play with RAT application (ports: mbone/rat + an SVN version) and it seems to crash my 6.3-RELEASE-p1 box in rather deterministic way. Crash details are shown below. Has anyone seen a problem like this? Yes, there's an off-by-one reference count bu

Re: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-08 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
John Baldwin wrote: On Monday 07 April 2008 12:16:53 pm Petr Holub wrote: Hi all, I started to play with RAT application (ports: mbone/rat + an SVN version) and it seems to crash my 6.3-RELEASE-p1 box in rather deterministic way. Crash details are shown below. Has anyone seen a problem like

RE: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-08 Thread Petr Holub
> Yes, there's an off-by-one reference count bug in the multicast stuff. You > need 1.85.2.10 of sys/netinet/in.c: I can confirm that RAT can be restarted many times now with this patch applied (at least when RAT doesn't touch audio devices as I may be also reporting some sound related panic soon

Re: panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-08 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:16:53 pm Petr Holub wrote: > Hi all, > > I started to play with RAT application (ports: mbone/rat + an SVN version) > and > it seems to crash my 6.3-RELEASE-p1 box in rather deterministic way. Crash > details are shown below. Has anyone seen a problem like this? Yes, the

panics on 6.3-RELEASE in IP stack

2008-04-07 Thread Petr Holub
Hi all, I started to play with RAT application (ports: mbone/rat + an SVN version) and it seems to crash my 6.3-RELEASE-p1 box in rather deterministic way. Crash details are shown below. Has anyone seen a problem like this? Thanks, Petr GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Founda