Am 21.07.2007 um 01:15 schrieb Tom Judge:
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Am 21.07.2007 um 00:18 schrieb Tom Judge:
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
As for performance issues with the SAS5/i, there is a problem
in the controller. A work arround was created by Scott Long
which created
Norberto Meijome schrieb:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:38:14 +0200
[LoN]Kamikaze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I mentioned earlier I remember it working during the 5.3 era on Stable, at
some point it worked. I even remember removing my CD-Rom drive from my
Thinkpad
without running atacontrol
From: Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i can eject the disk just fine (which in itself is weird, i think) the
device is still there...
umount /dev/cd0
works fine and off it goes. other than that, no, i havent tried to access the
device in question
I never saw that behaviour. It
Just so you know... after having done a large number of SCSI target
mode implementations and having seen what initiators do, it's
Microsoft that is the closest to actually adhering to and using the
SCSI standards correctly.
On 7/20/07, Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul
Tom Judge wrote:
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Am 21.07.2007 um 00:18 schrieb Tom Judge:
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
As for performance issues with the SAS5/i, there is a problem in
the controller. A work arround was created by Scott Long which
created a sysctl that could be
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
As for performance issues with the SAS5/i, there is a problem in the
controller. A work arround was created by Scott Long which created a
sysctl that could be set to cause the controller to turn on the on
drive write cache's. These changes where
Am 21.07.2007 um 21:33 schrieb Scott Long:
Michael Worobcuk wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
As for performance issues with the SAS5/i, there is a problem in
the controller. A work arround was created by Scott Long which
created a sysctl that could be set to cause the controller to
turn on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
IMHO, you should never use working on win... as a statement to say
that some hardware is
a) working
b) compliant with a standard
I was only stating, that after 8 years of use, I would have noticed if
the disk/controller
Hi,
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 10:08, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
As the subject says, on my 6-stable systems ntpd just sits there and does
nothing. The logs only mention when the daemon gets started or shut
down. It
complains when servers
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:02:50 -0600 (MDT)
: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Momchil Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : What is then the reason for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 11:55:39 -0500 Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 21), Tim Daneliuk said:
I asked this question a while back, but needed to do more digging to make
sure I had latest sources etc.
I have
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:10:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
'k, I just bought a new desktop, SATA/300MB/s interface, and this drive:
http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=254
Web site states 3Gb/s ... I'm seeing same SATA!50:
Seagate and WDC both ship SATA300 drives
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:10:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 21), Tim Daneliuk said:
ad4: 238475MB WDC WD2500JS-00NCB1 10.02E02 at ata2-master SATA150
ad8: 152627MB WDC WD1600AAJS-08PSA0 05.06H05 at ata4-master SATA150
Something else I thought I'd mention in
13 matches
Mail list logo
