Re: gptboot broken when compiled with clang 6 and WITHOUT_LOADER_GELI -- clang 5 is OK

On Thu, 26-Apr-2018 at 11:55:19 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 25 Apr 2018, at 18:58, Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsme...@siemens.com> wrote: > > > > I have set up a new system disk for an i386 11.2-PRERELEASE box. I did the > > usual > > > > gpart creat

Re: gptboot broken when compiled with clang 6 and WITHOUT_LOADER_GELI -- clang 5 is OK

On Thu, 26-Apr-2018 at 11:55:19 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 25 Apr 2018, at 18:58, Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsme...@siemens.com> wrote: > > > > I have set up a new system disk for an i386 11.2-PRERELEASE box. I did the > > usual > > > > gpart creat

Re: gptboot broken when compiled with clang 6 and WITHOUT_LOADER_GELI -- clang 5 is OK

On Thu, 26-Apr-2018 at 12:06:21 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 26 Apr 2018, at 06:17, Dewayne Geraghty > wrote: > > > > Andre, You're not alone. I think there's a problem with clang6 on i386 > > FreeBSD 11.1X, refer: > >

Re: gptboot broken when compiled with clang 6 and WITHOUT_LOADER_GELI -- clang 5 is OK

On Thu, 26-Apr-2018 at 11:55:19 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 25 Apr 2018, at 18:58, Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsme...@siemens.com> wrote: > > > > I have set up a new system disk for an i386 11.2-PRERELEASE box. I did the > > usual > > > > gpart creat

gptboot broken when compiled with clang 6 and WITHOUT_LOADER_GELI -- clang 5 is OK

I have set up a new system disk for an i386 11.2-PRERELEASE box. I did the usual gpart create -s gpt $disk gpart add -t freebsd-boot -s 984 $disk gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptboot -i 1 $disk ... thing, just to notice that the box wouldn't boot. It seems to hang where stage 2 should

Re: i386 with 4GB RAM: less than 2GB available on A2SAV (Intel Atom E3940)

On Sun, 28-Jan-2018 at 10:32:44 -0600, Mike Karels wrote: > > On 28 Jan 2018, at 15:57, Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsme...@siemens.com> = > > wrote: > > > I have a lot of machines running with 4 GB physical RAM and, for > > > some reasons, I still have to use a 32

Re: i386 with 4GB RAM: less than 2GB available on A2SAV (Intel Atom E3940)

On Sun, 28-Jan-2018 at 10:32:44 -0600, Mike Karels wrote: > > On 28 Jan 2018, at 15:57, Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsme...@siemens.com> = > > wrote: > > > I have a lot of machines running with 4 GB physical RAM and, for > > > some reasons, I still have to use a 32

Re: i386 with 4GB RAM: less than 2GB available on A2SAV (Intel Atom E3940)

On Sun, 28-Jan-2018 at 17:05:54 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 28 Jan 2018, at 15:57, Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsme...@siemens.com> wrote: > > I have a lot of machines running with 4 GB physical RAM and, for > > some reasons, I still have to use a 32 bits OS. > > >

Re: i386 with 4GB RAM: less than 2GB available on A2SAV (Intel Atom E3940)

On Sun, 28-Jan-2018 at 22:51:04 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 28.01.2018 21:57, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > I have a lot of machines running with 4 GB physical RAM and, for > > some reasons, I still have to use a 32 bits OS. > > > > All of them show somethi

i386 with 4GB RAM: less than 2GB available on A2SAV (Intel Atom E3940)

I have a lot of machines running with 4 GB physical RAM and, for some reasons, I still have to use a 32 bits OS. All of them show something between 3 and 3.5 GB of RAM available in dmesg but the brand new Supermicro A2SAV really shocked me: FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 15 06:57:10 CET 2018

kernel build error on STABLE-11 with bktr

Is it just me seeing this or does nobody else use bktr compiled into the kernel anymore: ... cc -target i386-unknown-freebsd11.0 --sysroot=/usr/obj/src/src-11/tmp -B/usr/obj/src/src-11/tmp/usr/bin -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -g -nostdinc -I. -I/src/src-11/sys -I/src/src-11/sys/contrib/libfdt

Re: Segmentation fault running ntpd

On Fri, 30-Oct-2015 at 19:47:59 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: > Not sure if it's the same issue, but it sure looks like it is. > > I have upgraded a couple of hosts (amd64) from 10.2-RELEASE-p5 > to 10.2-RELEASE-p6, i.e. the freebsd-upgrade essentially just > replaced the /usr/sbin/ntpd with a new

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: OK, patch is applied. I will reboot the machine later and see what happens tomorrow in the morning. However, it might take a few days since the last 2 weeks all

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Fri, 12-Jul-2013 at 08:01:12 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:24:40AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: OK, patch is applied. I

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Fri, 12-Jul-2013 at 08:35:33 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:05:27AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 12-Jul-2013 at 08:01:12 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:24:40AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: OK, patch is applied. I will reboot the machine later and see what happens tomorrow in the morning. However, it might take a few days since the last 2 weeks all

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Sun, 07-Jul-2013 at 14:32:17 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:13:54PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Sun, 07-Jul-2013 at 09:41:12 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:25:53AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: OK, here we go (looks better

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 08:15:50 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:27:00AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 07:24:40 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:14:09AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Mon, 17-Jun-2013 at 21

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Sun, 07-Jul-2013 at 09:41:12 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:25:53AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: OK, here we go (looks better now): GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 08:15:50 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:27:00AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 07:24:40 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:14:09AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Mon, 17-Jun-2013 at 21

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 19:25:28 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:29:19PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: OK, patch is applied. I will reboot the machine later and see what happens tomorrow in the morning. However, it might take a few days since the last 2 weeks all

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Mon, 17-Jun-2013 at 21:30:31 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, June 16, 2013 2:39:42 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 31, 2013 8:26:11 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: Each day at 5:15 we are generating snapshots

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Mon, 17-Jun-2013 at 21:30:31 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, June 16, 2013 2:39:42 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 31, 2013 8:26:11 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: Each day at 5:15 we are generating snapshots

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Thu, 04-Jul-2013 at 07:24:40 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:14:09AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Mon, 17-Jun-2013 at 21:30:31 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, June 16, 2013 2:39:42 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03 +0200

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Sun, 16-Jun-2013 at 12:30:07 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:55:38AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Sun, 16-Jun-2013 at 10:49:37 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:02:39AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Sun, 16-Jun-2013 at 08:54:41

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Mon, 17-Jun-2013 at 21:30:31 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, June 16, 2013 2:39:42 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 31, 2013 8:26:11 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: Each day at 5:15 we are generating snapshots

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 31, 2013 8:26:11 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: Each day at 5:15 we are generating snapshots on various machines. This used to work perfectly under 7-STABLE for years but since we started to use 9.1-STABLE the machine

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Sun, 16-Jun-2013 at 08:54:41 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 07:25:23PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 31, 2013 8:26:11 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: Each day at 5:15 we are generating snapshots

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Sun, 16-Jun-2013 at 10:49:37 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:02:39AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Sun, 16-Jun-2013 at 08:54:41 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 07:25:23PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03

FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

Each day at 5:15 we are generating snapshots on various machines. This used to work perfectly under 7-STABLE for years but since we started to use 9.1-STABLE the machine reboots in about 10% of all cases. After rebooting we find a new snapshot file which is a bit smaller than the good ones and

Re: FreeBSD-9.1: machine reboots during snapshot creation, LORs found

On Fri, 31-May-2013 at 16:51:03 +0200, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, May 31, 2013 8:26:11 am Andre Albsmeier wrote: Each day at 5:15 we are generating snapshots on various machines. This used to work perfectly under 7-STABLE for years but since we started to use 9.1-STABLE the machine

Re: Lost CDROM on 9.1 with ATA_CAM on Promise controller

On Thu, 18-Apr-2013 at 13:53:14 +0200, Alexander Motin wrote: On 17.04.2013 12:47, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Wed, 17-Apr-2013 at 10:53:54 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:26:00AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Tue, 16-Apr-2013 at 21:38:22 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick

Re: Lost CDROM on 9.1 with ATA_CAM on Promise controller

On Tue, 16-Apr-2013 at 21:38:22 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:55:20PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: I have lost one of my CDROM drives (HL-DT-STDVD-RAM GH22LP20/2.00) after going from 7.4 to 9.1 when using ATA_CAM. It is attached to a Promise PDC20268 UDMA100

Re: Lost CDROM on 9.1 with ATA_CAM on Promise controller

On Wed, 17-Apr-2013 at 10:53:54 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:26:00AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Tue, 16-Apr-2013 at 21:38:22 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:55:20PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: I have lost one of my CDROM drives

Re: Lost CDROM on 9.1 with ATA_CAM on Promise controller

On Wed, 17-Apr-2013 at 10:53:54 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:26:00AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Tue, 16-Apr-2013 at 21:38:22 +0200, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:55:20PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: I have lost one of my CDROM drives

Lost CDROM on 9.1 with ATA_CAM on Promise controller

I have lost one of my CDROM drives (HL-DT-STDVD-RAM GH22LP20/2.00) after going from 7.4 to 9.1 when using ATA_CAM. It is attached to a Promise PDC20268 UDMA100 controller. A standard harddisk drive attached to this controller works well. Cables, controller and drive where replaced already. Kernel

ppc fails to attach to puc on 9.1-STABLE, 7.4-STABLE works

I want my printer port back on 9.1 ;-( I have this card: puc0@pci0:4:1:0:class=0x078000 card=0x00121000 chip=0x98359710 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NetMos Technology' device = 'PCI 9835 Multi-I/O Controller' class = simple comms It attached and worked under

Re: bug with some em nics on RELENG_7

On Thu, 19-Nov-2009 at 09:27:36 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: Cool, so stable/7 will just need to be updated :) I need to catch up all the Hi Jack, has this been done already? I am asking since I have problem which might be related to this: A FreeBSD-7.2 machine (Sat Nov 28 12:28:42 CET 2009) with

Re: security.bsd.map_at_zero=0 problem with samba33 (including solution)

On Sat, 03-Oct-2009 at 22:27:39 +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Andre Albsmeier wrote: Hi, On Sat, 03-Oct-2009 at 16:27:32 -0400, jhell wrote: On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:42 -, Andre.Albsmeier wrote: FYI, after setting security.bsd.map_at_zero to 0 on 7.2-STABLE

security.bsd.map_at_zero=0 problem with samba33 (including solution)

FYI, after setting security.bsd.map_at_zero to 0 on 7.2-STABLE all samba33 programmes did abort() immediately after start. The solution was to use CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-pie -Andre -- BSD, from the people who brought you TCP/IP. ___

Re: security.bsd.map_at_zero=0 problem with samba33 (including solution)

On Sat, 03-Oct-2009 at 16:27:32 -0400, jhell wrote: On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:42 -, Andre.Albsmeier wrote: FYI, after setting security.bsd.map_at_zero to 0 on 7.2-STABLE all samba33 programmes did abort() immediately after start. The solution was to use CONFIGURE_ARGS+=

Bug in 7.2-STABLE's /bin/sh?

Hello all, is it correct to print OK here? -- snip -- #!/bin/sh if false || ! echo bla | grep -q bla; then echo OK fi -- snap --- 7.2-STABLE (can't check others at the moment) does which I think is wrong... Thanks,

Re: Bug in 7.2-STABLE's /bin/sh?

On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 18:44:08 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/10/2009 17:49 Andre Albsmeier said the following: Hello all, is it correct to print OK here? -- snip -- #!/bin/sh if false || ! echo bla | grep -q bla; then echo OK fi

Re: Bug in 7.2-STABLE's /bin/sh?

On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 20:31:01 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 18:44:08 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 01/10/2009 17:49 Andre Albsmeier said the following: Hello all, is it correct to print OK here? -- snip -- #!/bin

7.2-STABLE: Wiring down umass devices to uhubs

[This is on 7.2-STABLE] I have a USB card reader which gives me 4 da drives. I was able to wire them down so they appear as: scbus3 on umass-sim0 bus 0: Generic USB SD Reader 1.00 at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (da30,pass30) Generic USB CF Reader 1.01 at scbus3 target 0 lun 1 (da31,pass31)

Re: net/iwi-firmware refuses to build on 7.2-STABLE

On Thu, 02-Jul-2009 at 11:08:09 +0200, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote: iwicontrol is not used on 7 any more. You can use sysctl to query the hardware switch instead: sysctl dev.iwi.0.radio That did it, thanks a lot, -Andre ___

net/iwi-firmware refuses to build on 7.2-STABLE

Today I wanted to build net/iwi-firmware on 7.2-STABLE and I got === iwi-firmware-2.4_8 is configured with iwicontrol(8) which you don't need, use 'make rmconfig' and uncheck CONTROL. While the firmware itself is in the base system, iwicontrol(8) is not. The port should be modified to cope

Re: net/iwi-firmware refuses to build on 7.2-STABLE

On Wed, 01-Jul-2009 at 13:28:57 -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: Andre Albsmeier wrote: Today I wanted to build net/iwi-firmware on 7.2-STABLE and I got === iwi-firmware-2.4_8 is configured with iwicontrol(8) which you don't need, use 'make rmconfig' and uncheck CONTROL. While

Re: Sensorsd framework in 7.X ?

On Mon, 28-Jul-2008 at 15:46:55 +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote: Cristiano Deana wrote: Hi, any news about a MFC from -current to -stable (or 7.1) for the sensorsd framework? I find it very useful in openbsd, so i hoped to have it soon in free. tnx As far as i can understand it was

Re: Call for Testers: ncurses 5.6 update

On Tue, 13-Mar-2007 at 00:45:24 +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: On 3/12/07, Stefan Lambrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rong-en Fan wrote: Hi folks, ncurses in 6.x is pretty old. We have update-to-date ncurses in 7.x with wide character support now. The patch at

Re: CF card and /dev filesystem entries

On Mon, 21-Nov-2005 at 09:11:51 +, Brian Candler wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 02:11:56PM -1000, Robert Marella wrote: Now, that does the job: [EMAIL PROTECTED] brian# dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/da0 count=0 0+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.28 secs

Re: MNT_USER?

On Tue, 03-May-2005 at 04:10:18 -0700, Colin Percival wrote: Danny Braniss wrote: BTW, this, the MNT_NOEXEC, uncovered, IMHO, a bug in libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c where it's now checking for MNT_NOEXEC, but only if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set! This is not a bug. Checking for MNT_NOEXEC adds a cost

Re: Flash player sound solution

On Sun, 13-Mar-2005 at 17:12:43 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 06:50:01PM +, Chris Hodgins wrote: Scott Robbins wrote: There are a few pages out there that will crash FreeBSD native firefox with linuxpluginwrapper, at least. The problem doesn't occur in

Re: Flash player sound solution

On Sat, 12-Mar-2005 at 22:21:35 -0800, Joshua Tinnin wrote: On Saturday 12 March 2005 05:42 am, James McNaughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Problem: Using native Mozilla and linuxpluginwrapper/linux-flashplugin (on 4.10-stable et al) to view flash content results in no sound and

Re: Flash player sound solution

On Sun, 13-Mar-2005 at 17:18:13 +, Chris Hodgins wrote: Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Sat, 12-Mar-2005 at 22:21:35 -0800, Joshua Tinnin wrote: On Saturday 12 March 2005 05:42 am, James McNaughton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Problem: Using native Mozilla and linuxpluginwrapper/linux

Re: problem with ipfilter and todays -stable

On Fri, 13-Aug-2004 at 19:19:02 +, Michael Handler wrote: On 2004-08-13, Bernhard Valenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i just updated from 4.8 to 4.10-stable(from today). i noticed that i can't ping the machine. [...] I just did the same upgrade last night, and am experiencing similar

Re: FreeBSD 4.9 RC1 (i386) now available

[CC'ed Martin Blapp since he was the last one who touched amd] On Mon, 29-Sep-2003 at 08:19:05 -0700, Murray Stokely wrote: Not all FTP sites have the first release candidate, but it is at least available from ftp.freebsd.org. Please download and install this candidate and help us find bugs

Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness

On Sat, 01-Mar-2003 at 10:49:34 +0100, Francesco Casadei wrote: On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:50:31AM +0100, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote: [reposted from -scsi@, maybe that's not the right place] Hi, On an Adaptec 2940 I have an IBM DNES-309170W and a SEAGATE ST318438LW, soft-raided with

4.7-STABLE: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block, softupdates related?

In case anyone wants to dig into this... 4.7-STABLE #0: Mon Dec 23 15:41:17 CET 2002 using softupdates. /dev/ad2a is a 120GB hard drive, 96GB were in use. 75 of these 96GB were rm -rf'ed. The rm command returned quickly since the 75GB were stored in few big files. The box crashed during the

Re: Matrox G550 tv-out

On Sun, 10-Nov-2002 at 22:42:28 -0500, Rob Babb wrote: I have a G550 running on 4.7. I've installed the ports collection for the Matrox Power Desk, which seems to be working in KDE 3, but the tv-out settings are grayed out. I've tried getting help from Matrox's Linux help, but they say it's

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/ppp command.c (fwd)

On Tue, 17-Sep-2002 at 04:17:38 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Colleagues, the following commit brings up a thought: has anyone an experience of narrowing the system when there is no chances to use IPv6? AFAICS, NOINET6 is not mentioned anywhere in share/mk, sys/conf/*, sys/*/conf/*,

Re: sys/modules/aic7xxx/aicasm breaks buildworld with MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true

On Tue, 03-Sep-2002 at 11:56:42 +0900, Yoshihiko SARUMARU wrote: Hi all, Today, I buildworld with RELENG_4 branch (4.7-PRERELEASE) as usual, but it failed with sys/modules/aic7xxx/aicasm: (snip) cd /usr/src/sys; make buildincludes; make installincludes (snip) === sys/modules/aic7xxx

panic: ffs_vfree: freeing free inode

One of my 4.5-STABLE servers crashed today with this msg: panic: ffs_vfree: freeing free inode I have the kernel.debug and the dump. I don't know how to debug ffs stuff but I I am happy if someone instructs me what to do. Since the filesystems are mounted with softupdates it might be a bug in

Re: Another possible solution for non-sendmail users

On Thu, 28-Mar-2002 at 14:49:49 -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: From: Coleman Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another thing to look at is the /usr/sbin/sendmail - mailwrapper link that is produced from installworld. In current it seems to have been linking that, even Stable creates the same links

Re: pcm problem in 4.4-PRERELEASE

On Tue, 07-Aug-2001 at 07:25:36 -, Conrad Sabatier wrote: Since upgrading to 4.4-PRERELEASE, I can't get mtv to do audio anymore. The following message appears in the console window: pcm0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead I've tried both with and without esd enabled. Same

Re: pcm problem in 4.4-PRERELEASE

On Tue, 07-Aug-2001 at 07:25:36 -, Conrad Sabatier wrote: Since upgrading to 4.4-PRERELEASE, I can't get mtv to do audio anymore. The following message appears in the console window: pcm0: play interrupt timeout, channel dead I've tried both with and without esd enabled. Same

Re: NIS/YP still broken!

On Sat, 02-Jun-2001 at 15:22:37 -0700, John Polstra wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hartmann, O. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE has still a broken NIS/YP! If there are more than one slave servers ypxfrd should spread its tables, push seems to lock up and get a

Re: NIS/YP problems after cvsupdate

On Wed, 16-May-2001 at 20:24:35 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: Hello. Three weeks ago I did the last cvsupdate on our FBSD 4.3 boxes. On our master NIS/YP server rpc.ypxfrd is running due the fact all of our boxes within this area run FreeBSD 4.3. Until last weekend an cron driven make in

Re: NIS/YP problems after cvsupdate

On Wed, 16-May-2001 at 21:30:36 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2001, John Polstra wrote: Hello. Well, all of our FBSD boxes are equipted with Intel NIC (fxp) and 100MBit/full-duplex (the switches are also full duplex types). All other network facilities work well - only the

Re: No /boot/loader (dangerously dedicated)

On Sun, 23-Jul-2000 at 15:33:43 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Doug White once stated: = Wait! Smarter then what? So it can boot NT and Win98 for some = weenies, or, actually do something useful (not sure what, though)? = Why am I to waste space (even so little) "to be compatible

Re: No /boot/loader (dangerously dedicated)

On Sun, 23-Jul-2000 at 18:57:12 -0400, Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, John Baldwin wrote: Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hello all! Mikhail Teterin wrote: John Baldwin once stated: Folks, gemoetries are for brain damaged PC operating systems. All

Re: Acroread4

On Wed, 12-Apr-2000 at 13:12:15 -0700, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wilko Bulte writes: On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 10:38:04AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: "A" == Asmodai Jeroen writes: I don't think this is a 4.0 issue. I get the same on a

Re: Acroread4

On Wed, 12-Apr-2000 at 14:44:21 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: "WB" == Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: WB WKB ~acroread4 WB Floating point exception (core dumped) WB on 3.4-stable. Is this what Vivek is seeing? I see no errors. It just works perfectly fine. On my 3.4-stable, I

Re: ASUS P2B-S and FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE

On Tue, 16-Nov-1999 at 11:01:13 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote: On Tue, 16-Nov-1999 at 09:19:48 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote: Is anyone using FreeBSD 3.3 with an ASUS P2B SCSI? I believe this is an AHA 2940U2W "clone" - is that right? If you have been successful with a