Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Chris H
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:48:06 + Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:40:42PM -0400, Jason Unovitch wrote: ..uh top quoting.. Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default []. Fatal double fault: eip = 0xc0b416f5 esp = 0xe2673000 ebp =

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Glen Barber wrote: ZFS on i386 requires KSTACK_PAGES=4 in the kernel configuration to work properly, as noted in the 10.1-RELEASE errata (and release notes, if I remember correctly). We cannot set KSTACK_PAGES=4 in GENERIC by default, as it is too disruptive. Why? If you are using ZFS

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:40:42PM -0400, Jason Unovitch wrote: ..uh top quoting.. Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default []. Fatal double fault: eip = 0xc0b416f5 esp = 0xe2673000 ebp = 0xe2673008 cpuid =0; apic id = 00 panic: double fault cpuid = 0 KDB stack

freebsd downgrade

2015-07-23 Thread Stari Karp
Hi! I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update ugrade and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. Is it possible to downgrade BETA2 to 10.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.1-RELEASE, please? Thank you. ___

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:19:20AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Glen Barber wrote: ZFS on i386 requires KSTACK_PAGES=4 in the kernel configuration to work properly, as noted in the 10.1-RELEASE errata (and release notes, if I remember correctly). We cannot set KSTACK_PAGES=4 in

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Jason Unovitch
..uh top quoting.. Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default []. Fatal double fault: eip = 0xc0b416f5 esp = 0xe2673000 ebp = 0xe2673008 cpuid =0; apic id = 00 panic: double fault cpuid = 0 KDB stack backtrace: #0 0xc0b72832 at kdb_backtrace+0x52 #1 0xc0b339cb at vpanic+0x11b

Re: freebsd downgrade

2015-07-23 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/23/15 16:21, Stari Karp wrote: Hi! I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update ugrade and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. Is it possible to downgrade BETA2 to 10.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.1-RELEASE,

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote: Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM. The only correct answer to how much RAM do you need to run ZFS is always more AFAICT. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well as amd64. Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well as amd64. Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a 2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Glen Barber wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:44:43PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote: Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM. The only correct answer to how much RAM do you need to run ZFS is

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:54:00AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Glen Barber wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:44:43PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote: Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM.

Re: MFC r282973 (disable libgomp build) and r283060 (disable libgcov build)?

2015-07-23 Thread Matthieu Volat
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:03:01 -0700 (PDT) Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org wrote: Should r282973 and r283060 be MFCed to FreeBSD 10? On amd64 and i386, which use clang as their base compiler and don't have gcc in base by default, the math/scilab port uses clang for cc and c++ compilation, but

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:44:43PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote: Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM. The only correct answer to how much RAM do you need to run ZFS is always more AFAICT. There's a

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote: Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a 2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2 days before the kernel panics started. Even on amd64, you need to tune the system

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:00:03 + Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote .. FreeBSD kernel grew since 10.1-RELEASE, so this is not unexpected. Not trying to hijack the thread, or anything. But on that note; does FreeBSD keep a graph, or anything that indicates kernel [size] over major versions? I'm

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

2015-07-23 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:19:20AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Why is zfs on i386 so hard? zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well as amd64. I have never, ever, heard of anyone who has a deep understanding of zfs on FreeBSD recommend anything other than amd64.

10.2-BETA2 patch etc/ntp.conf to enable ntpd pool client functionality

2015-07-23 Thread John Marshall
I have submitted a patch to the distributed ntp.conf to enable ntpd pool client functionality. This was not possible in the ancient version of ntpd shipped with FreeBSD releases over the past several years. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201803 Essentially this gives you a

Re: struct timehands: th_generation field

2015-07-23 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:43 AM, deco33...@yandex.com wrote: I am struggling on one field of a struct : http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L63 I would like to understand what th_generation means please. Seems to me you get a clue from: (

struct timehands: th_generation field

2015-07-23 Thread deco33000
Hi, Currently I read more about timers and clock. I am struggling on one field of a struct : http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L63 I would like to understand what th_generation means please. Thanks a lot --  Jog ___

Re: struct timehands: th_generation field

2015-07-23 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, deco33...@yandex.com wrote: Is the maximum value for th_generation equal to 10 ? http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L77 I don't think those relate to generations. Generations change on every clock tick; the multiple timehands structs

Heads-up: Change to 10.2-RELEASE schedule

2015-07-23 Thread Glen Barber
At this time, re@ feels it is not necessary to have 10.2-BETA3 as part of the release cycle, so the next 10.2 builds (planned to start in just under 9 hours) will be 10.2-RC1. The 10.2-RELEASE schedule has been updated on the FreeBSD.org website to reflect this change, and is also included in

Re: struct timehands: th_generation field

2015-07-23 Thread deco33000
___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: struct timehands: th_generation field

2015-07-23 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 10:59 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, deco33...@yandex.com wrote: Is the maximum value for th_generation equal to 10 ? http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_tc.c?v=FREEBSD10#L77 I don't think those relate to generations.