On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:32:44PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote:
options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been
significantly expanded to test a much larger set of
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:25:58PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin
I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case.
I've built another kernel, adding back
makeoptions
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:52:32AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:37:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact
that running thousands of checks for bugs
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0300, Matti J. Karki wrote:
On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the
copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced
repeatedly.
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
Hello All,
I have been running FBSD a long while, and actually running since the 5.x
releases on the server I am having troubles with. I basically have a small
network and just use NIS/NFS to link my various FBSD and
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:22:59PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
Personally, since FreeBSD 4.11 will reach its EoL about 8 months
from now, and the 4.x-[56].x upgrade path is non-trivial, I
recommend installing FreeBSD 6.1 instead.
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 07:35:53PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
Is there a server currently furnishing snapshots of the FreeBSD 4.11 security
branch? We have some servers running various 4.x versions that might not be
happy with 6.x due to memory requirements. They also might have slower file
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:04:05PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
Core and debug kernel are available, but the trace appears to be
corrupted.
Sorry to hijack your thread, but I'm also seeing corrupted backtraces
from kgdb involving generic_bcopy().
Is there something about its asm
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:03:33AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:20:24PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
Well, y'know, if they could release a FreeBSD 2.2.9 (as was done last
month), it
shouldn't be a problem to do a 4.12 release as a last gasp to tide us
over
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:43:32PM -0400, Rong-en Fan wrote:
As I posted few days ago, I have similar problems like Howard's
(some details in the thread 6.1-RELEASE, em0 high interrupt rate
and nfsd eats lots of cpu on stable@). After binary searching
the source tree, I found that
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 03:18:25PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, list.
Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock
problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM -0400, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile 6.0-stable on a release box, prior to upgrade.
I've tried several times and all end with an internal compiler error:
segmentation fault: 11. And then i'm told to submit a bug report. My
problem is when
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:56:59AM +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:
hi all,
I've seen an increase in panics since upgrading to 6.1 (I'm tracking
RELENG_6).
6.1-Release seemed ok, but since updating kernel/world to more recent updates,
I've been having lockups on resume.
I'm using a Thinkpad
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:48:53PM -0400, Howard Leadmon wrote:
So what's changed at that delta, under the one that works vfs_lookup.c is:
Edit src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c
Add delta 1.80.2.6 2006.03.31.07.39.24 kris
Under the one that fails the vfs_lookup.c is:
Edit
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:58:09PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
+options QUOTA
options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists
options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories
options MD_ROOT # MD
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :
/etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 335544320 total allocated
It looks like you are using a malloc-backed
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:26:24PM +0300, Iasen Kostov wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:54 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE :
/etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:24:22PM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
Hi, list.
Some time ago Kostik Belousov publish in this list patch for nfsd (see
thread Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?) for resolving
problem with CPU usage. Several peoples test it (me too) and answer,
what
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:06:44AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 mtx_owned(Giant)),
(nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsafenet=1 Giant));
from nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c, line 570.
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
My dual-CPU DS20 Alpha box can more or less consistently be
forced into a panic like:
FreeBSD/alpha (goldrush.wbnet) (ttyd0)^
login: panic: lockmgr: thread 0xfc007d9d4a80, not
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:02:53PM -0700, Mark Morley wrote:
Hi all,
We have an NFS server (amd64) running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE. It serves a dozen
or so clients which are a mix of FreeBSD 4.11 and 6.1-STABLE. All NFS traffic
is on a dedicated gigabit switched network.
Periodically we have
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:49:18PM -0700, Mark Morley wrote:
Please post your kernel config.
Kris
Ok, here it is. This server has two em nic's (only one is used though),
a single IDE boot disk, and a RAID using an Adaptec 2410SA controller.
machine amd64
cpu
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Marko Lerota wrote:
After some testing I saw that nfs server with 6.1 release or stable
have problems with CPU performance.
I had 2 servers. One 5.4 and one 6.1. The servers are identical in
configuration and only have nfs servers running.
If
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:41:32PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:01:07PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote..
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
My dual-CPU DS20 Alpha box can more or less consistently be
forced into a panic like:
FreeBSD/alpha (goldrush.wbnet)
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:24:15AM +0200, Marko Lerota wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Marko Lerota wrote:
After some testing I saw that nfs server with 6.1 release or stable
have problems with CPU performance.
I had 2
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:09:05PM -0600, Brad Waite wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm going to take another stab at getting some help.
For the last 6 months my FBSD gateway has been locking up every few
days, usually about once a week. No panic, no reboots, just a hard lock
with no response on the
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:59:41PM -0400, Eric Millbrandt wrote:
Is buildworld broken under RELENG_4.
No.
I made sure to start out with a
clean buildtree and to delete /usr/obj. Here is the stop and attached
is the entire script.
DING! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src# uname -a
FreeBSD
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Morten A. Middelthon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:21:50AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:14:53AM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi, all!
In our local office network we have a rather old FreeBSD 5.2.1
server
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:49:10PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 8/15/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:59:50AM +0200, Morten A. Middelthon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:21:50AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:14:53AM +0100
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Tom Hummel wrote:
Hi list,
a recent test-install of OBSD somehow destroyed parts of my FBSD
installation so I was forced to reinstall, which wasn't so much of a
problem since my ~ partition was still fine.
However since the new installation of
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Tom Hummel wrote:
You have no output at all? What commands are running (check via ps)?
What does ^T report at the command line running make?
goes as follows
^T: load: 0.01 cmd: bash 673 [ttyin] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 1908k
Where did bash come from?
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 05:17:34PM +0200, Tom Hummel wrote:
Where did bash come from? It's not part of FreeBSD; I guess you
somehow replaced /bin/sh with bash.
gosh, no.
Bash should be located in /usr/local/bin/ and I invoke it at login for
root in chase of an interactive session through
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 07:27:40PM +0200, Tom Hummel wrote:
Why was zsh also running on that tty?
invoked in manually, makes no difference, outcome is the same.
bash is still the problem somehow, as you can see since it's the
process sitting waiting for input.
Kris
pgpXLvFn7rgWN.pgp
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:10:49PM +0200, Tom Hummel wrote:
bash is still the problem somehow, as you can see since it's the
process sitting waiting for input.
shouldn't 'make buildenv' solve this?
I don't know if fixing your broken shell is within its list of powers
:-)
Kris
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 01:24:48PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 04:20, Peter van Heusden wrote:
Thanks for the advice John. I upgraded to 6-STABLE and just got a kernel
panic again. Before I list the dump, I'd like to mention two messages I
see in my syslog.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:02:19PM +0200, Tom Hummel wrote:
I don't know if fixing your broken shell is within its list of powers
:-)
Kris
alright, it was bash :( stupid shell.
I'll just keep csh for root's shell - it's a bit annoying sometimes, but
still good enough to do the little
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:09:35PM +0200, Laurent C wrote:
Hello all,
I can't get my athlon x2 processor working at 100% on cpu-intensive apps.
I've made some tests with john --test and transcode, wich are both
multithreaded apps.
For example if I launch transcode it takes between 50% and
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:12:53PM +0400, Nikolay Kalev wrote:
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:37:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directory
/usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c:33:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file
or directory
/usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c:64:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:17:51PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:12:53PM +0400, Nikolay Kalev wrote:
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:37:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directory
/usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c:33:23: opt_ip6fw.h
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:25:38AM -0400, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
wait..Makefile, lin
e 33: Could not find
/usr/ports/japanese/gnomelibs/../../x11/gnomelibs/Makefile
Why not?
have a complete and up-to-date ports collection. (INDEX
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:44:42AM -0400, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote:
IIRC, you must have all the ports (ports-all in your config file) in order
to generate an INDEX, as it will fail otherwise.
Yeah, when I realized that I interrupted the cvsup command, edited
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:09:13PM +0200, Philippe Pegon wrote:
Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I have to create regular snapshots of several volumes roughly 1.4TB in
size (each). But using mksnap_ffs takes a lot of time (45 minutes) and
it looks like it could be speed up.
[snip]
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:49:35AM -0400, Ron Tarrant wrote:
Hi again, Kris,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
No, that's fine. You need to a) confirm you are really getting the
error you posted, b) if so, check why the file it mentions cannot be
read.
So, I should re-run cvsup and portsdb
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 01:28:31PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right?
C'mon guys. This sort of thing belies a total lack of concern when changes
are MFC'd into production branches of the code. This kind of thing is
expected if
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 09:02:35PM +0100, Joao Barros wrote:
On 9/9/06, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you try to get a dump, trace, or at least figure out which function
the IP is refering to?
Well, the problem only occurs when I boot from the disk and the
installed kernel
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was
that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed
stable ...
You mean like in the FreeBSD handbook? It's not anyone else's
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:55:42AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was
that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:13:31PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 03:21:33PM +, Patrick J Okui wrote:
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Karl Denninger wrote:
Once the -RELEASE branch is taken, code updates there STOP.
I take it you haven't read the text in the
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:10:26PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
I just tried to load my standard kernel from the boot blocks (instead
of using loader(8)), but I either get a hang before the kernel prints
anything, or a BTX halted. Is this still supposed to work in 6-
stable, or has it
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 04:52:18PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Not sure if there is anything thta I can do with this, no dump and it
crashes, so no DDB ... but figured I'd post it ...
Sep 10 16:49:34 jupiter kernel: g_vfs_done():da0s1g[READ(offset=-2048,
length=16384)]error = 5
Sep
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 07:33:25PM -0400, 'Anubhav A.' wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Volker thusly...
we're talking about software. Have you ever seen a piece of software which
has
been really bug-free? Not the hello-world, I'm talking
Recently i read about which is more
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:37:53AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:55:48 -0500
Greg Barniskis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you /track/ STABLE by frequently cvsupping it and rebuilding your
system, you will very likely
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:57:25PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:07:35AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
deleted
A couple of things. Will having gcc unroll loops have any
negative consequences? (I can't imagine how:: but better
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:34:08PM -0500, hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote:
On 14 September 2006, at 14:05, Bj?rn K?nig wrote:
hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) schrieb:
On 12 September 2006, at 02:06, Bj?rn K?nig wrote:
Karl Denninger schrieb:
This is not cool folks.
I think you
You are refusing personal email. This is a bit antisocial since it
leaves me no way to reply privately to your email.
Kris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:35:46PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
You are refusing personal email. This is a bit antisocial since it
leaves me no way to reply privately to your email.
Hi Kris,
Huh ? Some mistake. No intent to block
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:19:35AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lol, that's the stupidest thing I've heard all week.
Inflamatory. Refered to postmaster.
Let's hope your filtering doesn't accuse
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:41:29PM -0700, Brian wrote:
Don Wilde wrote:
On 9/19/06, *Brian* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just cvsupped this morning after seeing the gzip
announcement. During
a buildworld, I get the below. I have replicated this a few
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:00:40PM +0200, martinko wrote:
hello list,
i've just pulled the releng_6 sources and run make -j4 buildworld as
usual and this i've got:
=== gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/doc (all)
makeinfo --no-split -I /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/doc -I
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:40:24AM +0200, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
That doesn't provide any information since you used -j4. When posting
errors from buildworld, you need to run without -j, or log the entire
buildworld output and then figure out where the actual error
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:59:53AM +0200, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:40:24AM +0200, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
That doesn't provide any information since you used -j4. When posting
errors from buildworld, you need to run without -j, or log
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:05:54PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
*** Error code 1
Chances are you
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:55:34PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
Yesterday we upgraded an amd64 system from 6.1 to 6.2-PRE from a
cvsup of September 20 evening. The overnight nightly dump to tape
went off normally. This afternoon when the sysadmin was performing
the level0 backup, the
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:24:41PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I know this is very un-useful as a bug report, but I'm putting this
out in case anyone else has noticed this. It has never happened to
us before when we were running 5.4
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:14:51PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:46:28AM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
Yeah for some reason I couldn't do that, I can't even remember all the
reasons now but the main reason is because I have a USB keyboard, for
some reason I can
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:11:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 10:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to mount nfs mounting point and to copie 16K of 7G data.
and, it goes to freezing. I can't kill neither cp
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:32:11PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
See a previous reply to Vivek where I explained what is needed to help
debug this kind of problem.
and my luck has it such that i've not had a lockup since i added
I don't know if mohan already committed it, so perhaps he can comment.
Kris
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:10:02AM +0200, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
Will a fix for NFS/TCP (nfs_socket.c rev 1.138) be ever committed to stable?
Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
On Monday 08 May 2006 19:41, Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:21:55PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
Doesn't seem to have any effect for me (other than high sys% times).
qemu is really good at provoking my em0 to timeout.
What might be useful for someone who can provoke this, is to configure
your kernel with MUTEX_PROFILING, then do
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:03:29PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
and provide access to that file.
This will help to show whether something is causing Giant starvation.
http://www.gank.org/freebsd/stats.out
That's after about
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:34:39PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:19:04PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:48:42PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/usb_fastintr_RELENG_6.diff
At first glance it appeared to work, but
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 11:05:35PM -0700, Paul Allen wrote:
From Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:42:42PM
-0400:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:34:39PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:19:04PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 06:42:02PM -0700, Mohan Srinivasan wrote:
I thought I had MFC'ed the fix to releng_6. Maybe I did not :(. Sorry...
I don't know if it is too late to get this into 6.1 or not. cc:ing re: for
his comments.
This is a pretty serious bug, and if there are last minute
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 01:37:38PM +0100, Pete French wrote:
Are you enabling an option, like IPv6, that puts Giant over the network
stack?
Am not enabling anything, but if INET6 is part of GENERIC (which I think it is
isn't it?) then I would have that in my kernels as they basically look
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:08:08PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:56:54AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 4:43 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Details are posted at http://vivek.khera.org/scratch/crashlogs/
I have the crashdumps available to a
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:48:12PM +0200, Philippe Pegon wrote:
In June 2006, I opened a PR (kern/98622) about a regression on CARP
with IPv6 addresses: CARP is not usable with IPv6. Since I tracked
down the culprit commit (see appropriate info in the PR), I can
affirm that this regression
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:40:25AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Corrected patch is at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/usb_fastintr_RELENG_6.diff
I have a Dell 1950 here that's been dedicated to helping solve this
problem. I can reliably
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:36:37AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
When this kind of thing happens you just need to periodically make a
bit of noise to make sure it doesn't get forgotten. In particular you
should mention
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 01:06:37PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The only thing I think was running at the time would be a large file
copy from a remote system to this one using rsync.
As I understand, you got the panic. Then, you shall
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 03:53:54PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
from what i read in the output from kgdb, it seems that something
locked the kernel and we broke to debugger from the watchdog timeout
(I enable software watchdog).
Hmm
and return it to Kris Kennaway (on cc:) and myself.
Thanks.
1. Are you experiencing network hangs and/or timeout messages on the
console? If yes, please provide a _brief_ description of the problem.
After Bill Moran set me up with access to his machine that is
experiencing bce timeouts, I
and return it to Kris Kennaway (on cc:) and myself.
Thanks.
1. Are you experiencing network hangs and/or timeout messages on the
console? If yes, please provide a _brief_ description of the problem.
OK, next question, to all em users:
If your em device is using a shared interrupt, and you
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:17:33PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:25:42AM +0300, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
Hi folks.
I have kernel panic on 5.5-RELEASE-p5 box.
Could some one please help me to find the source of this panic.
If you need more info just let me know.
==
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:05:52PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down further.
I ask all of you
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:21:32AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
And so looks mine, FreeBSD 6.2-PRE/AMD64,
high I/O on disks and I/O on net renders this box unusuable ...
thor# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 12437 1
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:39:50AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:01:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:30 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
The network load was minimal at the time. I had everyone log out and
close mail etc.
What were
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 08:54:35AM +0200, Michal Mertl wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
All,
I'm seeing some patterns here with all of the network driver problem
reports, but I need more information to help narrow it down
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:11:05PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
This is very strange. You 3 instances of getty where just reading the
tty input, and all suspectible processes (like sshd) are waiting
on net
events. No processes are blocked
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:36:10PM -0700, Paul Allen wrote:
Well, I suspect that most people with the resources to do what you ask
have already moved on precisely because the EoL has been published.
i.e., faced with that limited commitment, we had no choice but to
(grudgingly and at the last
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:59:10AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 11, 2006, at 6:36 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
I think the most likely path of success is, as you say, to make the
4.x
userland more like 6.x.
For anyone who really wishes to stick to freebsd 4.x for performance,
we
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:43:01PM +, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
KK Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:46:54 -0400
KK From: Kris Kennaway
KK The 4.x support policy was announced some time ago and may be found
KK here:
policy != justification
Yes, and the justification has also been discussed
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:53:36AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hiya,
Whats the right way to grab kernel profiling data these days?
I've tried using the kernel profiling w/ kgmon and gprof but the top CPU
wasters are the profiling functions themselves, quickly followed by
write_eflags().
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 07:07:22PM -0400, Michael W. Oliver wrote:
Colin,
Thanks for the verbose and reasoned explanation. Since the email last
week, I have taken the opportunity to upgrade two machines, one here and
one remote (both with serial console) from 4.9-5.5-6.2PRE, and while I
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:15:14PM +0100, Jason Thomson wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Conrad Burger wrote:
Hi
It looks like there is a new version of the bce driver in HEAD.
When will it be incorporated into Releng_6?
It will be merged when someone, preferably 2-3 people, tell me
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:31:53PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 10/18/06, Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a Sun T2000 that I generally run with the em driver from as of
July in order to avoid watchdog timeouts. One trivial scenario that
reproduces the problem with 100% consistency is
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attempted via a
number of tests to reproduce this problem, the machine even shares the em
interrupt with usb, and yet so far he has been unsuccessful.
What tests is he
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:23:54PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2 and attempted via
a
number of tests to reproduce this problem
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:29:55PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:23:54PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
The engineer in our test group has installed 6.2 BETA2
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:47:57AM +0900, Kazuaki ODA wrote:
Hi,
I ran the following two scripts simultaneously on 6.2-PRERELEASE SMP box
(cvsup'ed today).
#!/bin/sh
while true; do
ls -lR / ls_result.txt
done
1 - 100 of 1403 matches
Mail list logo
