Pyun YongHyeon a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:44:03PM +0100, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
I encountered connectivity issues with an integrated Realtek 8168 on my
MSI motherboard after enabling jumbo frames on my other box.
Investigating the issue, I found that the packets with an
- Kurt Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'm researching the topic of PAUSE counters (receiving side) for
FreeBSD systems.
That's a sort of flow control with ethernet, see e.g.:
http://www.techfest.com/networking/lan/ethernet3.htm#3.2.1
Cisco switches seem to receive and count
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you ask me, kernel developer | server install should be on
disc1, and desktop^*$ should go on disc99.
FreeBSD
...the power to serve.
^
eh ?
???
So what do you propose to use as workstations with your
Hi all.
I have an old FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0 and was wondering if anyone has any
opinion whether I should do a binary upgrade to 6.3 from CD or do a csup
and makeworld? May I run into any difficulties in the future depending
on which way I go?
Or is it perhaps possible to go direct to 7.0?
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi !
In this context, I believe that it makes more sense to place the
server related install on the first disc. This makes it possible
to install a server with the least amount of effort.
Granted.
It /also/
makes it quite possible for a would-be desktop
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Sounds like TCP stack breakage, and not so much an MTU problem.
I read many months ago that some others having this problem solved it by
disabling RFC1323 extensions (default is on), which is a little odd, but
it worked for a couple people. Try doing sysctl
Andreas Pettersson wrote:
Hi all.
I have an old FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0 and was wondering if anyone has any
opinion whether I should do a binary upgrade to 6.3 from CD or do a csup
and makeworld? May I run into any difficulties in the future depending
on which way I go?
Or is it perhaps
LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic:
/usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g
-i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C
It can also be (eventually) triggered by blogbench -c 100 -i 30 -r 50
-w 10 -W 10 and heavy IO load
Tom Samplonius wrote:
FreeBSD does not send PAUSE frames, but most of the NICs out there will
process received PAUSE frames.
However ethernet flow control is mainly useful on the switches anyways.
Switches these day (*) have small buffers (sometimes just a shared 3MB buffer
for 24
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
Is it required to have 'options INET6' even if I'm not using any IPv6
connectivity ?
No, not unless you rely on SCTP, which at this time *does* require
INET6. If you remove INET6, you must also remove SCTP.
Be aware that if you
Hi list,
Is anybody running 7-STABLE (AMD64) with qmail-ldap ?
I have some FreeBSD+qmail-ldap servers running very wheel, but I'm
having a strange problem with a new setup running qmail-ldap with
7-STABLE(AMD64). Any operation that involves ldap connection result in
a core dumped. The
Hi,
I'm using a 7-RELEASE on a Dell PowerEdge 1955, using a mpt driver to
manage a hardware raid1.
Is there any way to check the status of the raid?
Know it's running on a single disk (the second one failed and has been
removed), and the only thing i can see are:
mpt0: mpt_cam_event: 0x16
mpt0:
--On Monday, March 03, 2008 02:20:49 -0800 Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would assert that FreeBSD is first and foremost a Server OS.
The fact that it can also provide a full blown desktop, is so much
the better.
In this context, I believe that it makes more sense to place the
server
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Bruce M. Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are switch ASICs out there which implement upstream bandwidth
limiting on ports by sending the PAUSE frame.
I believe thompsa@ recently committed a fix to if_bridge to allow it to
ignore PAUSE frames for the
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:49:03AM -0800, LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic:
/usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g
-i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce it.
[...]
#19
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:49:03AM -0800, LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic:
/usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g
-i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce
On Mar 3, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Cristiano Deana wrote:
I'm using a 7-RELEASE on a Dell PowerEdge 1955, using a mpt driver to
manage a hardware raid1.
Is there any way to check the status of the raid?
I've been wondering this as well. My Sun X4100's have LSI SAS mirror
controllers in them and
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 09:50 PM Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check /etc/make.conf for CFLAGS, and if present remove it.
This fixed the problem.
Thank you.
-Derek.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:44:03PM +0100, Arnaud Houdelette wrote:
I encountered connectivity issues with an integrated Realtek 8168
on my MSI motherboard after enabling jumbo frames on my other box.
Investigating the issue, I found that
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
Is it required to have 'options INET6' even if I'm not using any IPv6
connectivity ?
No, not unless you rely on SCTP, which at this time *does* require
INET6. If you remove INET6, you must also remove SCTP.
Be aware that
Hi list,
I found a situation that I can't explain, I have qmail-ldap running
at some FreeBSD 6.2 without any problem. Friday after Installed a new
server this time with 7-STABLE. I stated to get core dumped from
qmail-ldap when they try access the OpenLDAP database.
I compiled/run this simple
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi list,
I found a situation that I can't explain, I have qmail-ldap running
at some FreeBSD 6.2 without any problem. Friday after Installed a new
server this time with 7-STABLE. I stated to get core dumped from
qmail-ldap when they try access the OpenLDAP
Hi there,
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
kernel without disabling SCTP. With fresh 7.0-STABLE source, here's the
error output (INET6 disabled, but SCTP enabled):
uipc_syscalls.o(.text+0x3c1):
Andy Dills wrote:
Hi there,
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
kernel without disabling SCTP. With fresh 7.0-STABLE source, here's the
error output (INET6 disabled, but SCTP enabled):
Yes, INET6
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:29:55PM -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
Is this intended and/or a known issue?
Known and well-documented. If you need/want SCTP, you need to keep the
INET6 option. Otherwise, remove INET6 and remove SCTP as well.
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc
Quoting Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On Monday, March 03, 2008 02:20:49 -0800 Chris H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would assert that FreeBSD is first and foremost a Server OS.
The fact that it can also provide a full blown desktop, is so much
the better.
In this context, I believe that it
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past 127.0.0.1.
More specifically; I installed rbldnsd from ports, and it worked quite
well on a 6.x install. However, attempting the same config/install
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 14:21 +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Well it doesn't rule it out. X may be introducing latencies that
are causing your mouse to lose sync or something.
It's not the mouse
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:27:35 +0800，Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The kernel is
FreeBSD fs12.sina.com.cn 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 2
18:50:05 CST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ZFORK
amd64
the get all at below:
fs12# zfs get all
NAME PROPERTY VALUE
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past 127.0.0.1.
More specifically; I installed rbldnsd from ports, and it worked quite
well
On Monday 03 March 2008 19:07:38 Mark Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
Is it required to have 'options INET6' even if I'm not using any IPv6
connectivity ?
No, not unless you rely on SCTP, which at this time *does* require
INET6. If you
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past 127.0.0.1.
More specifically; I installed rbldnsd from ports, and it worked quite
well on a 6.x install.
Hello Jeremy, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past 127.0.0.1.
More specifically; I installed rbldnsd from ports, and it
On Monday 03 March 2008 19:07:38 Mark Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
Is it required to have 'options INET6' even if I'm not using any IPv6
connectivity ?
No, not unless you rely on SCTP, which at this time *does* require
INET6.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:23:59PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the loopback
past
Quoting Royce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote, on 3/3/2008 5:21 PM:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
I've looked at this software: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
Why exactly do you need this software to bind to 127.0.0.2 or 127.0.0.3?
I don't
Jeremy Chadwick wrote, on 3/3/2008 5:21 PM:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
I've looked at this software: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
Why exactly do you need this software to bind to 127.0.0.2 or 127.0.0.3?
I don't see any indication of it needing that.
Hello Jeremy, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any addresses on the
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:29:20PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Ditto. And our RELENG_6 production servers are the same.
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
|
Quoting Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:23:59PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use (create) any
Quoting Royce Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote, on 3/3/2008 5:21 PM:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
I've looked at this software: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html
Why exactly do you need this software to bind to 127.0.0.2 or 127.0.0.3?
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:39:44PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:23:59PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get the install disc? Mine clearly doesn't. :(
All I am provided is 127.0.0.1 - not 127.0.0.2,3...
127.0.0.1/8 just means 127.0.0.1 with a
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get the install disc? Mine clearly doesn't. :(
All I am provided is 127.0.0.1 - not 127.0.0.2,3...
Quoting Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get the install disc? Mine clearly doesn't. :(
All I am
Quoting Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Jeremy, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having some difficulty working with anything past 127.0.0.1.
It seems impossible to use
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get the install disc? Mine clearly doesn't. :(
All I am provided is 127.0.0.1 - not
Quoting Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Chris H. wrote:
Are you sure it's a /24 you are talking about? My 7.0 disks install
127.0.0.1/8 here.
Really? Where did you get the install disc? Mine clearly doesn't. :(
49 matches
Mail list logo
