On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:31:45PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-stable.
>
> I've added torrent client (transmission) to software on my home
> server and it starts to hang in very unusual way: kernel works but
> userland doesn't.
>
>I can ping it (and it answers). I
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:37:25PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > OpenOffice hangs on NFS when I try to save a file or even when I try
> > to
> > open the save dialog in this case.
> >
> >
> > $ 17:25:35 ron...@ronald [~]
> > procstat -kk 85575
> > PID TID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
> > 8557
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:44:57PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-stable.
>
> I've added `transmission' BitTorrent client to my home server and now
> it deadlocks easily (after about 1 hour of intensive download and
> seeding). This server is upgraded from 7.x and last time I've r
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 10:29:09PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Kostik.
> You wrote 8 января 2011 г., 22:02:32:
>
>
> > There is some weird backtrace at the pid 20, what is g_raid5 ?
> It is geom_raid5, with two threads -- working one and one for
> processing finished bios.
>
> > If
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 11:10:21PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Kostik.
> You wrote 8 января 2011 г., 22:56:13:
>
>
> >> And, if it is "classic deadlock" is here any "classical" solution to
> >> it?
> > Do not allocate during bio processing.
> So, if GEOM need some cache, it needs pr
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 19/01/2011 11:09, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >>On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> >>>I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB
> >>>eg.), but now
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:20:53PM +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In RELENG_8, gmirror is good enough to keep whole HDD pair withing the mirror.
> Its performance, stability any pretty ease of maintainance allows
> to use it widely.
>
> With wide deployment of gmirror in production I've
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:30:06AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 23:20, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >In RELENG_8, gmirror is good enough to keep whole HDD pair withing the
> >mirror.
> >Its performance, stability any pretty ease of maintainance allows
> >to use it widely.
> >
>
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:30:37PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/25/2011 12:28, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >No, my use for rc.early is different. I use it to load modules
> >before filesystems are mounted.
>
> Ok, I'll bite ... what is deficient about doing this in /
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch
> >>
> >> I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:19:12PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I updated ports (portmaster -a basically) on this 8.2-PRE box and now I find
> X takes a long, long time to start up and uses lots of CPU. It shows the
> wchan as swwrt.
>
> eg..
> last pid: 21791; load averages: 0.12, 0.29,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:53:14AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Noticed while digging through devfs_read_f() and devfs_write_f() in
> the course of investigating some unexpected (by me) geom behavior:
>
> ...
> int ioflag, error, resid;
> ...
> resid = uio->uio_resid;
>
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:30:52AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 2/20/2011 9:33 AM, Andrey Smagin wrote:
> > On week -current I have same problem, my box paniced every 2-15 min. I
> > resolve problem by next steps - unplug network connectors from 2 intel em
> > (82574L) cards. I think last time
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:55:37PM +0100, Henner Heck wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i experience freezing of my FreeBSD machine when performing certain
> operations
> on a Samba share.
>
> Technical info:
> - FreeBSD 8.2 Release 64 Bit (it also happened with 8.2 RC3)
> - Samba 3.5.6.1
> - Athlon II Quad
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:03:07AM +0200, Nikolay Denev wrote:
> On 1 Mar, 2011, at 01:33 , Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > Dear all:
> >
> > Just an FYI that I've gone ahead and merged userspace DTrace support to
> > FreeBSD 8.x from 9.x. While it appeared to pass build tests locally, boot
> > and
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:56:58PM +, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Author: kib
> Date: Wed Mar 2 14:56:58 2011
> New Revision: 219178
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219178
>
> Log:
> Fix a bug in the result of manual assembly.
>
> Reported by:Stefan Grundmann
>
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:50:05PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I have a Atheros AR5424 and so, based on the 8.2-STABLE i386 NOTES
> and some rummaging in the sources, I tried to build a kernel with:
>
> deviceath # Atheros pci/cardbus NIC's
> deviceath_
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:04:05PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2011-03-13 11:05:21 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2011-03-13 11:05:21 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
> TB --- 2011-03-13 11:05:21 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2011-03-1
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 01:19:38PM -0400, Derek Tattersall wrote:
> While trying to develop an understanding of the use POSIX message
> queues, I found that issuing a mq_open (2) call, resulted in Bad system
> call: 12 error message. I have tried to run the tools/regression/mqueue
> tests, but they
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:17:27AM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Ahoy. This morning, I awoke to the following on one of my servers:
>
> pid 59630 (httpd), uid 80, was killed: out of swap space
> pid 59341 (find), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space
> pid 23134 (irssi), uid 1001, was killed: out
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:40:56PM +0400, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After recent Qt-4.7.3 update I can't build KDE4 ports anymore (tested on
> 8.2-STABLE amd64 only). The problem is always reproduced with x11/kdelibs4.
> The build stalls with hanging automoc4 processes. Any help is appreci
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 07:39:46PM +0400, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 15:41:05 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > You did not supplied enough information.
> > Which of the processes is parent, which is child ?
> > Note that there are other threads in the pid 186
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:57:05PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> When trying to use doscmd on 8-stable, all I get is:
>
> Error mapping HMA, HMA disabled: : Invalid argument
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> The segfault happens at the end of mem_init(), when the allocated DOS
> memory (which
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:44:55PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> As Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > Do sysctl security.bsd.map_at_zero=1
>
> Just for the record, this sysctl also makes my really really old utree
> binary work again. The binary dates back to 386BSD 0.0, and I&#x
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 13:15 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Example: run mutt from within GNU screen while connected to
> > the system with PuTTY, then copy some of the terminal content and paste
> > it some
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:36:42AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/07/2011 08:55 Mike Tancsa said the following:
> > I did a buildworld on this box to bring it up to RELENG_8 for the BIND
> > fixes. Unfortunately, the formerly solid box (April 13th kernel)
> > panic'd tonight with
> >
> > Unre
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> The "Rev" column is required for of devices that are not uniquely
> identified by their Vnd/Dev-IDs. (These used to exist, e.g. the Symbios
> SCSI controllers, though I'm not aware of any device that needed a
> different driver dependi
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> We have 2 freebsd 8.2-STABLE (cvsuped june 22) that keeps crashing in a bad
> way :
>
> The are doing heavy apache / php4 web serving from a nfs mount and panic at
> least once a day
> with the following message (no
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> Le 25/07/2011 11:59, Kostik Belousov a Иcrit:
>
> Ok the patched server crashed this morning strangely : all httpd processes
> were stuck in nfs or vmopar
> and were unkillable. Below is the full ps.
Plea
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:17:52PM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> Le 26/07/2011 12:06, Kostik Belousov a Иcrit:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> > > Le 25/07/2011 11:59, Kostik Belousov a ?crit:
> > >
> > > Ok the
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:12:23PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:17:52PM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> > > Le 26/07/2011 12:06, Kostik Belousov a Иcrit:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Herve Boul
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:05:33PM -0700, maestro something wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> >> Have you started kgdb with the correct kernel and core file?
> >> If yes, then I am out of ideas.
> >>
> >
> > I hope so, I only recompiled the kernel once according to the DTRACE wiki
> > instructions and I certain
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:21:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[skip]
> But I also would like to use this opportunity to discuss how we can
> make it easier to debug such issue as this. I think that this problem
> demonstrates that when we treat certain junk in kernel address value
> as a userland
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:33:29PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov
> wrote:
>
> > On 10.08.2011 19:16, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> >
> >> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >>
> >> On Aug 9, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> >>>
> I am trying
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:42:28PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > On 08/20/2011 12:41, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:33:29PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> >&
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:57:02PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Michael Hoffmann wrote:
> > Maybe off topic?
> >
> > 1: echo "int main(void) { return 0; }" > t.c
> >
> > 2: setenv LDEMULATION elf_i386_fbsd
> >
> > 3: gcc -c -m32 -o t.o t.c
> >
> > 4: gcc -nostartfile
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:19:07PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> System is 8.2-RELEASE (GENERIC), amd64.
> Application -- i386 for freebsd7.
>
> In ktrace dump I find some strange result:
>
> 22951 100556 kas-milter CALL sigwait(0xffdfdf80,0xffdfdf7c)
> 22951 100556 kas-milter RET sigwa
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:24:46PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:07:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:19:07PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > System is 8.2-RELEASE (GENERIC), amd64.
> > > Ap
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:42:29PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:32:02PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > > > What should the system do for a delivered signal not present in the set
> > > > ?
> > > &g
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:56:09PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:07:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:19:07PM +0400, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > System is 8.2-RELEASE (GENERIC), amd64.
> > > Appli
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:29:29AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > Solaris is simply wrong in the same way we were wrong. Although POSIX
> > may not be as clear on this as one may like, its intention is clear and
> > additionally not returning EINTR reduces subtle portability p
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:29:29AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:56:09PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> > > sigwait() was fixed not to return EINTR in 9-current in r212405 (fixed
&
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 12:05:47PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> This should be enough for someone NFS-aware to look into it.
>
> Were you also able to get a core?
>
> I'll try to look into it in the next days, in particular about the
> softclock state.
>
I am absolutely sure that this is a zfs d
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:54:34PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:25:26 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote:
>
> RK> It is a while since I programmed C, but why will writing 0 bytes give
> RK> the reader an end-of-file? Shouldn't the fd be closed to indicate
> RK> end-of-file?
>
>
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:57:57PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:24:23 +0300 Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:54:34PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:25:26 +0200 Ronald Klop wrote
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:06:50PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> I suspect something is making those threads loop, but I don't know how
> to figure out where? (In the bad old days, I would have exscaped to a
> debugger and looked where the program counter was, then repeated after
> a "cont" a few
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:09:30PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hm, it's not all that useful. But it first calls dlopen(). Does it
> have shared modules? Do you have old copies of those somewhere lying
> around?
You need to build everything, i.e. base and the port, build with debug
symbols. Otherw
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm running 9.0-BETA3 (r225827) and now rebuilding all my 1215 ports
> (I've upgraded from 8.2). I'm getting panic. Is it known
> problem/already fixed somewhere?
>
> FreeBSD mile.xxx.ua 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:47:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I'm running 9.0-BETA3 (r225
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:51:53PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> 2011/9/29 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:47:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kostik Belousov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:12:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> 2011/9/29 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:51:53PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> >> 2011/9/29 Kostik Belousov :
> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:47:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovale
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:18:48PM +0200, V??clav Zeman wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote, On 9.10.2011 16:11:
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:48:57PM +0200, V??clav Zeman wrote:
> >> V??clav Zeman wrote, On 9.10.2011 15:25:
> >>> Bakul Shah wrote, On 6.10.2011 8:40:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:06:04
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 12:31, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Trying to track down a load problem we're seeing on 8.2-RELEASE-p4 i386
> > in a busy web hosting environment I came across the following post:
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/free
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46:27PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 02:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:07:45AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> >>> On 11/14
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:59:06PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 23:49, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46:27PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 11/15/2011 02:09, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:07:45A
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:26:49AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 00:12, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:59:06PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 11/16/2011 23:49, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:46:27PM -0800
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 02:57, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >> > It's not catching there though:
> >> >
> >> > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done.
> >> > Loaded symbols fo
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:07:51PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 01:19, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 11/17/2011 02:57, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>>> It's not catching there tho
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:54:58PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 02), Eivind Evensen said:
> > Does anybody else see this or know why?
> >
> > The machine here is running :
> >
> > > uname -a
> > FreeBSD elg.hjerdalen.lokalnett 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #36: Wed Nov
> >
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:57:08PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I have ports tinderbox runnign on stable/9-amd64, with working directories on
> tmpfs. I have two consecutive tmpfs deadlocks like
>
> root@beaver:/usr/local/tb/scripts# ps t2
> PID TT STATTIME COMM
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:59:32PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > > I have ports tinderbox runnign on stable/9-amd64, with working
> > > directories on
> > > tmpfs. I have two consecutive tmpfs deadlocks l
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:51:02PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:47:10PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> > > On 14.12.2011 22:22, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > >On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:11:47PM +0400, Andrey Z
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:51:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2011-Dec-19 22:27:49 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote:
> >Problem solved - it was indeed an endian thing.
> >The problem is that fsck uses a real_dev_bsize variable that is declared
> >long,
> >but the DIOCGSECTORSIZE ioctl takes an u
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:03:02PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> On 15.12.2011 17:01, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:51:02PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:04:48PM -0700, Charlie Martin wrote:
> We've got another mystery panic in 7.2-PRE. Upgrading is not an option;
> however, if this is familiar to anyone, backporting a patch would be.
>
> The stack trace is:
>
> db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x8019120a = db_trace_
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/
>
> Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 01:29:19AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:39:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and
> > after an update of the ports tree (with which lighttpd was updated
> > from lighttpd-1.4.26 to lig
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:35:32PM -0500, Scott Allendorf wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >on 28/05/2010 19:32 Scott Allendorf said the following:
> >>I recently upgraded to 8.1-PRERELEASE (amd64) on a Dell Optiplex 960
> >>running 8.0-RELEASE. After the upgrade, my floppy drive was no longer
> >>d
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 07:07:04PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Friday 28 May 2010 03:35 pm, Scott Allendorf wrote:
> > Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > > on 28/05/2010 19:32 Scott Allendorf said the following:
> > >> I recently upgraded to 8.1-PRERELEASE (amd64) on a Dell Optiplex
> > >> 960 running 8.0-
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Not long ago, POSIX semaphores support was enabled by default as it's
> becoming more widely used, by e.g. firefox. However, the support
> for these is still incomplete: we only have systemwide limit of 30
> semaphores, an
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:41:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010 11:06:22 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Not long ago, POSIX semaphores support was enabl
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Me??ner wrote:
>
> LM> Hi,
> LM> I hope this is not the wrong list to ask. Didn't get any answers on
> LM> -questions.
>
> LM> When you try to do the following inside a nullfs mounted di
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:15:49AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >>On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Me??ner wrote:
> >>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:06:11PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >
> >Yes, I hoped that Mikolaj ends up with something similar :). Please note
> >that this is racy, since we cannot know why usecount is greater t
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:08:31PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> >Hello!
> >
> > I'm trying to start the experimental NFSv4 server in RELENG_8 w/o
> >building it into the kernel, as nfsv4(4) suggests:
> >
> >... or start mountd(8) and nfsd(
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:29:29PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Is this a known problem (I've submitted a PR just in case it is not)?
>
> I am seeing this consistently when I try to do a build/installworld/kernel
> with daily sources from the master tree:
>
> http://www.mediafire.com/imageview
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:11:50AM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 06:24:55PM +0300, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > After updating my buildbox from 26 April 8-STABLE
> > to 8.1-RC2 I constantly getting SIGEPIPE
>
> > portsnap:
> > Fetching 4 metadata patches... done.
> > Applying m
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:48:16PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:20:33PM +1000, Sean wrote:
> > I'm getting the same thing; what shell are you using? I changed my shell
> > on one machine from /bin/tcsh to /usr/local/bin/bash and problem
> > disappeared.
>
> That thi
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:29:31AM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On 06/08/2010, at 2:38, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > > I think this is the main reason / has had to grow - the actual kernel
> > > > is relatively small so even a 256Mb / could hold several, but with
> > >
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 07:15:16PM +0400, Alexey Tarasov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a couple of Supermicro servers which got the similar kernel panic with
> all FreeBSD versions I tried since 6.4.
> Now I want to investigate into the problem.
> The servers get into panic with similar workload: fi
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:21:15PM +0400, Alexey Tarasov wrote:
> Hello Kostik!
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >>
> > The backtrace make absolutely no sense. I would not trust kgdb anyway.
> >
> > Compile ddb in and do
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:35:36PM +0400, Alexey Tarasov wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:21:15PM +0400, Alexey Tarasov wrote:
> >> Hello Kostik!
> >>
> >> On Aug 16
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:59:07AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> some 2 days ago my repo mirror (stable/8...@amd64) starts dumping core on
> copying
> repo:
>
> ...
> SetAttrs CVSROOT-src/Emptydir
> Edit CVSROOT-src/access,v
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> del
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:45:08AM +0200, freebsd wrote:
> hi list,
>
> we upgraded some 20 boxes from 7.1 and 7.2 to 7.3-RELEASE-p2 (all amd64)
> and now are experiencing some weird behaviour on 6 of them with rsnapshot:
>
> after a few days/several weeks (seems to be completely random),
> rsn
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:04:50PM +0200, freebsd wrote:
> Am 10.09.2010 11:21, schrieb Kostik Belousov:
> >On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:45:08AM +0200, freebsd wrote:
> >It sounds like a deadlock, but the cause cannot be identified without
> >further diagnostic. It might be
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 08:32:32AM -0500, Bryce Edwards wrote:
> I have a Supermicro with the C7X58 motherboard and an i7 930 cpu, and
> it is nowhere near the performance it should be. A buildworld just
> took 22.5 hours!
I use 5046A-XB with i7-930 as home workstation, running latest RELENG_8,
an
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 07:28:13PM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just began trying chrome web browser from
> http://chromium.hybridsource.org/ but it triggered 2 panics on my
> 8.1-STABLE system.
>
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD exxodus.fedaykin.here 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 03:58:12PM -0400, jhell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/22/2010 09:28, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 07:28:13PM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following:
> > > I guess, I could replace the kernel on the CD and have them reburn it?
> >
> > That should work.
> > BTW, here I describ
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:31:21PM +0400, Alexander Zagrebin wrote:
> > > I've tried the nginx with
> > > disabled sendfile (the nginx.conf contains "sendfile off;"):
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/random of=test bs=1m count=100
> > > 100+0 records in
> > > 100+0 records out
> > > 104857600 bytes transf
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:05:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/10/2010 17:53 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > Could it be the priming of the vm object pages content ?
>
> Sorry, not familiar with this term.
> Do you mean prepopulation of vm object with valid pa
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:22:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 29/10/2010 18:17 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 06:05:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 29/10/2010 17:53 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> >>> Could it b
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:43:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 30/10/2010 14:25 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:33:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 30/10/2010 13:12 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0300, Andriy G
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:27:09AM -0700, Josh Carroll wrote:
> >> I'm having a problem with nfsd hanging and not serving mount points,
> >> during which time it can not not be killed. This problem started
> >> happening sometime after November 2nd, since kernel from 11/2 sources
> >> does not exhi
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:58:53AM -0500, Daryl Richards wrote:
> I'm wondering what the status is of AES-NI in 8-STABLE? I can find
> references to it being put into 9 back in July, with the note that it
> would be MFC'ed within a month, but as far as I've been able to find,
> nothing after tha
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:09:55PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/11/2010 13:06 Martin Matuska said the following:
> > No, this is not good for us. Solaris does not allow "mounting" of
> > snapshots on any vnode, like we do. Solaris has them only in
> > .zfs/snapshots. This allows us to have re
Hello,
this is a call for testers of the merge of fpu_kern_enter/leave(9)
to RELENG_8. The changes are required to fix some issues with VIA
padlock engine, and to actually merge aesni(4) to RELENG_8.
I ask to look at the possible FPU context handling regressions.
Reports from the users of VIA padl
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > Patch is at
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/releng_8_fpu.1.patch
>
>
> Hi,
> One small failure on the patch
>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:08:30PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:42:50PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >> On 11/15/2010 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Patch is at
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:46:23PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 5:19 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > Would your conclusion be that the patch seems to increase the throughput
> > of the aesni(4) ?
> >
> > I think that on small-sized blocks, when usi
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
