Re: recommended poudriere jail versions?

[Guido Falsi]

On 10/01/15 14:05, Mark Martinec wrote:
> 2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupać wrote:
>> what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So
>> far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor
>> version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended
>> up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need to
>> rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is
>> starting to take too much of my time.
>>
>> I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per
>> architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built
>> on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for
>> 10.2- on 10.1-?
> 
> I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have,
> but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on 10.0-RELEASE
> and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I think the
> official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE .

Official packages are being build on 10.1-RELEASE at present. It's the
lowest supported minor in the 10 branch.

-- 
Guido Falsi 
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: recommended poudriere jail versions?

[Marko Cupać]

On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 14:05:32 +0200
Mark Martinec  wrote:

> 2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupać wrote:
> > what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports?
> > So far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every
> > minor version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients,
> > but I ended up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and
> > 10.2), where I need to
> > rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is
> > starting to take too much of my time.
> > 
> > I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per
> > architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built
> > on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for
> > 10.2- on 10.1-?
> 
> I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have,
> but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on
> 10.0-RELEASE and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I
> think the official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE .
> 
> This mostly works, except for a port like virtualbox-ose-kmod,
> which causes a kernel crash when built on 10.0-RELEASE and run
> on 10.2. So after each ports upgrade when noticing that pkg
> is reinstalling virtualbox-ose-kmod, I re-build this one from
> ports on a target host, otherwise the next reboot will end up
> crashing on loading a vboxdrv kernel module during startup.

Thanx for info. I'd like to give building everything on
10.1-RELEASE- a try, but I don't see the ability of poudriere
to specify patclevel when using ftp method - it always fetches the
latest one. Is this by design, to discourage building on potentially
vulnerable versions, or just non-implemented functionality?

Regards,
-- 
Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.
After  enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.

Marko Cupać
https://www.mimar.rs/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: recommended poudriere jail versions?

[Slawa Olhovchenkov]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:32:06AM +0200, Marko Cupa'c wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So
> far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor
> version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended
> up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need to
> rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is
> starting to take too much of my time.
> 
> I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per
> architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built
> on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for
> 10.2- on 10.1-?

Some packages (freeradius, for example) strict depends from openssl
version. Different openssl version in base (in jail and in target)
stop to run this application.
opensssl version in base can be changed by patchlevel too.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: recommended poudriere jail versions?

[Mark Martinec]

2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupać wrote:

what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So
far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor
version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended
up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need 
to

rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is
starting to take too much of my time.

I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per
architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built
on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for
10.2- on 10.1-?


I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have,
but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on 10.0-RELEASE
and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I think the
official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE .

This mostly works, except for a port like virtualbox-ose-kmod,
which causes a kernel crash when built on 10.0-RELEASE and run
on 10.2. So after each ports upgrade when noticing that pkg
is reinstalling virtualbox-ose-kmod, I re-build this one from
ports on a target host, otherwise the next reboot will end up
crashing on loading a vboxdrv kernel module during startup.

  Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

recommended poudriere jail versions?

[Marko Cupać]

Hi,

what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So
far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor
version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended
up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need to
rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is
starting to take too much of my time.

I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per
architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built
on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for
10.2- on 10.1-?

Thank you in advance,
-- 
Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.
After  enlightenment - chop wood, draw water.

Marko Cupać
https://www.mimar.rs/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"