Re: Filesystem operations slower in 13.0 than 12.2

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 14:58, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > It appears that the messages are associated with reading > > the disk(s), not directly with writing them, where the > > reads take more than "hz * 20" time units to complete. > > (I'm looking at main (14) code.) What might contribute > >

Re: device otus unknown

yeah, that we'll have to look into.. -a On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 13:33, tech-lists wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:32:25PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >If it's showing up like that then it's not an AR9170 device; it's a > >broadcom firmware device. :( > > yeah. In

Re: device otus unknown

If it's showing up like that then it's not an AR9170 device; it's a broadcom firmware device. :( -a On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 12:08, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > context: > freebsd-12-beta4 on amd64 and freebsd-12 on arm64, I'm trying right now > with amd64 r340354. > > I have a Netgear WNDA3100

Re: iwn crashing on 11n network

hi, I'm busy and there isn't a specific maintainer! Bug me in a couple days; we need to figure out how to enable the right command to enable debugging the firmware messages. Hopefully we can narrow down which firmware message its erroring out on! -a

Re: Lock contention in AIO

It's the same pages, right? Is it just the refcounting locking that's causing it? I think the biggest thing here is to figure out how to have pages have a lifecycle where the refcount can be inc/dec (obviously >1, ie not in a state where you can dec to 0) via atomics, without grabbing a lock.

Re: Unsupported USB BT device causes high interrupt load

can you capture a usb transfer dump from usbdump ? I'd like to see if it's because the usb bluetooth code is trying to attach and failing, or whether it really is just some broken transfer / notification loop. -a On 6 April 2017 at 03:16, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > I have an

Re: Bogus turbo mode with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9700 (2.80GHz)

hiya, Install the 'intel-pcm' package, then as root; kldload cpuctl pcm.x 1 -adrian On 26 November 2016 at 10:25, Jakub Lach wrote: > I've found that the original technology was called Intel Dynamic > Acceleration, > though it should be only utilized if not all cores

Re: Bogus turbo mode with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9700 (2.80GHz)

the acpi cpu frequency module just exposes the frequency lis given to it by ACPI. If your ACPI table exposes the turbo boost frequency but doesn't implement it on the backend, FreeBSD doesn't know. We just obey what we're told. :) -a On 25 November 2016 at 20:16, Jakub Lach

Re: ath0 associated, wlan0 not associated

pply to 10.3? > -- George > > On 11/03/16 18:48, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> hi, >> >> can you please try freebsd-11.0 ? I fixed a whole bunch of bugs in the >> AR9380 HAL and it may have improved that device. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> -a >>

Re: ath0 associated, wlan0 not associated

hi, can you please try freebsd-11.0 ? I fixed a whole bunch of bugs in the AR9380 HAL and it may have improved that device. Thanks! -a On 3 November 2016 at 07:09, George Mitchell wrote: > Originally posted to freebsd-wireless; no solution yet so I thought > I'd try

Re: FreeBSD 11 RC1 - no wifi

On 25 August 2016 at 12:45, Stefan Wendler wrote: > Hi, > > is this fixed in RC2? I haven't tried it yet but would be nice to know Hi, Just so everyone who may be interested/involved can see - I don't have the spare bandwidth/cycles to try and make wifi + lagg

Re: Panic in stable/11 (amd64) @r303903: page fault while in kernel mode

Just pop open the crashdump and "print *ifp" in the last stack frame before trap. -a On 11 August 2016 at 16:42, David Wolfskill <da...@catwhisker.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:37:26PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Eep. Is this anotehr case where there

Re: Panic in stable/11 (amd64) @r303903: page fault while in kernel mode

.. and maybe we should revert or comment out the code until we figure out what to do about LLADDR checks. (I see this in the detach path too; same kind of race. Sigh.) -adrian On 11 August 2016 at 16:37, Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Eep. Is this anotehr case wher

Re: Panic in stable/11 (amd64) @r303903: page fault while in kernel mode

Eep. Is this anotehr case where there's a race and ifp is NULL or the ll pointer for ifp is NULL or use-after-free'd? I remember bumping into these here and there because we don't seem to have a well defined lifecycle for lladdr access. ;( -adrian On 10 August 2016 at 12:10, Bryan Drewery

Re: Process stuck in "vnread"

Hi, I think a bunch of the lock order checks with witness get disabled for ZFS ? Maybe compile up a witness kernel so you can get 'show alllocks' in ddb. That should help narrow down exactly what's going on. Thanks! -a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN

hi, please bug me in a couple weeks. still moving house, etc. -a On 16 February 2016 at 02:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:23:20AM +0100, Giuseppe Lettieri wrote: > >> I am sorry, I did not participate to the implementation of kqueue >> support and

Re: 10.2 Release seems to be crashing on Azure with "Standard DS" VM sizes

Hm, the runtime going backwards is a bit odd, maybe they fixed that in -HEAD recently. Other than that, yeah, you'll need a crash dump or at least some screenshot when it does reboot. -a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 10.2 Release seems to be crashing on Azure with "Standard DS" VM sizes

hiya, how much RAM does the VM have? Yes, you need to either run dumpon or reboot once you update /etc/rc.conf . -a On 5 February 2016 at 13:55, Scott Otis wrote: > Been trying to get a FreeBSD VM server running on Azure on a "Standard DS" > size VM (so I have

Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN

gt; On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > On 22 October 2015 at 09:35, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: >> > >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 07:45:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >&

Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN

.. but if it does, can you enable witness and see what it reports as lock order violations? -a On 4 February 2016 at 10:47, Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've no time to help with this, I'm sorry :( > > > -a > > > On 4 February 2016 at 0

Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431

hiya, +wireless, +andriy Andriy has been working on adding lots of new things to urtwn and tidying it up. It's possible he's introduced some regressions. Just check in on the wireless list and join #freebsd-wireless on efnet to ask questions. Hopefully it was fixed a couple days ago with the TX

Re: hostapd loses connectivity on ath0

Hi, The stable/10 code doesn't have all the fixes I did over the last two years. Just disable 11n (ifconfig wlan0 -ht) and use that. :-) Sorry! -adrian On 3 November 2015 at 07:19, Alban Hertroys <haram...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 26 Oct 2015, at 22:10, Adrian Chadd <adri

Re: hostapd loses connectivity on ath0

hiya, you should try -head. But there's some long standing issues hiding around in the AR9227 code somewhere where they occasionally go deaf and I never figured out why... :( -a On 26 October 2015 at 13:27, Alban Hertroys wrote: > At random times my devices suddenly fail

Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN

On 22 October 2015 at 09:35, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 07:45:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Heh, file a bug with luigi; it should be defined better inside netmap itself. > > I am CC: luigi. > > Next question: do keve

Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN

On 22 October 2015 at 11:24, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 22 October 2015 at 09:35, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at

Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN

Heh, file a bug with luigi; it should be defined better inside netmap itself. -a On 18 October 2015 at 14:00, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:29:23PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> On 18 October 2015 at 11:56, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s

Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN

On 18 October 2015 at 11:56, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I have 82576 in NETMAP mode. > 802.1q packets received in decapsulated form. > This is bug or this is normal behavior? I don't know if it's a bug or not; I don't know if it was ever defined behaviour. You should just

Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance

Hi, Some hand-waving suggestions: * if you're running something before 10.2, please disable IXGBE_FDIR in sys/conf/options and sys/modules/ixgbe/Makefile . It's buggy and it caused a lot of issues. * It sounds like some extra latency is happening, so I'd fiddle around with interrupt settings. By

Re: Panic [page fault] in _ieee80211_crypto_delkey(): stable/10/amd64 @r286878

hi, you'll have to do some debugging. it looks like it's some kind of odd race - line 461 is _ieee80211_crypto_delkey(); line 105 is cipher_detach() and it blows up there. Try wlandebug +crypto during your next boot and let's see what it logs for the key. If you can 'print *key' in kgdb on the

Re: Many core dumps in pthread_getspecific.

hi! What was that option actually doing? How'd it break things? -adrian On 27 July 2015 at 05:02, Andre Meiser orta...@web.de wrote: Kudos to Konstantin Belousov! I'm not sure if this list was interested into all this error tracking. So we made the error tracking with private mails.

Re: suspend/resume regression

Hi, Yes, the USB device suspend/resume thing is a more generic suspend/resume problem. Warner has some ideas - eg, registering a is this a new device? method; the device driver will check if the device has changed upon resume and optionally go through a detach/reattach process. So for USB it

Re: struct timehands: th_generation field

accessing hardware isn't free. Locking also isn't free. That's why there's this mechanism. -adrian On 24 July 2015 at 08:58, deco33...@yandex.com wrote: OK. I read the document and understood it I guess. Very interesting, and well engineered. On x86/i386/amd64, could not all this be

Re: FreeBSD 10.1 Memory Exhaustion

On 15 July 2015 at 14:58, Philip Murray pmur...@nevada.net.nz wrote: On 13/07/2015, at 11:58 pm, Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net wrote: Put this on your box and see if the problem goes away :-) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 Is there a concise explanation

Re: FreeBSD 10.1 Memory Exhaustion

.. and in one instance, you had 57gig of RAM allocated just to ZFS 65536 size buffers. -adrian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: FreeBSD 10.1 Memory Exhaustion

hi, With that much storage and that many snapshots, I do think you need more than 96GB of RAM in the box. I'm hoping someone doing active ZFS work can comment.. I don't think the ZFS code is completely memory usage safe. The old Sun suggestions when I started using ZFS was if your server panics

Re: suspend/resume regression

: Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com writes: ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and it is okay at suspend/resume. No problem with -head on the X220 as well. I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another reference laptop. You might ping Allan Jude. If I'm

Re: suspend/resume regression

Hi, ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and itis okay at suspend/resume. I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another reference laptop. I don't run stable/10 on anything, so it may be something odd with what he MFCed and what's in stable/10. I'll update the

Re: suspend/resume regression

Thanks for digging into this! (two laptops are now running -head from today, all iswell. I'll update the t400 tomorrow.) -a On 28 June 2015 at 16:54, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone j...@ftfl.ca wrote: Adrian Chadd adrian.ch

Re: suspend/resume regression

does it always fail now? -a On 26 June 2015 at 14:06, Joseph Mingrone j...@ftfl.ca wrote: This is on a Lenovo X220. Suspend/resume was working until some time between late April and last week's STABLE snapshot. Suspend always seems to work, but there are two issues with resume. 1) When

Re: suspend/resume regression

Hi, please start binary searching. I'll update my x230 tonight when I get home and see if -head is broken. -adrian On 27 June 2015 at 15:48, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone j...@ftfl.ca wrote: Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com

Re: High Interrupt rate since r279961 on STABLE/10 branch

://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/pci/vga_pci.c?r1=284012r2=284011pathrev=284012 2015-06-11 0:38 GMT+08:00 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: Hi, There was an update to freebsd-head a few days ago from hans - it disabled PCI interrupts for VGA until a driver claims

Re: High Interrupt rate since r279961 on STABLE/10 branch

Hi, There was an update to freebsd-head a few days ago from hans - it disabled PCI interrupts for VGA until a driver claims it. See if that helps? -a b On 10 June 2015 at 05:33, Yanhui Shen shen@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I noticed the interrupt rate of my FreeBSD system is very high (~35%)

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

Frequency control may not be relevant on that platform. Try installing the intel-pcm package; then # kldload cpuctl # pcm.x 1 Then paste some of that in here. Let's see if the CPU is idling some other way. -adrian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

Hm, no thermal monitoring and no speedstep. Could be dangerous/fun. What's the output of sysctl dev.cpu.0 ? -adrian On 23 May 2015 at 07:40, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: On Sat, 23 May 2015 14:01:16 +0300,

Re: CPU frequency doesn't drop below 1200MHz (like it used to)

Hi, The whole point of throttling on modern hardware isn't to get really low clock rates, it's to deal with being out of thermal envelope. But, the modern intel cores will do that for you without OS involvement. So, you don't have to actually use p4tcc and it may actually configure your

Re: 10-STABLE suspend failure

Hi, that GEM idle fail is problematic. Try backing it out say, 1 month or so? I think that's before the drm merge from head to stable/10. -a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

Re: 10-STABLE suspend failure

I honestly have no idea, and this is kind of why I didn't want to commit it to stable/10 without it getting a whole lot more testing. Does -HEAD also fail to suspend for you? -a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: RELENG_10 performance regression (was Re: 35-40% performance drop releng9 vs releng10 openvpn

On 21 March 2015 at 08:52, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On 3/20/15 8:46 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: On 3/20/2015 8:15 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: For the purpose of devfs, does it make sense to bump timestamps like normal filesystems for each read/write operation? Looks like Mac OS X

Re: 35-40% performance drop releng9 vs releng10 openvpn

.. ipfw showed up? -a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: On-going laptop brightness issues

I thought jhb already mfc'ed it? -a On 12 March 2015 at 12:36, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: I have just submitted a PR to MFC the code that will fix brightness adjustmant on may laptops with modern Intel GPUs. It has been tested by at least two people and I have been using it

Re: On-going laptop brightness issues

On 12 March 2015 at 18:19, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: I thought jhb already mfc'ed it? -a Adrian, jhb asked that I ask you to MFC. I did so and, since you declined (as is your right and I understand

Re: 9.2-RC4 amd64 panic: vm_page_unwire

oh, wait a sec. I think some stuff went in that wired some important processes into memory. -adrian On 4 October 2013 06:29, John Marshall john.marsh...@riverwillow.com.auwrote: On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, 19:55 +1000, John Marshall wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, 11:12 +0300, Konstantin Belousov

Re: ixgbe/ix sysctl missing in FreeBSD 9.2

There's an LACP knob that ignores doing the LACP hash if the mbuf has a flowid. Find that knob and set it to 0. Then, retry. -a On 3 October 2013 15:24, Rumen Telbizov telbi...@gmail.com wrote: Jack, Thanks for the hints. I checked that the card is inserted into PCIe v3.0 x16 + I get no

Re: panic with if_iwi(4) upon netif restart

Sure, uhm, just remind me to commit it to -HEAD in the next few days. Then I'll get it backported to stable/9. Thanks, -adrian On 29 September 2013 10:03, Alexey Dokuchaev da...@nsu.ru wrote: On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 06:51:56PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: On Tuesday 19 June 2012

Re: reproducible dump possibly related to ath and virtualbox

On 17 September 2013 00:45, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote: On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 23:34:45 -0700 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, Please try -HEAD or -10. I fixed a number o AR9285 bugs there. Uh, I did this a few times before, and indeed it fixed some problems

Re: reproducible dump possibly related to ath and virtualbox

Hi, Please try -HEAD or -10. I fixed a number o AR9285 bugs there. Thanks, -adrian On 15 September 2013 05:48, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote: I just had another core dump on 9.2-PRERELEASE #1 r255487 amd64, and I think i see a pattern. Every now and then, at least once per day,

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

.. anything happening? -adrian On 2 September 2013 07:29, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2 September 2013 07:25, Mike Harding mvhard...@gmail.com wrote: It's detailed in the ticket, see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632 and search for 'reverted'. Ok. You

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

So you tinkered with this - which particular line(s) did you revert back to get the old behaviour? -adrian On 1 September 2013 22:46, Mike Harding mvhard...@gmail.com wrote: Why not put this out to stable and take a survey with more than 2 members? I am sure that there are those who will

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

On 2 September 2013 07:25, Mike Harding mvhard...@gmail.com wrote: It's detailed in the ticket, see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632 and search for 'reverted'. Ok. You and avg@ are digging into it deeper, so I'll leave it be for now. I'll retest this on my test laptops when

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

On 31 August 2013 23:41, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: I've tracked this down to a single line, details in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632. Basically, the code is now doing a 'sti, hlt' vs. a 'sti' in some code that is only supposed to run if

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

On 1 September 2013 14:35, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: Do you have any evidence that there is anybody else besides Mike who has this problem? Nope! but we can't assume that users are reporting all the system slowdowns. And honestly, I've heard enough strange stories on mailing

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

.. well, when is that pointer NULL? It looks like it's supposed to be NULL for one pair of the two HT CPUs? Are you taking the whole core into an ACPI idle state if one of two logical CPUs representing a core is going idle? -adrian ___

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

On 31 August 2013 10:35, Mike Harding mvhard...@gmail.com wrote: I've tracked this down to a single line, details in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181632. Basically, the code is now doing a 'sti, hlt' vs. a 'sti' in some code that is only supposed to run if idle is disabled.

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

On 29 August 2013 23:46, Mike Harding mvhard...@gmail.com wrote: I was able to track this down by building kernels against /base/stable/9 (it took -hours!-). Wow, thanks! The issue does occur with commit 244616, but does not occur with 244614. The only difference is a small patch to

Re: Why are cardbus drivers cbb(4) and pccard(4) still included in GENERIC?

Hm! Are they dynamically loaded if you insert the cards? (Ie, has devd been taught about them as appropriate?) -adrian On 29 August 2013 02:15, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote: In reference to this FreeBSD forums post: http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=231135postcount=4

Re: 9.2-RC3 - suspend/resume causes slow system performance

Wow. Uhm, can you downgrade to 9.1 and see if it still happens? Would you be able to bisect the kernel source and see if you can find where along stable/9 it happened? That's the fastest way to determine what broke. Thanks! -adrian On 29 August 2013 06:32, Mike Harding mvhard...@gmail.com

Re: Why are cardbus drivers cbb(4) and pccard(4) still included in GENERIC?

.. after tinkering in the USB world, i wonder what's wrong with this: * created a basic markup / description language to encapsulate what PCI/USB probing requires; * generated both config files _and_ .c / .h files for drivers to include; * have the kernel build process do .device_description -

Re: if_em, legacy nic and GbE saturation

Hi, There's bus limits on how much data you can push over a PCI bus. You can look around online to see what 32/64 bit, 33/66MHz PCI throughput estimates are. It changes massively if you use small versus large frames as well. The last time I tried it i couldn't hit gige on PCI; I only managed to

Re: NFS deadlock on 9.2-Beta1

Hi, Does -HEAD have this same problem? If so, we should likely just revert the patch entirely from -HEAD and -9 until it's resolved. -adrian On 24 August 2013 23:51, Michael Tratz mich...@esosoft.com wrote: On Aug 15, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote: Michael

Re: [ATH] 9.2-PRERELEASE and wlan0 device disconnection

Are you running the AR9285 on -HEAD? If not, upgrade. It should behave much, much better. -adrian On 19 August 2013 00:59, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote: I am struggling with my AR9285 for more than a year now. Sometimes it is better, sometimes worse, but never without

Re: [ATH] 9.2-PRERELEASE and wlan0 device disconnection

A lot of the ath PRs filed by me can be closed. They're reminders that things needed fixing, which I've done. A lot of them are for older cards on older machines with odd behaviour due to PCI/cardbus issues, power save bugs, ACPI hilarity, etc. I've tried to port over some fixes to address these

Re: [ATH] 9.2-PRERELEASE and wlan0 device disconnection

) on wlan0: Operation not permitted On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:02:41AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: good to know! -adrian On 18 August 2013 05:19, Tj Hariharan t...@archlinux.us wrote: Ok so, at the time I was using r254246. Just this afternoon, I realised

Re: [ATH] 9.2-PRERELEASE and wlan0 device disconnection

randomly. I have no idea what is causing this, though. (the r254246 was from installing from a download of 9.2 dvd). On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 09:49:49PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi! I'm not sure what could've caused this! Not much has changed in the wireless stack and ath driver between

Re: wpi fatal firmware error with country de

... hm, but if you do destroy, then re-create manually, does it work? (Versus using service) -adrian On 18 August 2013 10:14, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote: My system was built yesterday. I just figured I'm not using the entire frequency range available in Europe. This is a

Re: Update to 9.2-PRERELEASE, what is this?

Hah! I'm not tired of it. I like the layout; I'd like to see an better ascii beastie logo (one that uses block characters if the terminal supports it) to display something pretty. But I do like the centred layout of the boot menu. -adrian ___

Re: wpi fatal firmware error with country de

or something else. Sorry, I don't have the cycles to try and fix wpi issues. ;( -adrian On 18 August 2013 13:58, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote: On 18/08/2013 21:29, Adrian Chadd wrote: ... hm, but if you do destroy, then re-create manually, does it work? (Versus using service

Re: wpi fatal firmware error with country de

... so, unless you have a million wpi NICs and you can control purchasing of further hardware from intel, I doubt they're going to care about a very old, EOL NIC. Sorry! -adrian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [ATH] 9.2-PRERELEASE and wlan0 device disconnection

Hi! I'm not sure what could've caused this! Not much has changed in the wireless stack and ath driver between 9.1 and 9.2. Would you be able to work through different svn versions of stable/9 between 9.1 and 9.2 to narrow down when things broke? It may be something other than the wifi

Re: i386/179112: 9.1 installer panics with a kmem_malloc() failure on i386 embedded systems

Did the kmem_size_scale parameter get changed too? Did you test this on 128mb or 256mb of RAM (in a VM will do) to see if you still panic shortly after boot? Doing any kind of file/net IO quickly leads to death. -adrian On 1 August 2013 06:22, mar...@freebsd.org wrote: Synopsis: 9.1

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

still required because I don't have X61 handy anymore... On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:09:20 -0700 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 7 July 2013 22:00, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: Checking one more point .. do the USB ports come up ok if you originally boot with nothing

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

Nope, no such joy. What else can I try? -adrian On 16 July 2013 02:16, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: I'll try it out soon, thanks! -adrian On 15 July 2013 14:35, Taku YAMAMOTO t...@tackymt.homeip.net wrote: This reminds me of my local patch which I wrote and forgot about deep

Re: Is ATH_ENABLE_11N supposed to work on 9-stable?

Nope. It's a -10 thing. -adrian On 14 July 2013 08:01, Thomas Zander thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, from the mailing lists I couldn't figure out whether 11n is supposed to work on stable since the existing mail threads seem to focus on current exclusively. And since the

Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2

Please test on VMs. I've tested -HEAD in i386 virtualbox all the way down to 128mb with no panics. I'll test with 64mb soon. It's easy to do. i think the i386 PAE stuff on ${LARGE} memory systems is still broken. Peter? -adrian On 11 July 2013 07:59, Alfred Perlstein alf...@ixsystems.com

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On 7 July 2013 22:00, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: Checking one more point .. do the USB ports come up ok if you originally boot with nothing plugged in? If so (or if not), does that local APIC Yes. error message appear the same then too? No -adrian

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On 8 July 2013 11:19, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: From sys/amd64/include/apicreg.h: This system runs an i386 kernel. /* fields in ESR */ #define APIC_ESR_SEND_CS_ERROR 0x0001 #define APIC_ESR_RECEIVE_CS_ERROR 0x0002 #define APIC_ESR_SEND_ACCEPT

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

: The USB stack will currently run a complete controller reset upon resume, like during boot. --HPS -Original message- From:Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au Sent: Sunday 7th July 2013 7:52 To: Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-a...@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

Nope, no power after first resume if i have nothing plugged in. Why? -adrian On 7 July 2013 13:49, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote: On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 03:02:57PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 30 June 2013 07:22, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: After removing [numbers

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On 30 June 2013 07:22, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: After removing [numbers] (for WITNESS?), diff started making sense. The below is between the first and second suspend/resume cycles in dmesg-3.txt, encompassing the others. Cool! Nothing of note that I can see, if that usb

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On 27 June 2013 04:58, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: Well if there's a functional change in head that fixes this on Lars' and yours, getting it into stable shouldn't be so hard I expect. However if there's a fix (or some Lenovo workaround) for yours on 9 it'd be useful to hunt it

Re: STABLE/9 SMP ACPI suspend/resume - video mode not being restored

, 80x50) * go through an ACPI suspend/resume cycle * See the VGA display be corrupt. On 21 July 2012 17:28, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! I just tried it. It worked: * resume occured and the video mode was corrupt; * then shortly after it went through all the reattaching

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

[snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. Thanks! Adrian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On 26 June 2013 12:51, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09:20PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: [snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. Thanks! Please also try a recent CURRENT. I was having the same issues with dead USB ports on my

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

On 21 June 2013 05:48, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: No acpidump output on -stable or -acpi anyway .. likely best as an URL, if it comes down to ACPI. Ok, I'll put it online in a sec. So the fingerprint reader, camera and bluetooth shown in your usbconfig don't serve as 'USB devices

USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

Hi, FreeBSD-9 works fine on this Lenovo T400 - except that suspending with no USB devices plugged in result in no ports working after resume. If I have a device plugged in during suspend - on any port - then all the ports work fine after resume. I've attached usbconfig and acpidump output.

Re: revision higher than 250508 breaks webcam support

'ola! Cool, you've nailed it down to a specific revision. Can you create a PR (www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html) with all of this information? Hans/USB folk - here's an interesting problem. The original email is below. === Sorry, for waiting this long to post this problem, I thought it would be

Re: revision higher than 250508 breaks webcam support

Are you able to narrow down the specific commit along 9-stable that broke it? Thanks! Adrian On 16 May 2013 18:00, Jože Zobec jozze.z...@hotmail.com wrote: Sorry, for waiting this long to post this problem, I thought it would be dealt with this week, but since it wasn't better to report it

Re: Build GENERIC with IPX support

Hi, Are you able to help someone figure out what's going on? The main problem with IPX / netware testing is that we just don't have netware servers lying around. :) Adrian On 13 May 2013 14:10, Marek Salwerowicz marek_...@wp.pl wrote: W dniu 2013-05-13 08:52, Jeremy Chadwick pisze: IPX

Re: Build GENERIC with IPX support

It's supported as long as someone wants to use it and can help in at least diagnosing issues. So, if you have a segfault, run it inside gdb and report where its dying. Chances are things have just bitrotted a bit but not so much that it's worth killing. adrian On 12 May 2013 14:54, Marek

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

please file a PR! Adrian On 28 April 2013 19:06, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk wrote: Once I narrowed down the problem (acpi uart), I stumbled across http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-15740.html Preventing the ACPI driver from seizing control of UART seems to work

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

Hm, can you double check the port configuration? is it somehow getting the number of stop bits wrong or something? What about flow control? Are there overflow/underflow counters with the uart driver? I wonder if you're hitting issues there. adrian

  1   2   3   4   >