Re: 6.3-RELEASE panic

2008-01-22 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm afraid not -- FreeBSD Update is just distributing the bits from the release ISO image, and the release ISO doesn't include kernel debug bits (at least, not on 6.3-RELEASE -- I think it does on 7.0-RC1). I thought we shipped the debugging symbols in /boot precisely for

geli problem: MD5 hash checksum mismatch for da0

2008-01-22 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello, I tried to change my passphrase for a geli provider. Like man page tells, I attached the provider (da0) and used 'geli setkey da0' to change the key (only one key, no keyfile used). Everything seemd to work but after detaching any attach attempt fails with: MD5 hash checksum mismatch for

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:01:02 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est: JC Jan 18 23:18:14 comet kernel: est1: Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency JC Control on cpu1 Jan 18 23:18:14 comet kernel: est: CPU supports JC Control Enhanced Speedstep, but is not

Big geli proglem: MD5 hash checksum mismatch for da0

2008-01-22 Thread Harry Schmalzbauer
Hello, I tried to change my passphrase for a geli provider. Like man page tells, I attached the provider (da0) and used 'geli setkey da0' to change the key (only one key, no keyfile used). Everything seemd to work but after detaching any attach attempt fails with: MD5 hash checksum mismatch for

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:47:56AM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote: Ok, so it's probably neither specific for CPUs nor for the mainbaords; however, up to now all CPUs with this problem are Core2 CPUs. JC In the case of our servers, we usually turn EIST off (this one JC particular box has it

boot problems?

2008-01-22 Thread Krassimir Slavchev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am trying to boot 7.0-PRERELEASE on my notebook from USB memory stick. With the original BTX i have BTX halted. The only way to boot was using: http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx/realbtx.2.patch With this patch the kernel is loaded but

Re: 7-STABLE regression that breaks lang/drscheme is src/contrib/gcc/gthr-posix.h 1.1.1.8.2.1

2008-01-22 Thread Andrew Reilly
Hi Marius, On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100 Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in libstdc++ but also in headers that are installed beneath /usr/include/c++. So the code

Re: 7-STABLE regression that breaks lang/drscheme is src/contrib/gcc/gthr-posix.h 1.1.1.8.2.1

2008-01-22 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:44:05AM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote: Hello again, [to recap: drscheme, (which is an IDE that runs under the mred runtime, built from ports/lang/drscheme (or actually manually from a personal copy of that Makefile that builds the current release: 372, rather than

Re: 6.3-RELEASE panic

2008-01-22 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Petr Holub wrote: I tried to build it from the sources that come from the freebsd-update and thus I assume they are actually RELENG_6_3_0_RELEASE. Still I was unable to run gdb with the given vmcore against such a kernel. How do you did that? Try the following commands: # cd /usr/src/ # make

RE: 6.3-RELEASE panic

2008-01-22 Thread Petr Holub
I thought we shipped the debugging symbols in /boot precisely for the reason of making panics with default installs not report useless traces :( I think building GENERIC kernel from sources with tag=RELENG_6_3_0_RELEASE will help. I tried to build it from the sources that come from the

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:24:55AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I believe the problem is that our CPUs don't match any of the identification verification methods performed in src/sys/i386/cpufreq/est.c. I should be able to make a patch for this, but will need time -- our to-be-dev/test

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:47:25 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est: JC And I can tell the system is significantly slower when idle, which is JC normal. :-) JC So give that a try... First of all, thank you very much for your work and your mail.

coretemp(4) causes System to stall

2008-01-22 Thread Michael Schuh
Hi @List, i have tryed out the new coretemp driver for Intel Core CPU's my cpu is an T2400 Intel Core (w/o Duo). i have csup'ed the stable build from cvsup.uk.freebsd.org at this night. then built the entire system via sources ( with ULE-Scheduler, might this causes the stall?) then load the

Re: coretemp(4) causes System to stall

2008-01-22 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 09:01 AM 1/22/2008, Michael Schuh wrote: Hi @List, i have tryed out the new coretemp driver for Intel Core CPU's my cpu is an T2400 Intel Core (w/o Duo). i have csup'ed the stable build from cvsup.uk.freebsd.org at this night. then built the entire system via sources ( with ULE-Scheduler,

Re: boot problems?

2008-01-22 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:00:36 +0200 Krassimir Slavchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am trying to boot 7.0-PRERELEASE on my notebook from USB memory stick. With the original BTX i have BTX halted. The only way to Not related to your

Re: boot problems?

2008-01-22 Thread Stefan Lambrev
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:00:36 +0200 Krassimir Slavchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am trying to boot 7.0-PRERELEASE on my notebook from USB memory stick. With the original BTX i have BTX halted. The only way to

g_eli kernel panic on freshly updated 6.3-STABLE

2008-01-22 Thread Pascal Hofstee
Today i took the time to update 2 workstations to a fresh RELENG_6 build (6.3-STABLE) after they've been running on 6.2-STABLE for a long time. To my surprise both systems now exhibit a 100% repeatable kernel panic during boot directly after/during the initialisation of the GELI module. Console

Re: 7.0 RC1/SPARC64 panic in boot

2008-01-22 Thread Eirik Øverby
Hi list, by disabling the isp driver (set hint.isp.o.disabled=1), the system comes up. This of course denies us access to the external disk array hosted by the internal QLogic controller, but pinpoints the problem. We tried setting hint.isp.0.prefer_iomap=1, which made no difference

Re: NO_ knobs in /etc/make.conf

2008-01-22 Thread Vivek Khera
On Jan 21, 2008, at 3:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote: There is a cross-reference to src.conf(5) at the end of make.conf(5), but IMO the connection needs to be made more explicit. Anyone want to take that on? This should also go in the release notes if it's not already. So do I need to move my

firefox-2.0.0.11_1, 1 refuses to build because PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND

2008-01-22 Thread Robert Jameson
I ran into a problem today trying to build the latest firefox in ports firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1. === Extracting for firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1 = MD5 Checksum OK for firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for firefox-2.0.0.11-source.tar.bz2. === firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1 depends on file:

Re: 7.0 RC1/SPARC64 panic in boot

2008-01-22 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:16:16AM +0100, Eirik verby wrote: Hi list, by disabling the isp driver (set hint.isp.o.disabled=1), the system comes up. This of course denies us access to the external disk array hosted by the internal QLogic controller, but pinpoints the problem. We tried

Re: firefox-2.0.0.11_1, 1 refuses to build because PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND

2008-01-22 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:09:23PM +, Robert Jameson wrote: I ran into a problem today trying to build the latest firefox in ports firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1. ... firefox-2.0.0.11_1,1: bind installed with PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND causes build problems. That seems fairly self-explanatory to me and

Re: Manual/Wiki or other documentation for PXE install mainlyinstall.cfg?

2008-01-22 Thread Ruben van Staveren
On 21 Jan 2008, at 18:04, Drew Weaver wrote: Not specifically that I don’t know, more specifically that install.cfg doesn't know whether it’s a rl0, fxp0 or 3 or 4 others.. I have some stuff at http://ruben.is.verweg.com/stuff/freebsd/ ifrename/ that might help with this (and other cases,

Re: 7.0 RC1/SPARC64 panic in boot

2008-01-22 Thread Eirik Øverby
On Jan 22, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:16:16AM +0100, Eirik verby wrote: Hi list, by disabling the isp driver (set hint.isp.o.disabled=1), the system comes up. This of course denies us access to the external disk array hosted by the internal QLogic

7.0-RC1 ath0 will not work for more than a couple days (Access Point)

2008-01-22 Thread Hugo Silva
re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header

Re: 7.0-RC1 ath0 will not work for more than a couple days (Access Point)

2008-01-22 Thread Hugo Silva
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The most recently committed re(4) modifications correct this. Hugo Silva wrote: re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o

Re: 7.0-RC1 ath0 will not work for more than a couple days (Access Point)

2008-01-22 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The most recently committed re(4) modifications correct this. Hugo Silva wrote: re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame w/o packet header re0: discard frame

Portsnap update always says Ports tree is already up to date in 6.2

2008-01-22 Thread Jose Miguel Lopez Coronado
Dear all. I have been trying to use portsnap update to update automatically the ports tree in a server running release 6.2, but I always receive the same message: 'Ports tree is already up to date' I know this is not true because I have other freeBSD 6.2 machines with newer ports. If I'm not

Re: Portsnap update always says Ports tree is already up to date in 6.2

2008-01-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
Jose Miguel Lopez Coronado wrote: Dear all. I have been trying to use portsnap update to update automatically the ports tree in a server running release 6.2, but I always receive the same message: 'Ports tree is already up to date' I know this is not true because I have other freeBSD 6.2

Re: 7-STABLE regression that breaks lang/drscheme is src/contrib/gcc/gthr-posix.h 1.1.1.8.2.1

2008-01-22 Thread Marius Strobl
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:10:14PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote: Hi Marius, On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100 Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in libstdc++ but

Re: panic: vm_fault: fault on nofualt entry, addr: 81423000

2008-01-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 21 January 2008 08:00:33 am Pete French wrote: If you are using RSDT, then RsdtPhysicalAddress is what you care about rather than XsdtPhysicalAddress. O.K., I have this now - RsdtPhysicalAddress is 0x7fec7f40 on return from madt_map_table Can you print out the table header

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 21 January 2008 11:16:06 am Gerrit Kühn wrote: Hi folks, I have several systems using T7200 mobile CPUs running under 7-stable. However, EST does not recognize the cpus. When loading cpufreq I get: You can try this patch. It won't add support for all of the levels, but it will

Re: ZFS assert panic

2008-01-22 Thread Gergo Szakal
Some updates on this... 'zpool import' shows the pool OK but when I try to actually import it, I get the aforementioned panic. Under BeleniX I cannot import it because it says the pool is corrupted. The (crash) problem also occurs with 7.0 beta 2. So I cannot access an otherwise healthy pool now.

Re: 7-STABLE regression that breaks lang/drscheme is src/contrib/gcc/gthr-posix.h 1.1.1.8.2.1

2008-01-22 Thread Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 21:10 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote: Hi Marius, On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100 Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in libstdc++ but also in

Re: 7-STABLE regression that breaks lang/drscheme is src/contrib/gcc/gthr-posix.h 1.1.1.8.2.1

2008-01-22 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:54 -0500 Alexandre \Sunny\ Kovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I right to assume that this is *not* i386? I have 7-PRERELEASE (i386) cvsup'ed on January 22, early morning EST, and mred built from vanilla 372 sources (per your earlier recommendation) on January 8th.

Fwd: bin/119884: Make sysinstall use the new Brazillian ntp servers

2008-01-22 Thread Carlos A. M. dos Santos
Hello, Is there any chance that this fix get comited before the release of 7.0? The Brazilian [correctly spelled now :-)] NTP servers currently used by sysinstall are not reliable. It would be much better to use the new ones that use the atomic clock at the Brazil's National Astronomic

Latest Stable FreeBSD release and is it supported on dell 2950

2008-01-22 Thread navneet Upadhyay
Hi , I have following questions. 1. Which is the latest release of FreeBSD. 2. When was it released? 3. What is the patch level? 4.What is the stability 5. Which compiler to use: cc or gcc and which version . 6. Which platform/machine which BSD supports. Is Dell 2950 ok Thanks,

Re: nscd again (nis client cache)

2008-01-22 Thread Adam McDougall
I wanted to say Thanks!!! for this example, because before this point I was under the impression that nscd/cached was of no use for NIS clients, only LDAP or maybe other directory systems that I don't use. I tried cache compat as below for passwd and group and it works! Our NIS entries at work

Re: 7.0 RC1/SPARC64 panic in boot

2008-01-22 Thread Scott Long
Eirik Øverby wrote: On Jan 22, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Marius Strobl wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:16:16AM +0100, Eirik verby wrote: Hi list, by disabling the isp driver (set hint.isp.o.disabled=1), the system comes up. This of course denies us access to the external disk array hosted by

Re: Latest Stable FreeBSD release and is it supported on dell 2950

2008-01-22 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 navneet Upadhyay wrote: Hi , I have following questions. 1. Which is the latest release of FreeBSD. 2. When was it released? 3. What is the patch level? 4.What is the stability 5. Which compiler to use: cc or gcc and which

Re: 7.0 RC1/SPARC64 panic in boot

2008-01-22 Thread Eirik Øverby
Will apply the patch and reboot in an hour or two. The isp interface is only used for an external array, so we disable it and boot from internal drives on esp. Thanks! /Eirik On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Scott Long wrote: Eirik Øverby wrote: On Jan 22, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Marius Strobl

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread Krassimir Slavchev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Baldwin wrote: On Monday 21 January 2008 11:16:06 am Gerrit Kühn wrote: Hi folks, I have several systems using T7200 mobile CPUs running under 7-stable. However, EST does not recognize the cpus. When loading cpufreq I get: You can try