Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Doug Hardie
> On 17 February 2016, at 17:45, Lowell Gilbert > wrote: > > Doug Hardie writes: > >>> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert >>> wrote: >>> >>> Have you measured that paging (not swapping;

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Doug Hardie writes: >> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert >> wrote: >> >> Have you measured that paging (not swapping; that's a more extreme >> measure where the whole process gets removed from memory) is a >> significant load

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Doug Hardie
> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert > wrote: > > hiren panchasara writes: > >> On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote: >>> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?: They may not show as

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Lowell Gilbert
hiren panchasara writes: > On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote: >> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?: >> > >> > They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually >> > swapped, which would be unlikely to occur. Personally I

Re: 10-STABLE hangups frequently

2016-02-17 Thread Marius Strobl
Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets rid of that problem - especially on amd64 - and report back?

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, hiren panchasara < hi...@strugglingcoder.info> wrote: > Yes, I've seen this too. Inact end up accumulating a very large chunk of > memory leaving Free to very low. > > What VM/pagedaemon seems to care about is Free+Cache and not just Free. > I kind of get that

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread hiren panchasara
On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote: > El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?: > > > > They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually > > swapped, which would be unlikely to occur. Personally I wouldn't worry > > about it, the only thing I can think of is to

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Efraín Déctor
El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribió: They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually swapped, which would be unlikely to occur. Personally I wouldn't worry about it, the only thing I can think of is to restart processes one at a time to see which one clears

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread dweimer
On 2016-02-17 12:56 pm, Efraín Déctor wrote: > El 17/02/2016 a las 12:34 p. m., dweimer escribió: > >> I believe you are incorrectly reading it, the first character of the state >> line being a W Marks an idle interrupt thread, W only means swapped out if >> its an additional character in the

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Efraín Déctor
El 17/02/2016 a las 12:34 p. m., dweimer escribió: I believe you are incorrectly reading it, the first character of the state line being a W Marks an idle interrupt thread, W only means swapped out if its an additional character in the section. man ps [...snip...] state The state is

Re: intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread dweimer
On 2016-02-17 11:36 am, Efraín Déctor wrote: Hello. This past few days, on a dedicated server I'm seeing that swap space is being used while there are plenty of RAM to be used: Mem: 14G Active, 39G Inact, 7723M Wired, 504M Cache, 1864M Buf, 593M Free Swap: 8192M Total, 1567M Used, 6625M

intr using Swap

2016-02-17 Thread Efraín Déctor
Hello. This past few days, on a dedicated server I'm seeing that swap space is being used while there are plenty of RAM to be used: Mem: 14G Active, 39G Inact, 7723M Wired, 504M Cache, 1864M Buf, 593M Free Swap: 8192M Total, 1567M Used, 6625M Free, 19% Inuse, 108K In After investigating, I