Re: Policy for removing working code

for understanding. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Policy for removing working code

applied to it; this does not apply if nobody will review code. === -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon

help us directly by code. Don't reject them just on this criteria (and Project never did before). -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight

Re: Dummynet

net.inet.ip.dummynet.hash_size, allowed range is 16 to 65536. Am I missing something here? This worked fine in the 7-branch. The reason is that luigi@ merged ipfw3 from -CURRENT between 8.0R and 8.1R. There are many new features and, as seen from many PRs, many new bugs. -- WBR, Vadim

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon

. And that will make the FreeBSD Project better. So, not to flame more, do you disagree with this? -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon

in science and should be in FreeBSD mail lists. Just accusements. Sad. I give up. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd-stable

Re: Dummynet

=dummynet and find reports similar to yours. If there no such, create your one - because: 1) this is official place for bug reports, they won't get lost, and in mail lists - they may get lost 2) luigi@ just may be not knowing about the bug without report -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181

Re: Policy for removing working code

enough to do for a while. You may have noted in whois that I am not that site admin. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd

Re: Policy for removing working code

that things like call for volunteers go to announce@ (and many feature removal notifications may be not certain if there will be volunteers then). But perhaps your idea is applicable to www.freebsd.org, though. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator

Re: Policy for removing working code

...@. FreeBSD-CA-??? Change Announcement? for that are constructed much of the same way the SA EN are ?. No, as this is not certain - if volunteers will answer the call, feature may survive instead of removal. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator

Re: Policy for removing working code

, there is an article in another language that does this much better: http://lurkmore.ru//%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%81%D1%8F -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org

Re: Policy for removing working code

for ISDN (multiple notices to arch@ and current@ spread out across many months). Not entirely so. Individual drivers are more minor changes than major ones, and still 5 years ago there were messages to announce@ about such removals when there many-many of them, e.g. from Kris Kennaway. -- WBR, Vadim

Re: Policy for removing working code

, they in fact don't do. So announce@ is the only choice from purely practical means. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd-stable

Re: Policy for removing working code

this feature but about policy which will slowly bring FreeBSD project to troubles if nothing will be changed. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight

Policy for removing working code (Was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon)

Hi v...@freebsd.org! On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:01:55 +0200; v...@freebsd.org wrote about 'Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon': On 09/07/10 23:31, Vadim Goncharov wrote: 07.09.10 @ 18:53 Andriy Gapon wrote: The reason is performance for overall network stack, not ideology

Policy for removing working code (Was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon)

Hi Doug Barton! On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:37:07 -0700; Doug Barton wrote about 'Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon': On 09/07/2010 02:31 PM, Vadim Goncharov wrote: 07.09.10 @ 18:53 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 07/09/2010 13:38 Vadim Goncharov said the following: Just to clarify

Policy for removing working code (Was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon)

to pick up and modernize. I hope that for this particular case alternative from ports will be enough. But policy is not tied to one particular case, alas. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ

Re: Policy for removing working code

Hi John Baldwin! On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:42:28 -0400; John Baldwin wrote about 'Re: Policy for removing working code (Was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon)': On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 6:24:11 am Vadim Goncharov wrote: Because the original I4B code didn't work without

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon

and is purely ideologic, isn't it? -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon

07.09.10 @ 18:53 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 07/09/2010 13:38 Vadim Goncharov said the following: Just to clarify things a little for those following it: the original I4B code was removed ^ (1) for entirely practical reasons: it couldn't run without the Giant

Re: list spam

just to be able to post to the lists. Yes, me too, but I'm using two-way NNTP-server - gmane.org. Please keep it allowing to still post. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight

RELEASE discs ISO images (for future)

be it is good also to resurrect miniinst disk for Depenguinator project? :) -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

Re: INET6 -- and why I don't use it

- and routine failure will become much more pain in the ass. And dependence on DNS for public IPSEC keys even if addresses are known - is not good. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight

Re: INET6 -- and why I don't use it

and hackers, IPv6 still assumes friendly Internet and non-limited expanding, not even trying to look at basics... Ceterum censeo IPv6 esse delendam! P.S. Disclaimer. My additions are briefly translated from russian at http://netch.livejournal.com/tag/ipv6 -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181

Re: RELEASE discs ISO images (for future)

PROTECTED] Posting to 2 FreeBSD lists is deprecated. hackers@ is for releases. Why? Looks like not the place for official staff. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?

. There is no need to make it optional any more. Having it there really sends the wrong signal. I strongly disagree. I want to keep my machines without IPv6 as long as possible due to protocol (not implementation) architectural bugs. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[EMAIL

Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?

mentality over the years. Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ

Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?

source, here's the error output (INET6 disabled, but SCTP enabled): Yes, INET6 is (currently) required if you enable SCTP. Will it be fixed? Any time soon? -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ

[PATCH] ng_nat(4) redirects and rc.d script

: redirectdelete 3 # delete redirection with ID number 3 Enjoy! ;-) -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] ipfwpcap(8)

, Vadim Goncharov ipfwpcap.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] ipfwpcap(8)

be another commit, as not a user-visible change. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov ipfwpcap.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

swap at beginning of slice - danger?

changed and is it dangerous nowadays to have swap partition at offset 0 ? -- Best regards, Vadim Goncharov ICQ UIN 166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

panic with ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS on 5.4 (and probably 6.0)

in this. -- Best regards, Vadim Goncharov ICQ UIN 166852181 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]