Russell Jackson wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
hi,
I seem to remember hearing an anecdote somewhere that using hundreds
(or thousands?) nullfs mounts for jails results in unreasonably bad
file system access performance. Does somebody have this kind of setup
/ is it true?
I was doing this with
2009/3/10 Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org:
hi,
I seem to remember hearing an anecdote somewhere that using hundreds
(or thousands?) nullfs mounts for jails results in unreasonably bad
file system access performance. Does somebody have this kind of setup
/ is it true?
~600-700 null mount
Ivan Voras wrote:
hi,
I seem to remember hearing an anecdote somewhere that using hundreds
(or thousands?) nullfs mounts for jails results in unreasonably bad
file system access performance. Does somebody have this kind of setup
/ is it true?
I was doing this with jails --before we moved to
hi,
I seem to remember hearing an anecdote somewhere that using hundreds
(or thousands?) nullfs mounts for jails results in unreasonably bad
file system access performance. Does somebody have this kind of setup
/ is it true?
___
Ivan Voras wrote:
I seem to remember hearing an anecdote somewhere that using hundreds
(or thousands?) nullfs mounts for jails results in unreasonably bad
file system access performance. Does somebody have this kind of setup
/ is it true?
I'm using about several readonly nullfs mounts per
