Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
Hi, Søren
I've tested your patches using same config file as before, and it seems
work fine except on resume.
Hmm, thats one corner I cant test, suspend/resume dies horribly in ACPI
on all 3 notebooks I have since september last year or thereabouts...
After suspend, my
Hi
I switched over half a dozen or so servers to 5.x since october last
year expecting the same stability and performance I have had from
freebsd 4.x, after running it for 2 or 3 months I have ran into some
problems/concerns, listed below. This is not intended for anything
other then feedback
On Sunday, 6. February 2005 16:01, Chris wrote:
4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
libs version jump, why wasnt this done in 5.0
I personally told lots and lots of people to NOT use
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +, Chris wrote:
4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
libs version jump, why wasnt this done in 5.0 so 3rd party apps could
adjust, now we have a
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:29:03 +0100, Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
Hi, Søren
I've tested your patches using same config file as before, and it seems
work fine except on resume.
Hmm, thats one corner I cant test, suspend/resume dies horribly in ACPI
TB --- 2005-02-06 15:45:26 - tinderbox 2.3 running on dwp.des.no
TB --- 2005-02-06 15:45:26 - starting RELENG_4_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2005-02-06 15:45:26 - mkdir /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4_8/i386
TB --- 2005-02-06 15:45:26 - mkdir /home/tinderbox/sandbox/RELENG_4_8/i386/i386
Chris wrote:
Hi
I switched over half a dozen or so servers to 5.x since october last
year expecting the same stability and performance I have had from
freebsd 4.x, after running it for 2 or 3 months I have ran into some
problems/concerns, listed below. This is not intended for anything
other then
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:05:08AM -0800, George Hartzell wrote:
+ I've figured out that if I hardcode the provider when I label my
+ mirror everything seems to work out, which leaves me confused.
+
+ Here's the label command I was using (modified for my situation):
+
+ gmirror label -v -n
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
[...]
It happens because ad0 and ad0s1 share the same last sector.
To fix this you should use '-h' option as you did or you should recreate
ad0s1 slice one sector smaller.
Thanks for the help!
That makes sense, which is always a nice feeling.
Does that mean
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
*Possible* exact reproduction steps:
- install RELENG_5
- rebuild RELENG_5 with NO_NIS=true in /etc/make.conf
- restart sshd service
Sorry, no dice. I had to set PermitRootLogin yes in
/etc/ssh/sshd_config but logging in as root with password
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:29:23PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
*Possible* exact reproduction steps:
- install RELENG_5
- rebuild RELENG_5 with NO_NIS=true in /etc/make.conf
- restart sshd service
Sorry, no dice. I had to set
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:29:23PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
*Possible* exact reproduction steps:
- install RELENG_5
- rebuild RELENG_5 with NO_NIS=true in /etc/make.conf
- restart sshd
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +, Chris wrote:
4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
libs version jump, why wasnt this done in 5.0 so 3rd party apps could
adjust, now we have a
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:07:38PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:29:23PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
*Possible* exact reproduction steps:
- install RELENG_5
-
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:22:03PM -0800, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:07:38PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:29:23PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:52:26PM -0800, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:12:45PM -0800, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:11:07PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
I can't reproduce this on my systems,
Hi, Søren
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:52:57 +0100, Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
[...]
No changes are needed to your config file, unless you want ATA as modules.
I've tested your patches using same config file as before, and it seems
work fine except on
17 matches
Mail list logo
