Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Charles Sprickman wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, alan bryan wrote: --- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille wrote: From: Dan Langille Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool To: "Freddie Cash" Cc: "freebsd-stable" Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 7:07 PM On 7/1

Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, alan bryan wrote: --- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille wrote: From: Dan Langille Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool To: "Freddie Cash" Cc: "freebsd-stable" Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 7:07 PM On 7/19/2010 12:15 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Mon, J

Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread jhell
On 07/21/2010 02:14, Joshua Boyd wrote: > [r...@foghornleghorn ~]# zpool replace tank da0 label/disk01 > cannot open 'label/disk01': no such GEOM provider > must be a full path or shorthand device name Of course you cant. You have labeled a disk that is already in use so in turn the label should n

Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread Joshua Boyd
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Joshua Boyd wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:57 AM, alan bryan wrote: > >> >> >> --- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille wrote: >> >> > From: Dan Langille >> > Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool >> > To: "Freddie Cash" >> > Cc: "freebsd-stabl

Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread Joshua Boyd
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:57 AM, alan bryan wrote: > > > --- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille wrote: > > > From: Dan Langille > > Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool > > To: "Freddie Cash" > > Cc: "freebsd-stable" > > Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 7:07 PM > > On 7/19/2010 12

Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread alan bryan
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille wrote: > From: Dan Langille > Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool > To: "Freddie Cash" > Cc: "freebsd-stable" > Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 7:07 PM > On 7/19/2010 12:15 PM, Freddie Cash > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Gar

Re: 8.1-RC2 MCE caused by some LAPIC/clock changes? (was: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?)

2010-07-20 Thread Markus Gebert
On 20.07.2010, at 21:59, John Baldwin wrote: >> I started narrowing the revisions down until I >> found out, that while on r202386 I'm still able to trigger the MCE, r202387 >> seems to solve the problem on CURRENT: >> >> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=202387 > > Al

Re: 8.1-RC2 MCE caused by some LAPIC/clock changes? (was: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?)

2010-07-20 Thread Markus Gebert
On 20.07.2010, at 10:15, jhell wrote: >> Any ideas how to proceed? >> > > Adding to this I remembered some specific commits that caught my attention > when they happened. Specifically they were to mca.c (locate mca) on my > machine provided the file paths and svn log provided the commit log.

Re: 8.1-RC2 MCE caused by some LAPIC/clock changes? (was: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?)

2010-07-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, July 17, 2010 2:35:21 pm Markus Gebert wrote: > > On 13.07.2010, at 16:02, Markus Gebert wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I have not been able to get anything useful out the svn commit logs, which could explain this. Maybe someone else has an idea what could have changed between 7 and 8

Re: today's 8.1/i386: panic: bad pte

2010-07-20 Thread Mikhail T.
20.07.2010 12:47, Alan Cox написав(ла): Historically, this panic has indicated flakey memory. This panic occurs because a memory location within a page table has unexpectedly changed to zero. Ouch... Thanks for the hint (maybe, the panic should say something like that?) In any case, is there

Re: today's 8.1/i386: panic: bad pte

2010-07-20 Thread Alan Cox
Mikhail T. wrote: 20.07.2010 12:47, Alan Cox написав(ла): Historically, this panic has indicated flakey memory. This panic occurs because a memory location within a page table has unexpectedly changed to zero. Ouch... Thanks for the hint (maybe, the panic should say something like that?) In

Re: today's 8.1/i386: panic: bad pte

2010-07-20 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Mikhail T. > wrote: > Some part of KDE4's kdm crashed at start-up and seems to have taken the > entire machine with it: > > kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.22 > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is fr

Re: panic: handle_written_inodeblock: bad size

2010-07-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 01:41:24PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > > 19.07.2010 07:31, Jeremy Chadwick написав(ла): > > >If you boot the machine in single-user, and run fsck manually, are there > > >any errors? > > Thanks, Jeremy... I wi

today's 8.1/i386: panic: bad pte

2010-07-20 Thread Mikhail T.
Some part of KDE4's kdm crashed at start-up and seems to have taken the entire machine with it: kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.22 GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and

Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread Pawel Tyll
Hi guys, > I second what others have said - crap. > But there could be some hope, not sure. > Can you check what is the actual size used by the pool on the disk? > It should be somewhere in zdb -C output ("asize"?). > If I remember correctly, that actual size should be a multiple of some rather >

Re: SIGEPIPE after update to 8.1-RC2

2010-07-20 Thread Ruben van Staveren
On 20 Jul 2010, at 10:03, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:19:39AM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >> To me, this is a clear breakage and should be considered a show >> stopper issue for 8.1-RELEASE. > > Too late for that now… Oh well, errata when the culprit is found… I've

Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool

2010-07-20 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 20/07/2010 01:04 Garrett Moore said the following: > Well, hotswapping worked, but now I have a totally different problem. Just > for reference: > # zpool offline tank da3 > # camcontrol stop da3 > > # camcontrol rescan all > <'da3 lost device, removing device entry'> > # camcontrol rescan all

Re: SIGEPIPE after update to 8.1-RC2

2010-07-20 Thread Sean
On 20/07/2010, at 5:19 PM, Ruben van Staveren wrote: > Hi, > > This happens during a "sudo portupgrade -va --batch" > my shell is /bin/tcsh too. When I run "exec bash" after sudo -s and then do > the portupgrade the problem doesn't show up. > > To me, this is a clear breakage and should be co

Re: 8.1-RC2 MCE caused by some LAPIC/clock changes? (was: 8.1-RC2 - PCI fatal error or MCE triggered by USB/ehci on Sun X4100M2?)

2010-07-20 Thread jhell
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:35, Markus Gebert wrote: In Message-Id: On 13.07.2010, at 16:02, Markus Gebert wrote: Unfortunately, I have not been able to get anything useful out the svn commit logs, which could explain this. Maybe someone else has an idea what could have changed between 7 and 8

Re: SIGEPIPE after update to 8.1-RC2

2010-07-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:19:39AM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote: > To me, this is a clear breakage and should be considered a show > stopper issue for 8.1-RELEASE. Too late for that now... ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ --

Re: SIGEPIPE after update to 8.1-RC2

2010-07-20 Thread Ruben van Staveren
Hi, On 18 Jul 2010, at 4:20, Sean wrote: > On 18/07/2010 1:24 AM, Alex Kozlov wrote: >> Hi, stable >> >> After updating my buildbox from 26 April 8-STABLE >> to 8.1-RC2 I constantly getting SIGEPIPE >> > > > [snip] > > I'm getting the same thing; what shell are you using? I changed my shell