On 29/08/2013 08:47, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 28/08/2013 20:29 Jase Thew said the following:
I'm getting a similar panic with r254986 on stable/8 when starting up jails :
Thank you very much for the report. Somehow I missed Toomas'es report on the
mailing list.
It looks like I should have
On 29/08/2013 11:11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/08/2013 12:07 Jase Thew said the following:
After some fiddling about, I've obtained a crashdump of this panic :
http://goo.gl/sRXjo4
If you need anything else, please let me know.
Obviously, I can't do anything with the vmcore without
/devfs/devfs_vnops.c?view=patchr1=211847r2=211846pathrev=211847
Hi Andriy,
I've merged that change, rebuilt the kernel and that appears to have
resolved the panic. Jails are now starting up correctly with devfs rules
being successfully applied.
Thanks very much!
Regards,
Jase.
--
Jase Thew
j
.
--
Jase Thew
j...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Ports Committer
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 05/01/2012 13:30, Gót András wrote:
Hi,
You can easily set up FTPS with pure-ftpd, but AFAIK only the
authentication will be secured. This is also called FTP-TLS.
Regards,
Andras
Hi,
pure-ftpd offers configurable TLS support including control *and* data
channel encryption.
?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/DebugWithDcons may be of use to you.
Regards,
Jase Thew.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Barry Pederson wrote:
I've been burned by this a fair number of times, wish there was some
good way of having things starting from /usr/local/etc/rc.d to have
/usr/local/bin and sbin in the path on a consistent basis.
Barry
Hi,
/etc/profile is the system wide profile for sh
Brian wrote:
It turns out, as I look at the below, I was testing a unique process and
didn't realize it.
[...]
So, I was migrating not only from a release to stable, but more
specifically from a release to a prerelease.
Hi,
I think you misunderstand - 7.1-PRERELEASE is just the name [1]
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 04:13:51PM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 02:35:46PM +0200, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
I just installed a fresh FreeBSD/amd64 7.0-RELEASE and trying to update
to RELENG_7_0.
I added CPUTYPE ?= core2 to
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Andrei Kolu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2008 12:31:49 ??? wrote:
I installed FreeBSD 7.0 on HP DL 380.
This is a mptable result.
# mptable
Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step
John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 23 February 2008 03:32:41 pm Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi
the Razer Copperhead mouse did work in FreeBSD 7 (current) for a long
time, but after some period it stopped working. This patch from Uwe
Grohnwaldt:
Jase Thew wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 23 February 2008 03:32:41 pm Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi
the Razer Copperhead mouse did work in FreeBSD 7 (current) for a long
time, but after some period it stopped working. This patch from Uwe
Grohnwaldt:
http
Jase Thew wrote:
Jase Thew wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 23 February 2008 03:32:41 pm Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Oliver Herold wrote:
Hi
the Razer Copperhead mouse did work in FreeBSD 7 (current) for a long
time, but after some period it stopped working. This patch from Uwe
Grohnwaldt
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
How about RELENG_7? will we still get PRERELEASE?
Regards,
-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/
I imagine RELENG_7 will stay at PRERELEASE until 7.0-RELEASE is out of
the door, at which point it will become 7.0-STABLE.
Andrei Kolu wrote:
According to Theo de Raadth http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=118296441702631
latest Intel Core 2 Duo processors are buggy as hell. What counter-measures
are taken within FreeBSD community?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
Par Leijonhufvud wrote:
Pertti Kosunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.18] wrote:
What have I missed?
Update your ports tree, that version of fetchmail has vulnerabilities.
I know that. But fetching with fetchmail stopped working when I did that
(when the new port came I did a portupgrade, forgot
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Julian, meet Kris. Kris has been the head of the FreeBSD ports team for
Long enough without peer review. Leaders don't post flame bait.
- Below _Not_ personal criticism of any individual. -
Ideas of Automatic peer review, rotations etc are used by clubs,
Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Iantcho Vassilev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My vote goes to PureFtpd..
It`s ideal server..
But is not *nearly* as secure as vsftpd.
Hi,
I'm curious - do you have any empirical evidence to support this?
A trawl of a few vulnerabilty databases would suggest your comment is
. The IA-64 builds are for Intel Itanium and Itanium-2
processors only [1]. The AMD64 builds are the correct ones to use for
both AMD64 and Intel EM64T processors when 64-bit support is required [2].
Regards,
Jase Thew.
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-ia64.html#PROC-IA64
[2
19 matches
Mail list logo
