Sir:
FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE
samba-3.0.10,1
samba-libsmbclient-3.0.10_1
windows 2003
1. a share-folder is in windows-2003.
2. mount_smbfs -I windows-2003-ip //hostname/folder
/usr/home/alan/zfsbackup
3. about 60 servers have same crontab to make ftp connect to the
Freebsd
On Sun, 2006-Apr-09 17:56:51 -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
If you have a dual-em card in this server, you should get better performance
putting your primary load out the em interface(s). In general, we've
benched the em (and to a lesser extent, the fxp) interfaces as performing
much better than
Hello,
while trying to get the gnash CVS version to work I noticed that on my system
(FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE) truss obviously has problems tracing firefox:
truss prints somewhat random error messages and traces only some of the
system calls firefox makes (opening a local file doesn't show up, for
Note that using different slices may change your results. All modern
disks are faster near the outside (start of the disk) then the inside
(I get more than 50% increase from inside to outside on one system).
I am thinking this will not be an issue, given that it is the performance
of the
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Paul Saab wrote:
PS Mars G. Miro wrote:
PS
PS However, *sometimes* serial consoles work only for input (I can login
PS and
PS check new processes presence on ttyd0, but can not see any messages.
PS Trouble
PS is
PS that this situation is not easy reproducible,
Jonas Wolz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while trying to get the gnash CVS version to work I noticed that on
my system (FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE) truss obviously has problems tracing
firefox: truss prints somewhat random error messages and traces
only some of the system calls firefox makes (opening a
Hello Chuck,
Hello @all,
2006/4/7, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Michael Schuh wrote:
Hi everyone,
i need suggestions and hints about an redundant
storage-system.
My requirements are:
a Storage that is available via Network, flexible in scalation,
and must be redundant, and
I'm having an issue as I'm a newbie in installing/configuring the
marvell driver for FreeBSD.
A quick search in the mailing lists shows:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2601224+2604070
+/usr/local/www/db/text/2006/freebsd-questions/20060402.freebsd-questions
but I have no clue how I
Hello,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
You should be safe as long as the order of slices you give here is the
same as it was when device was initially labeled.
I have follow this procedure and it worked for me:
select 6. Escape to loader prompt
OK unload
OK disable-module geom_raid3
OK
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 13:22 -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 06:00:56PM -0600 I heard the voice of
Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
Modern disks (I don't know how to define a cutoff to this term,
unfortunately) definitely put more bits onto the outer rim of the
Yousef Raffah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having an issue as I'm a newbie in installing/configuring the
marvell driver for FreeBSD.
A quick search in the mailing lists shows:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2601224+2604070
Hello,
I've an SCSI version of the IOMEGA REV drive (35 GB, like ZIP drive). How
can I access this drive. FreeBSD detects the drive as CDROM:
cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0
cd0: Iomega RRD 89.B Removable CD-ROM SCSI-4 device
cd0: 20.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit)
cd0: cd present
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
it sseems to me that the maximum swap-size is
limitied to 2GB or better to INT_MAX ?
At another MAchine with FreeBSD4.11 i
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:13:07PM +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
it sseems to me that the maximum swap-size is
limitied
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:02:34AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Christian Lopez de Castilla Wagner, and lo! it spake thus:
As you can see, the outside is more than twice as fast in this case.
Just a guess, since both are IBM disks: You're using a
Workstation/Server disk, which probably performs
On Apr 9, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Juergen Lock wrote:
Is this something the kld is doing wrong (/usr/ports/emulators/
kqemu-kmod)
or is it a devfs problem? The report I got was for 6.0, but it also
happens for me on RELENG_5. This is nothing serious (kqemu works),
but
it certainly can be
On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 14:11:46 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
so that i have sign a Solution with cheap HW, ok this cheap HW is not very
stable and never so performant like the right Hardware, but if i use
this solution,
so i can relative fast replace defect items with new HW.
You probably can't
On 4/10/06, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
metoo
I can't comment on gigabit performance but at Fast Ethernet speeds,
I've found that fxp performs much better than dc, tl and tx NICs.
I've had fairly bad experiences with bge under even moderate load
(though the one in my laptop seems
I've got a 5.4-RELEASE-p9 system that I was doing some memory filesystem
testing on. I'm seeing something odd, though - a small MFS partition
mounted over top of /tmp that I can't get rid of.
Here's the system now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mrvoice]$ mount
/dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates)
H. Wade Minter wrote:
I've got a 5.4-RELEASE-p9 system that I was doing some memory filesystem
testing on. I'm seeing something odd, though - a small MFS partition
mounted over top of /tmp that I can't get rid of.
Here's the system now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mrvoice]$ mount
/dev/ad0s1a
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Michael Proto wrote:
How should I remove this mfs mountpoint permanently to get the disk-based
/tmp back?
--Wade
Do you have tmpmfs defined in /etc/rc.conf? If tmpfs is enabled there it
will create a /tmp mfs as you are indicating.
Not that I see:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
H. Wade Minter wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Michael Proto wrote:
How should I remove this mfs mountpoint permanently to get the
disk-based
/tmp back?
--Wade
Do you have tmpmfs defined in /etc/rc.conf? If tmpfs is enabled there it
will create a /tmp mfs as you are indicating.
Not that I
- Original Message -
From: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Needs suggestion for redundant Storage
On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 14:11:46 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
so that i
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Michael Proto wrote:
Does /tmp exist and is writable when the system is started? Looking at
the test in /etc/rc.d/tmp, it looks like /tmp will be mounted as a mfs
if /bin/mkdir -p /tmp/.diskless fails.
It should have been, but I went ahead and set tmpmfs=NO in rc.conf,
Hello,
Have a look at /boot/defaults/loader.conf for your desired driver.
Then copy it to your /boot/loader.conf file (the desired line).
Also have a look at the command: man loader.conf
Quoting Yousef Raffah [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having an issue as I'm a newbie in installing/configuring the
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:23:53PM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
ok. then, freebsd-developers may change The Power To Serve to The Power
To Test, FreeBSD is an advanced operating system to FreeBSD is
an advanced operating system in stage of forever development, etc.
pay money to use stable
On Apr 10, 2006, at 17:56, Mark Linimon wrote:
In the meantime, we volunteers (who do at least 90% of the FreeBSD
work)
will continue trying to do our best, with no written guarantee that it
will suit your purposes.
If you read the EULA on most commercial operating systems you'll find
Hello friend !
You have just received a postcard from someone who cares about you!
This is a part of the message:
Hy there! It has been a long time since I haven't heared about you!
I've just found out about this service from Claire, a friend of mine
who also told me that...
On Monday 10 April 2006 18:56, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:23:53PM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
ok. then, freebsd-developers may change The Power To Serve to The
Power To Test, FreeBSD is an advanced operating system to FreeBSD is
an advanced operating system in stage
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 01:47, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:13:07PM +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 06:07, Chris H. wrote:
but I have no clue how I can bypass the second step, which is installing
the if_myk.ko to /boot/kernel
I have tried to cp if_yk.ko /boot/kernel/
bad idea.
Maybe you should elaborate as to why..
It shouldn't do any *harm*.
The only
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
The old swap size = 2x RAM rule is no longer applicable unless you have a
very special application.
This rule always seemed counterintuitive to me anyway.
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more than enough RAM you
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
The old swap size = 2x RAM rule is no longer applicable unless you have a
very special application.
This rule always seemed counterintuitive to me anyway.
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more than enough
Quoting Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 06:07, Chris H. wrote:
but I have no clue how I can bypass the second step, which is installing
the if_myk.ko to /boot/kernel
I have tried to cp if_yk.ko /boot/kernel/
bad idea.
Maybe you should elaborate as to why..
Pete Slagle wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
The old swap size = 2x RAM rule is no longer applicable unless you
have a very special application.
This rule always seemed counterintuitive to me anyway.
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more
On Apr 10, 2006, at 21:45, Pete Slagle wrote:
When you have more than enough RAM you don't need any swap space at
all.
You need enough swap space to do a dump in case a panic occurs.
While panics are (hopefully) rare, if it does happen, you usually
want things set up so that you can
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 03:32:58PM +0200, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:
I have follow this procedure and it worked for me:
select 6. Escape to loader prompt
OK unload
OK disable-module geom_raid3
OK boot -s
# fsck -p
# mount -a
# graid3 dump ad4s2 | grep -w no
# graid3 dump ad5s2 |
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 11:51, Chris H. wrote:
This is the correct location for modules. Hence my bad idea comment.
But if you had sourced: /boot/defaults/loader.conf, man loader.conf
then you already figured this out, and know why I might have said bad
idea. :)
Yes, *I* already know that
38 matches
Mail list logo
