Hi,
starting about last week, I'm getting:
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken
pipe (32)
rsync: write failed on /net/rnd/dist/tmp/local/amd64.FreeBSD_8.3-wip/compat/li
nux/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive.tmpl: Permission denied (13)
rsync error: error in
Hi,
starting about last week, I'm getting:
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken
pipe (32)
rsync: write failed on
/net/rnd/dist/tmp/local/amd64.FreeBSD_8.3-wip/compat/li
nux/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive.tmpl: Permission denied (13)
rsync error:
Hello,
I'm mostly using freebsd, but there are a few cases where it's
impossible to do, and because of these, i'm not using fbsd there.
These reasons are mostly are:
- Lack of a working infiniband/OFED stack, with all its utils,
mellanox connectX3 drivers, RDMA, iscsi-over-RDMA,
- Lack of proper support for a decent hypervisor for virtualisation.
We can't make a hypervisor out of freebsd, if there are no such
virtualisations available like XEN, kvm or something similar, that
just works out of the box.
What do you need that VirtualBox doesn't provide ? I
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:55:20 +0100
Pete French petefre...@ingresso.co.uk wrote:
- Lack of proper support for a decent hypervisor for
virtualisation. We can't make a hypervisor out of freebsd, if there
are no such virtualisations available like XEN, kvm or something
similar, that just
Yes, virtualbox is not that bad. However, to get some really nice
features, you need the non-free version. Also, we can use citrix's
xenserver's management tool to manage non-citrix xen clusters, because
the API is same. With that we get a management tool for our clusters,
which is really
On 06/28/2012 10:01 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
When something in software works fine with one NIC but not another
(nearly-) identical one, the first thing that comes to my mind is that
the MAC address on the card is being used by the software as a sort of
UUID. I had that happen with a commercial
TB --- 2012-06-29 11:24:21 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-29 11:24:21 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-06-29
On 29/06/2012 10:45, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Hi,
starting about last week, I'm getting:
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken
pipe (32)
rsync: write failed on
/net/rnd/dist/tmp/local/amd64.FreeBSD_8.3-wip/compat/li
On 29/06/2012 10:45, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Hi,
starting about last week, I'm getting:
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]:
Broken
pipe (32)
rsync: write failed on
/net/rnd/dist/tmp/local/amd64.FreeBSD_8.3-wip/compat/li
Some update between r237683 and r237740 has caused a regression with
xfce4's Terminal program:
An attempt to resize a window by dragging a corner results in the
window immediately closing.
I have reproduced this on a Pentium 4 machine with an old ati radeon
9000 era card and on newer
machines with
Hi All,
I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the
X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD
8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are
unable to configure the ix0 or ix1 interfaces where the HP works just
fine. Wondering if
Please post the output of pciconf -lvc for these devices.
-Andrew
On Jun 29, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the
X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD
8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the
X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD
8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are
unable to configure the
I have a GT430 installed on my machine, but I think GT520 will
use less power, from specification:
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gt-520/specifications
It only needs 29W while GT430 needs 49W.
NVIDIA also provides their native driver for FreeBSD.
There is fanless
Do not get a Radeon newer than the 4000-series, the drivers are not
available in FreeBSD at present. The 4650 has worked well for me.
I'm not picky. In old node I have/had geforce 6200, which is pretty
old. Works fine for non-demanding user. It also has no fan.
As I said, my only concern at
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the
X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD
8-STABLE image. The
Be patient, a new version will hit HEAD soon with the ID added.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.comwrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
- Original Message -
From: Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de
I need a working DVD drive, so I'm now considering to
downgrade to 8-stable. But then again, TMPFS didn't work
a well for me as it does in 9-stable (which was the main
reason for me to upgrade), so I'm kind of stuck in
On 2012-06-29 15:34, David Wolfskill wrote:
...
FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #201 237770M: Fri
Jun 29 04:46:48 PDT 2012
r...@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
OK using gcc, but with clang (separate bootable slice), I get whines and
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 9-STABLE acting as a kerberized NFSv3 server.
server# ktutil list
FILE:/etc/krb5.keytab:
Vno Type Principal
5 aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96 nfs/server.linguamatics@linguamatics.com
5 des3-cbc-sha1 nfs/server.linguamatics@linguamatics.com
5
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the
X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD
8-STABLE image. The
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 08:11:28PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
I had not merged r235281 from head to stable/9 yet. Please try again with
r237812.
Much better (after patching with the change for r237812):
FreeBSD d134.dwolf.juniper.net. 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #201 237770M: Fri
Someone was/is recently working on a Heimdal upgrade, but I'm
not sure if they are doing it as a port or part of the base
system.
Otherwise, the version of Kerberos in FreeBSD is quite old
(around Heimdal 1.0.5 I think?) and it would be no surprise
that the new gssapi wouldn't be supported.
Hi,
On Thursday, June 28, 2012 09:00:56 PM Zoran Kolic wrote:
Thanks all for reply!
The real question is which video card do you want to use?
Since I'm not gamer nor do 3d, some silent card will suffice.
There are nvidia gp520 and radeon 6450, both with no fan.
Also, I always enable
25 matches
Mail list logo
