Re: FYI: Promise TX4 silent corruption (RELENG_7)

2007-10-22 Thread Lars Viklund
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:19:35AM +0200, Peter Schuller wrote: Hello, Since then I have now tried two distinct TX4 cards (but only in one PCI slot). Both suffer from the same problem. Amazingly a SiI 3114 *does* seem to work in the same PCI slot - no corruption, and no DMA timeouts and

Re: X11 extremely slow while compiling other things

2007-10-22 Thread Anish Mistry
On Saturday 20 October 2007, Yi Wang wrote: Hi, My box is running 7.0-PREREALEASE. When I run more than two building tasks, X11 became extremely slow. The mouse pointer can also hardly move. Running more than two building tasks under 6-stable does not introduce the issues. Does any one

Re: X11 extremely slow while compiling other things

2007-10-22 Thread Yi Wang
Thanks to all. But I have the ULE scheduler enabled in the kernel. % cat /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL | grep -v ^# | grep -v ^$ cpu I686_CPU ident MYKERNEL options SCHED_ULE # 4BSD scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel

Re: X11 extremely slow while compiling other things

2007-10-22 Thread Pollywog
Yi Wang wrote: Hi, My box is running 7.0-PREREALEASE. When I run more than two building tasks, X11 became extremely slow. The mouse pointer can also hardly move. Running more than two building tasks under 6-stable does not introduce the issues. Does any one know how to

Re: Closed Port, Need to Reopen

2007-10-22 Thread Krassimir Slavchev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, If you are running Radius see /etc/services. Ports used by Radius are 1812/1813. Squirrel wrote: For some reason, my port 1645 is closed on FreeBSD 6.2. I have all the firewall disabled, but it's not allowing me access the port 1645. How do

Re: Closed Port, Need to Reopen

2007-10-22 Thread Ian Smith
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Squirrel wrote: For some reason, my port 1645 is closed on FreeBSD 6.2. I have all the firewall disabled, but it's not allowing me access the port 1645. How do you manually open this port? I can't seem to find at google. I suspect this belongs over on

Re: X11 extremely slow while compiling other things

2007-10-22 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
Try adding options FULL_PREEMPTION to your kernel. What is the difference between this and PREEMPTION + IPI_PREEMPTION? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any

Re: Closed Port, Need to Reopen

2007-10-22 Thread Tom Samplonius
- Squirrel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For some reason, my port 1645 is closed on FreeBSD 6.2. I have all the firewall disabled, but it's not allowing me access the port 1645. How do you manually open this port? I can't seem to find at google. You also need to have something listening

Re: X11 extremely slow while compiling other things

2007-10-22 Thread Yi Wang
IPI_PREEMPTION allows the scheduler running on CPU A to preempt a thread on CPU B. This should reduce latency in some circumstances. # PREEMPTION allows the threads that are in the kernel to be preempted # by higher priority threads. It helps with interactivity and # allows

Re: Closed Port, Need to Reopen

2007-10-22 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Squirrel wrote: For some reason, my port 1645 is closed on FreeBSD 6.2. I have all the firewall disabled, but it's not allowing me access the port 1645. How do you manually open this port? I can't seem to find at google. You need to configure an application to listen on the port.

Re: Closed Port, Need to Reopen

2007-10-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
Squirrel wrote: For some reason, my port 1645 is closed on FreeBSD 6.2. I have all the firewall disabled, but it's not allowing me access the port 1645. How do you manually open this port? I can't seem to find at google. FreeBSD does nothing special here. If you are sure you have an

Re: Closed Port, Need to Reopen

2007-10-22 Thread Marian Hettwer
Hi Squirrel (odd name that is...), On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:54:53 -0500, Squirrel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For some reason, my port 1645 is closed on FreeBSD 6.2. I have all the firewall disabled, but it's not allowing me access the port 1645. How do you manually open this port? I can't seem

Re: X11 extremely slow while compiling other things

2007-10-22 Thread Yi Wang
yes, already had tried. renice -10 On 10/22/07, Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yi Wang wrote: Hi, My box is running 7.0-PREREALEASE. When I run more than two building tasks, X11 became extremely slow. The mouse pointer can also hardly move. Running more than two

Re: Mounting smbfs as user?

2007-10-22 Thread Ivan Voras
On 18/10/2007, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user in question probably needs read/write access to the /dev/smbX device in question. There is no such device: # ls /dev/smb* ls: No match. (with and without a smbfs mount point mounted by root)

Re: kern/104406: [ufs] Processes get stuck in ufs stateunderpersistent CPU load

2007-10-22 Thread Oleg Derevenetz
Can anyone take a look on PR kern/104406 ? I got repeatable hang situation, but I can't obtain a kernel dump to get result of all show commands from here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html After my break to debugger using

Re: FYI: Promise TX4 silent corruption (RELENG_7)

2007-10-22 Thread Peter Schuller
The card seems to be doing naughty things to the PCI bus under load; your dmesg ought to be full of PCI timeouts. No timeouts or errors in dmesg. I expected some, because that is what I got on another machine (earlier 7-CURRENT) where I was unable to use SiL/Promise because of such issues. In

Re: Mounting smbfs as user?

2007-10-22 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Hi, Ivan Voras wrote: On 18/10/2007, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user in question probably needs read/write access to the /dev/smbX device in question. There is no such device: # ls /dev/smb* ls: No match. Err, /dev/smb stands for System Management Bus and have

Re: Mounting smbfs as user?

2007-10-22 Thread Roland Smith
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:04:15PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: On 18/10/2007, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user in question probably needs read/write access to the /dev/smbX device in question. There is no such device: # ls /dev/smb* My bad. That's a device for the system

buildworld failure (boot2.ld too big when CFLAGS set in make.conf)

2007-10-22 Thread Josh Carroll
Hello, During buildworld on RELENG_7 csup'd as of 10/22, it dies in sys/boot/i386/boot2 with: === sys/boot/i386/boot2 (all) -533 bytes available *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2. *** Error code 1 I took a look at the cc command line: cc -Os -fno-guess-branch-probability

Re: Mounting smbfs as user?

2007-10-22 Thread Ivan Voras
On 22/10/2007, Stefan Lambrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Err, /dev/smb stands for System Management Bus and have nothing to do with smbfs :) What I found is the claim that only root is allowed to set up the kernel's iconv table And now I'm thinking, may be, if the root setup this table, the