trick - I seem to recall disabling apic and/or using 4BSD scheduler.
Eric
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 26 November 2005 at 20:25:58 -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I've had both Dell and ThinkPad (no longer IBM). I prefer Dell,
despite their attempts to convince me otherwise.
However, we currently seem to have significant ACPI
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
___
freebsd-stable
On 03/01/07 17:42, Steven Hartland wrote:
I've been repartitioning some of our machines here and
found that using the following method sysinstall creates
corrupt filesystems.
1. Boot a machine using an nfs mounted /usr
2. Run: sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 to enable writing
to the disk mbr
3.
On 03/02/07 07:46, Steven Hartland wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
I don't know about the fs corruption, but the double mounts is
something you asked it to do (maybe unknowingly). When you added
that partition, one of the options is to mount it.
Clearly an easy work around in that case
On 03/02/07 08:37, Steven Hartland wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
On 03/02/07 07:46, Steven Hartland wrote:
Mounting an NFS share on top of a skimmed down /usr is very common,
and very desirable. You may mount /usr from a small read-only
partition (vnode file, etc) and then mount a different
On 03/02/07 08:44, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:11:52AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
Mounting an NFS share on top of a skimmed down /usr is very common, and
very desirable. You may mount /usr from a small read-only partition
(vnode file, etc) and then mount a different
On 03/02/07 09:37, Steven Hartland wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:11:52AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
Mounting an NFS share on top of a skimmed down /usr is very common,
and very desirable. You may mount /usr from a small read-only
partition (vnode file, etc
On 03/02/07 09:56, Steven Hartland wrote:
Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steven Hartland
This is just a special case of mounting on a non-empty directory. It
should work right. The last mounted file system is the one you get
(unless you're using a file system that's designed to behave
On 03/07/07 23:13, Fluffles wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Fluffles wrote:
If you use dd on the raw device (meaning no UFS/VFS) there is no
read-ahead. This means that the following DD-command will give lower STR
read than the second:
no read-ahead:
dd if=/dev/mirror/data of=/dev/null bs=1m
On 03/08/07 09:58, Fluffles wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
On 03/07/07 23:13, Fluffles wrote:
On what hardware is this? Using any form of geom software RAID?
The low Per Char results would lead me to believe it's a very slow CPU;
maybe VIA C3 or some old pentium? Modern systems should get 100MB
On 03/09/07 12:55, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Eric Anderson wrote:
[ ... ]
Dunno. I was merely trying to keep things honest, since what was
communicated (whether intended or not) was that a C3 isn't modern,
and is akin to a Pentium, which it isn't.
I've got a VIA C3
may or may not gain. How busy was the server during that time? Is this to
a single IDE disk? If so, you are probably bottlenecked by that IDE drive.
Eric
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur
of things. Is this a single
drive, or a RAID subsystem?
Eric
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never
Mounted on
/dev/da0s1d1891668564 1643042028 9729305294% 32927755
211542003 13% /vol1
What's wrong? It lets me mount it rw and ro, but I'm afraid data is
going to get corrupt.
Eric
--
Eric Anderson
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never
).
Eric
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't
and an ext2
fs. I think it has to do with the tasting (or re-tasting) of the GEOM
devices, but that's pretty much a guess.
Eric
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:48 PM 13/03/2006, Eric Anderson wrote:
I get the above panic after nfs clients attach to this nfs server and
being
I do have dumps from two crashes so far.
This is FreeBSD-6.1-PRERELEASE from Friday-ish.
Dont know if it was fixed or not, but there were a lot of VM
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Ivan Kolosovskiy wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
The base install, running GENERIC will only use 3GB.
:[ ]. Why so?! How make FreeBSD to use 4GB? it is possible?
Sure, as the rest of my email said. man pae
Eric
[moved to -current due to lack of response]
Eric Anderson wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:48 PM 13/03/2006, Eric Anderson wrote:
I get the above panic after nfs clients attach to this nfs server
and being
I do have dumps from two crashes so far.
This is FreeBSD-6.1-PRERELEASE from Friday-ish
/setting-up-bluetooth-mouse-on-freebsd.html
Eric
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't
--
Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't
Dennis Melentyev wrote:
Can't confirm, but it seems like formating card with phone will give
you FAT12 even on 1Gb card. (Not volunteering to reformat my player)
:)
It would be useful to some people to have access to a FAT12 formatted
file system that is 32MB. Can you (or someone else) dd
Joe Peterson wrote:
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Are the datestamps (Thu Jan 24 23:20:58 2008) found within the corrupt
block before or after the datestamp of the file it was found within?
i.e. was the corrupt block on the disk before or after the mp3 was
written there?
Hi Gavin, those dated are
On Feb 8, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Danny Braniss wrote:
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2009-Feb-08 10:45:13 +0200, Danny Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote:
Feb 6 18:00:13
30 matches
Mail list logo
