6.0 on VMWare 5.0: `calcru: negative runtime of -12728437 usec for pid 28 (irq17: lnc0)'

Hello freebsd-stable, FreeBSD 6.0 on VMWare 5.0 prints such messages every 3-4 minute. Also, messages like calcru: runtime went backwards from 40644816 to 40005944 usec for pid 3 (g_up) is shown routinely. timecounter is ACPI-safe, kernel is GENERIC one. 5.4-STABLE on some virtual ma

[releng_5 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2005-11-09 06:13:51 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-09 06:13:51 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2005-11-09 06:13:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-09 06:14:45 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-09 06:14:45

Re: What should be in GENERIC?

Hi folks! > And the real problem of a big kernel is Sometimes people want just what they need. Do you want your cousin's cycle in a living room? Stuff one even don't know what is it for? Drivers for scsii you don't have? I would like freebsd as neat as possible. It _is_ simple and neat. Wha

Re: USB Card Reader Permissions

On Tue, 2005-Nov-08 20:54:41 +, Andy Fraser wrote: >I've read the man pages for devfs, devfs.conf and devfs.rules. devfs.rules >looks like what I need but I can't work out what I actually need to do or how >to test a rule without rebooting. I also found the man pages very opaque but some goo

Re: Tun and ALTQ

On Tuesday 08 November 2005 18:15, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote: > > It seems that it work. Thanks. > > > > Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify "em", for "tun", vice > > versa... what a mess, hehe. > > No prob; I don't see w

[releng_5 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2005-11-09 03:56:25 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-09 03:56:25 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2005-11-09 03:56:25 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-09 03:57:28 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-09 03:57:28 - cd /

Re: AGP ceased to work on eMachines M5310 laptop

Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Monday 07 November 2005 09:23 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote: Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Monday 07 November 2005 05:18 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote: On Mon, November 7, 2005 11:49 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote: Please send me 'pciconf -lv' output. Here it is, th

Re: 5-stable kernel hang during boot

See my posts and others on these topics: critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4) 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2) [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing Those are from September 2005, when I and others started having problems with the latest (poor) edits to the 5

[releng_5 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2005-11-09 02:24:47 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-09 02:24:47 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-11-09 02:24:47 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-09 02:26:08 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-09 02:26:08 - cd

Re: psm0 broken with acpi_ibm on 6.0-RELEASE

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Petr Holub wrote: I've found the following problem on my IBM T41p when running 6.0-RELEASE: when both psm and acpi_ibm are compiled in the kernel, the psm0 device (touchpad) doesn't initialize properly - with verbose logging it says psm0: unable to allocate IRQ When acpi_ibm

[releng_5 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

TB --- 2005-11-09 01:16:50 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-09 01:16:50 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2005-11-09 01:16:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-09 01:17:51 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-09 01:17:51 - cd

Re: USB Card Reader Permissions

On Wednesday 09 Nov 2005 12:22 am, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > I thought that was only for devices that exist at boot? I have my DVD > > burner set up in devfs.conf so I can use it as my user (reading and > > burning with some other tweaks[1]). > > Nope, it's applied to all devices as they are creat

Re: Does ath driver support Atheros 5005G? - CORRECTED kldstat

Randy Parker wrote: Two hours ago I made a post with the Subject line you see on this note. I copied the post I made to bsdforum's laptop forum Sunday night, and added the kldstat to the copy. Unfortunately, I included the kldstat from my more recent NDISulator efforts to get the 5005 going (whic

Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 135, Issue 5

I get "ifconfig: SIOCS80211: > Invalid argument" > while trying to set up wep with up to date ndis > stuff on 5.4. > > ATM I use an older ndis build which still works. > > wlan_wep seems to exist at 6.0 only: > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/modules/wlan_we

Re: What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Colin Percival wrote: Tom Grove wrote: Richard Bejtlich wrote: After speaking with Colin, he mentioned that IPSec, NAT, and disk quotas (enabled via options QUOTA) are the three most popular kernel changes that prevent people from running GENERIC and hence using freebsd-up

Re: USB Card Reader Permissions

On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:20, Andy Fraser wrote: > On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 10:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > > I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for > > > a USB card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours > > > and found nothing concrete so far alt

Re: USB Card Reader Permissions

On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 10:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for a > > USB card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours and > > found nothing concrete so far although I'll keep looking. > > devfs.conf can do it. I

Re: USB Card Reader Permissions

On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:24, Andy Fraser wrote: > I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for a > USB card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours and > found nothing concrete so far although I'll keep looking. devfs.conf can do it. > So far I have this

USB Card Reader Permissions

Hi, I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for a USB card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours and found nothing concrete so far although I'll keep looking. So far I have this situation: I plug in the card reader and device nodes are created (e

Re: Sobre FreeBSD stable

Sounds like a misunderstanding. . Dani asks the question about freebsd releases. I just answer his question in spanish. - Rodrigo Hector Lecuanda wrote: Hay dos ramas de -stable 6.0-stable y 5.x ambas son de calidad de produccion aunque la de nueva tecnologia es la 6.0 y la de legado es la 5

Re: What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

John-Mark Gurney wrote: GENERIC is already so large, that if you want/need a smaller kernel, you're going to rebuild anyways, Since I care about that extra 2megs, I recompiled my own kernel, And the real problem of a big kernel is I dont understand exactly why do you have to recompile

multicast join flood messes up sk0

My sk0 is rendered useless when flooded with multicast join requests. Here is my setup: FreeBSD server.mcneil.com 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #94: Mon Nov 7 23:51:05 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMD64 amd64 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+ (2009.79-MH

Re: What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

Colin Percival wrote this message on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:22 -0800: > In deciding what options should go into the GENERIC kernel, I think the > question we should be asking is not "how many people use this?", but > instead "would adding this option inconvenience more people than it would > help?

Re: Sendmail not compiling with make world in 6.0

As Brain had stated you are using the libsasl from your 5.x system. You need to rebuild the sasl port for 6.x, and then do either a buildworld or build sendmail manually from the base sources. If your system is not at 6.x right now, just comment out those entries in /etc/make.conf. Do the build/i

Does ath driver support Atheros 5005G? - CORRECTED kldstat

Two hours ago I made a post with the Subject line you see on this note. I copied the post I made to bsdforum's laptop forum Sunday night, and added the kldstat to the copy. Unfortunately, I included the kldstat from my more recent NDISulator efforts to get the 5005 going (which has not worked yet e

Re: kernel panic with cdrecord

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:53:21 +0200 Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 05/11/2005 20:36 Manfred Lotz said the following: > > > > I agree. Happened to me as well under FreeBSD 6.0. burncd was > > hanging when trying to fixate and never came back. > > I personally don't see this problem,

[releng_5 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2005-11-08 17:30:11 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-08 17:30:11 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2005-11-08 17:30:11 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-08 17:31:07 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-08 17:31:07

psm0 broken with acpi_ibm on 6.0-RELEASE

Hi all, I've found the following problem on my IBM T41p when running 6.0-RELEASE: when both psm and acpi_ibm are compiled in the kernel, the psm0 device (touchpad) doesn't initialize properly - with verbose logging it says psm0: unable to allocate IRQ When acpi_ibm is removed from the kernel, psm0

Re: AGP ceased to work on eMachines M5310 laptop

On Monday 07 November 2005 09:23 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Monday 07 November 2005 05:18 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote: > >> On Mon, November 7, 2005 11:49 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >>> Please send me 'pciconf -lv' output. > >> > >> Here it is, thanks. > >> -- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 135, Issue 3

Hi All I just installed FreeBSD I have to say, it looks good. Certainly I have better experiences with it than I have with Linux. Jamie. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, s

Re: Tun and ALTQ

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote: > It seems that it work. Thanks. > > Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify "em", for "tun", vice > versa... what a mess, hehe. No prob; I don't see why using the em(4) backing the tun(4) wouldn't work for ALTQ _IF_ you actually

Does ath driver support Atheros 5005G?

I installed 6.0-RELEASE on a Toshiba M55-139 laptop. It has the Atheros AR5005G 802.11 device, which 'dmesg' reports as ath0 mem 0xd0200-0xd020 irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci 4 ath0: Ethernet address: 00:11:f5:8d:f4:fc ath0: mac 7.8 phy 4.5 radio 5.6 On PCI Bus 4, 'scanpci' sees pci bus 0x

Re: What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

Colin Percival wrote: Tom Grove wrote: Richard Bejtlich wrote: After speaking with Colin, he mentioned that IPSec, NAT, and disk quotas (enabled via options QUOTA) are the three most popular kernel changes that prevent people from running GENERIC and hence using freebsd-update for binary ke

Re: Fwd: carp + ipfw problem

Hello all, I'm trying to configure a firewall with carp + ipfw, but I encountered the strange problem. Packets are bypassing carp interface, instead ipfw log shows packet flow to/from physical interface, e.g.: http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/ "it is important to keep in mind that

5-stable kernel hang during boot

Hi, I've got an IBM Intellistation M Pro with dual 600 Mhz PIIIs, an IBM DNES-309170W (da0 on ahc0) as the root drive and HighPoint RocketRaid 1520 with two WD1600JD drives mirrored as data drives. There is nothing on ata0 and the CD-ROM drive is the master on ata1. I have been running a custom

swapinfo error on 6.x

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5-stable: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/imb# swapinfo Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity /dev/da0s1b 104419222736 1021456 2% /dev/da1s1b 104419222996 1021196 2% Total 208838445732 2042652

What should be in GENERIC? (was Re: Facilitating binary kernel upgrades)

Tom Grove wrote: > Richard Bejtlich wrote: >> After speaking with Colin, he mentioned that IPSec, NAT, and disk >> quotas (enabled via options QUOTA) are the three most popular kernel >> changes that prevent people from running GENERIC and hence using >> freebsd-update for binary kernel updates. >>

Re: Sobre FreeBSD stable

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 04:27:21PM +0100, dani mot wrote: > Hola listeros > Soy nuevo en el tema del FreeBSD y me gustaria saber > cual es la distribucion stables en estos momentos. > Podria ser la 4.11 o la 5.x? > Saludos > y gracias > taurus > Hola, La distribucion "stable" en este momento

Re: timecounter and Hz quality in kern RELENG_6

martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Michael Schuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After digging in the source i have found that timec.c have an routine for > > > computing the so called "Hz quality". > > > > During boot, the kernel probes several time counters and

Sobre FreeBSD stable

Hola listeros Soy nuevo en el tema del FreeBSD y me gustaria saber cual es la distribucion stables en estos momentos. Podria ser la 4.11 o la 5.x? Saludos y gracias taurus __ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, más seguri

Missing wep_wlan at 5.4 (was: Atheros (ath0) no RX traffic)

Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > Richard Arends wrote: > >> Today I upgraded my laptop from 5-STABLE to 6-STABLE. After the > >> upgrade, my wireless is not working anymore. > > > > > > You are doing better than me. I try this: > > ifconfig ath0 wepk

xl1: watchdog timeout on 6-STABLE with 3c575B cardbus NIC

Since upgrading to 6-STABLE I get errors on my cardbus NIC. If I have the patience to wait for echo on an ssh terminal one could say that it works, but in a real world it's unusable. Hopefully helpful details: * Worked fine on 5.4 * Whilst downloading a freebsd iso over ftp, no watchdog timeouts o

Re: timecounter and Hz quality in kern RELENG_6

Hello, thanks to Oliver and Michael for explain me the "mechanics" behind timecounter and "Hz quality". I have send the question, why i have to wonder about different IRQ-Counts but same HZ. It is really thaat HZ on both machines is the same. I have only knowed the old behavior. I set the HZ ove

Re: FreeBSD6 /bin/tcsh ls-F : Floating exception (core dumped)

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:46:28PM +0900, TOMITA Yoshinori wrote: [...] > Here is a tiny patch. Please send-pr this, so that it doesn't get lost. This would probably fix http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88538 as well. Thanks. -- Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Is 6.0 the new stable or is it 5.4??

As the front page of the website says, the 5.x series of releases are now Legacy. 6.0 is now considered the stable release platform, but 5.x will be supported for a while longer, I think. Eriq Lamar wrote: newbie wants to know :) ___ freebsd-stable

Is 6.0 the new stable or is it 5.4??

newbie wants to know :) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Is 6.0 the new stable or is it 5.4??

newbie wants to know. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: New user confused by need to do huge upgrade

On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 00:30, Stephen Hurd wrote: > > I installed from two CDs, and got a working KDE system. Now, I want to [snip] > > Heh, essentially the problem is this... before a release, the ports tree is > stabalized... everything builds and works together, broken dependencies are > fixed,

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2005-11-08 06:48:07 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-08 06:48:07 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2005-11-08 06:48:07 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-08 06:49:22 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-08 06:49:22 - cd

Re: 5.x, 6.x and CPUTYPE

On 11/8/05, Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Craig Boston wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:05:13PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote: > >> Thanks, Craig. I'm glad to hear that I'm not alone in pursuing this method. > >> Do you know of any particular disadvantages of continuing with this > >> l