bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug

2011-02-06 Thread Russell Jackson
I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere. Are there any plans to update BIND in the 8.1/8.2 branches? https://www.isc.org/announcement/bind-9-dnssec-validation-fails-new-ds-record -- Russell A. Jackson r...@csub.edu Network Analyst California State University, Bakersfield

Re: bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug

2011-02-06 Thread Russell Jackson
On 02/06/2011 10:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/06/2011 20:58, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: | On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:05:08PM -0800, Russell Jackson wrote: | I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere. Are there any plans to | update BIND

Re: Performance with hundreds of nullfs mounts?

2009-03-11 Thread Russell Jackson
Ivan Voras wrote: hi, I seem to remember hearing an anecdote somewhere that using hundreds (or thousands?) nullfs mounts for jails results in unreasonably bad file system access performance. Does somebody have this kind of setup / is it true? I was doing this with jails --before we moved to

Re: questionable feature- rcvar woes

2007-11-29 Thread Russell Jackson
Frank Behrens wrote: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28 Nov 2007 14:37: Use forcestart or forcestop to manage services that are not enabled in rc.conf. This is normal. If you got a warning, then on shutdown every rc.d Most (all?) people recommend in this thread the use of

Re: update on dell precision 670 vs em death match

2006-11-13 Thread Russell Jackson
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:56:21PM -0800, Russell Jackson wrote: Whatever that last em commit was, it seems to have made the interrupt issues better. It still seems high, but it's a lot better than the 2000/s I was getting before. interrupt total rate irq1

update on dell precision 670 vs em death match

2006-11-10 Thread Russell Jackson
Whatever that last em commit was, it seems to have made the interrupt issues better. It still seems high, but it's a lot better than the 2000/s I was getting before. interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 54 0 irq6: fdc0

Re: nvidia0 em0 shared irq problem persists on dell precision 670

2006-11-09 Thread Russell Jackson
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:39:52PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: Is the firewire controller something that you can disable? Can you selectively disable some of the USB controllers? Scott I've tried disabling every combination of devices possible. The only change that fixed the problem

Re: nvidia0 em0 shared irq problem persists on dell precision 670

2006-11-09 Thread Russell Jackson
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:23:45PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: Russell Jackson wrote: [ ... ] pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum Did you notice this? Try reflashing your motherboard to the latest available BIOS revision, doing a load defaults, and then clearing and reseting the ESCD

nvidia0 em0 shared irq problem persists on dell precision 670

2006-11-08 Thread Russell Jackson
I synced sources today and tested the em changes, and the problem has not gone away for me. nvidia0 and em0 are shown as shared with ioacpi disabled using a device hint. interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 60 0 irq6: fdc0

Re: nvidia0 em0 shared irq problem persists on dell precision 670

2006-11-08 Thread Russell Jackson
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:23:45PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: Russell Jackson wrote: [ ... ] pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum Did you notice this? Try reflashing your motherboard to the latest available BIOS revision, doing a load defaults, and then clearing and reseting the ESCD

Re: nvidia0 em0 shared irq problem persists on dell precision 670

2006-11-08 Thread Russell Jackson
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:39:52PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: Is the firewire controller something that you can disable? Can you selectively disable some of the USB controllers? Scott I'll have to try that tomorrow at work. I did disable the em NIC in the BIOS setup, and (not

Re: em network issues

2006-10-28 Thread Russell Jackson
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 02:50:44PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: ? 23 ??? 2006 13:37, Mikhail Teterin ???: We aren't currently speaking about performance, we need to know whether kernel with DEVICE_POLLING option makes NIC work stable. Yes, that seems to be the case...

Re: isc-dhcpd and jails bound to an aliased ip

2006-09-19 Thread Russell Jackson
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:08:28PM -0700, Russell Jackson wrote: Attempting to run isc-dhcpd (using USE_SOCKETS) inside a jail bound to an aliased ip does not appear to work. The process never seems to recieve any broadcast traffic; however, it does see unicast traffic as would be expected

isc-dhcpd and jails bound to an aliased ip

2006-09-18 Thread Russell Jackson
Attempting to run isc-dhcpd (using USE_SOCKETS) inside a jail bound to an aliased ip does not appear to work. The process never seems to recieve any broadcast traffic; however, it does see unicast traffic as would be expected. I'm not sure how to debug this since one cannot run tcpdump in the jail

Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore?

2001-06-11 Thread Russell Jackson
Jordan Hubbard wrote: Short answer: -stable builds fine. Long answer: It only builds fine if you don't use non-standard build flags like SHARED=symlinks, which some people appear to be using since they're reporting problems. On a completely stock -stable system as of yesterday, I can

Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore?

2001-06-11 Thread Russell Jackson
Jordan Hubbard wrote: Hmmm. It seems like this thread has degraded to simple project-bashing so I'll not be a party to keeping it on life support any longer. Suffice it to say that people make mistakes and of far greater importance is whether or not they realize it when they do and