Hi all!
I just recently bought a RT2561C based (at least I think so) wireless card,
which is also happily recognized by the ral-driver:
ral0: Ralink Technology RT2561 mem 0x8800-0x88007fff irq 17 at device
0.0 on cardbus0
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
ral0: Ethernet address:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK My list of software is purely server stuff; I
VK don't use any FreeBSD desktops.
It seems to be the key point here.
I'm thinking about giving a try for the following scheme for my
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
--
One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk
Tacunka Witco
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:23:46PM +0100, Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
I would not use dot-zero release for production without excessive
local
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
I'm deploying FreeBSD 7 on my webservers, because they are
loadbalanced. But I will not deploy ver. 7 on my db-server until I get
to ver.
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
Both of them will be production stable at release, i'd say that unless
you have reason, such as non-supported
Hello,
As seen in another thread, I was curious about a zpool created under
FreeBSD being available under opensolaris.
So I boot indiana and do:
zpool import -f -o ro pool2
zpool scrub pool2
all ended properly...
shutdown.
When I reboot with FreeBSD (7.0-BETA2) I get:
zpool status pool2
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
As seen in another thread, I was curious about a zpool created under
FreeBSD being available under opensolaris.
So I boot indiana and do:
zpool import -f -o ro pool2
zpool scrub pool2
all ended properly...
shutdown.
When I reboot with FreeBSD (7.0-BETA2) I
Hello List,
Was a fix ever developed for the ip filter OOW keep state problem that can
be installed on or back ported to 6.1 stable?
Thanks for any advice,
Steve
--
They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin)
The
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 03:54:24PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
today I updated from 6.2-RELEASE-p8 to 7.0-BETA2 as well.
I've ran into the same problem with the password input to GELI on boot time.
Chars are showing up after several keypresses.
After removing the new dcons driver from my
Subscription Confirmation
You are currently subscribed to the Thunder Mountain Custom
Rifle mailing list. As an active subscriber, you receive valuable email
newsletters, announcements, and
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Isn't it a interesting challenge ?
I got it:
zpool export pool2 zpool import -f pool2
do the trick
sorry for the noise :-|
It's good to know that ZFS is compatible between the two operating
systems :)
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
For low-loaded machines, 7.0 is stable enough even with all the new
goodies like ZFS, tmpfs, ULE - I have such a
Original Message
Subject: Re: kern/118044: panic: spin lock held too long
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:20:01 GMT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Per olof Ljungmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has
On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
notification.
In the meantime, your best bet is to disable ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS.
There is a chance this was a recent regression, previously in 7.0
they were believed to work.
I'm running 6.2-REL. The old kernel was -p5, now without the
Gardner Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just recently upgraded my 6.2-PRERELEASE system to 7.0-BETA2 and am
noticing the following bad checksums on my two on board broadcom
gigabit ethernet cards.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dmesg | grep VPD
pci0:10:9:0: bad VPD cksum, remain 72
pci0:10:9:1: bad VPD
Hi all!
I just recently bought a RT2561C based (at least I think so) wireless card,
which is also happily recognized by the ral-driver:
ral0: Ralink Technology RT2561 mem 0x8800-0x88007fff irq 17 at device
0.0 on cardbus0
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
ral0: Ethernet address:
The second BETA for the 6.3 release cycle is available on the FTP mirror
sites. If you would like to update an older system using cvsup the
branch tag to use is still RELENG_6 (note that if you use that approach
your system will claim to be 6.3-PRERELEASE). You can also give FreeBSD
Update a
Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 16:51:16 schrieb Heiko Wundram (Beenic):
snip
FSCK, sorry, I meant to repost to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the noise...
--
Heiko Wundram
Product Application Development
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi.
Just installed a new DL360 with 8 cores at 2.33 Ghz and 8 GB ram and
15K rpm sas-disks. When I installed the beta2 from cd 'make -j 9
buildworld' took approx. 20 min. After a recompile of userland and
kernel and switch to ULE it went down to:
World build completed on Wed Nov 14 17:44:08 CET
Hi,
It's a BETA2 and links about 6.3R on the page are still broken/missing[1] :)
Any idea where one can look at the TODO list for 6.3 ?
[1]http://www.freebsd.org/where.html#helptest
Ken Smith wrote:
The second BETA for the 6.3 release cycle is available on the FTP mirror
sites. If you would
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:59:03PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK My list of software is purely server stuff; I
VK don't use any FreeBSD desktops.
It seems to be the key point
Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:59:03PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK My list of software is purely server stuff; I
VK don't use any FreeBSD desktops.
It seems to
Dylan Smith wrote:
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for my
servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable or
production release?
Both of them will be production stable at release, i'd say that unless
you have reason, such
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:56:16PM +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
Just installed a new DL360 with 8 cores at 2.33 Ghz and 8 GB ram and
15K rpm sas-disks. When I installed the beta2 from cd 'make -j 9
buildworld' took approx. 20 min. After a recompile of userland and
kernel and switch to
Quoting Dylan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for my
servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable or
production release?
Both of them will be production stable at release, i'd say that
unless
Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 20:48:00 schrieb Sam Leffler:
I don't think I can help w/ the interrupt storm but you didn't provide
any logs for wpa_supplicant or wlandebug so it's hard to help w/ that
issue.
Sorry for not providing any logs, but I just got the card yesterday, and
haven't had
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
Just installed a new DL360 with 8 cores at 2.33 Ghz and 8 GB ram and
15K rpm sas-disks. When I installed the beta2 from cd 'make -j 9
buildworld' took approx. 20 min. After a recompile of userland and
kernel and switch to ULE it went down to:
World build
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:56:16PM +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
Just installed a new DL360 with 8 cores at 2.33 Ghz and 8 GB ram and
15K rpm sas-disks. When I installed the beta2 from cd 'make -j 9
buildworld' took approx. 20 min. After a recompile of userland and
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071114 12:07] wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:56:16PM +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
Just installed a new DL360 with 8 cores at 2.33 Ghz and 8 GB ram and
15K rpm sas-disks. When I installed the beta2 from cd 'make -j 9
I tried to rollback the freebsd-update 6.2-R - 6.3-B1.
(The reason was to freebsd-update to 6.3-B2 with the possibility of
doing a rollback to 6.2-R.)
It printed quite a few lines of
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: grep: Undefined symbol __sbmaskrune
and
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: sort: Undefined symbol
Scott Oertel wrote:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
Just installed a new DL360 with 8 cores at 2.33 Ghz and 8 GB ram and
15K rpm sas-disks. When I installed the beta2 from cd 'make -j 9
buildworld' took approx. 20 min. After a recompile of userland and
kernel and switch to ULE it went down to:
I have cd/dwd writer on my laptop:
acd0: DVDR PIONEER DVDRW DVR-K17/1.05 at ata0-master PIO4
Writer work properly on 7.0-BETA1 #15: Tue Oct 30 13:21:42 EET 2007 ,
but after today upgrade to 7.0-BETA2 #16: Wed Nov 14 15:41:44 EET 2007
kernel panics during run burncd -es 8 data file.iso fixate (i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Impressive ;-) My main machine (with an Athlon XP @ 2GHz) takes ~2
hours to build kernel and world (I use a script to do that). My
other box is running -CURRENT and takes ~11 hours to build kernel
and world (Celeron 500...).
Just to supply
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
notification.
In the meantime, your best bet is to disable ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS.
There is a chance this was a recent regression, previously in 7.0 they
were believed to work.
I'm running 6.2-REL. The old kernel was -p5,
Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2007 08:55:49 schrieb Heiko Wundram (Beenic):
snip
Just for an update: I was stupid, really stupid enough not to check with any
of the APs I tried to connect to whether they had MAC-filtering enabled, and
all of them did. I turned that off just now for my private AP,
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
I tried to rollback the freebsd-update 6.2-R - 6.3-B1.
To confirm that I understand what you're saying here: You upgraded
from FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-BETA1, then you ran freebsd-update
rollback to move back to FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, right?
It printed quite a few
A quick heads-up to everyone here using my new FreeBSD Update upgrade
code: If you have performed a minor version upgrade (e.g., 6.2-RELEASE -
6.3-BETA1 or 7.0-BETA1.5 - 7.0-BETA2) please do not attempt to roll it
back using freebsd-update rollback.
That code is currently broken and will make
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:04:48PM +, Pete French wrote:
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if(atof(3.2) == atof(3.200))
puts(They are equal);
else
puts(They are NOT equal!);
return
39 matches
Mail list logo
