> On 17 February 2016, at 17:45, Lowell Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> Doug Hardie writes:
>
>>> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you measured that paging (not swapping;
Doug Hardie writes:
>> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert
>> wrote:
>>
>> Have you measured that paging (not swapping; that's a more extreme
>> measure where the whole process gets removed from memory) is a
>> significant load
> On 17 February 2016, at 16:50, Lowell Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> hiren panchasara writes:
>
>> On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote:
>>> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?:
They may not show as
hiren panchasara writes:
> On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote:
>> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?:
>> >
>> > They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually
>> > swapped, which would be unlikely to occur. Personally I
Could those of you experiencing these hangs with ZFS please test
whether instead of reverting all of r292895, a kernel built with
just the merge of r291244 undone via the following patch gets
rid of that problem - especially on amd64 - and report back?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:01 PM, hiren panchasara <
hi...@strugglingcoder.info> wrote:
> Yes, I've seen this too. Inact end up accumulating a very large chunk of
> memory leaving Free to very low.
>
> What VM/pagedaemon seems to care about is Free+Cache and not just Free.
> I kind of get that
On 02/17/16 at 04:44P, Efra?n D?ctor wrote:
> El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribi?:
> >
> > They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually
> > swapped, which would be unlikely to occur. Personally I wouldn't worry
> > about it, the only thing I can think of is to
El 17/02/2016 a las 01:15 p. m., dweimer escribió:
They may not show as swapped unless the entire process is actually
swapped, which would be unlikely to occur. Personally I wouldn't worry
about it, the only thing I can think of is to restart processes one at
a time to see which one clears
On 2016-02-17 12:56 pm, Efraín Déctor wrote:
> El 17/02/2016 a las 12:34 p. m., dweimer escribió:
>
>> I believe you are incorrectly reading it, the first character of the state
>> line being a W Marks an idle interrupt thread, W only means swapped out if
>> its an additional character in the
El 17/02/2016 a las 12:34 p. m., dweimer escribió:
I believe you are incorrectly reading it, the first character of the
state line being a W Marks an idle interrupt thread, W only means
swapped out if its an additional character in the section.
man ps
[...snip...]
state The state is
On 2016-02-17 11:36 am, Efraín Déctor wrote:
Hello.
This past few days, on a dedicated server I'm seeing that swap space
is being used while there are plenty of RAM to be used:
Mem: 14G Active, 39G Inact, 7723M Wired, 504M Cache, 1864M Buf, 593M
Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 1567M Used, 6625M
Hello.
This past few days, on a dedicated server I'm seeing that swap space is
being used while there are plenty of RAM to be used:
Mem: 14G Active, 39G Inact, 7723M Wired, 504M Cache, 1864M Buf, 593M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 1567M Used, 6625M Free, 19% Inuse, 108K In
After investigating, I
12 matches
Mail list logo