Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-07 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: I normally run the command # pkg_version

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \ before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 needs

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \

pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-05 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \ before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 needs updating (index has 1.5.0.07.00) It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \ before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 needs updating (index has