How to configure FreeBSD for rebooting when kernel panic
Hi all, It is possible to configure OS for rebooting when kernel panic? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to configure FreeBSD for rebooting when kernel panic
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Hi all, It is possible to configure OS for rebooting when kernel panic? That should be the default condition as long as you don't specify debugger support (or do and use DDB_UNATTENDED) Kris pgpzKShPybVZI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How to configure FreeBSD for rebooting when kernel panic
Kris Kennaway wrote: That should be the default condition as long as you don't specify debugger support (or do and use DDB_UNATTENDED) Thanks. I have RELENG_5 server with ATA RAID promise controller and 4 ATA disks in two RAID0 stripes. Today one RAID0 has BROKEN (ar0). I have tried umount -f /dev/ar0s1d and currently have unreacheble system.. (i have only remote access to this machine) :( How to umount broken raid without system hold? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Loss of serial ports after upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Kevin. That solved the problem. I'm not sure how the di(sable) for sio0/1 was written into the kernel.conf. It has been a little while. Maybe my mind is a little hazy. Maybe I had a reason at the time to disable the serial ports. I am wondering why, when I booted the 4.6 kernel, the serial devices were recognized? Maybe because 4.6 kernel config does not have options UCONSOLE? At least I think so. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
man 4 ar on 5.4
See man 4 ar I think it is fully outdated, bease ar is an RAID storage device, as i see when i use Promise TX2000 Artem ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: man 4 ar on 5.4
On 6/10/05, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See man 4 ar I think it is fully outdated, bease ar is an RAID storage device, as i see when i use Promise TX2000 Artem ATA(4) FreeBSD Kernel Interfaces Manual ATA(4) NAME ata, ar, acd, ad, afd, ast -- generic ATA/ATAPI disk controller driver Nevertheless I think it is indeed confusing to have duplicate names for different devices. Jiawei -- Without the userland, the kernel is useless. --inspired by The Tao of Programming ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: man 4 ar on 5.4
Artem Kuchin wrote: See man 4 ar I think it is fully outdated, bease ar is an RAID storage device, as i see when i use Promise TX2000 On 5.4-STABLE this manual is not for ATA RAID. In ata(4) manual i have not found anything interesting.. My question was how to unmount FS at broken RAID0 without kernel panic? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov The Branch of JSC SO-CDO UES Kirov RDO System Administrator, +7 (8332) 57-47-88 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to configure FreeBSD for rebooting when kernel panic
Andrew McNaughton wrote: You can't unmount your root file system. Because of this it's possibly a good idea to have as minimal a root partition system as possible, off the raid system, and very rarely changed, so it's unlikely to get screwed up. Yes, i know. Root FS, and othser system FS's is on the other disk. RAID stripe have only public data. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
changes to src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c
Latest change to uipc_socket2.c fixed my problem with start of apache2 in chroot enviroment. Whenever I reboot 5.4 I was forced to manualy do: chroot /CHROOT/APACHE /usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd -D SSL no matter I already had that line in rc.local. Now that problem is also gone. Regards, gg. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to configure FreeBSD for rebooting when kernel panic
On 2005.06.10 03:06:46 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:04:17AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Hi all, It is possible to configure OS for rebooting when kernel panic? That should be the default condition as long as you don't specify debugger support (or do and use DDB_UNATTENDED) BTW. note that DDB_UNATTENDED was been broken for a while (so it still went into the DDB) - it should be fixed now at least in -CURRENT, but I'm not sure if that change made it back to 5-STABLE/5.4-RELEASE. -- Simon L. Nielsen pgpcKkwG7pidi.pgp Description: PGP signature
5.4 Resolver bug?
When doing: nslookup 85.236.100.78 nslookup: couldn't get address for '88~ë¿¿À': not found I tracked down the cause to this was the fact that resolv.conf had localhost in it which named wasn't binding to. But surely I shouldn't get back this corruption? Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to configure FreeBSD for rebooting when kernel panic
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Andrew McNaughton wrote: You can't unmount your root file system. Because of this it's possibly a good idea to have as minimal a root partition system as possible, off the raid system, and very rarely changed, so it's unlikely to get screwed up. Yes, i know. Root FS, and othser system FS's is on the other disk. RAID stripe have only public data. You want a system where if the mounts (other than the root fs) fail, the system will still be adminsterable. To maintain remote access, you'd need to make sure that all your basic login tools are on the root disk. eg sshd, root's default shell, etc. Should be doable, but would be nice if it didn't involve as much custom tinkering as I expect it would. Andrew -- Life is a process of becoming, a combination of states we have to go through. Where people fail is that they wish to elect a state and remain in it. This is a kind of death. -- Anais Nin --- Andrew McNaughton http://www.scoop.co.nz/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +61 422 753 792 -- pgp encrypted mail welcome keyid: 70F6C32D keyserver: pgp.mit.edu 5688 2396 AA81 036A EBAC 2DD4 1BEA 7975 A84F 6686 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 Resolver bug?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:58:42AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: When doing: nslookup 85.236.100.78 nslookup: couldn't get address for '88~ë¿¿À': not found I tracked down the cause to this was the fact that resolv.conf had localhost in it which named wasn't binding to. But surely I shouldn't get back this corruption? This is what I get on a machine that also has 127.0.0.1 in the resolv.conf $ nslookup 85.236.100.78 Server: localhost.sr.se Address: 127.0.0.1 *** localhost.sr.se can't find 85.236.100.78: Non-existent host/domain Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gunnar Flygt SR Datadrift Sveriges Radio ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 Resolver bug?
- Original Message - From: Gunnar Flygt [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is what I get on a machine that also has 127.0.0.1 in the resolv.conf $ nslookup 85.236.100.78 Server: localhost.sr.se Address: 127.0.0.1 *** localhost.sr.se can't find 85.236.100.78: Non-existent host/domain Clearly I needed a cup on coffee this morning, some muppet had actually put the following in resolv.conf: nameserver localhost So although there is an issue there ( invalid entry should have just been ignored ) its safe say its not a major issue :) Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:44:07PM -0500, Vulpes Velox wrote: Personnally, when upgrading from 4.x to 5.x, we ran into the following 3 issues that are still not fixed in 5.4: kern/80617: Hangup writing large blocks to NFS mounted FS(Patches available) Not exremely important: just don't do that. kern/79208: i387 libm's floorf(), ceilf() and truncf() (Fixed in RELENG_5) PITA when running threaded calculations. kern/78824 socketpair()/close() race condition (Fixed in CURRENT) Patch will be MFC'd to RELENG_5 soon. Anyway: you won't catch me running an unpatched 5.4 system... I'd say stick with RELENG_5 for the time being. Given the choice, I can't see any reason not to run a system that is not using the current stable. Which is exactly what I recommended (current stable == RELENG_5) :-) Marc pgp8aJetGF8zB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: You can't make the archive search, but Google Groups can (and does) very well. I search the mail list archives far more frequently with Google (or Google Groups) than with the archive search tool. Sure you can..there's a message ID search right there on the search page! I already posted a link to this. Kris wrote http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html I tried http://www.freebsd.org/search/ clicked to http://www.freebsd.org/search/#mailinglists clicked to amd64 moused in the original message ID I had quoted [EMAIL PROTECTED] got the posting by David O'Brien http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=218610+56+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-amd64/20050605.freebsd-amd64 It wasn't a search by key field of Message-ID, just a search for arbitrary text, content being the MessageID. But it worked. ( I had vaguely assumed the search box on front of http://www.freebsd.org search after clicking mailing lists on front page, leading to http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL probably would have been unified searches,, but not so, I guess one search comes standard with ports/mail/mailman, the other is special to freebsd.org site. - Julian StaceyNet Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam). Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: changes to src/sys/kern/uipc_socket2.c
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:32:14AM +0200, Goran Gajic wrote: Latest change to uipc_socket2.c fixed my problem with start of apache2 in chroot enviroment. Whenever I reboot 5.4 I was forced to manualy do: chroot /CHROOT/APACHE /usr/local/apache2/bin/httpd -D SSL no matter I already had that line in rc.local. Now that problem is also gone. Great to know I wasn't the only one having problems because of it. ;-) And thanks again Robert, for fixing this! Marc pgpJjGozQP5C2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: kern/78824: race condition close()ing and read()ing the same socketpair on SMP.
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:21:37AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: Great. I'll MFC this in a week or so assuming that there are no reports of problems with the patch in HEAD. Thanks for the clear and concise bug report, and sorry about taking so long to get this fixed! Haven't had any problems with this in the last two weekson RELENG_5. So the issue only remains in RELENG_5_4 now. Marc ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
autofs
Hi, list. Why autofs was exclude from FreeBSD? By. Dmitriy ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft USB Wireless Mouse not working
Hi, I'm running 5.4-STABLE and I'm not able to get my MS USB Wireless mouse working. After plugging the mouse I see this in my dmesg: uhid0: Microsoft Microsoft USB Wireless Mouse, rev 2.00/0.17, addr 2, iclass 3/1 But there is no ums device. I have device ums in kernel. Is there any patch available to get this working? thanks in advance michal ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
panics on 5.4-RELEASE-p1
Hi, we have a FreeBSD server which regularly panics (almost everyday). Moreover the console on serial port (booting with -h option) lockups the server when it panics, I took a screenshot with a camera and manually recopied it... config file and dmesg output attached. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1: apic id = 06 fault wirtual address = 0x1c fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc062c6e3 stack pointer = 0x10:0xe926c9bc frame pointer = 0x10:0xe926c9c8 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 99772 (expect) [thread pid 99772 tid 100159 ] Stopped at knote+0x27: lock cmpxchgl %ecx,0x1c(%edx) db where Tracing pid 99772 tid 100159 td 0xc394cd80 knote(c3b04080,0,0,c3b04010,c3b04000) at knote+0x27 ttwakeup(c3b04000,c3b04000,c3b04000,c3fd8800,e926ca14) at ttwakeup+0x55 ttymodem(c3b04000,1) at ttymodem+0x170 ptcopen(c3fd8800,8003,2000,c394cd80,c08c5fa0) at ptcopen+0x63 spec_open(e926ca80,e926cb3c,c06a68ed,e926ca80,180) at spec_open+0x2b6 spec_vnoperate(e926ca80) at spec_vnoperate+0x13 vn_open_cred(e926cbe4,e926cce4,9a5,c574c700,3) at vn_open_cred+0x419 vn_open(e926cbe4,e926cce4,9a5,3,c060ae07) at vn_open+0x1e kern_open(c394cd80,8060dc7,0,8003,805ebb7) at kern_open+0xeb open(c394cd80,e926cd14,3,2,296) at open+0x18 syscall(2f,2f,2f,3,) at syscall+0x2b3 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall (5, FreeBSD ELF32, open), eip = 0x2819f6bb, esp = 0xbfbfe5cc, ebp = 0xbfbfe5f8 --- thanks in advance -- Philippe PEGON Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p1 #2: Thu Jun 9 12:59:40 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRC Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3600.14-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 2147430400 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2095968256 (1998 MB) ACPI APIC Table: HP 0083 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 6 ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 9 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 2.0 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 48-71 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 2.0 irqs 72-95 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: HP P52 on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-safe frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x908-0x90b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 2.0 on pci0 pci13: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 4.0 on pci0 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci6 pci7: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci6 pci10: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 ciss0: HP Smart Array 642 port 0x5000-0x50ff mem 0xfdf8-0xfdfb,0xfdff-0xfdff1fff irq 72 at device 1.0 on pci10 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 6.0 on pci0 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 ciss1: HP Smart Array 6i port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xfde8-0xfdeb,0xfdef-0xfdef1fff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci2 bge0: Broadcom BCM5704C Dual Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x2100 mem 0xfde7-0xfde7 irq 25 at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus0: MII bus on bge0 brgphy0: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:12:79:3c:3d:5b bge1: Broadcom BCM5704C Dual Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x2100 mem 0xfde6-0xfde6 irq 26 at device 2.1 on pci2 miibus1: MII bus on bge1 brgphy1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:12:79:3c:3d:5a pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib7 pci1: display, VGA at device 3.0 (no driver attached) pci1: base peripheral at device 4.0 (no driver attached) pci1: base peripheral at device 4.2 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: Intel 6300ESB UDMA100 controller port 0x500-0x50f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 18 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on
Re: Microsoft USB Wireless Mouse not working
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:38:42 +0200, Michal Vanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm running 5.4-STABLE and I'm not able to get my MS USB Wireless mouse working. After plugging the mouse I see this in my dmesg: uhid0: Microsoft Microsoft USB Wireless Mouse, rev 2.00/0.17, addr 2, iclass 3/1 But there is no ums device. I have device ums in kernel. Is there any patch available to get this working? Do you also have 'uhid' in your kernel or loaded as a module? Maybe it attaches before ums. If yes, try removing it from your kernel and boot again. This is just a thought, so maybe it doesn't work. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Microsoft USB Wireless Mouse not working
Ronald Klop wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:38:42 +0200, Michal Vanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm running 5.4-STABLE and I'm not able to get my MS USB Wireless mouse working. After plugging the mouse I see this in my dmesg: uhid0: Microsoft Microsoft USB Wireless Mouse, rev 2.00/0.17, addr 2, iclass 3/1 But there is no ums device. I have device ums in kernel. Is there any patch available to get this working? Do you also have 'uhid' in your kernel or loaded as a module? Maybe it attaches before ums. If yes, try removing it from your kernel and boot again. This is just a thought, so maybe it doesn't work. hmm ... but for other USB mices (wired) it works normaly. doesn't ums depend on uhid? michal ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: autofs
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote on Fri 10.06.2005 14:34 Why autofs was exclude from FreeBSD? google says: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2004-September/000737.html http://freebsdaddicts.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1042 --- 8 snip --- markm 2004-11-10 19:54:18 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: sys/conf files sys/modules Makefile Removed files: sys/modules/autofs Makefile sys/fs/autofsautofs.h autofs_util.c autofs_vfsops.c autofs_vnops.c Log: Remove at request of author, perhaps to be re-added later. -- Regards, Holger Kipp ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space
Hello, Hi, Julien, 在 2005-06-10五的 07:09 +0200，Julien Gabel写道： Hi, Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1e989M-46M956M-5% /var/tmp Any hints? I had to run fsck(8) on /tmp, which was in the same state as shown here, three time in the last five months. You may want to have mount -f -u -ordonly /tmp before running fsck in foreground, and then mount -u /tmp to restore its mount options. I had use 'mount -u -o ro /tmp' (don't know that the -f option may help in this case before you write it :), but since the problem appears on a desktop, i was able to switch to single user to umount/fsck/mount the corresponding file system. Thank for the -f tip anyway! -- -jpeg. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: UFS2 partition with negative used space
Hi, On Jun 9, 2005, at 11:50 PM, Xin LI wrote: Hi, Suleiman, 2005-06-09 23:35 -0400Suleiman Souhlal Hi, [...] It used to be recomputed by the kernel at mount time if the filesystem was dirty, but delphij changed it so that background fsck recomputes it instead. For some reason, in this case, this wasn't enough to synchronize the superblock's cg summary with the actual summary stored in the cgs. I'll have to investigate some more. Will setting vfs.ffs.compute_summary_at_mount=1 before mounting the volume help the situation? Unfortunately, we didn't try that (well, we actually did, but I forgot to tell Jean-Yves to make sure his volume was dirty before mounting it). -- Suleiman Souhlal | [EMAIL PROTECTED] The FreeBSD Project | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with Serial ATA - Tyan Tiger i7320 motherboard
I just got a machine Tyan Tiger i7320 motherboard with a 250Gb Serial ATA Hitachi drive. When I try to boot FreeBSD 5.4 Release it says: ATA0 ATAPI IDENTITY_TIMEOUT several times And ATA1 IDENTIFY_TIMEOUT Before the install starts - RedHat Liunx correctly sees the drive. :( Does this mean FreeBSD does not support this or have I got the wrong BIOS settings. Any help gratefully received. It is an Adaptec AIC-8110 SATA I controller I think. In the startup of FreeBSD it says Intel 6300ESB UDMA100 controller (atapci0 atapci1) Thanks ALan ___ Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.4 not running HTT
I have several boxes that I have upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4 and has stopped using the HTT virtal CPU's. This have been going on for a while. the oldest is dated 20050519 and the latest is yesterday. Is there something that I have missed? Been using same configs for 5.3 without any problems. /Bjorn Little outputs from yesterdays build: # ps aux | grep idle root 12 99.0 0.0 0 8 ?? RL3:12PM 12:28.60 [idle: cpu0] root 11 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? RL3:12PM 0:00.00 [idle: cpu1] # ps aux | grep acpi root 7 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? IL3:12PM 0:00.00 [acpi_task0] root 8 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? IL3:12PM 0:00.00 [acpi_task1] root 9 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? IL3:12PM 0:00.00 [acpi_task2] root 20 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? WL3:12PM 0:00.00 [irq9: acpi0] root 84 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? WL3:12PM 0:00.00 [swi6: acpitaskq] root 87 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? DL3:12PM 0:00.02 [acpi_thermal] acpi is loaded # kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 14 0xc040 3266f0 kernel 2 14 0xc0727000 56270acpi.ko 31 0xc23e9000 24000usb.ko SMP and apic is in the kernelconfig. # To make an SMP kernel, the next line is needed options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel device apic# I/O APIC # sysctl -a | grep cpu kern.threads.virtual_cpu: 2 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.onecpu: 0 kern.ccpu: 1948 kern.smp.maxcpus: 16 kern.smp.cpus: 2 debug.kdb.stop_cpus: 1 debug.PMAP1changedcpu: 0 hw.ncpu: 2 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_usage: 100.00% machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 machdep.hlt_cpus: 2 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 0 machdep.logical_cpus_mask: 2 dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU0 dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0 dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0 dev.cpu.1.%desc: ACPI CPU dev.cpu.1.%driver: cpu dev.cpu.1.%location: handle=\_PR_.CPU1 dev.cpu.1.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0 dev.cpu.1.%parent: acpi0 Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #1: Fri Jun 10 15:03:54 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/games Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3047.90-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SS E2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 1073717248 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1045368832 (996 MB) ACPI APIC Table: COMPAQ 0083 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 6 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 7 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-15 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 1.1 irqs 16-31 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 1.1 irqs 32-47 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 1.1 irqs 48-63 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard ... ... ... da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: COMPAQ RAID 1 VOLUME OK Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 135.168MB/s transfers da0: 17359MB (35553120 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 4357C) SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 not running HTT
--On 10 June 2005 17:35 +0200 kama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have several boxes that I have upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4 and has stopped using the HTT virtal CPU's. This have been going on for a while. the oldest is dated 20050519 and the latest is yesterday. Is there something that I have missed? Been using same configs for 5.3 without any problems. Perhaps, ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc :) -Karl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 not running HTT
Have a read /usr/src/UPDATING it explains. Steve / K - Original Message - From: kama [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have several boxes that I have upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4 and has stopped using the HTT virtal CPU's. This have been going on for a while. the oldest is dated 20050519 and the latest is yesterday. Is there something that I have missed? Been using same configs for 5.3 without any problems. This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
We're using mostly:
5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 6 12:22:18 BST 2005
This is on a Dell PowerEdge 2850. (2 * 2.8 GHz Xeons, 4GB ram, disks),
we've been keeping up with stable because supposedly all these new
fixes to threading will help us out here.
We're trying to get FreeBSD to perform reasonably well, in comparison
to Linux, or even what we should expect to see. We're getting about
half the performance we get from gentoo on the same application
(mysql).
The discussion on the 'freebsd-threads' mailing list about a year ago
seems to match our experiences nowadays pretty well:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2004-May/002002.html
Nothing much seems to have changed, although lots of people claim that
FreeBSD 5.x is now fine, it doesn't seem to be.
Here's a rough breakdown of the sort of performance we're seeing, this
is the default select-key super-smack but setup for innodb rather than
myisam.
Using the simple 'select-key.smack' Super-Smack benchmark (50 clients
with 1000 runs each):
OS CPUsBuild ThreadingKqueries/sec
-
FreeBSD 1 Pro KSE 10.6
FreeBSD 1 Pro libthr 10.6
FreeBSD 2 Pro libthr 14.4
FreeBSD 2 Source libthr 14.5
FreeBSD 2 Source KSE/P (static) 15.7
FreeBSD 2 Source KSE/P (dynamic) 15.8
FreeBSD 2 Source KSE/S (dynamic) 15.8
FreeBSD 2 Pro KSE 15.9
FreeBSD 2 Source LinuxThreads 17.7
Gentoo 2 Source NPTL 34.0 !!
(KSE/P = KSE with Process Scope Threading, KSE/S = KSE with System
Scope Threading)
And, here's the full set of results :
# FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE SMP, MySQL Pro 4.1.12, libkse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 27 0 % foreach f (1 2 3 4 5)
{/data/supersmack-1.3/bin/super-smack select-key.smack 50 1000|grep
select_index}
select_index10 2 0 15978.35
select_index10 3 0 15908.00
select_index10 6 0 15852.89
select_index10 6 0 15888.05
select_index10 5 0 15868.09
# FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE NON-SMP, MySQL Pro 4.1.12, libkse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9 0 % foreach f (1 2 3 4 5)
{/data/supersmack-1.3/bin/super-smack select-key.smack 50 1000|grep
select_index}
select_index10 11 0 11846.17
select_index10 7 0 10544.36
select_index10 4 0 10615.13
select_index10 5 0 10607.55
select_index10 4 0 10640.58
# FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE SMP, MySQL Pro 4.1.12, libthr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 33 130 % foreach f (1 2 3 4 5)
{/data/supersmack-1.3/bin/super-smack select-key.smack 50 1000|grep
select_index}
Select_index10 19 3 14412.10
select_index10 11 3 14529.83
select_index10 11 3 14489.03
select_index10 12 3 14488.09
select_index10 15 3 14495.77
# FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE NON-SMP, MySQL Pro 4.1.12, libthr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11 0 % foreach f (1 2 3 4 5)
{/data/supersmack-1.3/bin/super-smack select-key.smack 50 1000|grep
select_index}
select_index10 7 0 10531.75
select_index10 5 0 10673.64
select_index10 24 2 11179.66
select_index10 28 4 10675.24
select_index10 27 4 10191.25
# FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE SMP, Hand-built 4.1.12, libthr (dynamic)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4 0 % foreach f (1 2 3 4 5)
{/data/supersmack-1.3/bin/super-smack select-key.smack 50 1000|grep
select_index}
select_index10 13 3 14487.99
select_index10 16 3 14460.64
select_index10 11 3 14397.79
select_index10 15 3 14503.39
select_index10 11 3 14502.58
# FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE SMP, Hand-built 4.1.12, libkse process scope (dynamic)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7 0 % foreach f (1 2 3 4 5)
{/data/supersmack-1.3/bin/super-smack select-key.smack 50 1000|grep
select_index}
select_index10 16 2 15813.88
select_index10 14 1 15901.01
select_index10 3 0 15870.71
select_index10 14 0 15917.34
select_index10 6 0 15357.74
# FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE SMP, Hand-built 4.1.12, libkse process scope (static)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7 130 % foreach f (1 2 3 4 5)
{/data/supersmack-1.3/bin/super-smack select-key.smack 50 1000|grep
select_index}
select_index10 19 3 15836.35
select_index10 22 2 15807.58
select_index10 20 3 15782.74
select_index10 21 3 15790.82
Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:13:57PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: You can't make the archive search, but Google Groups can (and does) very well. I search the mail list archives far more frequently with Google (or Google Groups) than with the archive search tool. Sure you can..there's a message ID search right there on the search page! I already posted a link to this. Kris wrotehttp://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html I tried http://www.freebsd.org/search/ clicked tohttp://www.freebsd.org/search/#mailinglists clicked toamd64 moused in the original message ID I had quoted [EMAIL PROTECTED] got the posting by David O'Brien http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=218610+56+/usr/local/www/db/text/2005/freebsd-amd64/20050605.freebsd-amd64 It wasn't a search by key field of Message-ID, just a search for arbitrary text, content being the MessageID. But it worked. And what was wrong with casting your eye one line down, clicking on Message-ID and entering it in the search box at http://www.freebsd.org/search/search-mid.html Is it really rendered in an invisible font for several people not to have seen it? Kris pgpXcWwdYD8qC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 06:05:37PM +0100, Steve Roome wrote: We're using mostly: 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 6 12:22:18 BST 2005 Show your kernel config etc. Kris pgpfXpy1EB8Ez.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
Hi Kris, On 10 Jun 2005, at 18:17, Kris Kennaway wrote: Show your kernel config etc. I've been working with Steve on this project. We've been playing with various tuning factors, including kernel changes, different stripe sizes on the RAID, my.cnf tuning, libmap.conf, and although we can gain a bit here and there, we can't account for the doubling of performance with Gentoo. Anyway, I've included the dmesg and kernel config. The Gentoo install was pretty vanilla-flavoured, as neither Steve or I had installed Gentoo before, and both of us are pretty rusty on any form of Linux. Incidentally, this does not seem to be I/O-bound. The data is big enough to stay in the table cache anyway. I just noticed these particular tests were done on FreeBSD without HTT, whereas the Gentoo test was. However, I can tell you that in earlier runs, the difference between HTT and non-HTT on FreeBSD for this benchmark was negligible. Regards, Tom --- [snip] --- Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 9 09:13:03 BST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/PE2850_i386_4 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE ,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE real memory = 3489398784 (3327 MB) avail memory = 3418517504 (3260 MB) ACPI APIC Table: DELL PE BKC ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 7 ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 8 ioapic1: WARNING: intbase 32 != expected base 24 ioapic2: Changing APIC ID to 9 ioapic2: WARNING: intbase 64 != expected base 56 ioapic3: Changing APIC ID to 10 ioapic3: WARNING: intbase 96 != expected base 88 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 2.0 irqs 32-55 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 64-87 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 2.0 irqs 96-119 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: DELL PE BKC on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 amr0: LSILogic MegaRAID 1.51 mem 0xdfec-0xdfef, 0xd80f-0xd80f irq 46 at device 14.0 on pci2 amr0: LSILogic PERC 4e/Di Firmware 513O, BIOS H418, 256MB RAM pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci1 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 4.0 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 5.0 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci5 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.35 port 0xecc0-0xecff mem 0xdfbe-0xdfbf irq 64 at device 7.0 on pci6 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:43:ec:b1:7f em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci5 pci7: ACPI PCI bus on pcib7 em1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.35 port 0xdcc0-0xdcff mem 0xdf9e-0xdf9f irq 65 at device 8.0 on pci7 em1: Ethernet address: 00:11:43:ec:b1:80 em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pcib8: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 6.0 on pci0 pci8: ACPI PCI bus on pcib8 pcib9: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci8 pci9: ACPI PCI bus on pcib9 pcib10: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci8 pci10: ACPI PCI bus on pcib10 pcib11: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci11: ACPI PCI bus on pcib11 pci11: display, VGA at device 13.0 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: Intel ICH5 UDMA100 controller port 0xfc00-0xfc0f, 0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A orm0: ISA Option ROMs at iomem 0xec000-0xe,0xc-0xcafff on isa0 sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300 vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled Timecounter TSC frequency 2793011648 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acd0: CDROM SAMSUNG CD-ROM SN-124/N104 at ata0-master PIO4 amrd0: LSILogic MegaRAID logical drive on amr0 amrd0:
Re: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:25:17PM +0100, Danny Cooper wrote: Do you see any traffic when you run 'tcpdump port 22' on the server? Or if you just try telnet server.ip 22 do you get anything back? I know I am stating basic's but its caught me out a few times before where a firewall has caught the packets. DC -Original Message- From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2005 22:02 To: 'Danny Cooper' Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Yep, timeout before auth. Matt -Original Message- From: Danny Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:43 PM To: 'Matt Smith' Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Have you checked /var/log/auth.log for any error messages with sshd -Original Message- From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2005 20:56 To: 'Danny Cooper'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Did that, to no avail. It was fine then it started doing this. Any other suggestions? Matt -Original Message- From: Danny Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:28 PM To: 'Matt Smith'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Have you opened up the /etc/hosts.allow file to allow connections for the home lan? e.g. ALL : localhost : allow ALL : 127.0.0.1 : allow ALL : 192.68.0.0/255.255.255.255 : allow sshd : all : allow ftpd : all : allow ALL : ALL : deny Danny C -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Smith Sent: 06 June 2005 19:20 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Hello, you may remember the problems that my friends were having with ssh/ftp timeouts. Well now I have the same issue with my FBSD 4.10 install. I can ping the box and use the Apache and telnet daemons, but not the SSHD or FTPD. I tried to upgrade the SSHD to no avail and I CAN connect to the daemons from the loopback address, but not across my home LAN. Any suggestions? Matt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] /Tied of top-postings - adding the following to my procmail config * ^X-Mailer: Microsoft /dev/null -ip -- Never put all your eggs in your pocket. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LSI SATA-150-6 Raid support
Can anyone tell me what is status of support of drivers for LSI Logic SATA 150-6 RAID controllers? I have seen news from May,11 that LSI will support FreeBSD 5.4 but I was not able to find drivers for 5.4R on their site. I'm trying to install 5.4R on Fujitsu Siemens RX200S2 which has this SATA but 5.4R sees disks ad4 and ad6 although I have configured controller to use raid 1. Regards. gg. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect
It was the DNS problem. Thank you to all Matt -Original Message- From: Igor Pokrovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 1:52 PM To: Danny Cooper Cc: 'Matt Smith'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:25:17PM +0100, Danny Cooper wrote: Do you see any traffic when you run 'tcpdump port 22' on the server? Or if you just try telnet server.ip 22 do you get anything back? I know I am stating basic's but its caught me out a few times before where a firewall has caught the packets. DC -Original Message- From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2005 22:02 To: 'Danny Cooper' Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Yep, timeout before auth. Matt -Original Message- From: Danny Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:43 PM To: 'Matt Smith' Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Have you checked /var/log/auth.log for any error messages with sshd -Original Message- From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2005 20:56 To: 'Danny Cooper'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Did that, to no avail. It was fine then it started doing this. Any other suggestions? Matt -Original Message- From: Danny Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:28 PM To: 'Matt Smith'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Have you opened up the /etc/hosts.allow file to allow connections for the home lan? e.g. ALL : localhost : allow ALL : 127.0.0.1 : allow ALL : 192.68.0.0/255.255.255.255 : allow sshd : all : allow ftpd : all : allow ALL : ALL : deny Danny C -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Smith Sent: 06 June 2005 19:20 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SSHD and FTPD, can't connect Hello, you may remember the problems that my friends were having with ssh/ftp timeouts. Well now I have the same issue with my FBSD 4.10 install. I can ping the box and use the Apache and telnet daemons, but not the SSHD or FTPD. I tried to upgrade the SSHD to no avail and I CAN connect to the daemons from the loopback address, but not across my home LAN. Any suggestions? Matt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] /Tied of top-postings - adding the following to my procmail config * ^X-Mailer: Microsoft /dev/null -ip -- Never put all your eggs in your pocket. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
* Steve Roome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: We're trying to get FreeBSD to perform reasonably well, in comparison to Linux, or even what we should expect to see. We're getting about half the performance we get from gentoo on the same application (mysql). Fancy giving CURRENT a try? For the record, we run FreeBSD 5.3 in production as our master database server without problems, so long as we keep the few heavy queries we do off it: Uptime: 6044357 Threads: 146 Questions: 1963912006 Slow queries: 1842 Opens: 182277 Flush tables: 3733 Open tables: 357 Queries per second avg: 324.917 But it would be nice not to fall back on Linux for our slaves to do the heavy lifting. Maybe FreeBSD 6 will be less disappointing in this regard. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 not running HTT
Steven Hartland wrote: Have a read /usr/src/UPDATING it explains. It should be in /usr/src/UPDATING, but I don't see it there myself. I got bitten by the same problem. The other guy who gave ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc provided the right answer, but it should be also mentioned in UPDATING. I have several boxes that I have upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4 and has stopped using the HTT virtal CPU's. This have been going on for a while. the oldest is dated 20050519 and the latest is yesterday. Is there something that I have missed? Been using same configs for 5.3 without any problems. This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: LSI SATA-150-6 Raid support
Goran Gajic wrote: Can anyone tell me what is status of support of drivers for LSI Logic SATA 150-6 RAID controllers? I have seen news from May,11 that LSI will support FreeBSD 5.4 but I was not able to find drivers for 5.4R on their site. I'm trying to install 5.4R on Fujitsu Siemens RX200S2 which has this SATA but 5.4R sees disks ad4 and ad6 although I have configured controller to use raid 1. Regards. gg. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] hi - it is fully supported by os - check hardware notes http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#DISK and news section. next time do not post on two lists please ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patching a file with blanks in the name
--- foo bar/meow~ Fri Mar 11 09:00:49 2005 +++ foo bar/meowFri Jun 10 12:17:22 2005 - a = 0; + a = 1; With the above example patch searches only for `foo', then gives up and asks for help. I tried quoting the entire file name and escaping the blanks with backslashes -- neither method works... Any ideas? Thanks! There was a discussion and maybe even a fix proposed for this issue on one of the GNU lists, probably [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Anyway, I don't think the current release version of patch will handle paths containing spaces... Strange... I can't imagine the fix being that complex... Instead of cutting the file-name on the first blank, I'd cut it on the last tab. People with tabs in the filenames would have to append one more tab at the end. Regular, diff-generated patches (vast majority of them all) would not be affected at all, as they always have timestamps (after a tab). I could do the coding -- would anyone be interested in comitting it? Some of the port-ed software (like the blasted java/eclipse) has blanks in directory names :-( -mi ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
Steve Roome wrote: We're using mostly: 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 6 12:22:18 BST 2005 This is on a Dell PowerEdge 2850. (2 * 2.8 GHz Xeons, 4GB ram, disks), we've been keeping up with stable because supposedly all these new fixes to threading will help us out here. We're trying to get FreeBSD to perform reasonably well, in comparison to Linux, or even what we should expect to see. We're getting about half the performance we get from gentoo on the same application (mysql). The discussion on the 'freebsd-threads' mailing list about a year ago seems to match our experiences nowadays pretty well: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2004-May/002002.html Nothing much seems to have changed, although lots of people claim that FreeBSD 5.x is now fine, it doesn't seem to be. Here's a rough breakdown of the sort of performance we're seeing, this is the default select-key super-smack but setup for innodb rather than myisam. Using the simple 'select-key.smack' Super-Smack benchmark (50 clients with 1000 runs each): OS CPUsBuild ThreadingKqueries/sec - FreeBSD 1 Pro KSE 10.6 FreeBSD 1 Pro libthr 10.6 FreeBSD 2 Pro libthr 14.4 FreeBSD 2 Source libthr 14.5 FreeBSD 2 Source KSE/P (static) 15.7 FreeBSD 2 Source KSE/P (dynamic) 15.8 FreeBSD 2 Source KSE/S (dynamic) 15.8 FreeBSD 2 Pro KSE 15.9 FreeBSD 2 Source LinuxThreads 17.7 Gentoo 2 Source NPTL 34.0 !! (KSE/P = KSE with Process Scope Threading, KSE/S = KSE with System Scope Threading) Quick ideas: Have you tried a kernel with PREEMPTION enabled? I haven't quantified the effect, but it's improved performance in some situations. Have you tried increasing vfs.read_max? Guy -- Guy Helmer, Ph.D., Principal System Architect, Palisade Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.palisadesys.com/~ghelmer ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange error
This day I've a very strange error when trying to connect to my FreeBSD machine (4.11-STABLE) I got the following error: ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host Can anyone give me any clue what's wrong? Jack ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
Hi Guy, On 10 Jun 2005, at 21:37, Guy Helmer wrote: Have you tried a kernel with PREEMPTION enabled? I haven't quantified the effect, but it's improved performance in some situations. Have you tried increasing vfs.read_max? Thanks for your suggestions... I've given them a go, and it looks like there's no discernible difference in performance for either/ both, on KSE, libthr or LinuxThreads. =( Regards, Tom ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:04:23PM +0100, Tom Gidden wrote: Hi Guy, On 10 Jun 2005, at 21:37, Guy Helmer wrote: Have you tried a kernel with PREEMPTION enabled? I haven't quantified the effect, but it's improved performance in some situations. Have you tried increasing vfs.read_max? Thanks for your suggestions... I've given them a go, and it looks like there's no discernible difference in performance for either/ both, on KSE, libthr or LinuxThreads. =( Did you retry with HTT yet? Note that it's disabled by default in FreeBSD, so if you see no performance improvement when you only turn it on in the BIOS, that could be why. Kris pgpw0r7vHc0k3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 5.4 not running HTT
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:06:51PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Steven Hartland wrote: Have a read /usr/src/UPDATING it explains. It should be in /usr/src/UPDATING, but I don't see it there myself. It depends on which version you are looking at the source of. In the release/security branches (RELENG_5_4, etc.) all security patches (like this one) are noted in UPDATING. For the development branches (RELENG_5 , -CURRENT) security patches usually don't get mentioned. I.e. if you are looking at the source for RELENG_5_4 there is a notice in UPDATING, if you are looking at the source for RELENG_5 there is not. In this particular case there probably should have been a note added to UPDATING for both -STABLE and -CURRENT, but there wasn't. I got bitten by the same problem. The other guy who gave ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc provided the right answer, but it should be also mentioned in UPDATING. -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 not running HTT
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:14:25PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 03:06:51PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Steven Hartland wrote: Have a read /usr/src/UPDATING it explains. It should be in /usr/src/UPDATING, but I don't see it there myself. It depends on which version you are looking at the source of. In the release/security branches (RELENG_5_4, etc.) all security patches (like this one) are noted in UPDATING. For the development branches (RELENG_5 , -CURRENT) security patches usually don't get mentioned. I.e. if you are looking at the source for RELENG_5_4 there is a notice in UPDATING, if you are looking at the source for RELENG_5 there is not. In this particular case there probably should have been a note added to UPDATING for both -STABLE and -CURRENT, but there wasn't. send-pr with the patch and/or talk to the security team. Kris pgpJOmoBhOVsT.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: LSI SATA-150-6 Raid support
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Goran Gajic wrote: Can anyone tell me what is status of support of drivers for LSI Logic SATA 150-6 RAID controllers? I have seen news from May,11 that LSI will support FreeBSD 5.4 but I was not able to find drivers for 5.4R on their site. I'm trying to install 5.4R on Fujitsu Siemens RX200S2 which has this SATA but 5.4R sees disks ad4 and ad6 although I have configured controller to use raid 1. Regards. gg. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] hi - it is fully supported by os - check hardware notes http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-i386.html#DISK and news section. next time do not post on two lists please Sorry, I was little bit confused. Fujitsu Siemens RX100 S2 has some LSI SATA software raid controller. I suppose that is reason why it is not registered as amrd. It is also not listed in pciconf -lv. Regards, gg. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:04:23PM +0100, Tom Gidden wrote: Hi Guy, On 10 Jun 2005, at 21:37, Guy Helmer wrote: Have you tried a kernel with PREEMPTION enabled? I haven't quantified the effect, but it's improved performance in some situations. Have you tried increasing vfs.read_max? Thanks for your suggestions... I've given them a go, and it looks like there's no discernible difference in performance for either/ both, on KSE, libthr or LinuxThreads. =( Did you retry with HTT yet? Note that it's disabled by default in FreeBSD, so if you see no performance improvement when you only turn it on in the BIOS, that could be why. Or repeat the Linux tests without HTT enabled. -- DE ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACL not supported on 5.4?
I have a 5.4 install that I'm trying to use to experiment with ACL (and extended attributes). Handbook section 14.12.1 (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/fs-acl.html) has a few sample commands that I tried running. But I get operation not supported, like so: 17:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED]touch test 17:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED]ll test -rw-r--r-- 1 bfoz user 0 Jun 10 17:03 test 17:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED]getfacl test #file:test #owner:1001 #group:1001 user::rw- group::r-- other::r-- 17:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED]setfacl -k test setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported 17:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED]setfacl -b test setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported I tried doing the above as root, but the result was the same. I'm pretty sure this was a fresh install of 5.4 (its been awhile since I made this box) so it should have UFS2 by default and the kernel does in fact have UFS_ACL compiled in. What else do I need to do? How do I check to see if I really do have UFS2? Thanks ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 not running HTT
Erik Trulsson wrote: It depends on which version you are looking at the source of. In the release/security branches (RELENG_5_4, etc.) all security patches (like this one) are noted in UPDATING. For the development branches (RELENG_5 , -CURRENT) security patches usually don't get mentioned. I.e. if you are looking at the source for RELENG_5_4 there is a notice in UPDATING, if you are looking at the source for RELENG_5 there is not. In this particular case there probably should have been a note added to UPDATING for both -STABLE and -CURRENT, but there wasn't. Quite right -- we fell into the trap of just following our standard procedures, instead of thinking about whether this met the test for being documented in UPDATING (which it certainly does, since it is a potentially astonishing user-visible change). I've added it to the stable branches, but not to -current, since hyper-threading is still enabled by default in HEAD. Colin Percival ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
Try linking mysql with ptmalloc2 (instead of the system malloc obviously). Doing this has the side-benefit of ensuring that you don't need to mess with MAXDSIZ. Try linking mysql with david xu's threading library. -Jon On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Tom Gidden wrote: Hi Kris, On 10 Jun 2005, at 18:17, Kris Kennaway wrote: Show your kernel config etc. I've been working with Steve on this project. We've been playing with various tuning factors, including kernel changes, different stripe sizes on the RAID, my.cnf tuning, libmap.conf, and although we can gain a bit here and there, we can't account for the doubling of performance with Gentoo. Anyway, I've included the dmesg and kernel config. The Gentoo install was pretty vanilla-flavoured, as neither Steve or I had installed Gentoo before, and both of us are pretty rusty on any form of Linux. Incidentally, this does not seem to be I/O-bound. The data is big enough to stay in the table cache anyway. I just noticed these particular tests were done on FreeBSD without HTT, whereas the Gentoo test was. However, I can tell you that in earlier runs, the difference between HTT and non-HTT on FreeBSD for this benchmark was negligible. Regards, Tom --- [snip] --- Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 9 09:13:03 BST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/PE2850_i386_4 Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE ,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE real memory = 3489398784 (3327 MB) avail memory = 3418517504 (3260 MB) ACPI APIC Table: DELL PE BKC ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 7 ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 8 ioapic1: WARNING: intbase 32 != expected base 24 ioapic2: Changing APIC ID to 9 ioapic2: WARNING: intbase 64 != expected base 56 ioapic3: Changing APIC ID to 10 ioapic3: WARNING: intbase 96 != expected base 88 ioapic0 Version 2.0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 2.0 irqs 32-55 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 64-87 on motherboard ioapic3 Version 2.0 irqs 96-119 on motherboard npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: DELL PE BKC on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter ACPI-fast frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pcib1: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci1 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 amr0: LSILogic MegaRAID 1.51 mem 0xdfec-0xdfef, 0xd80f-0xd80f irq 46 at device 14.0 on pci2 amr0: LSILogic PERC 4e/Di Firmware 513O, BIOS H418, 256MB RAM pcib3: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci1 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 pcib4: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 4.0 on pci0 pci4: ACPI PCI bus on pcib4 pcib5: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 5.0 on pci0 pci5: ACPI PCI bus on pcib5 pcib6: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci5 pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib6 em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.35 port 0xecc0-0xecff mem 0xdfbe-0xdfbf irq 64 at device 7.0 on pci6 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:43:ec:b1:7f em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pcib7: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci5 pci7: ACPI PCI bus on pcib7 em1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.35 port 0xdcc0-0xdcff mem 0xdf9e-0xdf9f irq 65 at device 8.0 on pci7 em1: Ethernet address: 00:11:43:ec:b1:80 em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pcib8: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 6.0 on pci0 pci8: ACPI PCI bus on pcib8 pcib9: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.0 on pci8 pci9: ACPI PCI bus on pcib9 pcib10: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 0.2 on pci8 pci10: ACPI PCI bus on pcib10 pcib11: ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 30.0 on pci0 pci11: ACPI PCI bus on pcib11 pci11: display, VGA at device 13.0 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: Intel ICH5 UDMA100 controller port 0xfc00-0xfc0f, 0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 sio0: 16550A-compatible COM port port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A orm0: ISA Option ROMs at iomem 0xec000-0xe,0xc-0xcafff on isa0 sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300 vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df
Re: 5.4 not running HTT
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Karl Pielorz wrote: --On 10 June 2005 17:35 +0200 kama [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have several boxes that I have upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4 and has stopped using the HTT virtal CPU's. This have been going on for a while. the oldest is dated 20050519 and the latest is yesterday. Is there something that I have missed? Been using same configs for 5.3 without any problems. Perhaps, ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc Thank you! =) /Bjorn ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
On Friday, 10 June 2005 at 18:05:37 +0100, Steve Roome wrote: We're using mostly: 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 6 12:22:18 BST 2005 This is on a Dell PowerEdge 2850. (2 * 2.8 GHz Xeons, 4GB ram, disks), we've been keeping up with stable because supposedly all these new fixes to threading will help us out here. What's the current malloc config for 5.4? Last time I saw this kind of comparison, it proved to be due to malloc debugging. That was on -CURRENT, though. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-dec2004.html#14 for more details. Greg -- The virus contained in this message was not detected. Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgpoodi3zh8lJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
Hi, Greg, 2005-06-11 13:49 +0930Greg 'groggy' Lehey On Friday, 10 June 2005 at 18:05:37 +0100, Steve Roome wrote: We're using mostly: 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 6 12:22:18 BST 2005 This is on a Dell PowerEdge 2850. (2 * 2.8 GHz Xeons, 4GB ram, disks), we've been keeping up with stable because supposedly all these new fixes to threading will help us out here. What's the current malloc config for 5.4? Last time I saw this kind of comparison, it proved to be due to malloc debugging. That was on -CURRENT, though. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-dec2004.html#14 for more details. The malloc config for 5.4 is aj IIRC. Maybe we should do a gprof'ed build of mysql as well as ktrace dump of a mysql daemon to figure out what was happening? Actually the test team at my company has found the exact problem within a recent FreeBSD (5.4-R) vs CentOS (4.0) benchmark test, but they have not arranged the same hardware for me yet to figure out why. Cheers, -- Xin LI delphij delphij net http://www.delphij.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux
2005-06-10 19:05 -0400Daniel Eischen On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: [snip] Or repeat the Linux tests without HTT enabled. The test team at my company have did a similar test with similar result, with HTT disabled so I'd say that HTT does not benefit MySQL that much :-/ Cheers, -- Xin LI delphij delphij net http://www.delphij.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ACL not supported on 5.4?
Hello Brandon, I get the same error messages if ACL are not enabled. I just want to make sure that you didn't overlook the part of the handbook where it says that you have to enable it. Well, is ACL support enabled on the file system, i.e. does 'mount' show acls in the list of options? /dev/da0s1g on /home (ufs, local, soft-updates, acls) If not then you should add 'acls' it in /etc/fstab /dev/da0s1g /home ufs rw,acls 2 2 or prefer tunefs -a enable /dev/da0s1g By the way, the option -k won't work on non-directories at all, see also the manpage of setfacl. Regards Björn ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
