at 09:44:32PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > On 11 May 2016 at 21:41, Luiz Otavio O Souza
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Kristof Provost wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 09 May 2016, at 16:58, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > &g
On 11 May 2016 at 21:41, Luiz Otavio O Souza <loos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Kristof Provost wrote:
> >
> >> On 09 May 2016, at 16:58, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> >>
> >> Since the upgrade, pf rules won't load anymore at boot
Hello list,
== CONTEXT ==
I've upgraded 3 boxes from 10.3-PRERELEASE #13 (04/04/16) to 10.3-STABLE
#17 (09/05/16)
Dates in d/m/Y format.
I'm afraid, since I use svnup, I cannot provide SVN revs.
== PROBLEM DESCRIPTION ==
Since the upgrade, pf rules won't load anymore at boot time, nor even
On 21 August 2015 at 09:06, Eugene M. Zheganin e...@norma.perm.ru wrote:
Hi.
On 20.08.2015 14:51, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
We've managed to find the source of the bug, if it is indeed a bug.
It all comes down to the order in which the IP addresses are assigned
On 19 August 2015 at 18:20, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 11:29, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list, Freddie,
I've been able to run extensive tests, the results of which I'm pasting
below.
First of all, I've been unable to replicate the problem
On 19 August 2015 at 11:29, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list, Freddie,
I've been able to run extensive tests, the results of which I'm pasting
below.
First of all, I've been unable to replicate the problem in our
preproduction and QA environments.
The differences between
Hello list,
Does anyone want to take a look at
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200914 ?
This is a patch I submitted for net/relayd 's rc.d script so that it
performs a configuration check before start/reload/restart, à la nginx.
The ticket's been assigned to mm@ but it looks
.
Cheers
On 17 August 2015 at 18:38, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 18:32, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015 9:22 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
I'm seeing this very peculiar behaviour between 2 10-STABLE boxes.
Host
On 17 August 2015 at 18:32, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015 9:22 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
I'm seeing this very peculiar behaviour between 2 10-STABLE boxes.
Host A is CARP Master with advskew 20 and runs 10.2-BETA1 from 10/07
Host
On 8 June 2015 at 12:13, Pete French petefre...@ingresso.co.uk wrote:
I did this a while ago - and it actually worked.
(CARP between 9 and 10).
I think I have each IP assigned its own VHID, though.
Thanks for this, someone else has confimred that 10 orks with multiple IP's
per VHID, so
Hello list,
I'm seeing this very peculiar behaviour between 2 10-STABLE boxes.
Host A is CARP Master with advskew 20 and runs 10.2-BETA1 from 10/07
Host B is CARP Backup with advskew 150 and runs 10.2-PRERELEASE from 12/08
When I configure CARP in rc.conf on host B, it becomes Master on
On 13 Mar 2013, at 06:29, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:32:28 -0500, John Mehr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100
Michael Ross g...@ross.cx wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr j...@visi.com wrote:
[..]
Hello,
I'm currently in the
On 20 Feb 2013, at 06:03, Nurhermansyah eka ekanoti...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all..
if I could make a stable version for freebsd 9.1-release ??
thanks
Hi,
Did you mean I'm running 9.1-RELEASE and I want to update it to 9-STABLE ?
If not, kindly clarify...
Glad I could help :)
On 20 Feb 2013, at 21:00, Craig Yoshida crai...@scripps.edu wrote:
fixed
you, sir, are a rock star.
---
Craig Yoshioka, Ph.D.
(619) 623-2233 (cell)
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.
: in the URL instead of / , possibly ?
I find it strange that there should be : in the URL, it is only acceptable
when denoting the destination port to connect to.
Try replacing them with slashes.
--
Sent from my [insert random phone here]
On 6 Feb 2013, at 12:59, Marek Salwerowicz
On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:45, Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hi,
It seems that I have more issues with the bge,
Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572
ifconfig says:
bge2: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
On 11 Sep 2012, at 10:15, Shiv. Nath prabh...@digital-infotech.net wrote:
Dear FreeBSD Guys,
It is FreeBSD Release 9.0 x64 and i see this log very frequent almost every
second, And i want to block this IP from reaching my server. i configured the
PF as following but still see the same
described below.
On 08/25/2012 01:22 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
In the meantime kindly post:
Ifconfig for your igb0
Netstat -rn
Netstat -aln | grep 22
On 25 Aug 2012, at 13:18, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
I'll get back to you regarding link aggregation when I'm done
I'll get back to you regarding link aggregation when I'm done with groceries.
We use it here in production and it works flawlessly.
On 25 Aug 2012, at 09:54, Giulio Ferro au...@zirakzigil.org wrote:
No answer, so it seems that link aggregation doesn't really work in freebsd,
this may help
In the meantime kindly post:
Ifconfig for your igb0
Netstat -rn
Netstat -aln | grep 22
On 25 Aug 2012, at 13:18, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
I'll get back to you regarding link aggregation when I'm done with groceries.
We use it here in production and it works flawlessly
On 7/23/12 2:37 PM, Gót András wrote:
Dear All,
In the weekend I tried to compile a custom AMD64 8.3 kernel. It started
as a normal buildworld + buildkernel update from 8.3 and it turned out
that without the FREEBSD_COMPAT6 and maybe LIB32 kernel config option
the system won't boot into
On 22 Jun 2012, at 22:02, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Andrew Boyer abo...@averesystems.com wrote:
The ixgbe driver creates devices named ix0, etc.
I believe you need to run 'ifconfig ix0 up' before it will attempt to get
link.
Thanks for
On 6/10/12 1:52 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Sami Halabi sodyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Oliver,
I saw you had similar problem for console on 2010
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Serial-console-problems-with-stab=le-8-td3950684.html
No, I don't think that the problem is related. My
On 6/9/12 9:55 AM, Sami Halabi wrote:
Hi,
I Just finished upgrade from FBSD-8.1-R fresh system to FBSD-8.3-p2.
once done, i created regular accounts, in wheel group.
first all was okay, but suddenly i found my self blocked out, because i
can't ssh as root, and i can't su either, when i su
On 6/12/12 2:48 PM, Pete French wrote:
Meant to reply to this at the time, but have been away...
Has anyone else run into problems when using IPv6 + CARP ?
I ran into some - aliases on a CARP integface did not seem
to work proprly - but if you workaround that then it appears
to work
On 6/12/12 3:00 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Ok so, I've read all the replies so far and I'm a bit perplexed.
Sami, before you drive 3 hours to and 3 hours fro, kindly log in as sody
over SSH, then try login to connect *locally* as the root user
On 6/12/12 3:03 PM, Pete French wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Pete, what are you running ?
We're on 8-STABLE here.
Yup, same here - aactually running a very recent STABLE now,
but for most of this year it's been on one from January. The
one running on the firewalls is from May 7th, and
On 6/12/12 3:05 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 6/12/2012 19:48, Pete French wrote:
I ran into some - aliases on a CARP integface did not seem
to work proprly - but if you workaround that then it appears
to work fine. We are using it in production with no problems.
I have noticed this issue
On 6/12/12 7:04 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
Bad distfile or checksum for lang/gcc46
The mirror you are using per your e-mail --
ftp://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/sources.redhat.com/
-- provides a broken image.
I have done several downloads
On 12 Jun 2012, at 20:17, Nenhum_de_Nos math...@eternamente.info wrote:
hail,
I write just to make sure its dead. I've lost the first disk on a ZFS pool
(jbod). Now I can't
mount it with only the second disk. The first disk clicks to death :(
[root@optimus ~]# zpool status
pool: pool
On 6 Jun 2012, at 23:10, grenville armitage garmit...@swin.edu.au wrote:
On 06/07/2012 00:16, Chris Rees wrote:
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Ericherichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
[..]
is my English really this bad?
From the handbook:
'. In particular, use only tag=. for the
On 5/31/12 9:51 PM, Nick Gustas wrote:
On 5/31/2012 12:52 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 5/31/12 6:37 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On 5/31/2012 5:41 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Furthermore, when upgrading the CARP Master firewall, we need to plan
with the Project Manager a failover to the CARP
On 5/31/12 8:13 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 31/05/2012 16:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You missed the bit about 3 reboots, while these don't take 15 mins each,
they're still time consuming and disruptive.
1/ reboot after installing new kernel
2/ reboot after installing new world
3/ reboot
On 6/1/12 8:54 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 31.05.12 18:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You missed the bit about 3 reboots, while these don't take 15 mins each,
they're still time consuming and disruptive.
1/ reboot after installing new kernel
2/ reboot after installing new world
3/ reboot
On 5/30/12 8:20 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to
this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users.
I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which
advertises
On 31 May 2012, at 12:21, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 5/30/12 8:20 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it
to this list in the hope
On 5/31/12 12:32 PM, Holger Kipp wrote:
Hi,
Am 31.05.2012 um 12:24 schrieb Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 5/30/12 8:20 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard
On 5/31/12 1:20 PM, Claus Guttesen wrote:
A regular debian update is 5 minutes + reboot
A regular FBSD update is about 1.5 hour + 3 reboots (after
installkernel, installworld, rebuild of ports)
But how often do you need to
As a matter of fact, too often, that's te problem.
We have 800
Hey list,
The thread about Why Are You Using FreeBSD, listing the pros and cons
of FBSD, has brought back a topic to mind.
Recently (read, 3 months ago) I was experimenting with IPv6 and CARP
on 8.x boxes and that crashed them both.
I posted a thread on -net and, sadly, never got a single
On 5/31/12 4:01 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
To add others, in no particular order:
Ease of upgrade. While some have noted that binary upgrades are easier
on Debian, it's far and away superior, IMMHO, to have a locally compiled
system. Many Linux distros have no upgrade path short of a wipe and
On 5/31/12 4:30 PM, Adam Strohl wrote:
On 5/31/2012 21:22, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 5/31/12 4:01 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
To add others, in no particular order:
Ease of upgrade. While some have noted that binary upgrades are easier
on Debian, it's far and away superior, IMMHO, to have
On 5/31/12 5:13 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
On 5/31/12 10:22 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 5/31/12 4:01 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
To add others, in no particular order:
Ease of upgrade. While some have noted that binary upgrades are easier
on Debian, it's far and away superior, IMMHO, to have
On 5/31/12 6:37 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On 5/31/2012 5:41 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Furthermore, when upgrading the CARP Master firewall, we need to plan
with the Project Manager a failover to the CARP Backup firewall.
Yes, I know about pfsync, yes, we use it, no, it doesn't *instantly
On 31 May 2012, at 22:31, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 31 May 2012 06:42, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hey list,
The thread about Why Are You Using FreeBSD, listing the pros and cons
of FBSD, has brought back a topic to mind.
Recently (read, 3 months ago) I
Type:
sync
Then:
df -h
Then:
cd /var du -hd 1
Post results.
On 4/27/12 5:16 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote:
I forgot this:
/dev/da0s1d 11G9.9G457M96%/var
From: Efraín Déctor
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 10:14 AM
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: /var getting
On 4/23/12 5:01 AM, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:39:44PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 22. Apr 2012, at 21:59 , Adrian Wontroba wrote:
A RELENG_8 system built this morning still identifies itself as
8.3-PRERELEASE.
Any chance of this becoming 8.3-STABLE soon? While
Hello list,
I installed a box recently and updated it to 8.3-PRERELEASE on 2012/04/11
I'm experiencing this extremely weird behavior where PF refuses to
load standard and const table definitions from the main ruleset.
- persist tables load just fine
- normal and const tables inside anchors
On 3/8/12 6:33 PM, Desai, Kashyap wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Freddie Cash
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:00 PM
To: Johan Hendriks
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: New LSI mps driver
On 2/26/12 10:30 AM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
No matter what effort you put into testing, you can never achieve the
robustness of an older release. I still have 7.4 running on one. This can
stay until next year.
So, why do you want to run the latest release on an important machine? You
On 26 Feb 2012, at 05:06, Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday 26 February 2012 00:55:46 Kevin Oberman wrote:
I thought he was creating a monolithic device...what was called
dangerously dedicated. No slices at all. Not only are DD volumes
yes, I remember
Hello list,
This is NOT a troll.
This is NOT a flame.
Do NOT hijack this thread to troll/flame.
I'm writing this in light of the *many* problem reports I see on the
lists with 9.0-RELEASE.
I'm getting extremely worried here.
Short introduction in order:
See, we use FreeBSD at work for
On 2/14/12 11:04 PM, Hugo Silva wrote:
On 02/14/12 17:33, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Hugo Silvah...@barafranca.com wrote:
Looks like there's been conversations about porting this to FreeBSD
since at
least 2007.
Are there any plans to have ifconfig carpdev
On 1/30/12 10:15 AM, Desai, Kashyap wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing some uncommon problem while doing compilation of mps driver (this
is a latest driver from LSI).
Here are the steps I followed.
CASE-1
1. remove mps directory from sys/dev and sys/module and overwrite those two
.
` Kashyap
-Original Message-
From: Desai, Kashyap
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:30 PM
To: 'Damien Fleuriot'; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: mps module compilation issue on FreeBSD-9 amd64
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd
On 12/27/11 10:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when they were running 8.1 or
8.2-RELEASE), or upgrading
On 12/28/11 10:46 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/27/11 10:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when
On 12/28/11 11:50 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 December 2011 22:46, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when they were running 8.1 or
8.2-RELEASE), or upgrading
On 12/28/11 1:38 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/28/11 10:46 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/27/11 10:22 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 07:46:52PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
The upgrade that troubles
On 12/28/11 12:37 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 28 December 2011 15:11, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 12/28/11 11:50 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 December 2011 22:46, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes
On 12/28/11 3:35 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 12/28/11 12:37 PM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 28 December 2011 15:11, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 12/28/11 11:50 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 December 2011 22:46, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hello list,
Yesterday
Hello list,
Yesterday and today, I've been busy either patching boxes for the BIND
advisory that we received on the 23rd (when they were running 8.1 or
8.2-RELEASE), or upgrading them (when running 8.0-RELEASE).
Today I've come across 2 boxes running 8.2-STABLE and of course, the
BIND patch
Hey up list,
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
I mean, couldn't this have waited and remained undisclosed until monday ?
I for one do *NOT* relish the idea of updating 50+ boxes this evening
and
On 12/23/11 5:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, December 23, 2011 11:07:56 am Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey up list,
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
I mean, couldn't this have waited
My point (which may or may not be valid) was that if the vulnerabilities
remained *undisclosed*, they would have a much lower chance of being
exploited.
On 12/23/11 5:47 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
So don't update until Monday? The outcome will be the same :)
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey up list
On 12/23/11 5:50 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 12/23/2011 10:07 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hey up list,
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
After receiving the fifth security advisory
On 12/23/11 5:54 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Look, just a rant here.
Who in *HELL* thought it would be a cool idea to release no less than
FOUR security advisories today ?
What's the impact for your boxes?
Only the BIND exploit concerns me, means that *potentially* servers for
my projects
. And
others are already exploiting some of these vulnerabilities.
Thanks,
Shawn Webb
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
My point (which may or may not be valid) was that if the vulnerabilities
remained *undisclosed*, they would have a much lower chance of being
On 12/9/11 11:10 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Brett Glass schreef:
The interfaces SEEM to be configured correctly, but the messages --
which must be coming from scripts called by /etc/netstart -- are
troubling.
Same thing happens with lagg0
If i use this config, after a reboot all is fine
On 12/9/11 10:13 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
FreeBSD 9.0-RC3 is looking good, but I'm still encountering two problems.
Firstly, when I try to configure VLANs in /etc/rc.conf, I'm getting
errors. For example, if I use
vlans_re0=1 2
ip_addrs_re0_1=192.168.0.1-4/16
ip_addrs_re0_2=10.0.0.0/24
On 9 Dec 2011, at 18:30, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
At 03:10 AM 12/9/2011, Johan Hendriks wrote:
After a /etc/netstart, i get the following:
ifconfig: create: bad value.
I get the create: bad value messages as well. What's more, if I change
rc.conf to assign variables of the
On 10/31/11 12:04 AM, Gót András wrote:
Dear All,
I'd like to have the following ruleset, for pure-ftpd passive port range:
(pasv and past mistyping corrected)
---
ftp_pasv_start=X
ftp_pasv_end=Y
rdr on $netif inet proto tcp from any to $internalip port
On 10/21/11 5:00 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I have an 8.1-RELEASE system with an xl on the mainboard:
xl0: 3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL port 0xdc80-0xdcff mem
0xf8fffc00-0xf8fffc7f irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci2
miibus0: MII bus on xl0
xlphy0: 3c905C 10/100 internal PHY PHY
On 15 Oct 2011, at 14:24, kapral kap...@toya.net.pl wrote:
Now i don't see any strange connections established but i had them b4 i
wrote email i know my browsers connect to strange ip unfortunatly i didn't
checked a port to whih was connected to but it was from high ports abowe
1024 on my
On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
for 9/head:
On 1 October 2011 03:18, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's a php module doing a lookup for the hostname of the back-end mysql
server.
Are the delays always 3 seconds?
Pretty much.
If so, that almost sounds like a timeout of some kind.
That was my first thought, but the answer
On 1 October 2011 11:04, johan Hendriks joh.hendr...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 29-09-11 16:49, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
Quick follow-up again.
This is the code for sys/netinet/ip_carp.c on FreeBSD 8.2, OpenBSD
3.8, OpenBSD 3.9 in function carp_setrun(struct carp_softc *sc,
sa_family_t af
On 9/15/11 11:07 AM, Damien FLEURIOT wrote:
Hello list,
TLDR: carp interface becomes MASTER for a split second after being
created, even if another MASTER exists on the network with faster
advertisements. Breaks connections. HOWTO prevent ?
We've been experiencing
On 29 September 2011 14:20, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 9/15/11 11:07 AM, Damien FLEURIOT wrote:
Hello list,
TLDR: carp interface becomes MASTER for a split second after being
created, even if another MASTER exists on the network with faster
advertisements. Breaks connections
Quick follow-up again.
This is the code for sys/netinet/ip_carp.c on FreeBSD 8.2, OpenBSD
3.8, OpenBSD 3.9 in function carp_setrun(struct carp_softc *sc,
sa_family_t af)
FREEBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE with init + preempt = auto MASTER bug
Function starts at line 1371.
---
On 18 Sep 2011, at 12:44, Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
Le Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:40:06 -0400 (EDT),
Brian Seklecki (Mobile) laval...@probikesllc.com a écrit :
What would help here, is for a carp interface to wait a given delay
(tunable through a sysctl ?) after creation
Posting to -stable since -pf didn't show much interest :/
Original Message
Subject: CARP interfaces and mastership issue
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:07:37 +0200
Hello list,
TLDR: carp interface becomes MASTER for a split second after being
created, even if another MASTER
On 15 September 2011 18:12, Brian Seklecki (Mobile)
laval...@probikesllc.com wrote:
Things went smoothly but when we brought the production VLANs up again
at layer 2 on the switches, when spanning-tree converged we had again a
double MASTER problem.
In older versions of FBSD, creating
On 8/2/11 9:39 AM, seanr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I Googled around and checked the PRs and wasn't successful in finding
any reports of what I'm seeing. I'm hoping someone here can help me
debug what's going on.
On my FreeBSD 8.2-S machine (built circa 12th June), I created a
On 23 Jun 2011, at 01:02, George Kontostanos gkontos.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Look, I think that this is getting personal and not constructive at all.
Stop mumbling unless you have something useful to add.
How about you do what he says and stop top posting, as per the list's policy ?
Annoying
Hello list,
Here I am today, setting up CARP interfaces on our backup firewalls, and
I'm wondering something...
Let's take the following scenario:
Datacenter PRIM, firewall PRIM:
- carp13 has public IPs X and Y and is master (advskew 100)
Datacenter PRIM, firewall BACK:
- carp13 has public
On 6/14/11 11:06 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
Here I am today, setting up CARP interfaces on our backup firewalls, and
I'm wondering something...
Let's take the following scenario:
Datacenter PRIM, firewall PRIM:
- carp13 has public IPs X and Y and is master (advskew
On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:33, Steve Polyack kor...@comcast.net wrote:
On 06/14/2011 01:00 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I can confirm that this scenario causes problems, see below:
### ON FIREWALL 1 , carp master for carp0, carp1, carp2
carp2: flags=49UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING metric 0 mtu 1500
On 4/9/11 9:25 AM, David Marec wrote:
Hi guys.
Since the release of FreeBSD 8.2, building world fails on the following
error:
--
david:/home/david#cd /usr/src
david:/usr/src#make -j4 buildworld make kernel
--
World
On 3/8/11 11:52 PM, Dave Johnson wrote:
Hi all
An IPFW problem?
An help gladly accepted
It would appear Port 80 closed
Ports 21 25 443 587 998 work well
rc.conf
defaultrouter=192.168.0.1
gateway_enable=YES
hostname=xxx.xxx.xxx
ifconfig_re0=inet 192.168.0.11 netmask
On 3/7/11 2:33 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
18 month old 7.2
FreeBSD dfw1.psg.com 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Sat Aug 22 08:37:36
UTC 2009 r...@dfw1.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DFW1 amd64
csup and
o make buildworld
o make kernel
o boot single user
o locks up right after
On 24 February 2011 08:55, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:30:17AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba
On 2/24/11 8:55 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:30:17AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba.
We're talking transfer rates of say
Hello list,
I apologize for this very trivial question but I can't seem to find the
answer in the doc:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pr-guidelines/article.html
I have submitted a PR late december 2k10 and it's still in open state:
On 24/02/11 12:03 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I apologize for this very trivial question but I can't seem to find the
answer in the doc:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pr-guidelines/article.html
I have submitted a PR late december 2k10 and it's still
Hello list,
I've recently upgraded my home box from 8.2-PRE to 8.2-RELEASE and since
then I've been experiencing *abysmal* performance with samba.
We're talking transfer rates of say 50kbytes/s here, and I'm the only
client on the box.
I've seen here and there discussions about sendfile's
On 2/18/11 5:42 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
Let me know if you run into any issues.
Ken
Rebuilt this afternoon, rebooted, still works fine.
I'll post if I run into any problem.
Thanks for your work, this driver was clearly needed on 8.x seeing the
cards are becoming more and more
On 2/18/11 5:49 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:07:21 -0800, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
Hello Damien, list:
Anyway this was just my humble attempt to encourage the MFC of this driver.
I think the card is
pretty good. I'd like to hear other people's opinion on this HBA
On 2/18/11 6:28 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:57:11 -0700
From: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 17:53:11 +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/18/11 5:49 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011
On 2/17/11 12:10 PM, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:07:17PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
It looks rather unhappy:
mybsd root /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools
#
/usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev
On 2/17/11 1:18 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
What is sad is that these controllers are becoming very mainstream now,
we're getting them more and more on Dell servers , and the fbsd project
still struggles with them (for reasons I
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
