active/active.
Am I right?
Regards,
Daniel
Andy Kosela ha scritto:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in
FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
How FreeBSD compares in this environment to RHEL
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Russell Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FreeBSD support for multipath/SAN is fairly poor. It's fiddly
to get to work and boot times are a little variable (into the
minutes) as it tries to discover the devices. Once it is configured
and booted, it just
have active/active.
Am I right?
Regards,
Daniel
Andy Kosela ha scritto:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in
FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
How FreeBSD compares in this environment
Quoting Andy Kosela, who wrote on Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:41:24PM +0200 ..
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Russell Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FreeBSD support for multipath/SAN is fairly poor. It's fiddly
to get to work and boot times are a little variable (into the
minutes) as
-RELEASE and ZFS as the
filesystem on the SAN. ZFS is hands down better then EXT3+LVM .
Andy Kosela wrote:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
How FreeBSD
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN hardware in FreeBSD?
I'm especially interested in support for HP EVA/XP disk arrays, Qlogic
HBAs, multipathing.
How FreeBSD compares in this environment to RHEL 5?
--
Andy Kosela
ora et labora
On FreeBSD7, i'm succesfully using Qlogic 4gb fibre channel HBAs (ISP
driver)
attached to Fibre Brocade Switch and IBM DS4700 (14 disks array) using 4
way multipath
with gmultipath.
Regards,
Daniel
Andy Kosela ha scritto:
Hi all,
What is the current status of support for high end SAN
