Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:57:50PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote:
Will the systems be quicker this way, or will it just help
with this 4GB memory limit?
Quicker - probably not. Will certainly help with the 4G limit.
On a low level sort of way amd64 actually might be
Ivan Voras wrote:
- The showstopper: Sysinstall completes (though slowly), but on reboot
the loader doesn't go further than the F1 prompt :( This is very
curious, since when booting from install CD the loader shows it
recognizes the CD drive and drives A: and C:, so BIOS seems to be ok. If
I
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Pete French wrote:
There's something unusual going on and I don't know what else to try.
Finally, after fiddling with various options, I've sort-of got it to
work by creating two slices (s1, s2), setting root partition on s1a and
the rest (/usr, /var, etc.) on s2. Now, the
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:33:24PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
If it's really only a web server, then you probably don't
need the USB ports. In that case you should remove ohci
and ehci from your kernel. The USB interrupt handler is
quite heavy-weight, so it can have
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:15 AM 11/13/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Is this with EM_INTR_FAST enabled also?
Yes. Havent done the stock case yet, but will do so later today.
Do you have a comparison with Linux under the same circumstances?
___
The machine in question has a 2-core Xeon, 2GB RAM and a new
ciss-compatible controller, for which I appologise for not remembering
the exact model but it's 200-something with three attached 7.2k RPM
SATA drives (so it's probably SAS-compatible) in RAID5, and 128 MB cache
with BBU. I'm trying to
Pete French wrote:
I've tried all the possible stripe sizes (128k gives the best performance)
but still I only get the above speeds. Just one of the 15k drives on it's
own performs better than this! I would expect the RAID-0 to give me at
least some speedup, or in the worst case be the same,
Pete French wrote:
- How does your performance compare when using dd on the raw devices (in
order: da0, da0s1, da0s1a...) vs when using it on the file system? (Poor
performance might indicate FS vs stripe alignment issues)
Raw dd gives 50 meg/second
On /dev/da1, with a reasonable block
Pete French wrote:
reading from the filesystem with the vfs.read_max set to 64 I now get
112 meg/second though ?!!! how can the filesystem give me better performance
than the raw device ? I do not think this is a caching issue as I am using
a test file nearly twice the size of the RAM in the
Pete French wrote:
It would be interesting for you to track iostat (i.e. run iostat 1)
with and without modified vfs.read_max and see if there's a difference.
On the file: KB/t is about 127.5 with both sizes. Rate is 39 on with
the read_max set to 8, but 115 with read_max set to 64.
Ok, this
Pete French wrote:
You might be able to speed up the read by playing with the vfs.read_max
sysctl (try 16 or 32).
Wow! That makes a huge difference, thanks. Should this not be in 'man tuning' ?
AFAIK vfs.read_max will only influence sequential reading - it's the
readahead size. Also, it's
Scott Long wrote:
My personally opinion is that the changes needed are too risky to rush
into 6.2 for all of the different drivers. For the vast majority of
people, what is in 6.2 works quite well, and there is no need to
introduce new bugs. We are pushing forward with if_em because the
Thomas Krause wrote:
BTW: There is no way to disable USB completely?
You can try using loader hints:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=device.hintssektion=5
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Why would the scheduler affect the sys component of the load (which
shoots to the sky before the machine drops of the network)? I thought,
it only matters for user-space programs (the order in which they run)...
It also schedules internal kernel threads (such as device
Fredrik Widlund wrote:
setups but hit the same limitation again and again. The strange part is
that a Dell raid adapter based on the same chipset, the Perc 5/I, works
well with writes achieving 200MB/s.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Several:
- are there cache differences between
Fredrik Widlund wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Several:
- are there cache differences between the controllers (amount of
memory, cache policy)?
Default settings on both.
Maybe you should check what the defaults are :) Especially the amount of
memory and is there a battery to back the cache
Fredrik Widlund wrote:
Solved my issue with LSI 8480E without BBU. With write: BadBBU,
cache: enabled, and io: cached, performance rose to around 200MB/s
from 20MB/s.
I don't know what BadBBU is, but from some Googling it seems to be a
setting that overrides BBU detection, and enables write
SiteRollout.com wrote:
1.) How exactly do I know whether I am running the STABLE or CURRENT
release, as when I run uname I can only see the following relevant info:
FreeBSD server4.domain.info 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Sep 23
13:52:48 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guido van Rooij wrote:
But a single-threaded process accessing a large file should also be
able to see a speed increase. I really do not see why a split or roundrobin
approach to a mirror would get only half the performance of a raw access
to a non-mirror. Somehow there must a limit of 128KB
Brent Casavant wrote:
Not with FreeBSD in particular. However, from time to time I've
run across a piece of software that makes bad assumptions about
deleting various input or output files. If run as root, the
program/library might accidentally delete a character special
device such as
Roland Smith wrote:
The command 'devfs rule -s 2 apply 100' should fix it, I think.
?
If I read devfs(8) correctly, this should apply rule 100 of ruleset 2.
Since I have no rulesets or rules, it doesn't work. :)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Roland Smith wrote:
Are you sure that you have no rulesets?
Yup. The command devfs rule showsets shows nothing. This is on
somewhat old RELENG_6.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
John Baldwin wrote:
Nothing to worry about. It means that there are more devices that couldn't
be
fit into the available space for the name. A + means there is one more
device on this IRQ and there wasn't enough room for its name. A * means
there are 2 or more devices on this IRQ and
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Hello all,
with my ADSL provider (a reseller of the german Telekom), I'm unable to
make ppp redial after the link has been lost. With Telekom, you usually
get disconnected every 24h hours, but you can simply reconnect if
our ppp would support it.
As a victim of
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I was feeling proactive and took a look at the vmstat code, which is
an amazing piece of work (take my comment however you wish, because it
has multiple implications).
Yeah, I see it. It will become a member of a collection of examples for
the
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Now I wonder why three of the file systems were reported as
being clean. It's my understanding that file systems are
only marked clean when they're unmounted. Did that change
recently? The system was idle at the time of the crash,
and soft-updates was enabled, so it's
The goal is to have a USB flash drive mounted via automounter in a way
that it auto-umounts after a while so I don't crash the system by
pluggin it out wile mounted. My amd.map looks like this:
/defaults type:=host;fs:=${autodir}/${rhost}/host;rhost:=${key};
*
Marko Lerota wrote:
Paul Saab [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this was fixed after 6.1-RELEASE. You need to grab the driver from -stable.
What does it mean? That I could run 6.1-RELEASE but have some drivers
from -stable or -current?
Yes if you are careful with the source, and do the patching
I had a chance today to play a little with a server that was later
passed on for deployment, and one of the thing I tried to do was create
something unusual - three disk groups/virtual disks on the PERC5/i RAID
controller, with a single drive in each group (entered as RAID0).
All went fine until
Huang wen hui wrote:
hi,
I have HP Server install FreeBSD 6.1R/amd64 with 2CPUs ,2 logical CPUs
per core.
On top show, It should show 4 cpus, but I never see 1 and 3 cpu on show.
Does anything I miss?
This is a simplified version of things, but it will help you: CPUs 0 and
2 are real CPUs,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only bgfsck
has todo a snapshot and cleanup unused space that got lost cause the
SU did not finish as the crash occured.
Maybe someone can give me some light into that :). I always tought that
*BSD don't need a journaling FS as it has already SU
Soft-updates was a
Christian Laursen wrote:
Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- todays desktop drives can lie about writing data. SoftUpdates relies
on some assumptions about when the data is physically written to
media, and those are not always valid today
I think journaling relies on the same assumptions
Christian Laursen wrote:
However, with journaling you can have filesystem corruption and not know
about it. With fsck, bg or not, at least you will know.
Also, I'm interested about this - what kind of silent corruption? The
same kind that can generally come from on-drive caches?
Christian Laursen wrote:
Journaling also needs writes to be done in the correct order. You don't
want to write the real update to the filesystem before you have made sure
Ok, but journal is (or should be) protected by checksumming or some kind
of record markers, so invalid entries are not
Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote:
this immediately gives me the result. It is something with the
pam or nss that is insisting on doing the port 389 first.
Have you edited the right configuration files? There are
/usr/local/etc/openldap/ldap.conf, /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf and
Philip Murray wrote:
When this happens it seems a lot of Apache processes get stuck in the
UFS state (in top).
I've seen this when there's a huge directory involved, such as created
by a runaway web cache function, PHP sessions, or PHP accelerator that
creates a lot of small cache files. If
Sean Winn wrote:
It's not tricky. man sigaction documents the functions that are async-
signal safe. Anything not listed there (such as printf) and you're on
your own.
My thoughts were more about 3rd party library calls, which may or may
not use non-signal-safe functions.
Stefan Bethke wrote:
mail in malloc(): warning: recursive call
Cosmic rays? Anything I could try to find the cause?
I know what it is, but you won't going to like it. As far as I
understand this happens when a process gets a signal in the middle of
using malloc(), and the signal handler also
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hmm, using SU with gjournal is really bad choice and you didn't tell
file system that it is on gjournaled device. Try:
I suggest this to be prominent in the documentation :)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Václav Haisman wrote:
journaled device, too. Will it overwrite the gmirror meta data and thus
break the mirror or will it somehow magically work? Does each GEOM layer
make the resulting block device one sector shorter?
No, when you create a mirror device, its size will be one sector less
Hr. Daniel Mikkelsen wrote:
But reading from the RAID1 runs at half the normal rates, while I
expected to get double rates.
Some possible things to check are:
- What did you use for bs= argument to dd? You should use sizes of 64KB
or more (for example, a common size is 1MB)
- Did you use dd
Loading cpufreq.ko results in these messages:
powernow0: Cool`n'Quiet K8 on cpu0
device_attach: powernow0 attach returned 6
powernow0: Cool`n'Quiet K8 on cpu0
device_attach: powernow0 attach returned 6
I've googled for it - there are many similar problems but no solution.
This is:
CPU: AMD
Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Can you give the output of top(1)? Until this is fixed, you can disable
pagezero with sysctl vm.idlezero_enable=0.
It's weekend so the load is not that great today:
last pid: 39200; load averages: 0.94, 1.07, 1.06up 3+19:07:24
13:55:38
131 processes: 4
Sam Leffler wrote:
Maybe this is the same problem jhb recently fixed in head with threads
getting assigned the wrong priority under certain conditions (it showed
up most easily with taskq threads).
Is it this one:
jhb 2006-04-17 18:20:38 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified
Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes
(what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very
busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured
apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to have
gotten worse -
Vlad GALU wrote:
How is the system, swapping-wise ?
Good: no swapping, 100+ MB free memory.
Free memory varies between ~90 and ~110 MB - maybe something is
returning memory to the OS and reclaiming it too often? (looking at top,
it could be php-cgi, but is there a way to precisely track
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
Next time this happen check following sysctls:
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_count
I guess you've hit the limit.
If so, is it safe to increase dyn_max to, for example, 8192?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
I've just had a weird transient problem on a (very loaded) 2 CPU web
server. Suddenly it stopped wanting to connect to the database server
with access denied error. Looking at security log (I have ipfw logging
enabled), I found this:
Apr 25 14:17:17 duality kernel: ipfw: 65400 Deny TCP
I forgot to add, here is the ipfw ruleset:
00500 691658783 639225488899 allow ip from any to any via lo0
01000 99014 6833994 allow icmp from any to any
05000 160430605 76502643136 allow tcp from me to any setup keep-state
05100 1002529109535100 allow udp from me to any
Brian Doherty wrote:
I have built a redundant freeBSD box for my mail server, and for my
webserver, and am putting the redundant boxes in a different geographic
location. I am looking for a way to backup the relevant data on the current
mail and webservers to the new redundant boxes every
On a very loaded web server (httpd processes are huge because PHP uses
lots of shared memory) the pagezero process seems to constantly take up
to 30% of CPU time (this is 2-CPU SMP machine):
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
12 root1 171 52
I have a problem with an apache installation' the httpd-error log file is
full of messages like these:
[Fri Feb 10 01:01:03 2006] [warn] pid file /var/run/httpd.pid overwritten
-- Unclean shutdown of previous Apache run?
[Fri Feb 10 01:01:03 2006] [notice] Apache/2.0.55 (FreeBSD) PHP/5.0.5
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Not sure if this is standard, but on an idle machine (ie. just set it
up, nothing running on it yet), with RAID1+0 across 4 drives:
Writing the 853 Megabyte file, 'iozone.tmp'...15.656250 seconds
Reading the file...3.921875 seconds
IOZONE performance measurements:
Philippe Pegon wrote:
do you have write cache on your Smart Array 532 ?
I don't know (not my hardware) - how to find out?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
Philippe Pegon wrote:
If I remember correctly, you can see it at boot time. I don't know how
to find it when FreeBSD is up. Maybe someone else knows it (if it's
possible) ?
It doesn't mention cache when booting and initialising the array.
___
Philippe Pegon wrote:
I'm not sure, but I believe that the Smart Array 532 doesn't have write
cache and doesn't support it :
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantstorage/arraycontrollers/smartarray532/questionsanswers.html#11
Yes, you're right :(
Oh well, I'll have to work
I need to get a Proliant machine with 2 P3 processors running FreeBSD 6.
I don't know much about the machine, I think it's ML 380 G2 or close to
that, but I have physical access. So far, everything is fine (once the
inability to boot from CD-ROM is circumvented), except one detail:
horrible
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, 2006-Feb-01 11:44:08 +, Pete French wrote:
I have a piece of coode which does some networking, in which I see read
and write calls failing with 'Interrupted system call' from time to time.
You will get EINTR if the interrupt occurs before any data is read
or
Mike Jakubik wrote:
It seems that powerd does very little in terms of reducing heat, and
sacrifices performance while doing so. Am i wrong to assume that
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1210.79-MHz 686-class CPU)
It is very unlikely this processor supports any kind of frequency
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I believe FreeBSD turns PCI cards off if there is no driver attached.
I don't think XP actually turns those devices off if you are actually using
them. Not sure about the specifics for stuff like USB (ie what happens if
it's sleeping and you connect a USB peripheral)
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 06:39:18PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
For some funny reasons, I'll probably have to setup a gmirror between a
SCSI disk device and a IDE one, and won't have much time for testing. So
Might have bad performance, who
For some funny reasons, I'll probably have to setup a gmirror between a
SCSI disk device and a IDE one, and won't have much time for testing. So
I'm wondering did anyone do such a thing and are there any caveats. For
example, AFAIK SCSI devices are under Giant and IDE are not - is there any
Michael Schuh wrote:
i have searched informations about geom-gate and RAID1 or
Raid10 over TCP/IP. But nothing relevant found, so that i write
the questions here.
Actually, there has been some discussion about this, but you probably
won't like the result...
Has anyone any experiences with
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
I was thinking about gvinum for the storage server, but given the
current documentation and the discussions about it now, I don't want to
risk it. So, I'm looking at hardware raid 5 controllers. From this list,
You could use graid3(8) - it has data+parity components
On a P3 server with 1GB of memory, every now and then (about twice a
month) I get a log full of errors like this:
swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 167,size 4096, error 12
swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 182,size 4096, error 12
swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed;
Is upgrading a i386 system to amd64 supported?
Can I just build an amd64 kernel and keep the userland?
--
Every sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology
- Arthur C Anticlarke
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Is it possible to use ipfw to filter packets by domain name?
What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Igor Robul wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
What I need it for: I'd like to allow ssh logins only from a specific
TLD (by reverse lookup...) - maybe there's another way?
/etc/hosts.allow
man 5 hosts_access
How safe is it? As I understand it, sshd actually accepts connections
prior to checking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Access control based on the reverse lookup of an IP address is a
dangerous idea in general. Anyone who manages their own reverse DNS
could bypass the security simply by creating a DNS entry. If someone
controls the in-addr.arpa zone for a particular IP range, they can
I have a motherboard here that reports USB controllers thusly in dmesg
(5.4-stable):
usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support
usb0: SiS 5571 USB controller on ohci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
Some time ago, there were complaints that nForce chipsets don't work very
well on FreeBSD - specifically various components like built-in NIC, sound
card, ACPI...
Is this still true? What about nForce4 (PCI-Express) support?
(I'm interested in 5.x branch only)
--
Every sufficiently advanced
Does stock ftpd know about PAM? I can't seem to log in via ftp with
users that are on my LDAP server (but I can with a local user that's in
/etc/passwd).
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Scot Hetzel wrote:
Which version of FreeBSD, and what does your PAM configuration for
ftpd look like?
Oh yes, thanks, I forgot not all services had pam_ldap line added when
we switched to LDAP :)
(it works now)
A related question: for some reasons, I want to allow FTP only from+to
localhost. I
The man page on rc.conf states that AUTO can be given to dumpon
variable and it will save the coredump to first suitable swap device. I
tried this today and it doesn't work - during boot, there's a line like
dumpon: 'AUTO' is not a valid device. By quick grepping in /etc/rc.d
it seems that
Ken Smith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:57:11PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html
Is SCHED_ULE abandoned for 5.x?
I wouldn't go as far as to say that but at the moment there are no plans
to make changes in the default scheduler for 5.4
Ken Smith wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html
Is SCHED_ULE abandoned for 5.x?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Sunday, 16. January 2005 01:07, Ivan Voras wrote:
What could be the reasons for su root to not work?
I have a user that's in wheel group. Logging in as root works on the
console, but su-ing from the user just writes 'Sorry', like the
password's wrong
Robert Watson wrote:
I've modified the su(1) source in HEAD to print a message if su(1) is
executed without an effective uid of 0 (i.e., as root, or setuid as
another user). Hopefully this error message will be more suggestive than
sorry:
paprika:~/freebsd/commit/src/usr.bin/su ./su
su: not
Thomas Dymond wrote:
Could this be anything to do with : security.bsd.suser_enabled
what's yours set to ?
security.bsd.suser_enabled: 1
But, I noticed I've got security.mac.* enabled somehow (it's not my
kernel...) - could MAC be interfering?
___
What could be the reasons for su root to not work?
I have a user that's in wheel group. Logging in as root works on the
console, but su-ing from the user just writes 'Sorry', like the
password's wrong. There are no clues in log files.
/etc/pam.d/su is identical to another machine where
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:07:07AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
/etc/pam.d/su is identical to another machine where everything works ok.
You forgot to mention what version (4.x doesn't use /etc/pam.d)
oops. 5.3-release.
___
freebsd
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:15:34AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
/etc/pam.d/su is identical to another machine where everything works ok.
OK. /etc/pam.d/su on 5.3 includes /etc/pam.d/system, so also make
sure they're in sync.
/etc/pam.d/system is the same
Is anybody running qemu successfully on 5-stable? I'm trying to boot a
knoppix live-cd from iso-image with:
qemu -cdrom knoppix.iso -boot d
It always reboots the computer (no core-dump, no panic, just reboot -
and that's as user-started process, not under root). Same thing under
X11 or
Jon Noack wrote:
Roland Smith wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:03:00PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Is anybody running qemu successfully on 5-stable? I'm trying to boot a
knoppix live-cd from iso-image with:
I tried to build it from ports on amd64 but the compiler segfaulted. :-(
So it might
I'm trying to setup (ipfw) firewall on a server that exports home
directories over NFS. Do I have to use nfsd_flafs and mountd_flags in
rc.conf to specify ports on the server (advice I found in various
mailing list archives) or is there a centralized solution? (what does
nfs_reserved_port_only
Is there a canonical way of preserving devfs rules (device permissions
actually) across reboots?
It seems devd.conf works only for static devices, not hotplugged,
while devfs rules works for those, but they vanish on reboot.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivan Voras wrote:
Is there a canonical way of preserving devfs rules (device permissions
actually) across reboots?
It seems devd.conf works only for static devices, not hotplugged,
^
this should have been devfs.conf
while devfs(8) rules work for those, but they vanish
Frank Mayhar wrote:
cat /etc/devfs.rules
[devfsrules_local=15]
add path 'bpf*' mode 0660
add path 'ugen*' mode 0664
add path 'cd*' mode 0664
For example. For some hints, 'man devfs' and /etc/defaults/devfs.rules.
Oh, and for this example, don't forget to add
whitevamp wrote:
im getting ready to do a cvsup / build world from 4.9 to 5.3 , and im planning
on doing a custom kernnel build and i was whanting to find out if these
settings are still vallid in 5.3 and if not what the replacement is if any ,
and ive serched the mailing list and googled it and
Is there a best practice for automated updating large number of
interdependant ports? I keep my ports tree up-to-date, and sometimes I
wish to install applications that depend on a newer version of an
existing one, and fail.
My current example is gnome. Recently, whatever I want to install
I found out today that I have two zombie sshd processes on a busy server
(dozen or so users over ssh, many other services), and I can't kill them.
sshd38653 0.0 0.0 00 ?? ZMon08AM 0:00.03 defunct
sshd75851 0.0 0.0 00 ?? Z 7:33PM 0:00.08 defunct
kill -9
Mark Andrews wrote:
Is there a way to find out what has happened and why does the situation
occur? (I can't reboot the server for testing)
You can't kill them because they are already dead. They
are just holding state so that the parent process can know
how they died. Once
Ronald Klop wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:06:21 +0100, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I find out what their parent processes are? (something like
tree-shaped ps?)
/usr/ports/sysutils/pstree
and ps can display the ppid (parent pid).
Thanks, parents were stuck and had to be killed
Terje Elde wrote:
ggate would be one option, but it'd be much nicer to have it as a
'real' geom module.
It would, but I don't know enough to make a kernel module.
A password will still be required, for generating the random sequence...
*cringe*
The only point of using such a XOR is to end up
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:38:06PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
439 ldap 200 149M 6128K kserel 0:07 0.00% 0.00% slapd
I know that the actually used memory size is the 6MB figure above, but
why does it allocate almost 150MB? Is it normal?
This sounds like a
I noticed Samba 3 can be built to support ACLs, so I tried it, mounted
a ufs2 partition with acls, shared it and really, manipulation of files
through windows explorer dialog adds ACL data to files, and getfacl(1)
reports there indeed are ACLs. BUT, there are two problems: the
permissions set
Trying to force linux-OpenGroupware port to run turned out to be hard
work, and currently I'm stuck at this: (output from dmesg):
linux: pid 49052 (glidelink): sysctl {1,23} is not implemented
linux: pid 49052 (glidelink): syscall syslog not implemented
linux: pid 49052 (glidelink): syscall
J.'LoneWolf' Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip: adding ata100 controller ]
This is normally the easy bit. If you don't want to boot off a drive
connected to this controller you don't have to do anything in the BIOS.
If you want to boot off this controller, simply change the boot
J.'LoneWolf' Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 15:04 1/02/2003 +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
What are my options if the BIOS is stupid/old enough not to have such a
knob?
I'm going out on a limb here, but IIRC (it's been a long time since I
actually worked with that old hardware) you should
- Original Message -
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-kthread is not supported.
Shouldn't it be removed from the gcc man page then?
(just curious: has it ever worked, and why was it removed?)
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins
401 - 500 of 501 matches
Mail list logo
