In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see. Let me see if I understand the implications:
(1) This disk won't interoperate with other OSes on the pc98
machine because the pc98 partition format specifies things
in terms of CHS, but
Important:
Don't write to the drive after changing bios settings.
Just see if it works.
When I installed 5.3 on another machine w/ a Maxtor 40GB HDD, FBSD
complained about the drive geometry settings. It seems the
defaults use CHS regardless of how the bios is set. I had to
change geometry
Søren Schmidt wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.tar.gz
New version available for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-releng5.gz
Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In /boot/defaults/loader.conf there's the line:
#init_path=[...skip...]:/stand/sysinstall
this line reflects the default init_path hardcoded into
sys/kern/init_main.c.
I wonder if /stand/sysinstall is still appropriate
as one of the defaults in the init path.
Hi
Subj from CVS (with vlan support), FreeBSD 4.8-p16, 4.9-p3 and 5.3-Stable.
I installed Subj on the two my routers and noticed that it does not work as
should. I investigated the problem and discovered the following: vrrpd use
the different destination MAC addresses for sending VRRPv2
Hi.
A couple of days ago I upgrades a few ports on
a 5.3 box and since then I'm often getting crashes.
-bash-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD jupiter.noonlights.net 5.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #0:
Wed Feb 16 23:36:03 CET 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JUPITER i386
I'd like to get
Andrew Heybey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ATA mkIII has improved my Toshiba Tecra M2V running RELENG_5.
Before, it would complain about ATAPI_IDENTIFY TIMED OUT on
ata1-slave (the cdrom is ata1-master) when booting (but still would
work). Even worse, when resuming from a memory suspend (S3)
another crash.. and in /var/log/messages I see:
Feb 17 12:20:50 jupiter savecore: no dumps found
Any hints, please?
Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Hi.
A couple of days ago I upgrades a few ports on
a 5.3 box and since then I'm often getting crashes.
-bash-2.05b# uname -a
FreeBSD jupiter.noonlights.net
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:36:25 -0800 (PST), Doug White
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Rong-En Fan wrote:
Hello,
This is a 5.3-RELEASE-p5/amd64 on IBM X236 (EM64T) with 2GB RAM
and a LSI 21320 rmpt(4) running at 160MB/s with a hardware
RAID (da0, da1). HTT is enabled. When
Hi,
In first test i say that problem is gone, but new tests the problem is
back. Try in your computer...
Rob wrote:
Very interesting indeed. I have two questions:
1) Which patch did you apply and from where did you
get it?
Search for email of this subject UPDATE2: ATA mkIII first official
Hi,
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Also FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE?
I don't have a 5.3-STABLE system to confirm but if it doesn't return -1
it is wrong.
Then, it's wrong.
What timestamp should it return? 2004-11-02 00:00:00 doesn't exist for
you, therefore there is no possible value for seconds since epoch that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Søren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New version available for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-releng5.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-current.gz
http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.tar.gz
o Add modules for
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:32:51AM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
S S?ren Schmidt wrote:
S
S New version available for testing:
S
S http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-releng5.gz
S http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.diff-current.gz
S http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3l.tar.gz
S
S
Hi,
(B
(BXorg is working fine now. Thanks.
(B
(BEitarou
(B
(BDaniel O'Connor wrote:
(B
(BOn Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:12, Ceri Davies wrote:
(B
(B
(BOn Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:41:14PM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
(B
(B
(BI got an io error
(B"xf86EnableIO: Fatal to open /dev/io for
My problem persist...
Any other patch? or idea?
Regards
-- # dmesg | egrep -i (ata|ad0) --
atapci0: VIA 82C686A UDMA66 controller port
0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0
ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0
ad0: FAILURE - SET_MULTI
Marcus Grando wrote:
My problem persist...
Any other patch? or idea?
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
--
-Søren
___
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:31:05 +0100 (CET), Oliver Fromme wrote
[snippage]
You do not need more RAM. At most, a little more swap
space wouldn't hurt, but even that isn't strictly
necessary, given that only 18% of your swap are in use.
I'd start worrying if that number goes beyond 50%.
I
Hello list,
Im running FreeBSD 5.3 on a 1.4GHz/256mb P4. I've done make buildworld
and make buildkernel with these options in make.conf:
---
# -- use.perl generated deltas -- #
# Created: Wed Feb 16 14:46:12 2005
# Setting to use base perl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Grando wrote:
My problem persist...
Any other patch? or idea?
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
Just an observation, but my Promise ATA-100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Grando wrote:
My problem persist...
Any other patch? or idea?
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
Just an observation, but my
Hi;
Here's a new one...
FreeBSD-STABLE 5.3, here's the boot DMESG and the problem
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD
Hello list,
Im running FreeBSD 5.3 on a 1.4GHz/256mb P4. I've done make buildworld
and make buildkernel with these options in make.conf:
---
# -- use.perl generated deltas -- #
# Created: Wed Feb 16 14:46:12 2005
# Setting to use base
Hi
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
I test all combinations (with/without apic | with/without ACPI), and
problems persist.
It will be that the problem is not with
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 09:15 -0500, First Last wrote:
Hello list,
Im running FreeBSD 5.3 on a 1.4GHz/256mb P4. I've done make buildworld
and make buildkernel with these options in make.conf:
---
# -- use.perl generated deltas -- #
Marcus Grando wrote:
Hi
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Hmm, does it work without apic ? without ACPI ?
And your cabling is correct and spec conformant ?
The 686A' I have in the lab works just dandy...
I test all combinations (with/without apic | with/without ACPI), and
problems persist.
OK.
It will be that
Hi,
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Have you tried other disks on this board ?
I test another disk (SAMSUNG SV8004H) in secondary and work with UDMA66.
Have you tried this disk on another board ?
I have another computer with 4.11-STABLE / QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 30 and
occurs same problem.
--
ad0s1g: UDMA
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:58:37 +0100, Charles Erik McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any error messages related to ad2 or ad3 in
/var/log/messages?
no.
I have two large disks:
/dev/ad2 144G124G9.2G93%/mnt/sp1604n
/dev/ad3 226G202G5.2G
bastion(root):/usr/src#disklabel /dev/ad2
disklabel: /dev/ad2: no valid label found
bastion(root):/usr/src#disklabel /dev/ad2s1
# /dev/ad2s1:
8 partitions:
#size offsetfstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
c: 3125766420unused0 0 # raw part,
don't edit
Marcus Grando wrote:
I test another disk (SAMSUNG SV8004H) in secondary and work with UDMA66.
OK, so the problem is not general of nature...
Have you tried this disk on another board ?
I have another computer with 4.11-STABLE / QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 30 and
occurs same problem.
--
ad0s1g: UDMA
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
another crash.. and in /var/log/messages I see:
Feb 17 12:20:50 jupiter savecore: no dumps found
Any hints, please?
If you watch it panic (or trigger one; break to ddb and use call
doadump), does it dump?
Kris
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, 10:32+0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
S?ren Schmidt wrote:
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-releng5.gz
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-current.gz
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.tar.gz
New version available for testing:
http:
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, 10:32+0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
S?ren Schmidt wrote:
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-releng5.gz
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.diff-current.gz
http: //people.freebsd.org/~sos/ata-mk3k.tar.gz
New version available for
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
another crash.. and in /var/log/messages I see:
Feb 17 12:20:50 jupiter savecore: no dumps found
Any hints, please?
If you watch it panic (or trigger one; break to ddb and use call
doadump), does it dump?
Kris
Mike Jakubik said:
Oliver Fromme said:
I'm not seeing a problem here. Beastie is not a religious icon,
not is it intended to be one.
Right -- but it looks like one. And every now and then
there are people who are offended by it because of their religious
bias.
Boo Hoo! Use
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:54:01 -0600, Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:58:37 +0100, Charles Erik McDonald
So, for example:
bastion(root):/usr/src#disklabel /dev/ad2
disklabel: /dev/ad2: no valid label found
bastion(root):/usr/src#disklabel /dev/ad2s1
#
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:31:25 +0100, Godwin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:58:37 +0100, Charles Erik McDonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bastion(root):#mount -t ufs /dev/ad3s1 /mnt/wd2500pb/
mount: /dev/ad3s1 on
atadisk.ko and atapicd.ko still do not depend on atapci.ko. So if you
don't ask to load atapci.ko in loader.conf you will get a panic
because the kernel won't find the root fs. I added MODULE_DEPEND() on
atapci macro to ata-disk.c and this solved the problem. Perhaps this
is just a
I've been on RELENG_5 for about 1 week now running ULE with PREEMPT.
Recently, I noticed some strange behavior that could be related to
scheduling; usually I leave my computer on all night (doing nothing as I
sleep), But when I'd wake up, and drag a window around, it seems this
sudden rush of
Julio Capote wrote:
I've been on RELENG_5 for about 1 week now running ULE with PREEMPT.
Recently, I noticed some strange behavior that could be related to
scheduling; usually I leave my computer on all night (doing nothing as I
sleep), But when I'd wake up, and drag a window around, it seems this
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:39:40PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:40:56PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote:
another crash.. and in /var/log/messages I see:
Feb 17 12:20:50 jupiter savecore: no dumps found
Any hints, please?
If you watch
I apologize in advance for the lack of details here. This break occurred
while I was rushing between locations and I didn't have an opportunity
to properly copy down the details of the error.
I have a 5.3 system with a geom_raid3 volume that was running -RELEASE
until this morning. I updated to
I found out, when using upd instead of tcp it works.
Karl
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Nottebrock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Februar 2005 15:02
An: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc: Karl M. Joch
Betreff: Re: 5.2.1 - Freenet6 TSPC Client dumps core
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:12:57PM -0500, Julio Capote wrote:
I've been on RELENG_5 for about 1 week now running ULE with PREEMPT.
Recently, I noticed some strange behavior that could be related to
scheduling; usually I leave my computer on all night (doing nothing as I
sleep), But when I'd
Is there a fix for the firefox advisory that portaudit keeps popping up?
=== firefox-1.0_7,1 has known vulnerabilities:
= web browsers -- window injection vulnerabilities.
Reference:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/b0911985-6e2a-11d9-9557-000a95bc6fae.html
= Please update your ports
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 15:35 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:12:57PM -0500, Julio Capote wrote:
I've been on RELENG_5 for about 1 week now running ULE with PREEMPT.
Recently, I noticed some strange behavior that could be related to
scheduling; usually I leave my
Hi,
This is with diskless operation.
Until the new, recent initdiskless script, I have
been using un-archived directories in /conf/base/
and /conf/default/.
With the recent patch to rc.d/initdiskless (now using
/rescue/pax), I've decided to create cpio.gz archives
instead, but failed. The pax
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 12:36:21AM +, Dick Davies wrote:
Is there a fix for the firefox advisory that portaudit keeps popping up?
=== firefox-1.0_7,1 has known vulnerabilities:
= web browsers -- window injection vulnerabilities.
Reference:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Dick Davies wrote:
Is there a fix for the firefox advisory that portaudit keeps popping up?
=== firefox-1.0_7,1 has known vulnerabilities:
= web browsers -- window injection vulnerabilities.
Reference:
48 matches
Mail list logo
