Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-13 Thread Rasmus Kaj
KK == Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KK And what was wrong with casting your eye one line down, clicking on KK Message-ID and entering it in the search box at KK http://www.freebsd.org/search/search-mid.html Ah, there it is. Thank you! KK Is it really rendered in an invisible

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-13 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 06/13/05 14:26, Rasmus Kaj wrote: KK == Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: KK And what was wrong with casting your eye one line down, clicking on KK Message-ID and entering it in the search box at KK http://www.freebsd.org/search/search-mid.html Ah, there it is. Thank you! KK

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: You can't make the archive search, but Google Groups can (and does) very well. I search the mail list archives far more frequently with Google (or Google Groups) than with the archive search tool. Sure you

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:13:57PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: You can't make the archive search, but Google Groups can (and does) very well. I search the mail list archives far more frequently with

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Pete French
Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting CFLAGS= -O0 in /etc/make.conf More info from: Message from

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:32:53AM +0100, Pete French wrote: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting CFLAGS= -O0 in /etc/make.conf

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:01:54 +0200 From: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pete French wrote: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 09 June 2005 06:32 am, Pete French wrote: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: GCC 3.4.2 on 5.4-RELEASE has a bug for amd64, I started avoiding that by putting CFLAGS= -O0 in /etc/make.conf More

Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?GCC broken for amd64 ? (was Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable?)

2005-06-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:22:41PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: You can't make the archive search, but Google Groups can (and does) very well. I search the mail list archives far more frequently with Google (or Google Groups) than with the archive search tool. Sure you can..there's a message